ubuntu-cve-2013-4788
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu
Published
2013-10-04 17:55
Modified
2025-07-16 04:50
Summary
Details
The PTR_MANGLE implementation in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.4, 2.17, and earlier, and Embedded GLIBC (EGLIBC) does not initialize the random value for the pointer guard, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to control execution flow by leveraging a buffer-overflow vulnerability in an application and using the known zero value pointer guard to calculate a pointer address.
Severity
N/A (UNKNOWN)
References
| URL | Type | |
|---|---|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"availability": "No subscription required",
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "eglibc-source",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "glibc-doc",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc-bin",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc-dev-bin",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-amd64",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-armel",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-dbg",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-dev",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-dev-amd64",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-dev-armel",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-dev-i386",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-dev-ppc64",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-dev-x32",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-i386",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-pic",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-ppc64",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-prof",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-udeb",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-x32",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libc6-xen",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libnss-dns-udeb",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libnss-files-udeb",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "multiarch-support",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
},
{
"binary_name": "nscd",
"binary_version": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS",
"name": "eglibc",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/eglibc@2.18-0ubuntu1?arch=source\u0026distro=trusty"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.18-0ubuntu1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"2.17-93ubuntu4"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "The PTR_MANGLE implementation in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.4, 2.17, and earlier, and Embedded GLIBC (EGLIBC) does not initialize the random value for the pointer guard, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to control execution flow by leveraging a buffer-overflow vulnerability in an application and using the known zero value pointer guard to calculate a pointer address.",
"id": "UBUNTU-CVE-2013-4788",
"modified": "2025-07-16T04:50:20Z",
"published": "2013-10-04T17:55:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2013-4788"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "http://hmarco.org/bugs/CVE-2013-4788.html"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-4788"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "low",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
],
"upstream": [
"CVE-2013-4788"
],
"withdrawn": "2025-07-18T16:42:56Z"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…