CWE-306
Missing Authentication for Critical Function
The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
CVE-2025-59780 (GCVE-0-2025-59780)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-14 23:26 – Updated: 2025-11-17 16:54
VLAI
Title
General Industrial Controls Lynx+ Gateway Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Summary
General Industrial Controls Lynx+ Gateway is missing critical authentication in the embedded web server which
could allow an attacker to send GET requests to obtain sensitive device
information.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Industrial Controls | Lynx+ Gateway |
Affected:
Version R08
Affected: Version V03 Affected: Version V05 Affected: Version V18 |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-59780",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-17T16:53:36.856914Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T16:54:08.683Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Lynx+ Gateway",
"vendor": "General Industrial Controls",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Version R08"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Version V03"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Version V05"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Version V18"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Abhishek Pandey from Payatu Security Consulting Pvt. Ltd. reported these vulnerabilities to CISA."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "General Industrial Controls Lynx+ Gateway\u0026nbsp;is missing critical authentication in the embedded web server which \ncould allow an attacker to send GET requests to obtain sensitive device \ninformation."
}
],
"value": "General Industrial Controls Lynx+ Gateway\u00a0is missing critical authentication in the embedded web server which \ncould allow an attacker to send GET requests to obtain sensitive device \ninformation."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-14T23:26:35.691Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-317-08"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2025/icsa-25-317-08.json"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-25-317-08",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "General Industrial Controls Lynx+ Gateway Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "General Industrial Controls (GIC) did not respond to CISA\u0027s attempts to \ncoordinate. Users of General Industrial Controls Lynx+ Gateway are \nencouraged to reach out to \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eGIC\u003c/a\u003e for more information.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "General Industrial Controls (GIC) did not respond to CISA\u0027s attempts to \ncoordinate. Users of General Industrial Controls Lynx+ Gateway are \nencouraged to reach out to GIC for more information."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-59780",
"datePublished": "2025-11-14T23:26:35.691Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-06T20:44:49.360Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T16:54:08.683Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-60251 (GCVE-0-2025-60251)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-26 00:00 – Updated: 2025-09-26 14:49
VLAI
Summary
Unitree Go2, G1, H1, and B2 devices through 2025-09-20 accept any handshake secret with the unitree substring.
Severity
5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-306 - Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Assigner
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-60251",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-26T14:49:33.822843Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-26T14:49:50.498Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Go2",
"vendor": "Unitree",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2025-09-20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "G1",
"vendor": "Unitree",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2025-09-20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "H1",
"vendor": "Unitree",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2025-09-20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "B2",
"vendor": "Unitree",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2025-09-20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Unitree Go2, G1, H1, and B2 devices through 2025-09-20 accept any handshake secret with the unitree substring."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-26T04:22:14.418Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://spectrum.ieee.org/unitree-robot-exploit"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/Bin4ry/UniPwn"
},
{
"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45381590"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "enrichogram 0.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-60251",
"datePublished": "2025-09-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-26T14:49:50.498Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-61673 (GCVE-0-2025-61673)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-03 21:12 – Updated: 2025-10-06 13:19
VLAI
Title
Karapace is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass
Summary
Karapace is an open-source implementation of Kafka REST and Schema Registry. Versions 5.0.0 and 5.0.1 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability when configured to use OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token authentication. If a request is sent without an Authorization header, the token validation logic is skipped entirely, allowing an unauthenticated user to read and write to Schema Registry endpoints that should otherwise be protected. This effectively renders the OAuth authentication mechanism ineffective. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.2.
