rustsec-2021-0097
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the
API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this
function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and,
on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to
hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently
sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL
value for the "out" parameter.
A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the
calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the
first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by
the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is
called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small.
A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a maximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically heap allocated.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"categories": [
"crypto-failure"
],
"cvss": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"informational": null
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affected_functions": null,
"affects": {
"arch": [],
"functions": [],
"os": []
}
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "openssl-src",
"purl": "pkg:cargo/openssl-src"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.0-0"
},
{
"fixed": "111.16.0"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"versions": []
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-3711",
"GHSA-5ww6-px42-wc85"
],
"database_specific": {
"license": "CC0-1.0"
},
"details": "In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the\nAPI function `EVP_PKEY_decrypt()`. Typically an application will call this\nfunction twice. The first time, on entry, the \"out\" parameter can be NULL and,\non exit, the \"outlen\" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to\nhold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently\nsized buffer and call `EVP_PKEY_decrypt()` again, but this time passing a non-NULL\nvalue for the \"out\" parameter.\n\nA bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the\ncalculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the\nfirst call to `EVP_PKEY_decrypt()` can be smaller than the actual size required by\nthe second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when `EVP_PKEY_decrypt()` is\ncalled by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small.\n\nA malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an\napplication could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a\nmaximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the\nbuffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to\ncrash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically\nheap allocated.",
"id": "RUSTSEC-2021-0097",
"modified": "2023-06-13T13:10:24Z",
"published": "2021-08-24T12:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://crates.io/crates/openssl-src"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2021-0097.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210824.txt"
}
],
"related": [],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.