CVE-2022-31170 (GCVE-0-2022-31170)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-07-21 14:00 – Updated: 2025-04-23 17:57
VLAI?
Summary
OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
CWE
- CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenZeppelin | openzeppelin-contracts |
Affected:
>= 4.0.0, < 4.7.1
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T07:11:39.603Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-31170",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T15:53:10.305026Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T17:57:25.929Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "openzeppelin-contracts",
"vendor": "OpenZeppelin",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.7.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"description": "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-07-21T14:00:18.000Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": " OpenZeppelin Contracts\u0027s ERC165Checker may revert instead of returning false",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-31170",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": " OpenZeppelin Contracts\u0027s ERC165Checker may revert instead of returning false"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "openzeppelin-contracts",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.7.1"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "OpenZeppelin"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-31170",
"datePublished": "2022-07-21T14:00:18.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-05-18T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T17:57:25.929Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:openzeppelin:contracts:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"4.0.0\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"4.7.1\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"37EC35C6-64E1-4FA6-BFEC-F476BA5BAD51\"}]}]}]",
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"OpenZeppelin Contracts es una biblioteca para el desarrollo de contratos inteligentes. Las versiones 4.0.0 hasta 4.7.1, son vulnerables a una reversi\\u00f3n de ERC165Checker en lugar de devolver \\\"false\\\". ERC165Checker.supportsInterface est\\u00e1 dise\\u00f1ado para devolver siempre un booleano con \\u00e9xito, y bajo ninguna circunstancia revertir. Sin embargo, una suposici\\u00f3n incorrecta sobre \\\"abi.decode\\\" de Solidity versi\\u00f3n 0.8 permite que algunos casos sean revertidos, dado un contrato de destino que no implementa EIP-165 como es esperado, espec\\u00edficamente si devuelve un valor distinto de 0 o 1. Los contratos que pueden verse afectados son los que usan \\\"ERC165Checker\\\" para comprobar el soporte de una interfaz y luego manejar la falta de soporte de una manera distinta a la reversi\\u00f3n. El problema fue parcheado en versi\\u00f3n 4.7.1\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2022-31170",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T07:04:02.930",
"metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 3.6}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 3.6}]}",
"published": "2022-07-22T04:15:14.547",
"references": "[{\"url\": \"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-20\"}]}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-252\"}]}]"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-31170\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2022-07-22T04:15:14.547\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T07:04:02.930\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"OpenZeppelin Contracts es una biblioteca para el desarrollo de contratos inteligentes. Las versiones 4.0.0 hasta 4.7.1, son vulnerables a una reversi\u00f3n de ERC165Checker en lugar de devolver \\\"false\\\". ERC165Checker.supportsInterface est\u00e1 dise\u00f1ado para devolver siempre un booleano con \u00e9xito, y bajo ninguna circunstancia revertir. Sin embargo, una suposici\u00f3n incorrecta sobre \\\"abi.decode\\\" de Solidity versi\u00f3n 0.8 permite que algunos casos sean revertidos, dado un contrato de destino que no implementa EIP-165 como es esperado, espec\u00edficamente si devuelve un valor distinto de 0 o 1. Los contratos que pueden verse afectados son los que usan \\\"ERC165Checker\\\" para comprobar el soporte de una interfaz y luego manejar la falta de soporte de una manera distinta a la reversi\u00f3n. El problema fue parcheado en versi\u00f3n 4.7.1\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-20\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-252\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openzeppelin:contracts:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.7.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"37EC35C6-64E1-4FA6-BFEC-F476BA5BAD51\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"cna\": {\"affected\": [{\"product\": \"openzeppelin-contracts\", \"vendor\": \"OpenZeppelin\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.7.1\"}]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\", \"version\": \"3.1\"}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"cweId\": \"CWE-20\", \"description\": \"CWE-20: Improper Input Validation\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"dateUpdated\": \"2022-07-21T14:00:18.000Z\", \"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}, \"references\": [{\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw\"}], \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"title\": \" OpenZeppelin Contracts\u0027s ERC165Checker may revert instead of returning false\", \"x_legacyV4Record\": {\"CVE_data_meta\": {\"ASSIGNER\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"ID\": \"CVE-2022-31170\", \"STATE\": \"PUBLIC\", \"TITLE\": \" OpenZeppelin Contracts\u0027s ERC165Checker may revert instead of returning false\"}, \"affects\": {\"vendor\": {\"vendor_data\": [{\"product\": {\"product_data\": [{\"product_name\": \"openzeppelin-contracts\", \"version\": {\"version_data\": [{\"version_value\": \"\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.7.1\"}]}}]}, \"vendor_name\": \"OpenZeppelin\"}]}}, \"data_format\": \"MITRE\", \"data_type\": \"CVE\", \"data_version\": \"4.0\", \"description\": {\"description_data\": [{\"lang\": \"eng\", \"value\": \"OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.\"}]}, \"impact\": {\"cvss\": {\"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\", \"version\": \"3.1\"}}, \"problemtype\": {\"problemtype_data\": [{\"description\": [{\"lang\": \"eng\", \"value\": \"CWE-20: Improper Input Validation\"}]}]}, \"references\": {\"reference_data\": [{\"name\": \"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552\", \"refsource\": \"MISC\", \"url\": \"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw\", \"refsource\": \"CONFIRM\", \"url\": \"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw\"}]}, \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}}}, \"adp\": [{\"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-03T07:11:39.603Z\"}, \"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\", \"x_transferred\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw\"}]}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2022-31170\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-04-23T15:53:10.305026Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-04-23T15:53:11.823Z\"}}]}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"cveId\": \"CVE-2022-31170\", \"datePublished\": \"2022-07-21T14:00:18.000Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2022-05-18T00:00:00.000Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-04-23T17:57:25.929Z\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…