Severity
8.6 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Aiven-Open/karapace/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/Aiven-Open/karapace/pull/1143/… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/Aiven-Open/karapace/releases/t… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aiven-Open | karapace |
Affected:
>= 5.0.0, < 5.0.2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61673",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-06T13:18:49.016628Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-06T13:19:08.624Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "karapace",
"vendor": "Aiven-Open",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 5.0.0, \u003c 5.0.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Karapace is an open-source implementation of Kafka REST and Schema Registry. Versions 5.0.0 and 5.0.1 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability when configured to use OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token authentication. If a request is sent without an Authorization header, the token validation logic is skipped entirely, allowing an unauthenticated user to read and write to Schema Registry endpoints that should otherwise be protected. This effectively renders the OAuth authentication mechanism ineffective. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-288",
"description": "CWE-288: Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-03T21:12:24.471Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/Aiven-Open/karapace/security/advisories/GHSA-vq25-vcrw-gj53",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Aiven-Open/karapace/security/advisories/GHSA-vq25-vcrw-gj53"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/Aiven-Open/karapace/pull/1143/commits/c4038e9ce9fa504b433d59ac2944e337292922c7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Aiven-Open/karapace/pull/1143/commits/c4038e9ce9fa504b433d59ac2944e337292922c7"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/Aiven-Open/karapace/releases/tag/5.0.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Aiven-Open/karapace/releases/tag/5.0.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-vq25-vcrw-gj53",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Karapace is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-61673",
"datePublished": "2025-10-03T21:12:24.471Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-29T20:25:16.180Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-06T13:19:08.624Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-61777 (GCVE-0-2025-61777)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-06 16:44 – Updated: 2026-01-28 23:09
VLAI
Title
FlagForge Allows Unauthenticated Badge Template API Access
Summary
Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.3.2, the `/api/admin/badge-templates` (GET) and `/api/admin/badge-templates/create` (POST) endpoints previously allowed access without authentication or authorization. This could have enabled unauthorized users to retrieve all badge templates and sensitive metadata (createdBy, createdAt, updatedAt) and/or create arbitrary badge templates in the database. This could lead to data exposure, database pollution, or abuse of the badge system. The issue has been fixed in FlagForge v2.3.2. GET, POST, UPDATE, and DELETE endpoints now require authentication. Authorization checks ensure only admins can access and modify badge templates. No reliable workarounds are available.
Severity
9.4 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/FlagForgeCTF/flagForge/securit… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/FlagForgeCTF/flagForge/commit/… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FlagForgeCTF | flagForge |
Affected:
>= 2.0.0, < 2.3.2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61777",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-06T17:00:10.742889Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-06T17:15:50.147Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "flagForge",
"vendor": "FlagForgeCTF",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 2.0.0, \u003c 2.3.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.3.2, the `/api/admin/badge-templates` (GET) and `/api/admin/badge-templates/create` (POST) endpoints previously allowed access without authentication or authorization. This could have enabled unauthorized users to retrieve all badge templates and sensitive metadata (createdBy, createdAt, updatedAt) and/or create arbitrary badge templates in the database. This could lead to data exposure, database pollution, or abuse of the badge system. The issue has been fixed in FlagForge v2.3.2. GET, POST, UPDATE, and DELETE endpoints now require authentication. Authorization checks ensure only admins can access and modify badge templates. No reliable workarounds are available."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-200",
"description": "CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-284",
"description": "CWE-284: Improper Access Control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T23:09:53.135Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/FlagForgeCTF/flagForge/security/advisories/GHSA-26rx-c53q-rjf9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FlagForgeCTF/flagForge/security/advisories/GHSA-26rx-c53q-rjf9"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FlagForgeCTF/flagForge/commit/e2121c5fb7a512a49dcd875812c944265fb1a846",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FlagForgeCTF/flagForge/commit/e2121c5fb7a512a49dcd875812c944265fb1a846"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-26rx-c53q-rjf9",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "FlagForge Allows Unauthenticated Badge Template API Access"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-61777",
"datePublished": "2025-10-06T16:44:27.713Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-30T19:43:49.901Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T23:09:53.135Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-61778 (GCVE-0-2025-61778)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-06 16:53 – Updated: 2025-10-06 17:05
VLAI
Title
Akka.Remote TLS did not properly implement certificate-based authentication
Summary
