Common Weakness Enumeration
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Back to CWE stats page
CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
CVE-2026-22229 (GCVE-0-2026-22229)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-02 17:58 – Updated: 2026-03-02 17:40
VLAI
Title
Command Injection Vulnerability on TP-Link Archer BE230 v1.2 and Deco BE25 v1.0
Summary
A command injection vulnerability may be exploited after the admin's authentication via the import of a crafted VPN client configuration file on the TP-Link Archer BE230 v1.2 and Deco BE25 v1.0. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain full administrative control of the device, resulting in severe compromise of configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.
This CVE covers one of multiple distinct OS command injection issues identified across separate code paths. Although similar in nature, each instance is tracked under a unique CVE ID.
This issue affects Archer BE230 v1.2 < 1.2.4 Build 20251218 rel.70420 and Deco BE25 v1.0: through 1.1.1 Build 20250822.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
7 references
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TP-Link Systems Inc. | Archer BE230 v1.2 |
Affected:
0 , < 1.2.4 Build 20251218 rel.70420
(custom)
|
|
| TP-Link Systems Inc. | Deco BE25 v1.0 |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.1.1 Build 20250822
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-22229",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-03T04:55:59.578719Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T15:04:31.085Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Archer BE230 v1.2",
"vendor": "TP-Link Systems Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.2.4 Build 20251218 rel.70420",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Deco BE25 v1.0",
"vendor": "TP-Link Systems Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.1.1 Build 20250822",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "caprinuxx"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "sunshinefactory"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A command injection vulnerability may be exploited after the admin\u0027s authentication via the import of a crafted VPN client configuration file on the TP-Link Archer BE230 v1.2 and Deco BE25 v1.0. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain full administrative control of the device, resulting in severe compromise of configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.\nThis CVE covers one of multiple distinct OS command injection issues identified across separate code paths. Although similar in nature, each instance is tracked under a unique CVE ID. \u003cbr\u003eThis issue affects Archer BE230 v1.2 \u0026lt; 1.2.4 Build 20251218 rel.70420 and Deco BE25\u0026nbsp;v1.0: through 1.1.1 Build 20250822.\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A command injection vulnerability may be exploited after the admin\u0027s authentication via the import of a crafted VPN client configuration file on the TP-Link Archer BE230 v1.2 and Deco BE25 v1.0. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain full administrative control of the device, resulting in severe compromise of configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.\nThis CVE covers one of multiple distinct OS command injection issues identified across separate code paths. Although similar in nature, each instance is tracked under a unique CVE ID. \nThis issue affects Archer BE230 v1.2 \u003c 1.2.4 Build 20251218 rel.70420 and Deco BE25\u00a0v1.0: through 1.1.1 Build 20250822."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-02T17:40:15.901Z",
"orgId": "f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630",
"shortName": "TPLink"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/download/archer-be230/v1.20/#Firmware"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/en/support/download/archer-be230/v1.20/#Firmware"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/sg/support/download/archer-be230/v1.20/#Firmware"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/4935/"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/sg/support/download/deco-be25/#Firmware"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/en/support/download/deco-be25/#Firmware"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/download/deco-be25/v1/#Firmware"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Command Injection Vulnerability on TP-Link Archer BE230 v1.2 and Deco BE25 v1.0",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630",
"assignerShortName": "TPLink",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-22229",
"datePublished": "2026-02-02T17:58:32.205Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-06T18:18:52.127Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-02T17:40:15.901Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-22265 (GCVE-0-2026-22265)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-15 16:27 – Updated: 2026-01-15 16:46
VLAI
Title
Roxy-WI has a Command Injection via grep parameter in logs.py allows authenticated RCE
Summary
Roxy-WI is a web interface for managing Haproxy, Nginx, Apache and Keepalived servers. Prior to 8.2.8.2, command injection vulnerability exists in the log viewing functionality that allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary system commands. The vulnerability is in app/modules/roxywi/logs.py line 87, where the grep parameter is used twice - once sanitized and once raw. This vulnerability is fixed in 8.2.8.2.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/roxy-wi/roxy-wi/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/roxy-wi/roxy-wi/commit/f040d33… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/roxy-wi/roxy-wi/releases/tag/v… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-22265",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-15T16:46:01.059080Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-15T16:46:11.782Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "roxy-wi",
"vendor": "roxy-wi",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 8.2.8.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Roxy-WI is a web interface for managing Haproxy, Nginx, Apache and Keepalived servers. Prior to 8.2.8.2, command injection vulnerability exists in the log viewing functionality that allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary system commands. The vulnerability is in app/modules/roxywi/logs.py line 87, where the grep parameter is used twice - once sanitized and once raw. This vulnerability is fixed in 8.2.8.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-15T16:27:52.446Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/roxy-wi/roxy-wi/security/advisories/GHSA-mmmf-vh7m-rm47",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/roxy-wi/roxy-wi/security/advisories/GHSA-mmmf-vh7m-rm47"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/roxy-wi/roxy-wi/commit/f040d3338c4ba6f66127487361592e32e0188eee",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/roxy-wi/roxy-wi/commit/f040d3338c4ba6f66127487361592e32e0188eee"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/roxy-wi/roxy-wi/releases/tag/v8.2.8.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/roxy-wi/roxy-wi/releases/tag/v8.2.8.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-mmmf-vh7m-rm47",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Roxy-WI has a Command Injection via grep parameter in logs.py allows authenticated RCE"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-22265",
"datePublished": "2026-01-15T16:27:52.446Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-07T05:19:12.923Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-15T16:46:11.782Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-22277 (GCVE-0-2026-22277)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-30 08:27 – Updated: 2026-02-26 15:04
VLAI
Summary
Dell UnityVSA, version(s) 5.4 and prior, contain(s) an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges.
