Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2023-52843 (GCVE-0-2023-52843)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-05-21 15:31 – Updated: 2026-05-11 19:34| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 , < 900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535
(git)
Affected: f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 , < 9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c (git) Affected: f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 , < cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f (git) Affected: f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 , < 3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779 (git) Affected: f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 , < 352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b (git) Affected: f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 , < f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29 (git) Affected: f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 , < 0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a (git) Affected: f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 , < ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79 (git) Affected: f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 , < 7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
2.6.25
Unaffected: 0 , < 2.6.25 (semver) Unaffected: 4.14.330 , ≤ 4.14.* (semver) Unaffected: 4.19.299 , ≤ 4.19.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.4.261 , ≤ 5.4.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.201 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.139 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.63 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.5.12 , ≤ 6.5.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.2 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.7 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52843",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-17T18:03:39.566045Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-17T18:04:29.081Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T23:11:36.182Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/llc/llc_input.c",
"net/llc/llc_s_ac.c",
"net/llc/llc_station.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/llc/llc_input.c",
"net/llc/llc_s_ac.c",
"net/llc/llc_station.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.25"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.25",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.14.330",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.299",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.261",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.201",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.139",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.63",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.7",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.14.330",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.25",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.299",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.25",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.261",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.25",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.201",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.25",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.139",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.25",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.63",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.25",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.25",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.25",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.7",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.25",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nllc: verify mac len before reading mac header\n\nLLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb\nhas an Ethernet header.\n\nSyzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert\npackets without mac len and with user configurable skb-\u003eprotocol\n(passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).\n\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782\n tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555\n tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\n\nAdd a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.\n\nThere are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are\nprotected by a test skb-\u003eprotocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not\nprotect against this tun scenario.\n\nBut the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will\nindirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any\nother LLC code.\n\nIt is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but\nnot sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume\nan Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3\nprotocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used\nto, on top of Token Ring.\n\nAt least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start\nof git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in\nthis commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all\nstable kernels should receive this."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T19:34:05.834Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b"
}
],
"title": "llc: verify mac len before reading mac header",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-52843",
"datePublished": "2024-05-21T15:31:41.872Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-21T15:19:24.254Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T19:34:05.834Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2023-52843",
"date": "2026-09-25",
"epss": "0.00245",
"percentile": "0.1407"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nllc: verify mac len before reading mac header\n\nLLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb\nhas an Ethernet header.\n\nSyzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert\npackets without mac len and with user configurable skb-\u003eprotocol\n(passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).\n\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782\n tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555\n tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\n\nAdd a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.\n\nThere are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are\nprotected by a test skb-\u003eprotocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not\nprotect against this tun scenario.\n\nBut the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will\nindirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any\nother LLC code.\n\nIt is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but\nnot sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume\nan Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3\nprotocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used\nto, on top of Token Ring.\n\nAt least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start\nof git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in\nthis commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all\nstable kernels should receive this."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: llc: verificar mac len antes de leer el encabezado de mac. LLC lee el encabezado de mac con eth_hdr sin verificar que el skb tenga un encabezado de Ethernet. Syzbot pudo ingresar llc_rcv en un dispositivo tun. Tun puede insertar paquetes sin mac len y con el protocolo skb-\u0026gt; configurable por el usuario (pasando un encabezado tun_pi cuando no se configura IFF_NO_PI). ERROR: KMSAN: valor uninit en llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [en l\u00ednea] BUG: KMSAN: valor uninit en llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111 llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station. c:81 [en l\u00ednea] llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111 llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 __netif_receive_skb+ 0x1a6 /0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637 netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [en l\u00ednea] netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782 tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c :1555 tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002 Agregue una prueba mac_len antes de las tres llamadas eth_hdr(skb) en net/llc. Hay m\u00e1s usos en include/net/llc_pdu.h. Todos estos est\u00e1n protegidos por un protocolo de prueba skb-\u0026gt;== ETH_P_802_2. Lo cual no protege contra este escenario tun. Pero la prueba mac_len agregada en este parche en llc_fixup_skb tambi\u00e9n los proteger\u00e1 indirectamente. Esto se llama desde llc_rcv antes que cualquier otro c\u00f3digo LLC. Es tentador simplemente agregar una verificaci\u00f3n general de mac_len en llc_rcv, pero no estoy seguro de si eso podr\u00eda interrumpir las rutas LLC v\u00e1lidas que no asumen un encabezado Ethernet. En principio, 802.2 LLC se puede utilizar adem\u00e1s de protocolos que no sean 802.3. La confirmaci\u00f3n a la que se hace referencia a continuaci\u00f3n muestra que sol\u00eda hacerlo, adem\u00e1s de Token Ring. Al menos uno de los tres usos de eth_hdr se remonta a antes del inicio del historial de git. Pero el que ejercita syzbot se introduce en este compromiso. Ese compromiso es lo suficientemente antiguo (2008), por lo que efectivamente todos los n\u00facleos estables deber\u00edan recibirlo."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52843",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T08:40:42.263",
"published": "2024-05-21T16:15:21.583",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/llc/llc_input.c",
"net/llc/llc_s_ac.c",
"net/llc/llc_station.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/llc/llc_input.c",
"net/llc/llc_s_ac.c",
