CWE-285
Improper Authorization
The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
CVE-2026-45620 (GCVE-0-2026-45620)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-29 13:07 – Updated: 2026-05-30 02:30
VLAI
Title
AVideo CVE-2026-43881 incomplete fix - `objects/mention.json.php:17` is an unauthenticated user enumeration
Summary
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In 29.0 and earlier, objects/mention.json.php has no User::loginCheck() or admin gate. It only has an entry guard: preg_match('/^@/', $_REQUEST['term']) and hard-coded rowCount=10. This enables unauthenticated user enumeration.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisorie… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-45620",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-30T02:30:19.772670Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-30T02:30:36.945Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "AVideo",
"vendor": "WWBN",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c= 29.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In 29.0 and earlier, objects/mention.json.php has no User::loginCheck() or admin gate. It only has an entry guard: preg_match(\u0027/^@/\u0027, $_REQUEST[\u0027term\u0027]) and hard-coded rowCount=10. This enables unauthenticated user enumeration."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-204",
"description": "CWE-204: Observable Response Discrepancy",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T13:07:19.969Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-vpfx-pxqw-2w79",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-vpfx-pxqw-2w79"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-vpfx-pxqw-2w79",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "AVideo CVE-2026-43881 incomplete fix - `objects/mention.json.php:17` is an unauthenticated user enumeration"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-45620",
"datePublished": "2026-05-29T13:07:19.969Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-12T20:31:43.449Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-30T02:30:36.945Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-4563 (GCVE-0-2026-4563)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-22 23:51 – Updated: 2026-03-25 13:53
VLAI
Title
MacCMS Member Order Detail User.php order_info authorization
Summary
A weakness has been identified in MacCMS up to 2025.1000.4052. This vulnerability affects the function order_info of the file application/index/controller/User.php of the component Member Order Detail Interface. This manipulation of the argument order_id causes authorization bypass. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.352400 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.352400 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.775050 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/HuajiHD/CVE/issues/10 | exploitissue-tracking |
Impacted products
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-4563",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-25T13:52:50.997995Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-25T13:53:02.294Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:maccms:maccms:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"Member Order Detail Interface"
],
"product": "MacCMS",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2025.1000.4052"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "HuajiHD (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A weakness has been identified in MacCMS up to 2025.1000.4052. This vulnerability affects the function order_info of the file application/index/controller/User.php of the component Member Order Detail Interface. This manipulation of the argument order_id causes authorization bypass. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 4,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "Authorization Bypass",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-22T23:51:03.216Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-352400 | MacCMS Member Order Detail User.php order_info authorization",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.352400"
},
{
"name": "VDB-352400 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.352400"
},
{
"name": "Submit #775050 | MacCMS 2025.1000.4052 Authorization Bypass",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.775050"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/HuajiHD/CVE/issues/10"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-22T01:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-22T09:25:33.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "MacCMS Member Order Detail User.php order_info authorization"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-4563",
"datePublished": "2026-03-22T23:51:03.216Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-22T08:20:25.349Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-25T13:53:02.294Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-4617 (GCVE-0-2026-4617)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-24 00:52 – Updated: 2026-03-24 13:34 X_Freeware
VLAI
Title
SourceCodester Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System Patient Check-In api_patient_checkin.php ValidateToken improper authorization
Summary
A weakness has been identified in SourceCodester Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System 1.0. The impacted element is the function ValidateToken of the file /php/api_patient_checkin.php of the component Patient Check-In Module. Executing a manipulation can lead to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.352481 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.352481 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.775747 | third-party-advisory |
| https://gist.github.com/HxH404/0ab53ccba44456b540… | exploit |
| https://www.sourcecodester.com/ | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SourceCodester | Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System |
Affected:
1.0
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-4617",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-24T13:34:33.383570Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-24T13:34:46.349Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"modules": [
"Patient Check-In Module"
],
"product": "Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System",