Severity
7.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/00042119… | vendor-advisory |
Date Public
2026-01-28 18:30
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-22277",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-31T04:56:21.326370Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T15:04:43.315Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "UnityVSA",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.5.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "N/A",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-01-28T18:30:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u0026nbsp; Dell UnityVSA, version(s) 5.4 and prior, contain(s) an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027) vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Dell UnityVSA, version(s) 5.4 and prior, contain(s) an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027) vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-30T08:27:02.070Z",
"orgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
"shortName": "dell"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000421197/dsa-2026-054-security-update-for-dell-unity-dell-unityvsa-and-dell-unity-xt-security-update-for-multiple-vulnerabilities"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
"assignerShortName": "dell",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-22277",
"datePublished": "2026-01-30T08:27:02.070Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-07T07:17:24.536Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T15:04:43.315Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-22313 (GCVE-0-2026-22313)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-16 18:36 – Updated: 2026-06-17 15:04
VLAI
Title
OS Commands Executed with Administrative Permissions in Radiflow iSAP Smart Collector
Summary
The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send
arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.
Severity
9.1 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.cvcn.gov.it/cvcn/cve/CVE-2026-22313 | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiflow | iSAP Smart Collector |
Affected:
3.07-1
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-22313",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-17T15:03:56.405202Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-17T15:04:07.971Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "iSAP Smart Collector",
"vendor": "Radiflow",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.07-1",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send\narbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system."
}
],
"value": "The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send\narbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T18:49:30.740Z",
"orgId": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
"shortName": "ENISA"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.cvcn.gov.it/cvcn/cve/CVE-2026-22313"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OS Commands Executed with Administrative Permissions in Radiflow iSAP Smart Collector",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
"assignerShortName": "ENISA",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-22313",
"datePublished": "2026-06-16T18:36:41.423Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-07T09:31:00.563Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-17T15:04:07.971Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-22550 (GCVE-0-2026-22550)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-03 06:56 – Updated: 2026-05-12 08:09
VLAI
Summary
OS command injection vulnerability exists in ELECOM wireless LAN products. A crafted request from a logged-in user may lead to an arbitrary OS command execution.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
Impacted products
15 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-X6000XS-G |
Affected:
v1.12 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-X6000XST-G |
Affected:
v1.16 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-XE5400GS-G |
Affected:
v1.13 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-XE5400GSA-G |
Affected:
v1.13 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-X1500GS-B |
Affected:
v1.12 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-X1500GSA-B |
Affected:
v1.12 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-X3000GS2-B |
Affected:
v1.09 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-X3000GS2-W |
Affected:
v1.09 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-X3000GS2A-B |
Affected:
v1.09 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-X3000GST2-B |
Affected:
v1.06 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-X1800GS-B |
Affected:
v1.19 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-X1800GSA-B |
Affected:
v1.19 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-X1800GSH-B |
Affected:
v1.19 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-X6000QS-G |
Affected:
v1.14 and earlier
|
|
| ELECOM CO.,LTD. | WRC-X6000QSA-G |
Affected:
v1.14 and earlier
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-22550",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-03T15:55:01.293499Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-03T15:55:14.398Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "WRC-X6000XS-G",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.12 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-X6000XST-G",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.16 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-XE5400GS-G",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.13 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-XE5400GSA-G",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.13 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-X1500GS-B",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.12 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-X1500GSA-B",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.12 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-X3000GS2-B",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.09 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-X3000GS2-W",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.09 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-X3000GS2A-B",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.09 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-X3000GST2-B",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.06 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-X1800GS-B",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.19 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-X1800GSA-B",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.19 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-X1800GSH-B",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.19 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-X6000QS-G",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.14 and earlier"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WRC-X6000QSA-G",
