cve-2022-4492
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-02-23 00:00
Modified
2024-08-03 01:41
Severity ?
Summary
The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol.
Impacted products
n/aundertow
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T01:41:45.097Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "undertow",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.7"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "ssrf",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2023-03-24T00:00:00",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-4492",
    "datePublished": "2023-02-23T00:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2022-12-14T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T01:41:45.097Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-4492\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2023-02-23T20:15:12.680\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-03-24T16:15:08.350\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-noinfo\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:build_of_quarkus:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"CE29B9D6-63DC-4779-ACE8-4E51E6A0AF37\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_camel_for_spring_boot:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"78698F40-0777-4990-822D-02E1B5D0E2C0\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_camel_k:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B87C8AD3-8878-4546-86C2-BF411876648C\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_service_registry:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"EF03BDE8-602D-4DEE-BA5B-5B20FDF47741\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"72A54BDA-311C-413B-8E4D-388AD65A170A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B40CCE4F-EA2C-453D-BB76-6388767E5C6D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:migration_toolkit_for_applications:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"3C2E7E3C-A507-4AB2-97E5-4944D8775CF7\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:migration_toolkit_for_runtimes:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F979A5E3-7FFB-45F1-9847-FFBAF0B12067\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9EFEC7CA-8DDA-48A6-A7B6-1F1D14792890\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:2.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E0FA5F7F-CCE8-4DF0-8F9D-516F72C30A45\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.