CVE-2013-0945 (GCVE-0-2013-0945)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2013-05-03 10:00 – Updated: 2024-09-17 00:50
VLAI?
Summary
EMC Avamar Client before 6.1.101-89 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T14:41:48.475Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "20130502 ESA-2013-035: EMC Avamar Client Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0014.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "EMC Avamar Client before 6.1.101-89 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2013-05-03T10:00:00Z",
        "orgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
        "shortName": "dell"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "20130502 ESA-2013-035: EMC Avamar Client Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0014.html"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security_alert@emc.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2013-0945",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "EMC Avamar Client before 6.1.101-89 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "20130502 ESA-2013-035: EMC Avamar Client Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0014.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
    "assignerShortName": "dell",
    "cveId": "CVE-2013-0945",
    "datePublished": "2013-05-03T10:00:00Z",
    "dateReserved": "2013-01-09T00:00:00Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-17T00:50:49.519Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndIncluding\": \"6.1.101-87\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"36EE497F-10AD-455C-A4F3-10762CBD8FD9\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"012C16C2-8904-4584-8B22-2D311388A7CF\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"3F0D5A62-9AF8-4E4B-A208-7772386794A9\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"56741A4C-2A47-47D5-BA57-73CF24F41267\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0:sp1:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"866AFF0F-F25C-4B11-AAD3-5AE12257CAEF\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0:sp2:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"13D2AF12-9343-4961-9FDE-BEAD12E528B8\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0.0-407:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"A853F02F-67BA-42E6-8D31-78EEA579A7E7\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0.4-26:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"E8F939D7-8E59-426A-8B80-30E6BA7384F4\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"A3ED3F62-A7F2-4E23-9000-1E0FCBC6B5B5\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"EMC Avamar Client before 6.1.101-89 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"EMC Avamar Client anterior a v6.1.101-89 no verifica que el nombre del servidor coincide con un nombre de dominio en el nombre com\\u00fan del sujeto (CN) o el campo subjectAltName del certificado X.509, permitiendo a los atacantes de hombre-en-medio (man-in-the-middle) falsificar servidores SSL mediante un certificado v\\u00e1lido de su elecci\\u00f3n.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2013-0945",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T01:48:30.427",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\", \"baseScore\": 9.3, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"COMPLETE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"COMPLETE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"COMPLETE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 8.6, \"impactScore\": 10.0, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2013-05-03T11:57:44.797",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0014.html\", \"source\": \"security_alert@emc.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0014.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "security_alert@emc.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-20\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2013-0945\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"published\":\"2013-05-03T11:57:44.797\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-11T00:51:21.963\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"EMC Avamar Client before 6.1.101-89 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"EMC Avamar Client anterior a v6.1.101-89 no verifica que el nombre del servidor coincide con un nombre de dominio en el nombre com\u00fan del sujeto (CN) o el campo subjectAltName del certificado X.509, permitiendo a los atacantes de hombre-en-medio (man-in-the-middle) falsificar servidores SSL mediante un certificado v\u00e1lido de su elecci\u00f3n.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\",\"baseScore\":9.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":10.0,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-20\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"6.1.101-87\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"36EE497F-10AD-455C-A4F3-10762CBD8FD9\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"012C16C2-8904-4584-8B22-2D311388A7CF\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"3F0D5A62-9AF8-4E4B-A208-7772386794A9\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"56741A4C-2A47-47D5-BA57-73CF24F41267\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0:sp1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"866AFF0F-F25C-4B11-AAD3-5AE12257CAEF\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0:sp2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"13D2AF12-9343-4961-9FDE-BEAD12E528B8\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0.0-407:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A853F02F-67BA-42E6-8D31-78EEA579A7E7\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:5.0.4-26:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E8F939D7-8E59-426A-8B80-30E6BA7384F4\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:emc:avamar:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A3ED3F62-A7F2-4E23-9000-1E0FCBC6B5B5\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0014.html\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0014.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.