CVE-2016-10517
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2017-10-24 18:00
Modified
2024-08-06 03:21
Severity ?
Summary
networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows "Cross Protocol Scripting" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port).
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T03:21:52.170Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES"
          },
          {
            "name": "101572",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2017-10-24T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows \"Cross Protocol Scripting\" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port)."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-10-26T09:57:01",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES"
        },
        {
          "name": "101572",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2016-10517",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows \"Cross Protocol Scripting\" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port)."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES"
            },
            {
              "name": "101572",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2016-10517",
    "datePublished": "2017-10-24T18:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2017-10-24T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T03:21:52.170Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"3.2.7\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"F4EB7067-58F6-49EF-A33D-E873007D2383\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows \\\"Cross Protocol Scripting\\\" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port).\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"networking.c en Redis en versiones anteriores a la 3.2.7 permite Cross Protocol Scripting porque carece de un control para cadenas POST y Host: que no son v\\u00e1lidas en el protocolo Redis (pero suele ocurrir cuando un ataque desencadena una petici\\u00f3n HTTP al puerto TCP de Redis).\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2016-10517",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:44:11.130",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV30\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 7.4, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.8, \"impactScore\": 4.0}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 4.3, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 8.6, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": true}]}",
      "published": "2017-10-24T18:29:00.197",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-254\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-10517\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2017-10-24T18:29:00.197\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T02:44:11.130\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows \\\"Cross Protocol Scripting\\\" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port).\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"networking.c en Redis en versiones anteriores a la 3.2.7 permite Cross Protocol Scripting porque carece de un control para cadenas POST y Host: que no son v\u00e1lidas en el protocolo Redis (pero suele ocurrir cuando un ataque desencadena una petici\u00f3n HTTP al puerto TCP de Redis).\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.4,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":4.0}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-254\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.2.7\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F4EB7067-58F6-49EF-A33D-E873007D2383\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.