var-201511-0089
Vulnerability from variot

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Graphical User Interface (GUI) in Fortinet FortiManager before 5.2.4 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) SOMVpnSSLPortalDialog or (2) FGDMngUpdHistory. Fortinet FortiManager is prone to multiple cross-site-scripting vulnerabilities because it fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input. An attacker may leverage these issues to execute arbitrary script code in the browser of an unsuspecting user in the context of the affected site. This can allow the attacker to steal cookie-based authentication credentials and launch other attacks. FortiManager 5.2.2 and prior versions are vulnerable. [+] Credits: hyp3rlinx

[+] Website: hyp3rlinx.altervista.org

[+] Source: http://hyp3rlinx.altervista.org/advisories/AS-FORTIMANAGER-XSS-0924.txt

Vendor:

www.fortinet.com

Product:

FortiManager v5.2.2

FortiManager is a centralized security management appliance that allows you to centrally manage any number of Fortinet Network Security devices. 2 potential XSS vectors were identified:

  • XSS vulnerability in SOMVpnSSLPortalDialog.
  • XSS vulnerability in FGDMngUpdHistory. 2 potential XSS vectors were identified:

  • XSS vulnerability in sharedjobmanager.

  • XSS vulnerability in SOMServiceObjDialog.

Affected Products

XSS items 1-2: FortiManager v5.2.2 or earlier. XSS items 3-4: FortiManager v5.2.3 or earlier.

Solutions:

No workarounds are currently available. Update to FortiManager v5.2.4.

Exploit code(s):

1- Persistent: https://localhost/cgi-bin/module/sharedobjmanager/firewall/SOMServiceObjDialog?devGrpId=18446744073709551615&deviceId=18446744073709551615&vdom=&adomId=3&vdomID=0&adomType=ems&cate=167&prodId=0&key=ALL&catetype=167&cate=167&permit_w=1&roid=189&startIndex=0&results=50



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.