CVE-2016-0891
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2016-04-20 17:00
Modified
2024-08-05 22:38
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T22:38:39.956Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "name": "20160427 EMC M\u0026R (Watch4net) lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery protection", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538207/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "39738", "tags": [ "exploit", "x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39738/" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html" }, { "name": "20160427 EMC M\u0026R (Watch4net) lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery protection", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_FULLDISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/89" }, { "name": "20160419 ESA-2016-039: EMC ViPR SRM Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerabilities", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/106" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2016-04-19T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2018-10-09T18:57:01", "orgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe", "shortName": "dell" }, "references": [ { "name": "20160427 EMC M\u0026R (Watch4net) lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery protection", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538207/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "39738", "tags": [ "exploit", "x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB" ], "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39738/" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html" }, { "name": "20160427 EMC M\u0026R (Watch4net) lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery protection", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_FULLDISC" ], "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/89" }, { "name": "20160419 ESA-2016-039: EMC ViPR SRM Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerabilities", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ" ], "url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/106" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "security_alert@emc.com", "ID": "CVE-2016-0891", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "20160427 EMC M\u0026R (Watch4net) lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery protection", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538207/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "39738", "refsource": "EXPLOIT-DB", "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39738/" }, { "name": "https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html" }, { "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html" }, { "name": "20160427 EMC M\u0026R (Watch4net) lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery protection", "refsource": "FULLDISC", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/89" }, { "name": "20160419 ESA-2016-039: EMC ViPR SRM Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerabilities", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/106" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe", "assignerShortName": "dell", "cveId": "CVE-2016-0891", "datePublished": "2016-04-20T17:00:00", "dateReserved": "2015-12-17T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T22:38:39.956Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-0891\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"published\":\"2016-04-20T17:59:00.150\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T02:42:34.913\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"M\u00faltiples vulnerabilidades de CSRF en p\u00e1ginas administrativas en EMC ViPR SRM en versiones anteriores a 3.7 permiten a atacantes remotos secuestrar la autenticaci\u00f3n de administradores.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":6.8,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-352\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:emc:vipr_srm:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"3.6.4\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5BA1447F-A2BA-41CD-93D7-A22776318347\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/106\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/89\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538207/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39738/\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/106\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/89\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538207/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39738/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.