Akka.NET is a .NET port of the Akka project from the Scala / Java community. In all versions of Akka.Remote from v1.2.0 to v1.5.51, TLS could be enabled via our `akka.remote.dot-netty.tcp` transport and this would correctly enforce private key validation on the server-side of inbound connections. Akka.Remote, however, never asked the outbound-connecting client to present ITS certificate - therefore it's possible for untrusted parties to connect to a private key'd Akka.NET cluster and begin communicating with it without any certificate. The issue here is that for certificate-based authentication to work properly, ensuring that all members of the Akka.Remote network are secured with the same private key, Akka.Remote needed to implement mutual TLS. This was not the case before Akka.NET v1.5.52. Those who run Akka.NET inside a private network that they fully control or who were never using TLS in the first place are now affected by the bug. However, those who use TLS to secure their networks must upgrade to Akka.NET V1.5.52 or later. One patch forces "fail fast" semantics if TLS is enabled but the private key is missing or invalid. Previous versions would only check that once connection attempts occurred. The second patch, a critical fix, enforces mutual TLS (mTLS) by default, so both parties must be keyed using the same certificate. As a workaround, avoid exposing the application publicly to avoid the vulnerability having a practical impact on one's application. However, upgrading to version 1.5.52 is still recommended by the maintainers.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/pull/7847 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/pull/7851 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://getakka.net/articles/remoting/security.html | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/releases/t… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| akkadotnet | akka.net |
Affected:
>= 1.2.0, < 1.5.52
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61778",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-06T17:05:20.929457Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-06T17:05:33.450Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "akka.net",
"vendor": "akkadotnet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.2.0, \u003c 1.5.52"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Akka.NET is a .NET port of the Akka project from the Scala / Java community. In all versions of Akka.Remote from v1.2.0 to v1.5.51, TLS could be enabled via our `akka.remote.dot-netty.tcp` transport and this would correctly enforce private key validation on the server-side of inbound connections. Akka.Remote, however, never asked the outbound-connecting client to present ITS certificate - therefore it\u0027s possible for untrusted parties to connect to a private key\u0027d Akka.NET cluster and begin communicating with it without any certificate. The issue here is that for certificate-based authentication to work properly, ensuring that all members of the Akka.Remote network are secured with the same private key, Akka.Remote needed to implement mutual TLS. This was not the case before Akka.NET v1.5.52. Those who run Akka.NET inside a private network that they fully control or who were never using TLS in the first place are now affected by the bug. However, those who use TLS to secure their networks must upgrade to Akka.NET V1.5.52 or later. One patch forces \"fail fast\" semantics if TLS is enabled but the private key is missing or invalid. Previous versions would only check that once connection attempts occurred. The second patch, a critical fix, enforces mutual TLS (mTLS) by default, so both parties must be keyed using the same certificate. As a workaround, avoid exposing the application publicly to avoid the vulnerability having a practical impact on one\u0027s application. However, upgrading to version 1.5.52 is still recommended by the maintainers."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-290",
"description": "CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-06T16:53:41.707Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/security/advisories/GHSA-jhpv-4q4f-43g5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/security/advisories/GHSA-jhpv-4q4f-43g5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/pull/7847",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/pull/7847"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/pull/7851",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/pull/7851"
},
{
"name": "https://getakka.net/articles/remoting/security.html",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://getakka.net/articles/remoting/security.html"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/releases/tag/1.5.52",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/releases/tag/1.5.52"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-jhpv-4q4f-43g5",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Akka.Remote TLS did not properly implement certificate-based authentication"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-61778",
"datePublished": "2025-10-06T16:53:41.707Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-30T19:43:49.901Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-06T17:05:33.450Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-61928 (GCVE-0-2025-61928)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-09 21:24 – Updated: 2025-10-10 14:23
VLAI
Title
Better Auth: Unauthenticated API key creation through api-key plugin
Summary
Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. In versions prior to 1.3.26, unauthenticated attackers can create or modify API keys for any user by passing that user's id in the request body to the `api/auth/api-key/create` route. `session?.user ?? (authRequired ? null : { id: ctx.body.userId })`. When no session exists but `userId` is present in the request body, `authRequired` becomes false and the user object is set to the attacker-controlled ID. Server-only field validation only executes when `authRequired` is true (lines 280-295), allowing attackers to set privileged fields. No additional authentication occurs before the database operation, so the malicious payload is accepted. The same pattern exists in the update endpoint. This is a critical authentication bypass enabling full an unauthenticated attacker can generate an API key for any user and immediately gain complete authenticated access. This allows the attacker to perform any action as the victim user using the api key, potentially compromise the user data and the application depending on the victim's privileges. Version 1.3.26 contains a patch for the issue.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| better-auth | better-auth |
Affected:
< 1.3.26
