rustsec-2021-0038
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2021-03-06 12:00
Modified
2023-06-13 13:10
Summary
Multiple memory safety issues
Details
Affected versions contain multiple memory safety issues, such as:
- Setting a multi label type where an image doesn't exist would lead to a NULL pointer dereference.
- Setting a window icon using a non-raster image (which FLTK rasterizes lazily) would lead to a NULL dereference.
- Pixmap constructor would not check for correct pixmaps which could lead to out-of bound reads.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"categories": [],
"cvss": null,
"informational": null
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affected_functions": null,
"affects": {
"arch": [],
"functions": [
"fltk::image::Pixmap::new",
"fltk::prelude::WidgetExt::set_label_type",
"fltk::prelude::WindowExt::set_icon"
],
"os": []
}
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "fltk",
"purl": "pkg:cargo/fltk"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.0-0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.15.3"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"versions": []
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-28306",
"CVE-2021-28307",
"CVE-2021-28308",
"GHSA-5pg8-h4gv-m3p8",
"GHSA-7qcc-g2m9-8533",
"GHSA-vjmg-pc8h-p6p8"
],
"database_specific": {
"license": "CC0-1.0"
},
"details": "Affected versions contain multiple memory safety issues, such as:\n\n - Setting a multi label type where an image doesn\u0027t exist would lead to a NULL pointer dereference.\n - Setting a window icon using a non-raster image (which FLTK rasterizes lazily) would lead to a NULL dereference.\n - Pixmap constructor would not check for correct pixmaps which could lead to out-of bound reads.",
"id": "RUSTSEC-2021-0038",
"modified": "2023-06-13T13:10:24Z",
"published": "2021-03-06T12:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://crates.io/crates/fltk"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2021-0038.html"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/MoAlyousef/fltk-rs/issues/519"
}
],
"related": [],
"severity": [],
"summary": "Multiple memory safety issues"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…