USN-2906-1 (UBUNTU-CVE-2015-1197)

Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu – Published: 2016-02-22 18:05 – Updated: 2026-02-10 04:40 – Source website
VLAI
Summary
cpio vulnerabilities
Details

Alexander Cherepanov discovered that GNU cpio incorrectly handled symbolic links when used with the --no-absolute-filenames option. If a user or automated system were tricked into extracting a specially-crafted cpio archive, a remote attacker could possibly use this issue to write arbitrary files. This issue only affected Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2015-1197)

Gustavo Grieco discovered that GNU cpio incorrectly handled memory when extracting archive files. If a user or automated system were tricked into extracting a specially-crafted cpio archive, a remote attacker could use this issue to cause GNU cpio to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or possibly execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2016-2037)


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "cves_map": {
          "cves": [
            {
              "id": "CVE-2015-1197",
              "severity": [
                {
                  "score": "low",
                  "type": "Ubuntu"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "id": "CVE-2016-2037",
              "severity": [
                {
                  "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
                  "type": "CVSS_V3"
                },
                {
                  "score": "medium",
                  "type": "Ubuntu"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS"
        }
      },
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "availability": "No subscription required",
        "binaries": [
          {
            "binary_name": "cpio",
            "binary_version": "2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu1.2"
          }
        ]
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS",
        "name": "cpio",
        "purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/cpio@2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu1.2?arch=source\u0026distro=trusty"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu1.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu1",
        "2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu1.1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "details": "Alexander Cherepanov discovered that GNU cpio incorrectly handled symbolic\nlinks when used with the --no-absolute-filenames option. If a user or\nautomated system were tricked into extracting a specially-crafted cpio\narchive, a remote attacker could possibly use this issue to write arbitrary\nfiles. This issue only affected Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.\n(CVE-2015-1197)\n\nGustavo Grieco discovered that GNU cpio incorrectly handled memory when\nextracting archive files. If a user or automated system were tricked into\nextracting a specially-crafted cpio archive, a remote attacker could use\nthis issue to cause GNU cpio to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or\npossibly execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2016-2037)\n",
  "id": "USN-2906-1",
  "modified": "2026-02-10T04:40:57Z",
  "published": "2016-02-22T18:05:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-2906-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2015-1197"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2016-2037"
    }
  ],
  "related": [],
  "schema_version": "1.7.0",
  "summary": "cpio vulnerabilities",
  "upstream": [
    "UBUNTU-CVE-2015-1197",
    "UBUNTU-CVE-2016-2037"
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…