CWE-77
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component.
5383 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-7JWH-866W-RQ5R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-15 00:02 – Updated: 2022-02-24 00:01CompleteFTPService.exe in the server in EnterpriseDT CompleteFTP before 12.1.4 allows Remote Code Execution by leveraging a Windows user account that has SSH access. The exec command is always run as SYSTEM.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-16864"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-02-14T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "CompleteFTPService.exe in the server in EnterpriseDT CompleteFTP before 12.1.4 allows Remote Code Execution by leveraging a Windows user account that has SSH access. The exec command is always run as SYSTEM.",
"id": "GHSA-7jwh-866w-rq5r",
"modified": "2022-02-24T00:01:12Z",
"published": "2022-02-15T00:02:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16864"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://enterprisedt.com/products/completeftp/doc/guide/html/history.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/RhinoSecurityLabs/CVEs/tree/master/CVE-2019-16864"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-7M98-6GVG-8J73
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:18 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:18Unrestricted file upload vulnerability in ls/vw_snapshots.php in the VideoWhisper Live Streaming Integration plugin before 4.29.5 for WordPress allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code by uploading a file with a double extension, and then accessing the file via a direct request to a wp-content/plugins/videowhisper-live-streaming-integration/ls/snapshots/ pathname, as demonstrated by a .php.jpg filename.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-1905"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-12-29T20:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Unrestricted file upload vulnerability in ls/vw_snapshots.php in the VideoWhisper Live Streaming Integration plugin before 4.29.5 for WordPress allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code by uploading a file with a double extension, and then accessing the file via a direct request to a wp-content/plugins/videowhisper-live-streaming-integration/ls/snapshots/ pathname, as demonstrated by a .php.jpg filename.",
"id": "GHSA-7m98-6gvg-8j73",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:18:52Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:18:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-1905"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.htbridge.com/advisory/HTB23199"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-7M9V-98CP-4M4C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-22 21:30 – Updated: 2025-09-22 21:30A weakness has been identified in Ruijie 6000-E10 up to 2.4.3.6-20171117. This affects an unknown part of the file /view/vpn/autovpn/sub_commit.php. This manipulation of the argument key causes os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-10774"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-22T01:15:36Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A weakness has been identified in Ruijie 6000-E10 up to 2.4.3.6-20171117. This affects an unknown part of the file /view/vpn/autovpn/sub_commit.php. This manipulation of the argument key causes os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
"id": "GHSA-7m9v-98cp-4m4c",
"modified": "2025-09-22T21:30:19Z",
"published": "2025-09-22T21:30:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-10774"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/maximdevere/CVE2/issues/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.325130"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.325130"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.649968"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-7MJQ-FCRM-26PG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-26 12:41 – Updated: 2024-11-26 15:31VMware Aria Operations contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability. A malicious actor with local administrative privileges can insert malicious commands into the properties file to escalate privileges to a root user on the appliance running VMware Aria Operations.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-38831"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-26T12:15:18Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "VMware Aria Operations contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability.\u00a0\u00a0A malicious actor with local administrative privileges can insert malicious commands into the properties file to escalate privileges to \u00a0a root user on the appliance running VMware Aria Operations.",
"id": "GHSA-7mjq-fcrm-26pg",
"modified": "2024-11-26T15:31:01Z",
"published": "2024-11-26T12:41:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38831"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/25199"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7P4J-PRHQ-8FFM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-14 15:30 – Updated: 2025-01-14 18:31An os command injection vulnerability exists in the touchlist_sync.cgi touchlistsync() functionality of Wavlink AC3000 M33A8.V5030.210505. A specially crafted set of HTTP requests can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-34166"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-14T15:15:15Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An os command injection vulnerability exists in the touchlist_sync.cgi touchlistsync() functionality of Wavlink AC3000 M33A8.V5030.210505. A specially crafted set of HTTP requests can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-7p4j-prhq-8ffm",
"modified": "2025-01-14T18:31:56Z",
"published": "2025-01-14T15:30:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-34166"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2024-2000"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2024-2000"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7P5G-53RX-5G9W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-03-26 21:30 – Updated: 2023-04-03 18:32Ruijie Networks RG-EW1200 Wireless Routers EW_3.0(1)B11P204 was discovered to contain a command injetion vulnerability via the params.path parameter in the upgradeConfirm function.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-26800"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-03-26T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Ruijie Networks RG-EW1200 Wireless Routers EW_3.0(1)B11P204 was discovered to contain a command injetion vulnerability via the params.path parameter in the upgradeConfirm function.",
"id": "GHSA-7p5g-53rx-5g9w",
"modified": "2023-04-03T18:32:09Z",