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61928",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-10T14:23:17.755463Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-10T14:23:23.158Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-99h5-pjcv-gr6v"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "better-auth",
"vendor": "better-auth",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.3.26"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. In versions prior to 1.3.26, unauthenticated attackers can create or modify API keys for any user by passing that user\u0027s id in the request body to the `api/auth/api-key/create` route. `session?.user ?? (authRequired ? null : { id: ctx.body.userId })`. When no session exists but `userId` is present in the request body, `authRequired` becomes false and the user object is set to the attacker-controlled ID. Server-only field validation only executes when `authRequired` is true (lines 280-295), allowing attackers to set privileged fields. No additional authentication occurs before the database operation, so the malicious payload is accepted. The same pattern exists in the update endpoint. This is a critical authentication bypass enabling full an unauthenticated attacker can generate an API key for any user and immediately gain complete authenticated access. This allows the attacker to perform any action as the victim user using the api key, potentially compromise the user data and the application depending on the victim\u0027s privileges. Version 1.3.26 contains a patch for the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-09T21:24:37.541Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-99h5-pjcv-gr6v",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-99h5-pjcv-gr6v"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/556085067609c508f8c546ceef9003ee8c607d39",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/556085067609c508f8c546ceef9003ee8c607d39"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-99h5-pjcv-gr6v",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Better Auth: Unauthenticated API key creation through api-key plugin"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-61928",
"datePublished": "2025-10-09T21:24:37.541Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-03T22:21:59.616Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-10T14:23:23.158Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-61945 (GCVE-0-2025-61945)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-04 16:10 – Updated: 2025-11-05 14:34
VLAI
Title
Missing Authentication for Critical Function in Radiometrics VizAir
Summary
Radiometrics VizAir is vulnerable to any remote attacker via access to the admin panel of the VizAir system without authentication. Once inside, the attacker can modify critical weather parameters such as wind shear alerts, inversion depth, and CAPE values, which are essential for accurate weather forecasting and flight safety. This unauthorized access could result in the disabling of vital alerts, causing hazardous conditions for aircraft, and manipulating runway assignments, which could result in mid-air conflicts or runway incursions.
Severity
10 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-306 - Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiometrics | VizAir |
Affected:
0 , < 08/2025
(date)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61945",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-05T14:33:59.072400Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-05T14:34:04.566Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VizAir",
"vendor": "Radiometrics",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "08/2025",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "date"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Souvik Kandar"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Radiometrics VizAir is vulnerable to any remote attacker via access to the admin panel of the VizAir system without authentication. Once inside, the attacker can modify critical weather parameters such as wind shear alerts, inversion depth, and CAPE values, which are essential for accurate weather forecasting and flight safety. This unauthorized access could result in the disabling of vital alerts, causing hazardous conditions for aircraft, and manipulating runway assignments, which could result in mid-air conflicts or runway incursions.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Radiometrics VizAir is vulnerable to any remote attacker via access to the admin panel of the VizAir system without authentication. Once inside, the attacker can modify critical weather parameters such as wind shear alerts, inversion depth, and CAPE values, which are essential for accurate weather forecasting and flight safety. This unauthorized access could result in the disabling of vital alerts, causing hazardous conditions for aircraft, and manipulating runway assignments, which could result in mid-air conflicts or runway incursions."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T16:10:49.931Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-308-04"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2025/icsa-25-308-04.json"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Radiometrics performed updates on all affected systems and resolved these vulnerabilities. No further action is needed on the user\u0027s end.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Radiometrics performed updates on all affected systems and resolved these vulnerabilities. No further action is needed on the user\u0027s end."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-25-308-04",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Missing Authentication for Critical Function in Radiometrics VizAir",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-61945",
"datePublished": "2025-11-04T16:10:49.931Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-07T19:42:54.137Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-05T14:34:04.566Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-61956 (GCVE-0-2025-61956)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-04 16:15 – Updated: 2025-11-04 16:26
VLAI
Title
Missing Authentication for Critical Function in Radiometrics VizAir
Summary
Radiometrics VizAir is vulnerable to a lack of authentication mechanisms for critical functions, such as admin access and API requests. Attackers can modify configurations without authentication, potentially manipulating active runway settings and misleading air traffic control (ATC) and pilots. Additionally, manipulated meteorological data could mislead forecasters and ATC, causing inaccurate flight planning.
