GHSA-5R46-Q4X7-6FX6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-09-01 00:00 – Updated: 2022-09-08 00:00
VLAI?
Details
A flaw was found in Undertow. For an AJP 400 response, EAP 7 is improperly sending two response packets, and those packets have the reuse flag set even though JBoss EAP closes the connection. A failure occurs when the connection is reused after a 400 by CPING since it reads in the second SEND_HEADERS response packet instead of a CPONG.
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-1319"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-252"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-08-31T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A flaw was found in Undertow. For an AJP 400 response, EAP 7 is improperly sending two response packets, and those packets have the reuse flag set even though JBoss EAP closes the connection. A failure occurs when the connection is reused after a 400 by CPING since it reads in the second SEND_HEADERS response packet instead of a CPONG.",
"id": "GHSA-5r46-q4x7-6fx6",
"modified": "2022-09-08T00:00:33Z",
"published": "2022-09-01T00:00:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1319"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/1443a1a2bbb8e32e56788109d8285db250d55c8b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/7c5b3ab885b5638fd3f1e8a935d5063d68aa2df3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1319"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073890"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-2060"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221014-0006"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…