"net/llc/llc_station.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.25"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.25",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.14.330",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.299",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.261",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.201",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.139",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.63",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.7",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "27D3D16C-672A-402A-9106-A656DCD153CA",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.14.330",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.26",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F51D1457-86F8-4A6C-A7B9-323058B3C5E8",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.299",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.15",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "286E50BB-5A21-49BA-A6E5-526C72ADFE34",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.261",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "AF1ADC4E-CCC4-498A-876F-5136DDD36C1D",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.201",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "81424D14-B38F-47B3-A1B8-BC3B60BB96EA",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.139",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "80E1EA7E-2788-466C-9FFB-34AFA1B052F0",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.63",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "825F64D9-E99F-49AA-8A7B-EF7C2965C5B2",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4CBFF885-A4D3-4F21-B6FD-4D770034C048",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F650D09A-41EA-4EB5-925B-F2146E8DDF2A",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc9:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8957EE27-E19A-4DE6-B46D-FE413E88BD93",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nllc: verify mac len before reading mac header\n\nLLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb\nhas an Ethernet header.\n\nSyzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert\npackets without mac len and with user configurable skb-\u003eprotocol\n(passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).\n\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782\n tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555\n tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\n\nAdd a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.\n\nThere are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are\nprotected by a test skb-\u003eprotocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not\nprotect against this tun scenario.\n\nBut the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will\nindirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any\nother LLC code.\n\nIt is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but\nnot sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume\nan Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3\nprotocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used\nto, on top of Token Ring.\n\nAt least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start\nof git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in\nthis commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all\nstable kernels should receive this."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: llc: verificar mac len antes de leer el encabezado de mac. LLC lee el encabezado de mac con eth_hdr sin verificar que el skb tenga un encabezado de Ethernet. Syzbot pudo ingresar llc_rcv en un dispositivo tun. Tun puede insertar paquetes sin mac len y con el protocolo skb-\u0026gt; configurable por el usuario (pasando un encabezado tun_pi cuando no se configura IFF_NO_PI). ERROR: KMSAN: valor uninit en llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [en l\u00ednea] BUG: KMSAN: valor uninit en llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111 llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station. c:81 [en l\u00ednea] llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111 llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 __netif_receive_skb+ 0x1a6 /0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637 netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [en l\u00ednea] netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782 tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c :1555 tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002 Agregue una prueba mac_len antes de las tres llamadas eth_hdr(skb) en net/llc. Hay m\u00e1s usos en include/net/llc_pdu.h. Todos estos est\u00e1n protegidos por un protocolo de prueba skb-\u0026gt;== ETH_P_802_2. Lo cual no protege contra este escenario tun. Pero la prueba mac_len agregada en este parche en llc_fixup_skb tambi\u00e9n los proteger\u00e1 indirectamente. Esto se llama desde llc_rcv antes que cualquier otro c\u00f3digo LLC. Es tentador simplemente agregar una verificaci\u00f3n general de mac_len en llc_rcv, pero no estoy seguro de si eso podr\u00eda interrumpir las rutas LLC v\u00e1lidas que no asumen un encabezado Ethernet. En principio, 802.2 LLC se puede utilizar adem\u00e1s de protocolos que no sean 802.3. La confirmaci\u00f3n a la que se hace referencia a continuaci\u00f3n muestra que sol\u00eda hacerlo, adem\u00e1s de Token Ring. Al menos uno de los tres usos de eth_hdr se remonta a antes del inicio del historial de git. Pero el que ejercita syzbot se introduce en este compromiso. Ese compromiso es lo suficientemente antiguo (2008), por lo que efectivamente todos los n\u00facleos estables deber\u00edan recibirlo."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52843",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T06:43:42.743",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52843",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-17T18:03:39.566045Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-21T16:15:21.583",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-908"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2025-11-21T10:54:51+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2023-52843",
"id": "CVE-2023-52843",
"initial_release_date": "2023-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "198",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: llc: verify mac len before reading mac header",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2023/cve-2023-52843.json",
"version": "3"
},
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-12T17:06:43Z",
"cve": "CVE-2023-52843",
"id": "CVE-2023-52843",
"initial_release_date": "2024-05-23T02:56:43Z",
"product_status:known_affected": "626",
"product_status:recommended": "735",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2023-52843.json",
"version": "104"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T23:11:36.182Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52843",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-17T18:03:39.566045Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-17T18:03:40.724Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/llc/llc_input.c",
"net/llc/llc_s_ac.c",
"net/llc/llc_station.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/llc/llc_input.c",
"net/llc/llc_s_ac.c",
"net/llc/llc_station.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.25"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.25",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.14.330",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.299",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.261",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.201",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.139",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.63",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.7",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nllc: verify mac len before reading mac header\n\nLLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb\nhas an Ethernet header.\n\nSyzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert\npackets without mac len and with user configurable skb-\u003eprotocol\n(passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).\n\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782\n tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555\n tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\n\nAdd a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.\n\nThere are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are\nprotected by a test skb-\u003eprotocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not\nprotect against this tun scenario.\n\nBut the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will\nindirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any\nother LLC code.\n\nIt is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but\nnot sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume\nan Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3\nprotocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used\nto, on top of Token Ring.\n\nAt least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start\nof git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in\nthis commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all\nstable kernels should receive this."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-19T08:27:02.074Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b"
}
],
"title": "llc: verify mac len before reading mac header",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-5f407fcff5a0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-52843",
"datePublished": "2024-05-21T15:31:41.872Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-21T15:19:24.254Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-19T08:27:02.074Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0632
