cve-2022-4492
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-02-23 00:00
Modified
2025-03-12 14:34
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
0.08% (0.2068)
Summary
The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492Vendor Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a undertow Version: 2.7
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
   containers: {
      adp: [
         {
            providerMetadata: {
               dateUpdated: "2024-08-03T01:41:45.097Z",
               orgId: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
               shortName: "CVE",
            },
            references: [
               {
                  tags: [
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260",
               },
               {
                  tags: [
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492",
               },
               {
                  tags: [
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/",
               },
            ],
            title: "CVE Program Container",
         },
         {
            metrics: [
               {
                  other: {
                     content: {
                        id: "CVE-2022-4492",
                        options: [
                           {
                              Exploitation: "none",
                           },
                           {
                              Automatable: "yes",
                           },
                           {
                              "Technical Impact": "partial",
                           },
                        ],
                        role: "CISA Coordinator",
                        timestamp: "2025-03-12T14:33:53.756138Z",
                        version: "2.0.3",
                     },
                     type: "ssvc",
                  },
               },
            ],
            problemTypes: [
               {
                  descriptions: [
                     {
                        cweId: "CWE-918",
                        description: "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
                        lang: "en",
                        type: "CWE",
                     },
                  ],
               },
            ],
            providerMetadata: {
               dateUpdated: "2025-03-12T14:34:50.123Z",
               orgId: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
               shortName: "CISA-ADP",
            },
            title: "CISA ADP Vulnrichment",
         },
      ],
      cna: {
         affected: [
            {
               product: "undertow",
               vendor: "n/a",
               versions: [
                  {
                     status: "affected",
                     version: "2.7",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         descriptions: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol.",
            },
         ],
         problemTypes: [
            {
               descriptions: [
                  {
                     description: "ssrf",
                     lang: "en",
                     type: "text",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         providerMetadata: {
            dateUpdated: "2023-03-24T00:00:00.000Z",
            orgId: "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
            shortName: "redhat",
         },
         references: [
            {
               url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260",
            },
            {
               url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492",
            },
            {
               url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/",
            },
         ],
      },
   },
   cveMetadata: {
      assignerOrgId: "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
      assignerShortName: "redhat",
      cveId: "CVE-2022-4492",
      datePublished: "2023-02-23T00:00:00.000Z",
      dateReserved: "2022-12-14T00:00:00.000Z",
      dateUpdated: "2025-03-12T14:34:50.123Z",
      state: "PUBLISHED",
   },
   dataType: "CVE_RECORD",
   dataVersion: "5.1",
   "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
      fkie_nvd: {
         configurations: "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:build_of_quarkus:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"CE29B9D6-63DC-4779-ACE8-4E51E6A0AF37\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_camel_for_spring_boot:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"78698F40-0777-4990-822D-02E1B5D0E2C0\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_camel_k:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"B87C8AD3-8878-4546-86C2-BF411876648C\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_service_registry:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"EF03BDE8-602D-4DEE-BA5B-5B20FDF47741\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"72A54BDA-311C-413B-8E4D-388AD65A170A\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"B40CCE4F-EA2C-453D-BB76-6388767E5C6D\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:migration_toolkit_for_applications:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"3C2E7E3C-A507-4AB2-97E5-4944D8775CF7\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:migration_toolkit_for_runtimes:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"F979A5E3-7FFB-45F1-9847-FFBAF0B12067\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"9EFEC7CA-8DDA-48A6-A7B6-1F1D14792890\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:2.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"E0FA5F7F-CCE8-4DF0-8F9D-516F72C30A45\"}]}]}]",
         descriptions: "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol.\"}]",
         id: "CVE-2022-4492",
         lastModified: "2024-11-21T07:35:22.223",
         metrics: "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 3.6}]}",
         published: "2023-02-23T20:15:12.680",
         references: "[{\"url\": \"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\"}, {\"url\": \"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]",
         sourceIdentifier: "secalert@redhat.com",
         vulnStatus: "Modified",
         weaknesses: "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"NVD-CWE-noinfo\"}]}]",
      },
      nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-4492\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2023-02-23T20:15:12.680\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-03-12T15:15:38.020\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-noinfo\"}]},{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-918\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:build_of_quarkus:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"CE29B9D6-63DC-4779-ACE8-4E51E6A0AF37\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_camel_for_spring_boot:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"78698F40-0777-4990-822D-02E1B5D0E2C0\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_camel_k:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B87C8AD3-8878-4546-86C2-BF411876648C\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_service_registry:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"EF03BDE8-602D-4DEE-BA5B-5B20FDF47741\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"72A54BDA-311C-413B-8E4D-388AD65A170A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B40CCE4F-EA2C-453D-BB76-6388767E5C6D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:migration_toolkit_for_applications:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"3C2E7E3C-A507-4AB2-97E5-4944D8775CF7\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:migration_toolkit_for_runtimes:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F979A5E3-7FFB-45F1-9847-FFBAF0B12067\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9EFEC7CA-8DDA-48A6-A7B6-1F1D14792890\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:2.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E0FA5F7F-CCE8-4DF0-8F9D-516F72C30A45\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}",
      vulnrichment: {
         containers: "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-03T01:41:45.097Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2022-4492\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-03-12T14:33:53.756138Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-918\", \"description\": \"CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-12T14:34:43.639Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"n/a\", \"product\": \"undertow\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"2.7\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260\"}, {\"url\": \"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492\"}, {\"url\": \"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002/\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"text\", \"description\": \"ssrf\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749\", \"shortName\": \"redhat\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2023-03-24T00:00:00.000Z\"}}}",
         cveMetadata: "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2022-4492\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-12T14:34:50.123Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2022-12-14T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749\", \"datePublished\": \"2023-02-23T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"redhat\"}",
         dataType: "CVE_RECORD",
         dataVersion: "5.1",
      },
   },
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.