"published": "2023-03-26T21:30:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-26800"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/winmt/my-vuls/tree/main/RG-EW1200"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7P64-5X2J-P5QX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-14 15:30 – Updated: 2025-11-04 00:32Multiple OS command injection vulnerabilities exist in the login.cgi set_sys_init() functionality of Wavlink AC3000 M33A8.V5030.210505. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an unauthenticated HTTP request to trigger these vulnerabilities.A command injection vulnerability exists within the restart_week_value POST parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-39761"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-14T15:15:21Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Multiple OS command injection vulnerabilities exist in the login.cgi set_sys_init() functionality of Wavlink AC3000 M33A8.V5030.210505. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an unauthenticated HTTP request to trigger these vulnerabilities.A command injection vulnerability exists within the `restart_week_value` POST parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-7p64-5x2j-p5qx",
"modified": "2025-11-04T00:32:15Z",
"published": "2025-01-14T15:30:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39761"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2024-2018"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2024-2018"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7P6V-69H6-W53J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-23 18:30 – Updated: 2025-12-23 21:30Linksys E5600 V1.1.0.26 is vulnerable to command injection in the runtime.macClone function via the mc.ip parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-29228"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-23T17:15:46Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Linksys E5600 V1.1.0.26 is vulnerable to command injection in the runtime.macClone function via the mc.ip parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-7p6v-69h6-w53j",
"modified": "2025-12-23T21:30:28Z",
"published": "2025-12-23T18:30:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-29228"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/JZP018/Vuln/blob/main/linsys/E5600/CI_macClone_mc.ip/CI_macClone_mc.ip.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7P7X-M4V3-7289
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-01 18:31 – Updated: 2025-05-02 18:31TOTOLINK CA600-PoE V5.3c.6665_B20180820 was found to contain a command injection vulnerability in the msg_process function via the Url parameter. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-44848"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-01T17:15:51Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "TOTOLINK CA600-PoE V5.3c.6665_B20180820 was found to contain a command injection vulnerability in the msg_process function via the Url parameter. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted request.",
"id": "GHSA-7p7x-m4v3-7289",
"modified": "2025-05-02T18:31:31Z",
"published": "2025-05-01T18:31:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-44848"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Summermu/VulnForIoT/tree/main/Totolink_CA600-PoE/msg_process_Url/readme.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7PGF-MJR6-8R53
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 06:32 – Updated: 2026-05-08 15:31/cgi-bin/time.cgi in Atlona AT-OME-MS42 Matrix Switcher 1.1.2 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands as root via a POST request that carries a serverName parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-30167"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-08T06:16:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "/cgi-bin/time.cgi in Atlona AT-OME-MS42 Matrix Switcher 1.1.2 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands as root via a POST request that carries a serverName parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-7pgf-mjr6-8r53",
"modified": "2026-05-08T15:31:20Z",
"published": "2026-05-08T06:32:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-30167"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/285733"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation
If possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation
Run time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
Mitigation
Assign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
CAPEC-136: LDAP Injection
An attacker manipulates or crafts an LDAP query for the purpose of undermining the security of the target. Some applications use user input to create LDAP queries that are processed by an LDAP server. For example, a user might provide their username during authentication and the username might be inserted in an LDAP query during the authentication process. An attacker could use this input to inject additional commands into an LDAP query that could disclose sensitive information. For example, entering a * in the aforementioned query might return information about all users on the system. This attack is very similar to an SQL injection attack in that it manipulates a query to gather additional information or coerce a particular return value.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-183: IMAP/SMTP Command Injection
An adversary exploits weaknesses in input validation on web-mail servers to execute commands on the IMAP/SMTP server. Web-mail servers often sit between the Internet and the IMAP or SMTP mail server. User requests are received by the web-mail servers which then query the back-end mail server for the requested information and return this response to the user. In an IMAP/SMTP command injection attack, mail-server commands are embedded in parts of the request sent to the web-mail server. If the web-mail server fails to adequately sanitize these requests, these commands are then sent to the back-end mail server when it is queried by the web-mail server, where the commands are then executed. This attack can be especially dangerous since administrators may assume that the back-end server is protected against direct Internet access and therefore may not secure it adequately against the execution of malicious commands.
CAPEC-248: Command Injection
An adversary looking to execute a command of their choosing, injects new items into an existing command thus modifying interpretation away from what was intended. Commands in this context are often standalone strings that are interpreted by a downstream component and cause specific responses. This type of attack is possible when untrusted values are used to build these command strings. Weaknesses in input validation or command construction can enable the attack and lead to successful exploitation.
CAPEC-40: Manipulating Writeable Terminal Devices
This attack exploits terminal devices that allow themselves to be written to by other users. The attacker sends command strings to the target terminal device hoping that the target user will hit enter and thereby execute the malicious command with their privileges. The attacker can send the results (such as copying /etc/passwd) to a known directory and collect once the attack has succeeded.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-75: Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files
Generally these are manually edited files that are not in the preview of the system administrators, any ability on the attackers' behalf to modify these files, for example in a CVS repository, gives unauthorized access directly to the application, the same as authorized users.
CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls
An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.