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et un déni de service.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Basesystem Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Public Cloud Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Legacy Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Development Tools Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Basesystem Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Legacy Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Development Tools Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0632",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-07-26T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es, un contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 et un d\u00e9ni de service.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-07-22",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2575-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242575-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-07-22",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2585-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242585-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-07-22",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2571-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242571-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une élévation de privilèges et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | Basesystem Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Development Tools Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Legacy Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Public Cloud Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE 11-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 Business Critical Linux 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP4 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Basesystem Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Development Tools Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Legacy Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE 11-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 Business Critical Linux 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-269355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-269355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-20022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-20022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42230"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-08-16T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-08-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2911-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242911-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2894-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242894-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2892-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242892-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-15",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2923-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242923-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2939-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242939-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-15",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2929-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242929-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2902-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242902-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2895-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242895-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2874-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242874-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2896-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242896-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2893-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242893-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2901-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242901-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-269355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-269355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42230"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-08-23T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2980-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242980-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2940-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242940-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2944-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242944-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2943-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242943-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2948-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242948-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2973-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242973-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2947-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242947-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions antérieures à V6.0 SP1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIPROTEC 5 versions antérieures à 10.0 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions antérieures à V3.19 P020 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions antérieures à 4.0.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions antérieures à V3.18 P032 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions antérieures à 5.2.1.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-40759. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions antérieures à V3.20 P008 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.3 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions antérieures à 4.78 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions antérieures à V20 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions antérieures à V7.0 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous modèles exceptés 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-52504. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions antérieures à V8.1 Update 3 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V6.0 SP1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIPROTEC 5 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.19 P020",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.0.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.18 P032",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 5.2.1.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-40759.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.20 P008",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.78",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V20 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V7.0 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous mod\u00e8les except\u00e9s 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-52504. ",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V8.1 Update 3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53227"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-08-12T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits Siemens",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-707630",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-707630.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-331739",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-331739.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-693808",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-693808.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-613116",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493396",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493396.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens ssa-400089",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-400089.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493787",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493787.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-894058",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-894058.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-355557",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-529291",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-529291.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-282044",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-282044.html"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2023-52843
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-05-21 16:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 06:43| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 2.6.25 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 2.6.25 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/llc/llc_input.c",
"net/llc/llc_s_ac.c",
"net/llc/llc_station.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/llc/llc_input.c",
"net/llc/llc_s_ac.c",