"vendor": "SourceCodester",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Abhiram T (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A weakness has been identified in SourceCodester Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System 1.0. The impacted element is the function ValidateToken of the file /php/api_patient_checkin.php of the component Patient Check-In Module. Executing a manipulation can lead to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-266",
"description": "Incorrect Privilege Assignment",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-24T00:52:31.044Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-352481 | SourceCodester Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System Patient Check-In api_patient_checkin.php ValidateToken improper authorization",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.352481"
},
{
"name": "VDB-352481 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.352481"
},
{
"name": "Submit #775747 | SourceCodester Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System 1.0 Improper Access Controls",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.775747"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://gist.github.com/HxH404/0ab53ccba44456b5400a5908414f5ab1"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.sourcecodester.com/"
}
],
"tags": [
"x_freeware"
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-23T01:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-23T07:02:58.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "SourceCodester Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System Patient Check-In api_patient_checkin.php ValidateToken improper authorization"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-4617",
"datePublished": "2026-03-24T00:52:31.044Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-23T05:57:53.947Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-24T13:34:46.349Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-46605 (GCVE-0-2026-46605)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-01 07:21 – Updated: 2026-06-01 14:44
VLAI
Title
Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ: Incomplete authorization during destination removal
Summary
Incomplete authorization by Apache ActiveMQ server before versions v6.2.6 and v5.19.7 allows authenticated connections to remove existing destinations with proper permissions.
This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Broker: before 5.19.7, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.6; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.7, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.6; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.7, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.6.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version v6.2.6 or v5.19.7, which fixes the issue.
Severity
4.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-285 - Improper Authorization
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://lists.apache.org/thread/l4lxgr2s73g9pb218… | vendor-advisory |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/0… |
Impacted products
3 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache ActiveMQ Broker |
Affected:
0 , < 5.19.7
(semver)
Affected: 6.0.0 , < 6.2.6 (semver) |
|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache ActiveMQ All |
Affected:
0 , < 5.19.7
(semver)
Affected: 6.0.0 , < 6.2.6 (semver) |
|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache ActiveMQ |
Affected:
0 , < 5.19.7
(semver)
Affected: 6.0.0 , < 6.2.6 (semver) |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-01T07:48:00.286Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/31/20"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-46605",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-01T14:44:45.455019Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-01T14:44:50.457Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.activemq:activemq-broker",
"product": "Apache ActiveMQ Broker",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.19.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.2.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.activemq:activemq-all",
"product": "Apache ActiveMQ All",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.19.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.2.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.activemq:apache-activemq",
"product": "Apache ActiveMQ",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.19.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.2.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Leon Johnson (github: lokerxx)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIncomplete authorization by Apache ActiveMQ server before versions v6.2.6 and v5.19.7 allows authenticated connections to remove existing destinations with proper permissions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Broker: before 5.19.7, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.6; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.7, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.6; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.7, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.6.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version v6.2.6 or v5.19.7, which fixes the issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Incomplete authorization by Apache ActiveMQ server before versions v6.2.6 and v5.19.7 allows authenticated connections to remove existing destinations with proper permissions.\n\nThis issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Broker: before 5.19.7, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.6; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.7, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.6; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.7, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.6.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version v6.2.6 or v5.19.7, which fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "moderate"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285 Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-01T07:21:13.148Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/l4lxgr2s73g9pb218f180psfyskf8ldm"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ: Incomplete authorization during destination removal",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-46605",
