All the vulnerabilites related to redhat - migration_toolkit_for_runtimes
cve-2023-1664
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-05-26 00:00
Modified
2024-08-02 05:57
Severity ?
Summary
A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration "Revalidate Client Certificate" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of "Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use "Revalidate Client Certificate" this flaw is avoidable.
References
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182196&comment#0
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T05:57:24.969Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182196\u0026comment#0"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "Keycloak",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "NA"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration \"Revalidate Client Certificate\" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of \"Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available\". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use \"Revalidate Client Certificate\" this flaw is avoidable."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2023-05-26T00:00:00",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182196\u0026comment#0"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2023-1664",
    "datePublished": "2023-05-26T00:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2023-03-27T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T05:57:24.969Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

cve-2022-4492
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-02-23 00:00
Modified
2024-08-03 01:41
Severity ?
Summary
The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol.
References
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T01:41:45.097Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "undertow",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.7"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "ssrf",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2023-03-24T00:00:00",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-4492",
    "datePublished": "2023-02-23T00:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2022-12-14T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T01:41:45.097Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2023-05-26 18:15
Modified
2024-11-21 07:39
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration "Revalidate Client Certificate" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of "Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use "Revalidate Client Certificate" this flaw is avoidable.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182196&comment#0Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182196&comment#0Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
redhat build_of_quarkus -
redhat jboss_a-mq 7
redhat keycloak -
redhat migration_toolkit_for_runtimes -
redhat single_sign-on 7.0


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:build_of_quarkus:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "CE29B9D6-63DC-4779-ACE8-4E51E6A0AF37",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_a-mq:7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "A58966CB-36AF-4E64-AB39-BE3A0753E155",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:keycloak:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "6E0DE4E1-5D8D-40F3-8AC8-C7F736966158",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:migration_toolkit_for_runtimes:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F979A5E3-7FFB-45F1-9847-FFBAF0B12067",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "9EFEC7CA-8DDA-48A6-A7B6-1F1D14792890",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration \"Revalidate Client Certificate\" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of \"Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available\". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use \"Revalidate Client Certificate\" this flaw is avoidable."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2023-1664",
  "lastModified": "2024-11-21T07:39:38.787",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 2.5,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2023-05-26T18:15:09.740",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182196\u0026comment#0"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182196\u0026comment#0"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-295"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    },
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-295"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2023-02-23 20:15
Modified
2024-11-21 07:35
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Summary
The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492Vendor Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
redhat build_of_quarkus -
redhat integration_camel_for_spring_boot -
redhat integration_camel_k -
redhat integration_service_registry -
redhat jboss_enterprise_application_platform 7.0.0
redhat jboss_fuse 7.0.0
redhat migration_toolkit_for_applications 6.0
redhat migration_toolkit_for_runtimes -
redhat single_sign-on 7.0
redhat undertow 2.7.0


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:build_of_quarkus:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "CE29B9D6-63DC-4779-ACE8-4E51E6A0AF37",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_camel_for_spring_boot:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "78698F40-0777-4990-822D-02E1B5D0E2C0",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_camel_k:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B87C8AD3-8878-4546-86C2-BF411876648C",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_service_registry:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "EF03BDE8-602D-4DEE-BA5B-5B20FDF47741",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "72A54BDA-311C-413B-8E4D-388AD65A170A",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B40CCE4F-EA2C-453D-BB76-6388767E5C6D",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:migration_toolkit_for_applications:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "3C2E7E3C-A507-4AB2-97E5-4944D8775CF7",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:migration_toolkit_for_runtimes:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F979A5E3-7FFB-45F1-9847-FFBAF0B12067",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "9EFEC7CA-8DDA-48A6-A7B6-1F1D14792890",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:2.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E0FA5F7F-CCE8-4DF0-8F9D-516F72C30A45",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2022-4492",
  "lastModified": "2024-11-21T07:35:22.223",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2023-02-23T20:15:12.680",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}