ubuntu-cve-2019-1549
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu
OpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c).
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"availability": "No subscription required",
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libssl1.1",
"binary_version": "1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.6"
},
{
"binary_name": "openssl",
"binary_version": "1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.6"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:18.04:LTS",
"name": "openssl",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/openssl@1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.6?arch=source\u0026distro=bionic"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.0.2g-1ubuntu13",
"1.0.2g-1ubuntu14",
"1.0.2n-1ubuntu1",
"1.1.0g-2ubuntu1",
"1.1.0g-2ubuntu2",
"1.1.0g-2ubuntu3",
"1.1.0g-2ubuntu4",
"1.1.0g-2ubuntu4.1",
"1.1.0g-2ubuntu4.3",
"1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.1",
"1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.2",
"1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.3",
"1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.4",
"1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.5"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "OpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c).",
"id": "UBUNTU-CVE-2019-1549",
"modified": "2026-04-22T07:38:49Z",
"published": "2019-09-10T17:15:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2019-1549"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20190910.txt"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-4376-1"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1549"
}
],
"related": [
"USN-4376-1"
],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "low",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
],
"upstream": [
"CVE-2019-1549"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.