RUSTSEC-2026-0120 (GHSA-3V94-MW7P-V465)

Vulnerability from osv_rustsec – Published: 2026-05-01 12:00 – Updated: 2026-05-07 08:56 – Source website
VLAI
Summary
NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation enters unbounded loop on cross-zone responses
Details

The NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation in hickory-net's DnssecDnsHandle walks from the QNAME up to the SOA owner name, building a list of candidate encloser names. The iterator used assumes the QNAME is a descendant of the SOA owner, terminating only when the current candidate equals the SOA name. When the SOA in a response's authority section is not an ancestor of the QNAME, the loop stalls at the DNS root and never terminates, repeatedly calling Name::base_name() and pushing newly allocated Name and hashed-name entries into the candidate Vec.

The bug is reachable by any caller of DnssecDnsHandle — including the resolver, recursor, and client — when built with the dnssec-ring or dnssec-aws-lc-rs feature and configured to perform DNSSEC validation. It is triggered while validating a NoData or NXDomain response whose authority section contains an SOA record from a zone other than an ancestor of the QNAME, on a code path that requires NSEC3 closest-encloser proof. In practice this can be reached through an insecure CNAME chain that crosses zone boundaries into a DNSSEC-signed zone returning NoData, but the minimum condition is just a mismatched SOA owner on a response requiring NSEC3 validation.

A debug_assert_ne!(name, Name::root()) guards the loop body, so debug builds abort with a panic on the first iteration past the root. Release builds compile the assertion out and run the loop unbounded, allocating until the process exhausts available memory (OOM). A reachable upstream attacker who can return such a response can therefore crash a debug-built validator or exhaust memory on a release-built one.

We recommend all affected users update to hickory-net 0.26.1 for the fix.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "categories": [
          "denial-of-service"
        ],
        "cvss": null,
        "informational": null
      },
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "affected_functions": null,
        "affects": {
          "arch": [],
          "functions": [],
          "os": []
        }
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "hickory-net",
        "purl": "pkg:cargo/hickory-net"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.0.0-0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.26.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "versions": []
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "GHSA-3v94-mw7p-v465"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "license": "CC-BY-4.0"
  },
  "details": "The NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation in `hickory-net`\u0027s\n`DnssecDnsHandle` walks from the QNAME up to the SOA owner name, building a\nlist of candidate encloser names. The iterator used assumes the\nQNAME is a descendant of the SOA owner, terminating only when the current\ncandidate equals the SOA name. When the SOA in a response\u0027s authority section\nis not an ancestor of the QNAME, the loop stalls at the DNS root and never\nterminates, repeatedly calling `Name::base_name()` and pushing newly allocated\n`Name` and hashed-name entries into the candidate `Vec`.\n\nThe bug is reachable by any caller of `DnssecDnsHandle` \u2014 including the\nresolver, recursor, and client \u2014 when built with the `dnssec-ring` or\n`dnssec-aws-lc-rs` feature and configured to perform DNSSEC validation. It is\ntriggered while validating a NoData or NXDomain response whose authority\nsection contains an SOA record from a zone other than an ancestor of the\nQNAME, on a code path that requires NSEC3 closest-encloser proof. In practice\nthis can be reached through an insecure CNAME chain that crosses zone\nboundaries into a DNSSEC-signed zone returning NoData, but the minimum\ncondition is just a mismatched SOA owner on a response requiring NSEC3\nvalidation.\n\nA `debug_assert_ne!(name, Name::root())` guards the loop body, so debug builds\nabort with a panic on the first iteration past the root. Release builds\ncompile the assertion out and run the loop unbounded, allocating until the\nprocess exhausts available memory (OOM). A reachable upstream attacker who\ncan return such a response can therefore crash a debug-built validator or\nexhaust memory on a release-built one.\n\nWe recommend all affected users update to `hickory-net` 0.26.1 for the fix.",
  "id": "RUSTSEC-2026-0120",
  "modified": "2026-05-07T08:56:41Z",
  "published": "2026-05-01T12:00:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://crates.io/crates/hickory-net"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0120.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/security/advisories/GHSA-3v94-mw7p-v465"
    }
  ],
  "related": [],
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation enters unbounded loop on cross-zone responses"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…