"net/llc/llc_station.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.25"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.25",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.14.330",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.299",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.261",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.201",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.139",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.63",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.7",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "27D3D16C-672A-402A-9106-A656DCD153CA",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.14.330",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.26",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F51D1457-86F8-4A6C-A7B9-323058B3C5E8",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.299",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.15",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "286E50BB-5A21-49BA-A6E5-526C72ADFE34",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.261",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "AF1ADC4E-CCC4-498A-876F-5136DDD36C1D",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.201",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "81424D14-B38F-47B3-A1B8-BC3B60BB96EA",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.139",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "80E1EA7E-2788-466C-9FFB-34AFA1B052F0",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.63",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "825F64D9-E99F-49AA-8A7B-EF7C2965C5B2",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4CBFF885-A4D3-4F21-B6FD-4D770034C048",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F650D09A-41EA-4EB5-925B-F2146E8DDF2A",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc9:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8957EE27-E19A-4DE6-B46D-FE413E88BD93",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nllc: verify mac len before reading mac header\n\nLLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb\nhas an Ethernet header.\n\nSyzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert\npackets without mac len and with user configurable skb-\u003eprotocol\n(passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).\n\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782\n tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555\n tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\n\nAdd a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.\n\nThere are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are\nprotected by a test skb-\u003eprotocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not\nprotect against this tun scenario.\n\nBut the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will\nindirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any\nother LLC code.\n\nIt is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but\nnot sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume\nan Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3\nprotocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used\nto, on top of Token Ring.\n\nAt least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start\nof git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in\nthis commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all\nstable kernels should receive this."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: llc: verificar mac len antes de leer el encabezado de mac. LLC lee el encabezado de mac con eth_hdr sin verificar que el skb tenga un encabezado de Ethernet. Syzbot pudo ingresar llc_rcv en un dispositivo tun. Tun puede insertar paquetes sin mac len y con el protocolo skb-\u0026gt; configurable por el usuario (pasando un encabezado tun_pi cuando no se configura IFF_NO_PI). ERROR: KMSAN: valor uninit en llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [en l\u00ednea] BUG: KMSAN: valor uninit en llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111 llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station. c:81 [en l\u00ednea] llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111 llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 __netif_receive_skb+ 0x1a6 /0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637 netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [en l\u00ednea] netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782 tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c :1555 tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002 Agregue una prueba mac_len antes de las tres llamadas eth_hdr(skb) en net/llc. Hay m\u00e1s usos en include/net/llc_pdu.h. Todos estos est\u00e1n protegidos por un protocolo de prueba skb-\u0026gt;== ETH_P_802_2. Lo cual no protege contra este escenario tun. Pero la prueba mac_len agregada en este parche en llc_fixup_skb tambi\u00e9n los proteger\u00e1 indirectamente. Esto se llama desde llc_rcv antes que cualquier otro c\u00f3digo LLC. Es tentador simplemente agregar una verificaci\u00f3n general de mac_len en llc_rcv, pero no estoy seguro de si eso podr\u00eda interrumpir las rutas LLC v\u00e1lidas que no asumen un encabezado Ethernet. En principio, 802.2 LLC se puede utilizar adem\u00e1s de protocolos que no sean 802.3. La confirmaci\u00f3n a la que se hace referencia a continuaci\u00f3n muestra que sol\u00eda hacerlo, adem\u00e1s de Token Ring. Al menos uno de los tres usos de eth_hdr se remonta a antes del inicio del historial de git. Pero el que ejercita syzbot se introduce en este compromiso. Ese compromiso es lo suficientemente antiguo (2008), por lo que efectivamente todos los n\u00facleos estables deber\u00edan recibirlo."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52843",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T06:43:42.743",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52843",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-17T18:03:39.566045Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-21T16:15:21.583",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-908"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-JM7V-C85H-4VVR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-21 18:31 – Updated: 2025-09-24 00:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
llc: verify mac len before reading mac header
LLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb has an Ethernet header.
Syzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert packets without mac len and with user configurable skb->protocol (passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111
llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]
llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111
llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637
netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]
netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782
tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555
tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002
Add a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.
There are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are protected by a test skb->protocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not protect against this tun scenario.
But the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will indirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any other LLC code.
It is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but not sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume an Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3 protocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used to, on top of Token Ring.
At least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start of git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in this commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all stable kernels should receive this.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-52843"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-908"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-21T16:15:21Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nllc: verify mac len before reading mac header\n\nLLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb\nhas an Ethernet header.\n\nSyzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert\npackets without mac len and with user configurable skb-\u003eprotocol\n(passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).\n\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782\n tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555\n tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\n\nAdd a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.\n\nThere are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are\nprotected by a test skb-\u003eprotocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not\nprotect against this tun scenario.\n\nBut the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will\nindirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any\nother LLC code.\n\nIt is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but\nnot sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume\nan Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3\nprotocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used\nto, on top of Token Ring.\n\nAt least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start\nof git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in\nthis commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all\nstable kernels should receive this.",
"id": "GHSA-jm7v-c85h-4vvr",
"modified": "2025-09-24T00:30:40Z",
"published": "2024-05-21T18:31:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
ICSA-25-226-15
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2025-08-12 00:00 - Updated: 2026-02-25 07:00OESA-2024-1736 (CVE-2021-47229)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-06-21 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: aardvark: Fix kernel panic during PIO transfer
Trying to start a new PIO transfer by writing value 0 in PIO_START register when previous transfer has not yet completed (which is indicated by value 1 in PIO_START) causes an External Abort on CPU, which results in kernel panic:
SError Interrupt on CPU0, code 0xbf000002 -- SError
Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt
To prevent kernel panic, it is required to reject a new PIO transfer when previous one has not finished yet.
If previous PIO transfer is not finished yet, the kernel may issue a new PIO request only if the previous PIO transfer timed out.
In the past the root cause of this issue was incorrectly identified (as it often happens during link retraining or after link down event) and special hack was implemented in Trusted Firmware to catch all SError events in EL3, to ignore errors with code 0xbf000002 and not forwarding any other errors to kernel and instead throw panic from EL3 Trusted Firmware handler.
Links to discussion and patches about this issue: https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/commit/?id=3c7dcdac5c50 https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20190316161243.29517-1-repk@triplefau.lt/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/971be151d24312cc533989a64bd454b4@www.loen.fr/ https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/1541
But the real cause was the fact that during link retraining or after link down event the PIO transfer may take longer time, up to the 1.44s until it times out. This increased probability that a new PIO transfer would be issued by kernel while previous one has not finished yet.
