CVE-2015-1473
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2015-04-08 10:00
Modified
2024-08-06 04:47
Severity ?
Summary
The ADDW macro in stdio-common/vfscanf.c in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.21 does not properly consider data-type size during a risk-management decision for use of the alloca function, which might allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation violation) or overwrite memory locations beyond the stack boundary via a long line containing wide characters that are improperly handled in a wscanf call.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/02/04/1
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72499
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2519-1
cve@mitre.orghttps://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=5bd80bfe9ca0d955bfbbc002781bc7b01b6bcb06
Impacted products
n/an/a
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T04:47:16.189Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "USN-2519-1",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_UBUNTU",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2519-1"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=5bd80bfe9ca0d955bfbbc002781bc7b01b6bcb06"
          },
          {
            "name": "72499",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72499"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20150203 Re: CVE request: heap buffer overflow in glibc swscanf",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/02/04/1"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2015-02-03T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The ADDW macro in stdio-common/vfscanf.c in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.21 does not properly consider data-type size during a risk-management decision for use of the alloca function, which might allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation violation) or overwrite memory locations beyond the stack boundary via a long line containing wide characters that are improperly handled in a wscanf call."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2016-11-25T19:57:01",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "USN-2519-1",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_UBUNTU"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2519-1"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=5bd80bfe9ca0d955bfbbc002781bc7b01b6bcb06"
        },
        {
          "name": "72499",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72499"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20150203 Re: CVE request: heap buffer overflow in glibc swscanf",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/02/04/1"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2015-1473",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The ADDW macro in stdio-common/vfscanf.c in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.21 does not properly consider data-type size during a risk-management decision for use of the alloca function, which might allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation violation) or overwrite memory locations beyond the stack boundary via a long line containing wide characters that are improperly handled in a wscanf call."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "USN-2519-1",
              "refsource": "UBUNTU",
              "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2519-1"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=5bd80bfe9ca0d955bfbbc002781bc7b01b6bcb06",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=5bd80bfe9ca0d955bfbbc002781bc7b01b6bcb06"
            },
            {
              "name": "72499",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72499"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20150203 Re: CVE request: heap buffer overflow in glibc swscanf",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/02/04/1"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2015-1473",
    "datePublished": "2015-04-08T10:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2015-02-03T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T04:47:16.189Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2015-1473\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2015-04-08T10:59:03.627\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-11-07T02:24:49.967\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The ADDW macro in stdio-common/vfscanf.c in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.21 does not properly consider data-type size during a risk-management decision for use of the alloca function, which might allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation violation) or overwrite memory locations beyond the stack boundary via a long line containing wide characters that are improperly handled in a wscanf call.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"El macro ADDW en stdio-common/vfscanf.c en la librar\u00eda GNU C (tambi\u00e9n conocida como glibc o libc6) anterior a 2.21 no considera correctamente el tama\u00f1o de tipos de datos durante una decisi\u00f3n de la gesti\u00f3n de riesgos para utilizar en la funci\u00f3n alloca, lo que podr\u00eda permitir atacantes dependientes de contexto causar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (violaci\u00f3n de segmentaci\u00f3n) o sobrescribir localizaciones de memoria m\u00e1s all\u00e1 del l\u00edmite de la pila a trav\u00e9s de una l\u00ednea larga que contiene caracateres anchas que se manejen incorrectamente en una llamada wscanf.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P\",\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"baseScore\":6.4},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":4.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:10.04:*:*:*:lts:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5D37DF0F-F863-45AC-853A-3E04F9FEC7CA\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:12.04:*:*:*:lts:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B6B7CAD7-9D4E-4FDB-88E3-1E583210A01F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:14.04:*:*:*:lts:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B5A6F2F3-4894-4392-8296-3B8DD2679084\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:14.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"49A63F39-30BE-443F-AF10-6245587D3359\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:gnu:glibc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"2.20\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"AA913F6A-63A0-468F-A0E0-66748E337246\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/02/04/1\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72499\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2519-1\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=5bd80bfe9ca0d955bfbbc002781bc7b01b6bcb06\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.