CVE-2022-1319
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2022-08-31 00:00
Modified
2024-08-03 00:03
Severity ?
Summary
A flaw was found in Undertow. For an AJP 400 response, EAP 7 is improperly sending two response packets, and those packets have the reuse flag set even though JBoss EAP closes the connection. A failure occurs when the connection is reused after a 400 by CPING since it reads in the second SEND_HEADERS response packet instead of a CPONG.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1319Vendor Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073890Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/1443a1a2bbb8e32e56788109d8285db250d55c8bPatch, Third Party Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/7c5b3ab885b5638fd3f1e8a935d5063d68aa2df3Patch, Third Party Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-2060Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221014-0006/Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
n/aundertow
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T00:03:05.119Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073890"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-2060"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/1443a1a2bbb8e32e56788109d8285db250d55c8b"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/7c5b3ab885b5638fd3f1e8a935d5063d68aa2df3"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1319"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221014-0006/"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "undertow",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "Fixed in 2.3.0.Final, 2.2.18.Final, 2.2.17.SP3, 2.2.17.SP4, 2.3.0.Alpha2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A flaw was found in Undertow. For an AJP 400 response, EAP 7 is improperly sending two response packets, and those packets have the reuse flag set even though JBoss EAP closes the connection. A failure occurs when the connection is reused after a 400 by CPING since it reads in the second SEND_HEADERS response packet instead of a CPONG."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-252",
              "description": "CWE-252 - Unchecked Return Value.",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2022-10-14T00:00:00",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073890"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-2060"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/1443a1a2bbb8e32e56788109d8285db250d55c8b"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/7c5b3ab885b5638fd3f1e8a935d5063d68aa2df3"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1319"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221014-0006/"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-1319",
    "datePublished": "2022-08-31T00:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2022-04-12T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T00:03:05.119Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-1319\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2022-08-31T16:15:09.410\",\"lastModified\":\"2022-11-07T19:09:46.767\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A flaw was found in Undertow. For an AJP 400 response, EAP 7 is improperly sending two response packets, and those packets have the reuse flag set even though JBoss EAP closes the connection. A failure occurs when the connection is reused after a 400 by CPING since it reads in the second SEND_HEADERS response packet instead of a CPONG.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se ha encontrado un fallo en Undertow. Para una respuesta AJP 400, EAP 7 env\u00eda inapropiadamente el flag de re\u00faso habilitado aunque JBoss EAP cierra la conexi\u00f3n. es producido un fallo cuando la conexi\u00f3n es reusada despu\u00e9s de un 400 por CPING ya que lee en el segundo paquete de respuesta SEND_HEADERS en lugar de un CPONG\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-252\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-252\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_application_runtimes:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A33441B3-B301-426C-A976-08CE5FE72EFB\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9EFEC7CA-8DDA-48A6-A7B6-1F1D14792890\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.2.17\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B1470237-30DB-4A05-8148-621CEE66EA57\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:2.2.17:-:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"FB2B656E-2229-4D16-B063-4D9456AEBF63\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:2.2.17:sp1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"04CA521E-1B46-44FB-AA69-309AC53A360A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:2.2.17:sp2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"005FB2BF-CF38-4F91-A24B-96D72222192C\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:2.2.19:-:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"269ECD35-C644-4B04-AAD3-D88F97CF0214\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:2.2.19:sp1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C0692735-244D-415B-894C-1A64E0307FC4\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:2.3.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F6DD3DE4-9C5D-4768-9414-C63D1D172B7F\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager:-:*:*:*:*:linux:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F3E0B672-3E06-4422-B2A4-0BD073AEC2A1\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager:-:*:*:*:*:vmware_vsphere:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"3A756737-1CC4-42C2-A4DF-E1C893B4E2D5\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager:-:*:*:*:*:windows:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B55E8D50-99B4-47EC-86F9-699B67D473CE\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:cloud_secure_agent:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F0F202E8-97E6-4BBB-A0B6-4CA3F5803C08\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:oncommand_insight:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F1BE6C1F-2565-4E97-92AA-16563E5660A5\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:oncommand_workflow_automation:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5735E553-9731-4AAC-BCFF-989377F817B3\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1319\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073890\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/1443a1a2bbb8e32e56788109d8285db250d55c8b\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/7c5b3ab885b5638fd3f1e8a935d5063d68aa2df3\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-2060\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221014-0006/\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.