CVE-2012-5424
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2012-11-07 23:00
Modified
2024-08-06 21:05
Severity ?
Summary
Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) 5.x before 5.2 Patch 11 and 5.3 before 5.3 Patch 7, when a certain configuration involving TACACS+ and LDAP is used, does not properly validate passwords, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending a valid username and a crafted password string, aka Bug ID CSCuc65634.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T21:05:47.240Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "20121107 Cisco Secure Access Control System TACACS+ Authentication Bypass Vulnerability",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_CISCO",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20121107-acs"
          },
          {
            "name": "87251",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_OSVDB",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://osvdb.org/87251"
          },
          {
            "name": "cisco-acs-sec-bypass(79860)",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_XF",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79860"
          },
          {
            "name": "56433",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56433"
          },
          {
            "name": "51194",
            "tags": [
              "third-party-advisory",
              "x_refsource_SECUNIA",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51194"
          },
          {
            "name": "1027733",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_SECTRACK",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027733"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2012-11-07T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) 5.x before 5.2 Patch 11 and 5.3 before 5.3 Patch 7, when a certain configuration involving TACACS+ and LDAP is used, does not properly validate passwords, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending a valid username and a crafted password string, aka Bug ID CSCuc65634."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-08-28T12:57:01",
        "orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
        "shortName": "cisco"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "20121107 Cisco Secure Access Control System TACACS+ Authentication Bypass Vulnerability",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_CISCO"
          ],
          "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20121107-acs"
        },
        {
          "name": "87251",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_OSVDB"
          ],
          "url": "http://osvdb.org/87251"
        },
        {
          "name": "cisco-acs-sec-bypass(79860)",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_XF"
          ],
          "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79860"
        },
        {
          "name": "56433",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56433"
        },
        {
          "name": "51194",
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory",
            "x_refsource_SECUNIA"
          ],
          "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51194"
        },
        {
          "name": "1027733",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_SECTRACK"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027733"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "psirt@cisco.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2012-5424",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) 5.x before 5.2 Patch 11 and 5.3 before 5.3 Patch 7, when a certain configuration involving TACACS+ and LDAP is used, does not properly validate passwords, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending a valid username and a crafted password string, aka Bug ID CSCuc65634."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "20121107 Cisco Secure Access Control System TACACS+ Authentication Bypass Vulnerability",
              "refsource": "CISCO",
              "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20121107-acs"
            },
            {
              "name": "87251",
              "refsource": "OSVDB",
              "url": "http://osvdb.org/87251"
            },
            {
              "name": "cisco-acs-sec-bypass(79860)",
              "refsource": "XF",
              "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79860"
            },
            {
              "name": "56433",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56433"
            },
            {
              "name": "51194",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51194"
            },
            {
              "name": "1027733",
              "refsource": "SECTRACK",
              "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027733"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
    "assignerShortName": "cisco",
    "cveId": "CVE-2012-5424",
    "datePublished": "2012-11-07T23:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2012-10-17T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T21:05:47.240Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_access_control_server:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"B1D9BFE6-C698-493C-98C8-9A3B2962BFB4\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_access_control_server:5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"4095508A-D5DA-4609-82E7-8FA243F08CB6\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_access_control_server:5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"DF26A035-DBF6-4720-82D2-268EF7472F0D\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_access_control_server:5.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"CD5F16F0-84E9-471D-9004-30D3078897DA\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) 5.x before 5.2 Patch 11 and 5.3 before 5.3 Patch 7, when a certain configuration involving TACACS+ and LDAP is used, does not properly validate passwords, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending a valid username and a crafted password string, aka Bug ID CSCuc65634.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) v5.x antes  v5.2 Patch 11 y v5.3 antes de 5.3 Patch 7, cuando se usa una determinada configuraci\\u00f3n que implica TACACS+ y LDAP, no valida correctamente las contrase\\u00f1as, lo que permite a atacantes remotos evitar la autenticaci\\u00f3n mediante el env\\u00edo de un nombre de usuario v\\u00e1lido y una contrase\\u00f1a modificada a mano. Se trata de un problema tambi\\u00e9n conocido como Bug ID CSCuc65634.\\r\\n\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2012-5424",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T01:44:40.700",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2012-11-07T23:55:01.320",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://osvdb.org/87251\", \"source\": \"ykramarz@cisco.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://secunia.com/advisories/51194\", \"source\": \"ykramarz@cisco.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20121107-acs\", \"source\": \"ykramarz@cisco.com\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56433\", \"source\": \"ykramarz@cisco.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027733\", \"source\": \"ykramarz@cisco.com\"}, {\"url\": \"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79860\", \"source\": \"ykramarz@cisco.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://osvdb.org/87251\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://secunia.com/advisories/51194\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20121107-acs\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56433\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027733\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79860\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "ykramarz@cisco.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-20\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2012-5424\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\",\"published\":\"2012-11-07T23:55:01.320\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T01:44:40.700\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) 5.x before 5.2 Patch 11 and 5.3 before 5.3 Patch 7, when a certain configuration involving TACACS+ and LDAP is used, does not properly validate passwords, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending a valid username and a crafted password string, aka Bug ID CSCuc65634.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) v5.x antes  v5.2 Patch 11 y v5.3 antes de 5.3 Patch 7, cuando se usa una determinada configuraci\u00f3n que implica TACACS+ y LDAP, no valida correctamente las contrase\u00f1as, lo que permite a atacantes remotos evitar la autenticaci\u00f3n mediante el env\u00edo de un nombre de usuario v\u00e1lido y una contrase\u00f1a modificada a mano. Se trata de un problema tambi\u00e9n conocido como Bug ID CSCuc65634.\\r\\n\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-20\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_access_control_server:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B1D9BFE6-C698-493C-98C8-9A3B2962BFB4\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_access_control_server:5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"4095508A-D5DA-4609-82E7-8FA243F08CB6\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_access_control_server:5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"DF26A035-DBF6-4720-82D2-268EF7472F0D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_access_control_server:5.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"CD5F16F0-84E9-471D-9004-30D3078897DA\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://osvdb.org/87251\",\"source\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/51194\",\"source\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20121107-acs\",\"source\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56433\",\"source\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027733\",\"source\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79860\",\"source\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://osvdb.org/87251\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/51194\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20121107-acs\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56433\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027733\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79860\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.