rustsec-2023-0055
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2023-09-03 12:00
Modified
2024-09-16 14:15
Summary
Multiple soundness issues
Details
lexical contains multiple soundness issues:
- Bytes::read() allows creating instances of types with invalid bit patterns
- BytesIter::read() advances iterators out of bounds
- The
BytesItertrait has safety invariants but is public and not markedunsafe write_float()callsMaybeUninit::assume_init()on uninitialized data, which is is not allowed by the Rust abstract machineradix()callsMaybeUninit::assume_init()on uninitialized data, which is is not allowed by the Rust abstract machine
The crate also has some correctness issues.
Alternatives
For quickly parsing floating-point numbers third-party crates are no longer needed. A fast float parsing algorithm by the author of lexical has been merged into libcore.
For quickly parsing integers, consider atoi and btoi crates (100% safe code). atoi_radix10 provides even faster parsing, but only with -C target-cpu=native, and at the cost of some unsafe.
For formatting integers in a #[no_std] context consider the numtoa crate.
For working with big numbers consider num-bigint and num-traits.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"categories": [],
"cvss": null,
"informational": "unsound"
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affected_functions": null,
"affects": {
"arch": [],
"functions": [],
"os": []
}
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "lexical",
"purl": "pkg:cargo/lexical"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.0-0"
},
{
"fixed": "7.0.0"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"versions": []
}
],
"aliases": [
"GHSA-c2hm-mjxv-89r4"
],
"database_specific": {
"license": "CC0-1.0"
},
"details": "`lexical` contains multiple soundness issues:\n\n 1. [Bytes::read() allows creating instances of types with invalid bit patterns](https://github.com/Alexhuszagh/rust-lexical/issues/102)\n 1. [BytesIter::read() advances iterators out of bounds](https://github.com/Alexhuszagh/rust-lexical/issues/101)\n 1. [The `BytesIter` trait has safety invariants but is public and not marked `unsafe`](https://github.com/Alexhuszagh/rust-lexical/issues/104)\n 1. [`write_float()` calls `MaybeUninit::assume_init()` on uninitialized data, which is is not allowed by the Rust abstract machine](https://github.com/Alexhuszagh/rust-lexical/issues/95)\n 1. [`radix()` calls `MaybeUninit::assume_init()` on uninitialized data, which is is not allowed by the Rust abstract machine](https://github.com/Alexhuszagh/rust-lexical/issues/126)\n\nThe crate also has some correctness issues.\n\n## Alternatives\n\nFor quickly parsing floating-point numbers third-party crates are no longer needed. A fast float parsing algorithm by the author of `lexical` has been [merged](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86761) into libcore.\n\nFor quickly parsing integers, consider `atoi` and `btoi` crates (100% safe code). `atoi_radix10` provides even faster parsing, but only with `-C target-cpu=native`, and at the cost of some `unsafe`.\n\nFor formatting integers in a `#[no_std]` context consider the [`numtoa`](https://crates.io/crates/numtoa) crate.\n\nFor working with big numbers consider `num-bigint` and `num-traits`.",
"id": "RUSTSEC-2023-0055",
"modified": "2024-09-16T14:15:37Z",
"published": "2023-09-03T12:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://crates.io/crates/lexical"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2023-0055.html"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/Alexhuszagh/rust-lexical/issues/102"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/Alexhuszagh/rust-lexical/issues/101"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/Alexhuszagh/rust-lexical/issues/95"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/Alexhuszagh/rust-lexical/issues/104"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/Alexhuszagh/rust-lexical/issues/126"
}
],
"related": [],
"severity": [],
"summary": "Multiple soundness issues"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…