GSD-2022-31170

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:19
Details
OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2022-31170
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2022-31170",
    "description": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.",
    "id": "GSD-2022-31170"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2022-31170"
      ],
      "details": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.",
      "id": "GSD-2022-31170",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:17.816733Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "ID": "CVE-2022-31170",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC",
        "TITLE": " OpenZeppelin Contracts\u0027s ERC165Checker may revert instead of returning false"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "openzeppelin-contracts",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.7.1"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "OpenZeppelin"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1."
          }
        ]
      },
      "impact": {
        "cvss": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        }
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
          }
        ]
      },
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      }
    },
    "gitlab.com": {
      "advisories": [
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003e=4.0.0 \u003c4.7.1",
          "affected_versions": "All versions starting from 4.0.0 before 4.7.1",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-20",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2022-07-21",
          "description": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 is vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that does not implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.",
          "fixed_versions": [
            "4.7.1"
          ],
          "identifier": "CVE-2022-31170",
          "identifiers": [
            "GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
            "CVE-2022-31170"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "All versions before 4.0.0, all versions starting from 4.7.1",
          "package_slug": "npm/@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable",
          "pubdate": "2022-07-21",
          "solution": "Upgrade to version 4.7.1 or above.",
          "title": "Improper Input Validation",
          "urls": [
            "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
            "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552",
            "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
          ],
          "uuid": "2cc01cf5-ed15-485d-8b82-8134e2153b6b"
        },
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003e=4.0.0 \u003c4.7.1",
          "affected_versions": "All versions starting from 4.0.0 before 4.7.1",
          "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-252",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2022-08-01",
          "description": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 is vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that does not implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.",
          "fixed_versions": [
            "4.7.1"
          ],
          "identifier": "CVE-2022-31170",
          "identifiers": [
            "CVE-2022-31170",
            "GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "All versions before 4.0.0, all versions starting from 4.7.1",
          "package_slug": "npm/@openzeppelin/contracts",
          "pubdate": "2022-07-22",
          "solution": "Upgrade to version 4.7.1 or above.",
          "title": "Improper Input Validation",
          "urls": [
            "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
            "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552",
            "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
          ],
          "uuid": "2fbdc191-e99c-412f-bd0f-1531b418d051"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:openzeppelin:contracts:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "4.7.1",
                "versionStartIncluding": "4.0.0",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2022-31170"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-252"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
          "impactScore": 3.6
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2022-08-01T15:50Z",
      "publishedDate": "2022-07-22T04:15Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.