"vendor": "ELECOM CO.,LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v1.14 and earlier"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OS command injection vulnerability exists in ELECOM wireless LAN products. A crafted request from a logged-in user may lead to an arbitrary OS command execution."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T08:09:24.537Z",
"orgId": "ede6fdc4-6654-4307-a26d-3331c018e2ce",
"shortName": "jpcert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.elecom.co.jp/news/security/20260203-01/"
},
{
"url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN94012927/"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ede6fdc4-6654-4307-a26d-3331c018e2ce",
"assignerShortName": "jpcert",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-22550",
"datePublished": "2026-02-03T06:56:59.277Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-30T01:42:48.683Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T08:09:24.537Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-22553 (GCVE-0-2026-22553)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-24 20:56 – Updated: 2026-02-26 19:39
VLAI
Title
InSAT MasterSCADA BUK-TS OS Command Injection
Summary
All versions of InSAT MasterSCADA BUK-TS are susceptible to OS command injection through a field in its MMadmServ web interface. Malicious users that use the vulnerable endpoint are potentially able to cause remote code execution.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| InSAT | MasterSCADA BUK-TS |
Affected:
All versions
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-22553",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-26T19:38:34.395779Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T19:39:01.753Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MasterSCADA BUK-TS",
"vendor": "InSAT",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Adem El Adeb reported these vulnerabilities to CISA."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eAll versions of InSAT MasterSCADA BUK-TS are susceptible to OS command injection through a field in its MMadmServ web interface. Malicious users that use the vulnerable endpoint are potentially able to cause remote code execution.\u003c/span\u003e\n\n\u003c/span\u003e"
}
],
"value": "All versions of InSAT MasterSCADA BUK-TS are susceptible to OS command injection through a field in its MMadmServ web interface. Malicious users that use the vulnerable endpoint are potentially able to cause remote code execution."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-24T21:00:29.951Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-055-01"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-055-01.json"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-26-055-01",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "InSAT MasterSCADA BUK-TS OS Command Injection",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(245, 250, 252);\"\u003eInSAT has not responded to requests to work with CISA to mitigate these vulnerabilities. Users of the affected products are encouraged to contact info@insat.ru or scada@insat.ru for additional information.\u003c/span\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "InSAT has not responded to requests to work with CISA to mitigate these vulnerabilities. Users of the affected products are encouraged to contact info@insat.ru or scada@insat.ru for additional information."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-22553",
"datePublished": "2026-02-24T20:56:14.099Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-09T17:52:06.925Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T19:39:01.753Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-2260 (GCVE-0-2026-2260)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-10 03:02 – Updated: 2026-02-23 10:01 Unsupported When Assigned
VLAI
Title
D-Link DCS-931L setSysAdmin os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was found in D-Link DCS-931L up to 1.13.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /goform/setSysAdmin. The manipulation of the argument AdminID results in os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.345007 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.345007 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.753398 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/cha0yang1/CVE/blob/main/DLinkRce.md | related |
| https://github.com/cha0yang1/CVE/blob/main/DLinkR… | exploit |
| https://www.dlink.com/ | product |
Impacted products
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-2260",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-10T18:35:58.088105Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-10T18:36:07.064Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "DCS-931L",
"vendor": "D-Link",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.9"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.10"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.11"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.12"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.13.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "cha0yang (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was found in D-Link DCS-931L up to 1.13.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /goform/setSysAdmin. The manipulation of the argument AdminID results in os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 8.3,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-23T10:01:54.740Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-345007 | D-Link DCS-931L setSysAdmin os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.345007"
},
{
"name": "VDB-345007 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.345007"
},
{
"name": "Submit #753398 | D-Link DCS931L v1.0.0-v1.13.0 Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.753398"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cha0yang1/CVE/blob/main/DLinkRce.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cha0yang1/CVE/blob/main/DLinkRce.md#poc"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.dlink.com/"
}
],
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-02-09T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-02-09T01:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-02-10T05:21:50.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "D-Link DCS-931L setSysAdmin os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-2260",
"datePublished": "2026-02-10T03:02:07.344Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-09T16:58:34.510Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-23T10:01:54.740Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-22708 (GCVE-0-2026-22708)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-14 16:43 – Updated: 2026-01-14 16:59
VLAI
Title
Cursor has a Terminal Tool Allowlist Bypass via Environment Variables
Summary
Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. Prior to 2.3, hen the Cursor Agent is running in Auto-Run Mode with Allowlist mode enabled, certain shell built-ins can still be executed without appearing in the allowlist and without requiring user approval.