After applying this change into the kernel, it is possible to revert the mentioned TF-A hack and SError events do not have to be caught in TF-A EL3.(CVE-2021-47229)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
phy: phy-mtk-tphy: Fix some resource leaks in mtk_phy_init()
Use clk_disable_unprepare() in the error path of mtk_phy_init() to fix some resource leaks.(CVE-2021-47234)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: rds: fix memory leak in rds_recvmsg
Syzbot reported memory leak in rds. The problem was in unputted refcount in case of error.
int rds_recvmsg(struct socket sock, struct msghdr msg, size_t size, int msg_flags) { ...
if (!rds_next_incoming(rs, &inc)) {
...
}
After this "if" inc refcount incremented and
if (rds_cmsg_recv(inc, msg, rs)) {
ret = -EFAULT;
goto out;
}
... out: return ret; }
in case of rds_cmsg_recv() fail the refcount won't be decremented. And it's easy to see from ftrace log, that rds_inc_addref() don't have rds_inc_put() pair in rds_recvmsg() after rds_cmsg_recv()
1) | rds_recvmsg() { 1) 3.721 us | rds_inc_addref(); 1) 3.853 us | rds_message_inc_copy_to_user(); 1) + 10.395 us | rds_cmsg_recv(); 1) + 34.260 us | }(CVE-2021-47249)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ieee802154: fix null deref in parse dev addr
Fix a logic error that could result in a null deref if the user sets the mode incorrectly for the given addr type.(CVE-2021-47257)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: fix various gadget panics on 10gbps cabling
usb_assign_descriptors() is called with 5 parameters, the last 4 of which are the usb_descriptor_header for: full-speed (USB1.1 - 12Mbps [including USB1.0 low-speed @ 1.5Mbps), high-speed (USB2.0 - 480Mbps), super-speed (USB3.0 - 5Gbps), super-speed-plus (USB3.1 - 10Gbps).
The differences between full/high/super-speed descriptors are usually substantial (due to changes in the maximum usb block size from 64 to 512 to 1024 bytes and other differences in the specs), while the difference between 5 and 10Gbps descriptors may be as little as nothing (in many cases the same tuning is simply good enough).
However if a gadget driver calls usb_assign_descriptors() with a NULL descriptor for super-speed-plus and is then used on a max 10gbps configuration, the kernel will crash with a null pointer dereference, when a 10gbps capable device port + cable + host port combination shows up. (This wouldn't happen if the gadget max-speed was set to 5gbps, but it of course defaults to the maximum, and there's no real reason to artificially limit it)
The fix is to simply use the 5gbps descriptor as the 10gbps descriptor, if a 10gbps descriptor wasn't provided.
Obviously this won't fix the problem if the 5gbps descriptor is also NULL, but such cases can't be so trivially solved (and any such gadgets are unlikely to be used with USB3 ports any way).(CVE-2021-47267)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: seq: Fix race of snd_seq_timer_open()
The timer instance per queue is exclusive, and snd_seq_timer_open() should have managed the concurrent accesses. It looks as if it's checking the already existing timer instance at the beginning, but it's not right, because there is no protection, hence any later concurrent call of snd_seq_timer_open() may override the timer instance easily. This may result in UAF, as the leftover timer instance can keep running while the queue itself gets closed, as spotted by syzkaller recently.
For avoiding the race, add a proper check at the assignment of tmr->timeri again, and return -EBUSY if it's been already registered.(CVE-2021-47281)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
igb: Fix use-after-free error during reset
Cleans the next descriptor to watch (next_to_watch) when cleaning the TX ring.
Failure to do so can cause invalid memory accesses. If igb_poll() runs while the controller is reset this can lead to the driver try to free a skb that was already freed.
(The crash is harder to reproduce with the igb driver, but the same potential problem exists as the code is identical to igc)(CVE-2021-47301)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ti: fix UAF in tlan_remove_one
priv is netdev private data and it cannot be used after free_netdev() call. Using priv after free_netdev() can cause UAF bug. Fix it by moving free_netdev() at the end of the function.(CVE-2021-47310)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
watchdog: Fix possible use-after-free by calling del_timer_sync()
This driver's remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function does not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the timer handler may still be running after the driver's remove function has finished, which would result in a use-after-free.
Fix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler has finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47321)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
misc/libmasm/module: Fix two use after free in ibmasm_init_one
In ibmasm_init_one, it calls ibmasm_init_remote_input_dev(). Inside ibmasm_init_remote_input_dev, mouse_dev and keybd_dev are allocated by input_allocate_device(), and assigned to sp->remote.mouse_dev and sp->remote.keybd_dev respectively.
In the err_free_devices error branch of ibmasm_init_one, mouse_dev and keybd_dev are freed by input_free_device(), and return error. Then the execution runs into error_send_message error branch of ibmasm_init_one, where ibmasm_free_remote_input_dev(sp) is called to unregister the freed sp->remote.mouse_dev and sp->remote.keybd_dev.