Severity
10 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-306 - Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiometrics | VizAir |
Affected:
0 , < 08/2025
(date)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61956",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-04T16:25:31.465424Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T16:26:27.186Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VizAir",
"vendor": "Radiometrics",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "08/2025",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "date"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Souvik Kandar"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Radiometrics VizAir is vulnerable to a lack of authentication mechanisms for critical functions, such as admin access and API requests. Attackers can modify configurations without authentication, potentially manipulating active runway settings and misleading air traffic control (ATC) and pilots. Additionally, manipulated meteorological data could mislead forecasters and ATC, causing inaccurate flight planning.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Radiometrics VizAir is vulnerable to a lack of authentication mechanisms for critical functions, such as admin access and API requests. Attackers can modify configurations without authentication, potentially manipulating active runway settings and misleading air traffic control (ATC) and pilots. Additionally, manipulated meteorological data could mislead forecasters and ATC, causing inaccurate flight planning."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T16:15:05.012Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-308-04"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2025/icsa-25-308-04.json"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Radiometrics performed updates on all affected systems and resolved these vulnerabilities. No further action is needed on the user\u0027s end.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Radiometrics performed updates on all affected systems and resolved these vulnerabilities. No further action is needed on the user\u0027s end."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-25-308-04",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Missing Authentication for Critical Function in Radiometrics VizAir",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-61956",
"datePublished": "2025-11-04T16:15:05.012Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-07T19:42:54.189Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T16:26:27.186Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-6226 (GCVE-0-2025-6226)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-18 08:48 – Updated: 2025-08-07 09:53
VLAI
Title
IDOR in CreatePost API allows for timeboxed message disclosure
Summary
Mattermost versions 10.5.x <= 10.5.6, 10.8.x <= 10.8.1, 10.7.x <= 10.7.3, 9.11.x <= 9.11.16 fail to verify authorization when retrieving cached posts by PendingPostID which allows an authenticated user to read posts in private channels they don't have access to via guessing the PendingPostID of recently created posts.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-306 - Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mattermost | Mattermost |
Affected:
10.5.0 , ≤ 10.5.6
(semver)
Affected: 10.8.0 , ≤ 10.8.1 (semver) Affected: 10.7.0 , ≤ 10.7.3 (semver) Affected: 9.11.0 , ≤ 9.11.16 (semver) Unaffected: 10.9.0 Unaffected: 10.5.8 Unaffected: 10.8.2 Unaffected: 10.7.4 Unaffected: 9.11.17 |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-6226",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-18T12:39:46.280328Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-18T12:46:21.941Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Mattermost",
"vendor": "Mattermost",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "10.5.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "10.8.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.8.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "10.7.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.7.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "9.11.16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.11.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "10.9.0"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "10.5.8"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "10.8.2"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "10.7.4"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "9.11.17"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Dawid Kulikowski (daw10)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mattermost versions 10.5.x \u003c= 10.5.6, 10.8.x \u003c= 10.8.1, 10.7.x \u003c= 10.7.3, 9.11.x \u003c= 9.11.16 fail to verify authorization when retrieving cached posts by PendingPostID which allows an authenticated user to read posts in private channels they don\u0027t have access to via guessing the PendingPostID of recently created posts."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-07T09:53:06.698Z",
"orgId": "9302f53e-dde5-4bf3-b2f2-a83f91ac0eee",
"shortName": "Mattermost"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://mattermost.com/security-updates"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Update Mattermost to versions 10.9.0, 10.5.7, 10.8.2, 10.7.4, 9.11.17 or higher."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "MMSA-2025-00490",
"defect": [
"https://mattermost.atlassian.net/browse/MM-64225"
],
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "IDOR in CreatePost API allows for timeboxed message disclosure"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9302f53e-dde5-4bf3-b2f2-a83f91ac0eee",
"assignerShortName": "Mattermost",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-6226",
"datePublished": "2025-07-18T08:48:02.717Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-06-18T10:41:12.541Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-07T09:53:06.698Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-62582 (GCVE-0-2025-62582)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-16 02:03 – Updated: 2026-06-04 14:58
VLAI
Title
DIAView - Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
Summary
Delta Electronics DIAView has multiple vulnerabilities.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
8.1 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-306 - Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delta Electronics | DIAView |
Affected:
0
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-05-29 02:05
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-62582",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-04T14:58:50.380214Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-04T14:58:57.163Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Windows"
],
"product": "DIAView",
"vendor": "Delta Electronics",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:delta_electronics:diaview:0:*:windows:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Tenable"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-29T02:05:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Delta Electronics DIAView has multiple vulnerabilities."