"datePublished": "2026-06-01T07:21:13.148Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-15T18:20:10.111Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-01T14:44:50.457Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-46620 (GCVE-0-2026-46620)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-26 15:04 – Updated: 2026-05-27 16:04
VLAI
Title
e107: CSRF in comment.php moderation endpoints via token-optional validation in session_handler::check()
Summary
e107 is a content management system (CMS). Prior to 2.3.5, e107 CMS does not properly enforce CSRF token validation on comment moderation actions. The problem comes down to how session_handler::check() handles CSRF tokens. Instead of requiring a token on every state-changing request, it only validates the token if one happens to be present. If there is no token at all, the check is skipped entirely. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.5.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisori… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-46620",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-27T16:04:28.086263Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-27T16:04:41.864Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "e107",
"vendor": "e107inc",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.3.5"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "e107 is a content management system (CMS). Prior to 2.3.5, e107 CMS does not properly enforce CSRF token validation on comment moderation actions. The problem comes down to how session_handler::check() handles CSRF tokens. Instead of requiring a token on every state-changing request, it only validates the token if one happens to be present. If there is no token at all, the check is skipped entirely. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.5."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-352",
"description": "CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-26T15:04:32.092Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "e107: CSRF in comment.php moderation endpoints via token-optional validation in session_handler::check()"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-46620",
"datePublished": "2026-05-26T15:04:32.092Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-15T19:34:14.012Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-27T16:04:41.864Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-47673 (GCVE-0-2026-47673)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-28 15:29 – Updated: 2026-05-30 01:59
VLAI
Title
Hono: JWT middleware accepts any Authorization scheme, not only Bearer
Summary
Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.21, the jwt and jwk middlewares do not verify that the Authorization header value uses theBearer scheme. Any two-part header value — regardless of the scheme name in the first position — proceeds to JWT verification. A request presenting a valid JWT under a non-Bearer scheme identifier (such as Basic or Token) is authenticated identically to a correctly formed Bearer request. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.21.
Severity
4.8 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-285 - Improper Authorization
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisorie… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-47673",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-30T01:59:04.719558Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-30T01:59:15.167Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.21"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.21, the jwt and jwk middlewares do not verify that the Authorization header value uses theBearer scheme. Any two-part header value \u2014 regardless of the scheme name in the first position \u2014 proceeds to JWT verification. A request presenting a valid JWT under a non-Bearer scheme identifier (such as Basic or Token) is authenticated identically to a correctly formed Bearer request. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.21."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T15:29:44.160Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-f577-qrjj-4474",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-f577-qrjj-4474"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-f577-qrjj-4474",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono: JWT middleware accepts any Authorization scheme, not only Bearer"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-47673",
"datePublished": "2026-05-28T15:29:44.160Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-19T21:10:38.798Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-30T01:59:15.167Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-47713 (GCVE-0-2026-47713)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-28 21:20 – Updated: 2026-05-29 14:48
VLAI
Title
AnythingLLM: Legacy mobile device tokens bypass multi-user workspace scoping after mode migration
Summary
AnythingLLM is an application that turns pieces of content into context that any LLM can use as references during chatting. Prior to 1.13.0, an approved mobile device token created in single-user mode can survive single-user -> multi-user migration even when the device record has userId = null. In multi-user mode, that stale token is still accepted by the mobile authentication middleware. Because no user is attached to the request, downstream mobile handlers fall back to unscoped data-access branches and return workspaces and workspace content without per-user filtering. This permits a pre-migration mobile token to enumerate a workspace assigned only to another user and retrieve victim-owned thread metadata and chat content in multi-user mode. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.13.0.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/sec… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/com… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mintplex-Labs | anything-llm |
Affected:
< 1.13.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-47713",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-29T14:48:29.600045Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T14:48:59.134Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/security/advisories/GHSA-h349-hp2v-8rhw"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "anything-llm",
