rustsec-2026-0101
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2026-04-13 12:00
Modified
2026-04-15 21:38
Summary
`safe-agent-rs` was removed from crates.io for being affiliated with malicious code
Details
While safe-agent-rs did not directly contain malicious code, it was owned by the same user as
pretty-changelog-logger and microsoftsystem64. safe-agent-rs also appeared to be imitating a
different websocket library. We decided to remove it out of an abundance of caution.
This crate had 2 versions published on 2026-03-24 that had a total of 4138 downloads. There were no crates depending on this crate on crates.io.
References
| URL | Type | |
|---|---|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"categories": [
"malicious"
],
"cvss": null,
"informational": null
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affected_functions": null,
"affects": {
"arch": [],
"functions": [],
"os": []
}
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "safe-agent-rs",
"purl": "pkg:cargo/safe-agent-rs"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.0-0"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"versions": []
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"license": "CC0-1.0"
},
"details": "While `safe-agent-rs` did not directly contain malicious code, it was owned by the same user as\n`pretty-changelog-logger` and `microsoftsystem64`. `safe-agent-rs` also appeared to be imitating a\ndifferent websocket library. We decided to remove it out of an abundance of caution.\n\nThis crate had 2 versions published on 2026-03-24 that had a total of 4138 downloads. There were no crates depending on this crate on crates.io.",
"id": "RUSTSEC-2026-0101",
"modified": "2026-04-15T21:38:09Z",
"published": "2026-04-13T12:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://crates.io/crates/safe-agent-rs"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0101.html"
}
],
"related": [],
"severity": [],
"summary": "`safe-agent-rs` was removed from crates.io for being affiliated with malicious code"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…