My patch add a "error_init_remote" label to handle the error of ibmasm_init_remote_input_dev(), to avoid the uaf bugs.(CVE-2021-47334)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: zr364xx: fix memory leak in zr364xx_start_readpipe
syzbot reported memory leak in zr364xx driver. The problem was in non-freed urb in case of usb_submit_urb() fail.
backtrace: [<ffffffff82baedf6>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:561 [inline] [<ffffffff82baedf6>] usb_alloc_urb+0x66/0xe0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:74 [<ffffffff82f7cce8>] zr364xx_start_readpipe+0x78/0x130 drivers/media/usb/zr364xx/zr364xx.c:1022 [<ffffffff84251dfc>] zr364xx_board_init drivers/media/usb/zr364xx/zr364xx.c:1383 [inline] [<ffffffff84251dfc>] zr364xx_probe+0x6a3/0x851 drivers/media/usb/zr364xx/zr364xx.c:1516 [<ffffffff82bb6507>] usb_probe_interface+0x177/0x370 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:396 [<ffffffff826018a9>] really_probe+0x159/0x500 drivers/base/dd.c:576(CVE-2021-47344)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/sched: Avoid data corruptions
Wait for all dependencies of a job to complete before killing it to avoid data corruptions.(CVE-2021-47354)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: macb: fix use after free on rmmod
plat_dev->dev->platform_data is released by platform_device_unregister(), use of pclk and hclk is a use-after-free. Since device unregister won't need a clk device we adjust the function call sequence to fix this issue.
[ 31.261225] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in macb_remove+0x77/0xc6 [macb_pci] [ 31.275563] Freed by task 306: [ 30.276782] platform_device_release+0x25/0x80(CVE-2021-47372)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i2c: acpi: fix resource leak in reconfiguration device addition
acpi_i2c_find_adapter_by_handle() calls bus_find_device() which takes a reference on the adapter which is never released which will result in a reference count leak and render the adapter unremovable. Make sure to put the adapter after creating the client in the same manner that we do for OF.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: encx24j600: check error in devm_regmap_init_encx24j600
devm_regmap_init may return error which caused by like out of memory, this will results in null pointer dereference later when reading or writing register:
general protection fault in encx24j600_spi_probe KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000090-0x0000000000000097] CPU: 0 PID: 286 Comm: spi-encx24j600- Not tainted 5.15.0-rc2-00142-g9978db750e31-dirty #11 9c53a778c1306b1b02359f3c2bbedc0222cba652 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:regcache_cache_bypass drivers/base/regmap/regcache.c:540 Code: 54 41 89 f4 55 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 e8 26 94 a8 fe 48 8d bb a0 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 4a 03 00 00 4c 8d ab b0 00 00 00 48 8b ab a0 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc900010476b8 EFLAGS: 00010207 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: fffffffffffffff4 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000012 RSI: ffff888002de0000 RDI: 0000000000000094 RBP: ffff888013c9a000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff3f9cc6a R10: ffffc900010476e8 R11: fffffbfff3f9cc69 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 000000000000000a R14: ffff888013c9af54 R15: ffff888013c9ad08 FS: 00007ffa984ab580(0000) GS:ffff88801fe00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055a6384136c8 CR3: 000000003bbe6003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: encx24j600_spi_probe drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/encx24j600.c:459 spi_probe drivers/spi/spi.c:397 really_probe drivers/base/dd.c:517 __driver_probe_device drivers/base/dd.c:751 driver_probe_device drivers/base/dd.c:782 __device_attach_driver drivers/base/dd.c:899 bus_for_each_drv drivers/base/bus.c:427 __device_attach drivers/base/dd.c:971 bus_probe_device drivers/base/bus.c:487 device_add drivers/base/core.c:3364 __spi_add_device drivers/spi/spi.c:599 spi_add_device drivers/spi/spi.c:641 spi_new_device drivers/spi/spi.c:717 new_device_store+0x18c/0x1f1 [spi_stub 4e02719357f1ff33f5a43d00630982840568e85e] dev_attr_store drivers/base/core.c:2074 sysfs_kf_write fs/sysfs/file.c:139 kernfs_fop_write_iter fs/kernfs/file.c:300 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:508 (discriminator 4) vfs_write fs/read_write.c:594 ksys_write fs/read_write.c:648 do_syscall_64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:113
Add error check in devm_regmap_init_encx24j600 to avoid this situation.(CVE-2021-47440)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: peak_pci: peak_pci_remove(): fix UAF
When remove the module peek_pci, referencing 'chan' again after releasing 'dev' will cause UAF.
Fix this by releasing 'dev' later.
The following log reveals it:
[ 35.961814 ] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci] [ 35.963414 ] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888136998ee8 by task modprobe/5537 [ 35.965513 ] Call Trace: [ 35.965718 ] dump_stack_lvl+0xa8/0xd1 [ 35.966028 ] print_address_description+0x87/0x3b0 [ 35.966420 ] kasan_report+0x172/0x1c0 [ 35.966725 ] ? peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci] [ 35.967137 ] ? trace_irq_enable_rcuidle+0x10/0x170 [ 35.967529 ] ? peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci] [ 35.967945 ] __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20 [ 35.968346 ] peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci] [ 35.968752 ] pci_device_remove+0xa9/0x250(CVE-2021-47456)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
isdn: mISDN: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context
The driver can call card->isac.release() function from an atomic context.
