Vulnerability-Lookup

RUSTSEC-2022-0027 (CVE-2022-1343)

Vulnerability from osv_rustsec – Published: 2022-05-03 12:00 – Updated: 2023-06-13 13:10 – Source website

Summary

`OCSP_basic_verify` may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate

Details

It is anticipated that most users of OCSP_basic_verify will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the OCSP_basic_verify function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0.

Severity

5.3 (Medium)


                    
                      CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

References

URL

Type

	https://crates.io/crates/openssl-src	PACKAGE
	https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2022-0027.html	ADVISORY
	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt	WEB

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "categories": [
          "crypto-failure"
        ],
        "cvss": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
        "informational": null
      },
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "affected_functions": null,
        "affects": {
          "arch": [],
          "functions": [],
          "os": []
        }
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "openssl-src",
        "purl": "pkg:cargo/openssl-src"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "300.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "300.0.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "versions": []
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-1343",
    "GHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "license": "CC0-1.0"
  },
  "details": "The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP\nresponse. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then\nthe response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the\ncase where the response signing certificate fails to verify.\n\nIt is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the\nOCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return\na negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate\nverification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0.",
  "id": "RUSTSEC-2022-0027",
  "modified": "2023-06-13T13:10:24Z",
  "published": "2022-05-03T12:00:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://crates.io/crates/openssl-src"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2022-0027.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt"
    }
  ],
  "related": [],
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "`OCSP_basic_verify` may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate"
}

CVE-2022-1343 (GCVE-0-2022-1343)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-05-03 15:15 – Updated: 2025-05-05 16:42

Title

OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate

Summary

The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).

Severity

5.3 (Medium)


                        
                          CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

SSVC

Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial

CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)

Decision recorded 2025-04-23 13:27 UTC

CWE

Incorrect signature verfication
CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation

Assigner

openssl mitre root Scorecard

References

4 references

URL	Tags
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba…
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-2022060…
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/s…

Impacted products

1 product

Vendor	Product	Version
OpenSSL	OpenSSL	Affected: Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2)

Date Public

2022-05-03 00:00

Credits

Raul Metsma

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T00:03:05.875Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2eda98790c5c2741d76d23cc1e74b0dc4f4b391a"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      },
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 5.3,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "LOW",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2022-1343",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:27:12.804295Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-295",
                "description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T16:42:39.898Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "OpenSSL",
          "vendor": "OpenSSL",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2)"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Raul Metsma"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2022-05-03T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL \"ocsp\" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the \"-no_cert_checks\" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2)."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "lang": "eng",
              "url": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html#Moderate",
              "value": "Moderate"
            },
            "type": "unknown"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "Incorrect signature verfication",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2023-02-14T00:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
        "shortName": "openssl"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2eda98790c5c2741d76d23cc1e74b0dc4f4b391a"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf"
        }
      ],
      "title": "OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
    "assignerShortName": "openssl",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-1343",
    "datePublished": "2022-05-03T15:15:21.496Z",
    "dateReserved": "2022-04-13T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T16:42:39.898Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

GHSA-MFM6-R9G2-Q4R7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-04 00:00 – Updated: 2022-06-17 00:05

Summary

`OCSP_basic_verify` may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate

Details

The function OCSP_basic_verify verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of OCSP_basic_verify will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the OCSP_basic_verify function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).

Severity

5.3 (Medium)


                  
                    CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "openssl-src"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "300.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "300.0.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-1343"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-06-17T00:05:49Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-05-03T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL \"ocsp\" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the \"-no_cert_checks\" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).",
  "id": "GHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7",
  "modified": "2022-06-17T00:05:49Z",
  "published": "2022-05-04T00:00:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1343"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/github/advisory-database/issues/405"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2eda98790c5c2741d76d23cc1e74b0dc4f4b391a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2022-0027.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "`OCSP_basic_verify` may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted

RUSTSEC-2022-0027 (CVE-2022-1343)

CVE-2022-1343 (GCVE-0-2022-1343)

GHSA-MFM6-R9G2-Q4R7

Tags

Sightings

Nomenclature

Related by attack behaviour