"vendor": "Mintplex-Labs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.13.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AnythingLLM is an application that turns pieces of content into context that any LLM can use as references during chatting. Prior to 1.13.0, an approved mobile device token created in single-user mode can survive single-user -\u003e multi-user migration even when the device record has userId = null. In multi-user mode, that stale token is still accepted by the mobile authentication middleware. Because no user is attached to the request, downstream mobile handlers fall back to unscoped data-access branches and return workspaces and workspace content without per-user filtering. This permits a pre-migration mobile token to enumerate a workspace assigned only to another user and retrieve victim-owned thread metadata and chat content in multi-user mode. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.13.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 2,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T21:20:56.596Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/security/advisories/GHSA-h349-hp2v-8rhw",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/security/advisories/GHSA-h349-hp2v-8rhw"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/commit/9d714f95c124b61df00b840e36f623a2eb7e7eb4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/commit/9d714f95c124b61df00b840e36f623a2eb7e7eb4"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-h349-hp2v-8rhw",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "AnythingLLM: Legacy mobile device tokens bypass multi-user workspace scoping after mode migration"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-47713",
"datePublished": "2026-05-28T21:20:56.596Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-19T21:29:25.482Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T14:48:59.134Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-47740 (GCVE-0-2026-47740)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-29 18:03 – Updated: 2026-06-02 01:50
VLAI
Title
Shopper: Authorization bypass in multiple Livewire admin components
Summary
Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.8.0, Multiple Filament actions on the admin Order detail and Order shipments table were callable by an authenticated low-privilege user without the permission required to mutate orders. The order detail actions cancel, mark paid, mark complete, capture payment, archive, and start processing were callable with the read-only read_orders permission and did not require edit_orders. capturePayment could trigger an actual PSP capture (real funds movement). The order shipments table actions mark delivered and edit tracking were callable with the read-only browse_orders permission. A user with read access to orders could therefore alter the lifecycle of every order in the panel and trigger real-world payment captures. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.8.0.
Severity
8.1 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/pull/511 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| shopperlabs | shopper |
Affected:
< 2.8.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-47740",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-02T01:50:41.879905Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-02T01:50:53.411Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "shopper",
"vendor": "shopperlabs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.8.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.8.0, Multiple Filament actions on the admin Order detail and Order shipments table were callable by an authenticated low-privilege user without the permission required to mutate orders. The order detail actions cancel, mark paid, mark complete, capture payment, archive, and start processing were callable with the read-only read_orders permission and did not require edit_orders. capturePayment could trigger an actual PSP capture (real funds movement). The order shipments table actions mark delivered and edit tracking were callable with the read-only browse_orders permission. A user with read access to orders could therefore alter the lifecycle of every order in the panel and trigger real-world payment captures. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.8.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-862",
"description": "CWE-862: Missing Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T18:03:54.473Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/security/advisories/GHSA-f946-9qp6-vgch",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/security/advisories/GHSA-f946-9qp6-vgch"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/pull/511",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/pull/511"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-f946-9qp6-vgch",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Shopper: Authorization bypass in multiple Livewire admin components"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-47740",
"datePublished": "2026-05-29T18:03:54.473Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-19T22:16:39.504Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-02T01:50:53.411Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-47744 (GCVE-0-2026-47744)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-29 17:58 – Updated: 2026-05-29 21:38
VLAI
Title
Shopper: Authorization bypass and RBAC privilege escalation in team settings
Summary
Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.8.0, two distinct authorization defects in the team settings allowed any authenticated panel user to take over the RBAC system. Settings/Team/Index had no mount() authorization. Any authenticated user could load the page and use its public actions to create new roles and delete other users, including administrators. Settings/Team/RolePermission gated its write actions on the read-only view_users permission. Any user holding view_users could grant themselves or any other user arbitrary permissions, including manage_users and edit_orders, effectively escalating to full panel administrator from a read-only account. Combined, these two defects allow a low-privilege authenticated user to obtain administrator privileges and remove the legitimate administrators from the panel. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.8.0.