Fix this by calling this function after releasing the lock.
The following log reveals it:
[ 44.168226 ] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:3018 [ 44.168941 ] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 5475, name: modprobe [ 44.169574 ] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 44.169899 ] irq event stamp: 0 [ 44.170160 ] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [ 44.170627 ] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff814209ed>] copy_process+0x132d/0x3e00 [ 44.171240 ] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff81420a1a>] copy_process+0x135a/0x3e00 [ 44.171852 ] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [ 44.172318 ] Preemption disabled at: [ 44.172320 ] [<ffffffffa009b0a9>] nj_release+0x69/0x500 [netjet] [ 44.174441 ] Call Trace: [ 44.174630 ] dump_stack_lvl+0xa8/0xd1 [ 44.174912 ] dump_stack+0x15/0x17 [ 44.175166 ] mightsleep+0x3a2/0x510 [ 44.175459 ] ? nj_release+0x69/0x500 [netjet] [ 44.175791 ] might_sleep+0x82/0xe0 [ 44.176063 ] ? start_flush_work+0x20/0x7b0 [ 44.176375 ] start_flush_work+0x33/0x7b0 [ 44.176672 ] ? trace_irq_enable_rcuidle+0x85/0x170 [ 44.177034 ] ? kasan_quarantine_put+0xaa/0x1f0 [ 44.177372 ] ? kasan_quarantine_put+0xaa/0x1f0 [ 44.177711 ] __flush_work+0x11a/0x1a0 [ 44.177991 ] ? flush_work+0x20/0x20 [ 44.178257 ] ? lock_release+0x13c/0x8f0 [ 44.178550 ] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20 [ 44.178872 ] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x148/0x360 [ 44.179187 ] ? read_lock_is_recursive+0x20/0x20 [ 44.179530 ] ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 44.179846 ] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x55/0x900 [ 44.180168 ] ? ____kasan_slab_free+0x116/0x140 [ 44.180505 ] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x60 [ 44.180878 ] ? skb_queue_purge+0x1a3/0x1c0 [ 44.181189 ] ? kfree+0x13e/0x290 [ 44.181438 ] flush_work+0x17/0x20 [ 44.181695 ] mISDN_freedchannel+0xe8/0x100 [ 44.182006 ] isac_release+0x210/0x260 [mISDNipac] [ 44.182366 ] nj_release+0xf6/0x500 [netjet] [ 44.182685 ] nj_remove+0x48/0x70 [netjet] [ 44.182989 ] pci_device_remove+0xa9/0x250(CVE-2021-47468)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
comedi: vmk80xx: fix bulk-buffer overflow
The driver is using endpoint-sized buffers but must not assume that the tx and rx buffers are of equal size or a malicious device could overflow the slab-allocated receive buffer when doing bulk transfers.(CVE-2021-47474)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: batman-adv: fix error handling
Syzbot reported ODEBUG warning in batadv_nc_mesh_free(). The problem was in wrong error handling in batadv_mesh_init().
Before this patch batadv_mesh_init() was calling batadv_mesh_free() in case of any batadv_*_init() calls failure. This approach may work well, when there is some kind of indicator, which can tell which parts of batadv are initialized; but there isn't any.
All written above lead to cleaning up uninitialized fields. Even if we hide ODEBUG warning by initializing bat_priv->nc.work, syzbot was able to hit GPF in batadv_nc_purge_paths(), because hash pointer in still NULL. [1]
To fix these bugs we can unwind batadv_init() calls one by one. It is good approach for 2 reasons: 1) It fixes bugs on error handling path 2) It improves the performance, since we won't call unneeded batadv_free() functions.
So, this patch makes all batadv_init() clean up all allocated memory before returning with an error to no call correspoing batadv_free() and open-codes batadv_mesh_free() with proper order to avoid touching uninitialized fields.(CVE-2021-47482)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
regmap: Fix possible double-free in regcache_rbtree_exit()
In regcache_rbtree_insert_to_block(), when 'present' realloc failed, the 'blk' which is supposed to assign to 'rbnode->block' will be freed, so 'rbnode->block' points a freed memory, in the error handling path of regcache_rbtree_init(), 'rbnode->block' will be freed again in regcache_rbtree_exit(), KASAN will report double-free as follows:
BUG: KASAN: double-free or invalid-free in kfree+0xce/0x390 Call Trace: slab_free_freelist_hook+0x10d/0x240 kfree+0xce/0x390 regcache_rbtree_exit+0x15d/0x1a0 regcache_rbtree_init+0x224/0x2c0 regcache_init+0x88d/0x1310 __regmap_init+0x3151/0x4a80 __devm_regmap_init+0x7d/0x100 madera_spi_probe+0x10f/0x333 [madera_spi] spi_probe+0x183/0x210 really_probe+0x285/0xc30
To fix this, moving up the assignment of rbnode->block to immediately after the reallocation has succeeded so that the data structure stays valid even if the second reallocation fails.(CVE-2021-47483)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/qib: Protect from buffer overflow in struct qib_user_sdma_pkt fields
Overflowing either addrlimit or bytes_togo can allow userspace to trigger a buffer overflow of kernel memory. Check for overflows in all the places doing math on user controlled buffers.(CVE-2021-47485)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/tls: Fix flipped sign in tls_err_abort() calls
sk->sk_err appears to expect a positive value, a convention that ktls doesn't always follow and that leads to memory corruption in other code. For instance,
[kworker]
tls_encrypt_done(..., err=<negative error from crypto request>)
tls_err_abort(.., err)
sk->sk_err = err;
[task]
splice_from_pipe_feed
...
