ubuntu-cve-2014-0083
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu
Published
2019-11-21 14:15
Modified
2026-05-20 14:48
Summary
Details
The Ruby net-ldap gem before 0.11 uses a weak salt when generating SSHA passwords.
Severity
5.5 (Medium)
N/A (UNKNOWN)
References
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"binary_version": "0.8.0-1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:16.04:LTS",
"name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/ruby-net-ldap@0.8.0-1?arch=source\u0026distro=xenial"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.8.0-1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"binary_version": "0.16.1-1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:18.04:LTS",
"name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/ruby-net-ldap@0.16.1-1?arch=source\u0026distro=bionic"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.12.1-2",
"0.16.1-1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"binary_version": "0.16.1-1ubuntu1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:20.04:LTS",
"name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/ruby-net-ldap@0.16.1-1ubuntu1?arch=source\u0026distro=focal"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.16.1-1",
"0.16.1-1ubuntu1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"binary_version": "0.16.1-1ubuntu1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:22.04:LTS",
"name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/ruby-net-ldap@0.16.1-1ubuntu1?arch=source\u0026distro=jammy"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.16.1-1ubuntu1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"binary_version": "0.17.1-2"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:24.04:LTS",
"name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/ruby-net-ldap@0.17.1-2?arch=source\u0026distro=noble"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.17.1-2"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"binary_version": "0.19.0-1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:25.10",
"name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/ruby-net-ldap@0.19.0-1?arch=source\u0026distro=questing"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.19.0-1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"binary_version": "0.20.0-1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:26.04:LTS",
"name": "ruby-net-ldap",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/ruby-net-ldap@0.20.0-1?arch=source\u0026distro=resolute"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.19.0-1",
"0.20.0-1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "The Ruby net-ldap gem before 0.11 uses a weak salt when generating SSHA passwords.",
"id": "UBUNTU-CVE-2014-0083",
"modified": "2026-05-20T14:48:38Z",
"published": "2019-11-21T14:15:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2014-0083"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap/blob/master/lib/net/ldap/password.rb"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-0083"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
],
"upstream": [
"CVE-2014-0083"
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…