Severity
9.9 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| shopperlabs | shopper |
Affected:
< 2.8.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-47744",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-29T21:38:07.299741Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T21:38:15.231Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "shopper",
"vendor": "shopperlabs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.8.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.8.0, two distinct authorization defects in the team settings allowed any authenticated panel user to take over the RBAC system. Settings/Team/Index had no mount() authorization. Any authenticated user could load the page and use its public actions to create new roles and delete other users, including administrators. Settings/Team/RolePermission gated its write actions on the read-only view_users permission. Any user holding view_users could grant themselves or any other user arbitrary permissions, including manage_users and edit_orders, effectively escalating to full panel administrator from a read-only account. Combined, these two defects allow a low-privilege authenticated user to obtain administrator privileges and remove the legitimate administrators from the panel. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.8.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-269",
"description": "CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T17:58:21.342Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/security/advisories/GHSA-c3qp-2ggw-xjg7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/security/advisories/GHSA-c3qp-2ggw-xjg7"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-c3qp-2ggw-xjg7",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Shopper: Authorization bypass and RBAC privilege escalation in team settings"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-47744",
"datePublished": "2026-05-29T17:58:21.342Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-19T22:16:39.504Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T21:38:15.231Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-4818 (GCVE-0-2026-4818)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-31 14:53 – Updated: 2026-03-31 17:23
VLAI
Title
Some management operations on data streams are not properly restricted when user does not have the necessary privileges
Summary
In Search Guard FLX versions from 3.0.0 up to 4.0.1, there exists an issue which allows users without the necessary privileges to execute some management operations against data streams.
Severity
6.8 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
2 references
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| floragunn | Search Guard FLX |
Affected:
3.0.0 , ≤ 4.0.1
(semver)
|
Date Public
2026-03-31 10:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-4818",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-31T17:23:12.638976Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-31T17:23:23.853Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Search Guard FLX",
"vendor": "floragunn",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.0.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-31T10:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "In Search Guard FLX versions from 3.0.0 up to 4.0.1, there exists an issue which allows users without the necessary privileges to execute some management operations against data streams."
}
],
"value": "In Search Guard FLX versions from 3.0.0 up to 4.0.1, there exists an issue which allows users without the necessary privileges to execute some management operations against data streams."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-862",
"description": "CWE-862",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-31T14:53:19.875Z",
"orgId": "9f311a02-c44f-4938-8530-9219246b8255",
"shortName": "floragunn"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://search-guard.com/cve-advisory/"
},
{
"url": "https://docs.search-guard.com/latest/changelog-searchguard-flx-4_1_0"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Some management operations on data streams are not properly restricted when user does not have the necessary privileges",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9f311a02-c44f-4938-8530-9219246b8255",
"assignerShortName": "floragunn",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-4818",
"datePublished": "2026-03-31T14:53:19.875Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-25T13:44:35.684Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-31T17:23:23.853Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Ensure that you perform access control checks related to your business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that you apply to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.
Mitigation ID: MIT-4.4
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
Description:
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Phases: System Configuration, Installation
Description:
- Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-1: Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs
In applications, particularly web applications, access to functionality is mitigated by an authorization framework. This framework maps Access Control Lists (ACLs) to elements of the application's functionality; particularly URL's for web apps. In the case that the administrator failed to specify an ACL for a particular element, an attacker may be able to access it with impunity. An attacker with the ability to access functionality not properly constrained by ACLs can obtain sensitive information and possibly compromise the entire application. Such an attacker can access resources that must be available only to users at a higher privilege level, can access management sections of the application, or can run queries for data that they otherwise not supposed to.
CAPEC-104: Cross Zone Scripting
An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security.
CAPEC-127: Directory Indexing
An adversary crafts a request to a target that results in the target listing/indexing the content of a directory as output. One common method of triggering directory contents as output is to construct a request containing a path that terminates in a directory name rather than a file name since many applications are configured to provide a list of the directory's contents when such a request is received. An adversary can use this to explore the directory tree on a target as well as learn the names of files. This can often end up revealing test files, backup files, temporary files, hidden files, configuration files, user accounts, script contents, as well as naming conventions, all of which can be used by an attacker to mount additional attacks.
CAPEC-13: Subverting Environment Variable Values
The adversary directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The adversary's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the adversary.