This allows an attacker via indirect or direct prompt injection to poison the shell environment by setting, modifying, or removing environment variables that influence trusted commands. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-15 - External Control of System or Configuration Setting
- CWE-74 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
- CWE-77 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
- CWE-94 - Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
- CWE-269 - Improper Privilege Management
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/cursor/cursor/security/advisor… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-22708",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-14T16:59:44.747154Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-14T16:59:53.022Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "cursor",
"vendor": "cursor",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. Prior to 2.3, hen the Cursor Agent is running in Auto-Run Mode with Allowlist mode enabled, certain shell built-ins can still be executed without appearing in the allowlist and without requiring user approval.\nThis allows an attacker via indirect or direct prompt injection to poison the shell environment by setting, modifying, or removing environment variables that influence trusted commands. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-15",
"description": "CWE-15: External Control of System or Configuration Setting",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-74",
"description": "CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component (\u0027Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-94",
"description": "CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-269",
"description": "CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-14T16:43:54.000Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cursor/cursor/security/advisories/GHSA-82wg-qcm4-fp2w",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cursor/cursor/security/advisories/GHSA-82wg-qcm4-fp2w"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-82wg-qcm4-fp2w",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Cursor has a Terminal Tool Allowlist Bypass via Environment Variables"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-22708",
"datePublished": "2026-01-14T16:43:54.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-08T19:23:09.857Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-14T16:59:53.022Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-22718 (GCVE-0-2026-22718)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-14 05:10 – Updated: 2026-01-14 14:19
VLAI
Title
Command injection vulnerability
Summary
The VSCode extension for Spring CLI are vulnerable to command injection, resulting in command execution on the users machine.
Severity
6.8 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spring | CLI VSCode Extension |
Affected:
0.9.0 and older
|
Date Public
2026-01-13 05:09
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-22718",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-14T14:18:27.679388Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-14T14:19:10.368Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "CLI VSCode Extension",
"vendor": "Spring",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.0 and older"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-01-13T05:09:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eThe VSCode extension for Spring CLI are vulnerable to command injection, resulting in command execution on the users machine.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The VSCode extension for Spring CLI are vulnerable to command injection, resulting in command execution on the users machine."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-14T05:10:58.485Z",
"orgId": "dcf2e128-44bd-42ed-91e8-88f912c1401d",
"shortName": "vmware"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://spring.io/security/cve-2026-22718"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Command injection vulnerability",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "dcf2e128-44bd-42ed-91e8-88f912c1401d",
"assignerShortName": "vmware",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-22718",
"datePublished": "2026-01-14T05:10:58.485Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-09T06:54:36.841Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-14T14:19:10.368Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-22761 (GCVE-0-2026-22761)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-20 16:39 – Updated: 2026-04-22 03:56
VLAI
Summary
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 8.5 through 8.6 contain a command injection vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges.
Severity
6.7 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/00045069… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dell | PowerProtect Data Domain |
Affected:
0 , < 8.6.1.10, 8.7.0.0 or later
(semver)
Affected: 0 , < 2.7.9 with DD OS 8.3.1.30 (semver) |
Date Public
2026-04-15 18:30
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-22761",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-21T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-22T03:56:06.445Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PowerProtect Data Domain",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.6.1.10, 8.7.0.0 or later",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.7.9 with DD OS 8.3.1.30",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Dell would like to thank brocked200 (Nguyen Quoc Khanh) for reporting these issues."
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-15T18:30:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 8.5 through 8.6 contain a command injection vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges."
}
],
"value": "Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 8.5 through 8.6 contain a command injection vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-20T16:39:40.268Z",
"orgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
"shortName": "dell"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000450699/dsa-2026-060-security-update-for-dell-powerprotect-data-domain-multiple-vulnerabilities"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
"assignerShortName": "dell",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-22761",
"datePublished": "2026-04-20T16:39:40.268Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-09T18:05:08.763Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-22T03:56:06.445Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation ID: MIT-22
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Description:
- For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation ID: MIT-4.3
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
Description:
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation ID: MIT-28
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
Description:
- While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation ID: MIT-27
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
Description:
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation ID: MIT-5
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation ID: MIT-21
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
Description:
- When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-39
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation ID: MIT-29
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Description:
- Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation ID: MIT-17
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation ID: MIT-16
Phases: Operation, Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.