}
],
"value": "Delta Electronics DIAView has multiple vulnerabilities."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-115",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-115 Authentication Bypass"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL - v4.3.1 and prior"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL - v4.4.0 and later (Architectural Hardening)"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-04T08:26:58.695Z",
"orgId": "759f5e80-c8e1-4224-bead-956d7b33c98b",
"shortName": "Deltaww"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://filecenter.deltaww.com/news/download/doc/Delta-PCSA-2026-00008_DIAView%20Missing%20Authentication%20for%20Critical%20Function%20(CVE-2025-62582)_v1.1.pdf"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Please\ndownload and upgrade DIAView to v4.4 or later.\u003cbr\u003e\nIn addition, to prevent a potential verification bypass on the database under\nsophisticated technical analysis, users are strongly advised to enforce\nfirewall isolation to\ncompletely restrict unauthorized remote access to the database."
}
],
"value": "Please\ndownload and upgrade DIAView to v4.4 or later.\n\nIn addition, to prevent a potential verification bypass on the database under\nsophisticated technical analysis, users are strongly advised to enforce\nfirewall isolation to\ncompletely restrict unauthorized remote access to the database."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "DIAView - Authentication Bypass Vulnerability",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "759f5e80-c8e1-4224-bead-956d7b33c98b",
"assignerShortName": "Deltaww",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-62582",
"datePublished": "2026-01-16T02:03:22.030Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-16T01:07:48.959Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-04T14:58:57.163Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability.
- Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port.
- In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks.
- In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
Mitigation ID: MIT-4.5
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
Description:
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
Mitigation
Phases: Implementation, System Configuration, Operation
Description:
- When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].
CAPEC-12: Choosing Message Identifier
This pattern of attack is defined by the selection of messages distributed via multicast or public information channels that are intended for another client by determining the parameter value assigned to that client. This attack allows the adversary to gain access to potentially privileged information, and to possibly perpetrate other attacks through the distribution means by impersonation. If the channel/message being manipulated is an input rather than output mechanism for the system, (such as a command bus), this style of attack could be used to change the adversary's identifier to more a privileged one.
CAPEC-166: Force the System to Reset Values
An attacker forces the target into a previous state in order to leverage potential weaknesses in the target dependent upon a prior configuration or state-dependent factors. Even in cases where an attacker may not be able to directly control the configuration of the targeted application, they may be able to reset the configuration to a prior state since many applications implement reset functions.
CAPEC-216: Communication Channel Manipulation
An adversary manipulates a setting or parameter on communications channel in order to compromise its security. This can result in information exposure, insertion/removal of information from the communications stream, and/or potentially system compromise.
CAPEC-36: Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality
An adversary searches for and invokes interfaces or functionality that the target system designers did not intend to be publicly available. If interfaces fail to authenticate requests, the attacker may be able to invoke functionality they are not authorized for.
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.