CAPEC-17: Using Malicious Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's configuration that allows an adversary to either directly access an executable file, for example through shell access; or in a possible worst case allows an adversary to upload a file and then execute it. Web servers, ftp servers, and message oriented middleware systems which have many integration points are particularly vulnerable, because both the programmers and the administrators must be in synch regarding the interfaces and the correct privileges for each interface.
CAPEC-39: Manipulating Opaque Client-based Data Tokens
In circumstances where an application holds important data client-side in tokens (cookies, URLs, data files, and so forth) that data can be manipulated. If client or server-side application components reinterpret that data as authentication tokens or data (such as store item pricing or wallet information) then even opaquely manipulating that data may bear fruit for an Attacker. In this pattern an attacker undermines the assumption that client side tokens have been adequately protected from tampering through use of encryption or obfuscation.
CAPEC-402: Bypassing ATA Password Security
An adversary exploits a weakness in ATA security on a drive to gain access to the information the drive contains without supplying the proper credentials. ATA Security is often employed to protect hard disk information from unauthorized access. The mechanism requires the user to type in a password before the BIOS is allowed access to drive contents. Some implementations of ATA security will accept the ATA command to update the password without the user having authenticated with the BIOS. This occurs because the security mechanism assumes the user has first authenticated via the BIOS prior to sending commands to the drive. Various methods exist for exploiting this flaw, the most common being installing the ATA protected drive into a system lacking ATA security features (a.k.a. hot swapping). Once the drive is installed into the new system the BIOS can be used to reset the drive password.
CAPEC-45: Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links
This type of attack leverages the use of symbolic links to cause buffer overflows. An adversary can try to create or manipulate a symbolic link file such that its contents result in out of bounds data. When the target software processes the symbolic link file, it could potentially overflow internal buffers with insufficient bounds checking.
CAPEC-5: Blue Boxing
['This type of attack against older telephone switches and trunks has been around for decades. A tone is sent by an adversary to impersonate a supervisor signal which has the effect of rerouting or usurping command of the line. While the US infrastructure proper may not contain widespread vulnerabilities to this type of attack, many companies are connected globally through call centers and business process outsourcing. These international systems may be operated in countries which have not upgraded Telco infrastructure and so are vulnerable to Blue boxing. Blue boxing is a result of failure on the part of the system to enforce strong authorization for administrative functions. While the infrastructure is different than standard current applications like web applications, there are historical lessons to be learned to upgrade the access control for administrative functions.', {'xhtml:b': 'This attack pattern is included in CAPEC for historical purposes.'}]
CAPEC-51: Poison Web Service Registry
SOA and Web Services often use a registry to perform look up, get schema information, and metadata about services. A poisoned registry can redirect (think phishing for servers) the service requester to a malicious service provider, provide incorrect information in schema or metadata, and delete information about service provider interfaces.
CAPEC-59: Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
CAPEC-60: Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
CAPEC-647: Collect Data from Registries
An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization to gather system-specific data and sensitive information within a registry (e.g., Windows Registry, Mac plist). These contain information about the system configuration, software, operating system, and security. The adversary can leverage information gathered in order to carry out further attacks.
CAPEC-668: Key Negotiation of Bluetooth Attack (KNOB)
An adversary can exploit a flaw in Bluetooth key negotiation allowing them to decrypt information sent between two devices communicating via Bluetooth. The adversary uses an Adversary in the Middle setup to modify packets sent between the two devices during the authentication process, specifically the entropy bits. Knowledge of the number of entropy bits will allow the attacker to easily decrypt information passing over the line of communication.
CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls
An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.
CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables
This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.
CAPEC-87: Forceful Browsing
An attacker employs forceful browsing (direct URL entry) to access portions of a website that are otherwise unreachable. Usually, a front controller or similar design pattern is employed to protect access to portions of a web application. Forceful browsing enables an attacker to access information, perform privileged operations and otherwise reach sections of the web application that have been improperly protected.