ubuntu-cve-2019-16254
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu
Published
2019-11-20 00:00
Modified
2026-04-22 07:39
Summary
Details

Ruby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to deceive clients. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-17742, which addressed the CRLF vector, but did not address an isolated CR or an isolated LF.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "availability": "Available with Ubuntu Pro (Infra-only): https://ubuntu.com/pro",
        "binaries": [
          {
            "binary_name": "jruby",
            "binary_version": "1.5.6-9+deb8u2build0.14.04.1~esm2"
          }
        ]
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS",
        "name": "jruby",
        "purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/jruby@1.5.6-9+deb8u2build0.14.04.1~esm2?arch=source\u0026distro=trusty/esm"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.5.6-9+deb8u2build0.14.04.1~esm2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "1.5.6-5ubuntu1",
        "1.5.6-6",
        "1.5.6-7"
      ]
    },
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "availability": "No subscription required",
        "binaries": [
          {
            "binary_name": "libruby2.3",
            "binary_version": "2.3.1-2~ubuntu16.04.14"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "ruby2.3",
            "binary_version": "2.3.1-2~ubuntu16.04.14"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "ruby2.3-tcltk",
            "binary_version": "2.3.1-2~ubuntu16.04.14"
          }
        ]
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Ubuntu:16.04:LTS",
        "name": "ruby2.3",
        "purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/ruby2.3@2.3.1-2~ubuntu16.04.14?arch=source\u0026distro=xenial"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.3.1-2~ubuntu16.04.14"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "2.3.0-1",
        "2.3.0-2",
        "2.3.0-4ubuntu2",
        "2.3.0-4ubuntu3",
        "2.3.0-5ubuntu1",
        "2.3.1-2~16.04",
        "2.3.1-2~16.04.2",
        "2.3.1-2~16.04.4",
        "2.3.1-2~16.04.5",
        "2.3.1-2~16.04.6",
        "2.3.1-2~16.04.7",
        "2.3.1-2~16.04.9",
        "2.3.1-2~16.04.10",
        "2.3.1-2~16.04.11",
        "2.3.1-2~16.04.12",
        "2.3.1-2~ubuntu16.04.13"
      ]
    },
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "availability": "No subscription required",
        "binaries": [
          {
            "binary_name": "libruby2.5",
            "binary_version": "2.5.1-1ubuntu1.6"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "ruby2.5",
            "binary_version": "2.5.1-1ubuntu1.6"
          }
        ]
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Ubuntu:18.04:LTS",
        "name": "ruby2.5",
        "purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/ruby2.5@2.5.1-1ubuntu1.6?arch=source\u0026distro=bionic"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.5.1-1ubuntu1.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "2.5.0~preview1-1ubuntu2",
        "2.5.0-4ubuntu1",
        "2.5.0-4ubuntu4",
        "2.5.0-5ubuntu1",
        "2.5.0-6ubuntu1",
        "2.5.1-1ubuntu1",
        "2.5.1-1ubuntu1.1",
        "2.5.1-1ubuntu1.2",
        "2.5.1-1ubuntu1.4",
        "2.5.1-1ubuntu1.5"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "details": "Ruby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to deceive clients. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-17742, which addressed the CRLF vector, but did not address an isolated CR or an isolated LF.",
  "id": "UBUNTU-CVE-2019-16254",
  "modified": "2026-04-22T07:39:06Z",
  "published": "2019-11-20T00:00:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2019-16254"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2019/10/01/http-response-splitting-in-webrick-cve-2019-16254/"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-4201-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16254"
    }
  ],
  "related": [
    "USN-4201-1"
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.7.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "medium",
      "type": "Ubuntu"
    }
  ],
  "upstream": [
    "CVE-2019-16254"
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…