CVE-2015-4321
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2015-08-20 10:00
Modified
2024-08-06 06:11
Severity ?
Summary
The Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(1.50), 9.3(2.100), 9.3(3), and 9.4(1) mishandles cases where an IP address belongs to an internal interface but is also in the ASA routing table, which allows remote attackers to bypass uRPF validation via spoofed packets, aka Bug ID CSCuv60724.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T06:11:12.892Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "1033265",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_SECTRACK",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033265"
          },
          {
            "name": "20150812 Cisco ASA Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) Bypass Vulnerability",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_CISCO",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=40440"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2015-08-12T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(1.50), 9.3(2.100), 9.3(3), and 9.4(1) mishandles cases where an IP address belongs to an internal interface but is also in the ASA routing table, which allows remote attackers to bypass uRPF validation via spoofed packets, aka Bug ID CSCuv60724."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-09-20T09:57:01",
        "orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
        "shortName": "cisco"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "1033265",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_SECTRACK"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033265"
        },
        {
          "name": "20150812 Cisco ASA Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) Bypass Vulnerability",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_CISCO"
          ],
          "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=40440"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "psirt@cisco.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2015-4321",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(1.50), 9.3(2.100), 9.3(3), and 9.4(1) mishandles cases where an IP address belongs to an internal interface but is also in the ASA routing table, which allows remote attackers to bypass uRPF validation via spoofed packets, aka Bug ID CSCuv60724."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "1033265",
              "refsource": "SECTRACK",
              "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033265"
            },
            {
              "name": "20150812 Cisco ASA Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) Bypass Vulnerability",
              "refsource": "CISCO",
              "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=40440"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
    "assignerShortName": "cisco",
    "cveId": "CVE-2015-4321",
    "datePublished": "2015-08-20T10:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2015-06-04T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T06:11:12.892Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2015-4321\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\",\"published\":\"2015-08-20T10:59:09.950\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T02:30:49.733\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(1.50), 9.3(2.100), 9.3(3), and 9.4(1) mishandles cases where an IP address belongs to an internal interface but is also in the ASA routing table, which allows remote attackers to bypass uRPF validation via spoofed packets, aka Bug ID CSCuv60724.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Vulnerabilidad en la implementaci\u00f3n Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) en Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(1.50), 9.3(2.100), 9.3(3) y 9.4(1), no maneja correctamente casos en los que una direcci\u00f3n IP pertenece a una interfaz interna pero tambi\u00e9n est\u00e1 en la tabla ASA de enrutamiento, lo que permite a atacantes remotos eludir la validaci\u00f3n uRPF a trav\u00e9s de paquetes suplantados, tambi\u00e9n conocida como Bug ID CSCuv60724.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-20\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.3\\\\(1.50\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1E044883-9952-477A-B2AA-3E0BB90C96A0\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.3\\\\(2.100\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6F4A28B7-87A2-464A-92A8-644E3F7D13D7\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.3\\\\(3\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"63FECF84-4FFB-443E-8529-A1FA4D1D821C\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.4\\\\(1\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B854F299-3798-41E7-9C02-17729B75B01C\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=40440\",\"source\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033265\",\"source\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=40440\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033265\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.