tls_sw_do_sendpage
if (sk->sk_err) {
ret = -sk->sk_err; // ret is positive
splice_from_pipe_feed (continued)
ret = actor(...) // ret is still positive and interpreted as bytes
// written, resulting in underflow of buf->len and
// sd->len, leading to huge buf->offset and bogus
// addresses computed in later calls to actor()
Fix all tls_err_abort() callers to pass a negative error code consistently and centralize the error-prone sign flip there, throwing in a warning to catch future misuse and uninlining the function so it really does only warn once.(CVE-2021-47496)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: pcm: oss: Limit the period size to 16MB
Set the practical limit to the period size (the fragment shift in OSS) instead of a full 31bit; a too large value could lead to the exhaust of memory as we allocate temporary buffers of the period size, too.
As of this patch, we set to 16MB limit, which should cover all use cases.(CVE-2021-47509)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfp: Fix memory leak in nfp_cpp_area_cache_add()
In line 800 (#1), nfp_cpp_area_alloc() allocates and initializes a CPP area structure. But in line 807 (#2), when the cache is allocated failed, this CPP area structure is not freed, which will result in memory leak.
We can fix it by freeing the CPP area when the cache is allocated failed (#2).
792 int nfp_cpp_area_cache_add(struct nfp_cpp cpp, size_t size) 793 { 794 struct nfp_cpp_area_cache cache; 795 struct nfp_cpp_area *area;
800 area = nfp_cpp_area_alloc(cpp, NFP_CPP_ID(7, NFP_CPP_ACTION_RW, 0), 801 0, size); // #1: allocates and initializes
802 if (!area) 803 return -ENOMEM;
805 cache = kzalloc(sizeof(*cache), GFP_KERNEL); 806 if (!cache) 807 return -ENOMEM; // #2: missing free
817 return 0; 818 }(CVE-2021-47516)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
staging: rtl8192e: Fix use after free in _rtl92e_pci_disconnect()
The free_rtllib() function frees the "dev" pointer so there is use after free on the next line. Re-arrange things to avoid that.(CVE-2021-47571)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: brcmstb: pm-arm: Fix refcount leak and __iomem leak bugs
In brcmstb_pm_probe(), there are two kinds of leak bugs:
(1) we need to add of_node_put() when for_each__matching_node() breaks (2) we need to add iounmap() for each iomap in fail path(CVE-2022-48693)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mmc: mmc_spi: fix error handling in mmc_spi_probe()
If mmc_add_host() fails, it doesn't need to call mmc_remove_host(), or it will cause null-ptr-deref, because of deleting a not added device in mmc_remove_host().
To fix this, goto label 'fail_glue_init', if mmc_add_host() fails, and change the label 'fail_add_host' to 'fail_gpiod_request'.(CVE-2023-52708)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: USB: Fix wrong-direction WARNING in plusb.c
The syzbot fuzzer detected a bug in the plusb network driver: A zero-length control-OUT transfer was treated as a read instead of a write. In modern kernels this error provokes a WARNING:
usb 1-1: BOGUS control dir, pipe 80000280 doesn't match bRequestType c0 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4645 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:411 usb_submit_urb+0x14a7/0x1880 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:411 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 4645 Comm: dhcpcd Not tainted 6.2.0-rc6-syzkaller-00050-g9f266ccaa2f5 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/12/2023 RIP: 0010:usb_submit_urb+0x14a7/0x1880 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:411 ... Call Trace: <TASK> usb_start_wait_urb+0x101/0x4b0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:58 usb_internal_control_msg drivers/usb/core/message.c:102 [inline] usb_control_msg+0x320/0x4a0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:153 __usbnet_read_cmd+0xb9/0x390 drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:2010 usbnet_read_cmd+0x96/0xf0 drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:2068 pl_vendor_req drivers/net/usb/plusb.c:60 [inline] pl_set_QuickLink_features drivers/net/usb/plusb.c:75 [inline] pl_reset+0x2f/0xf0 drivers/net/usb/plusb.c:85 usbnet_open+0xcc/0x5d0 drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:889 __dev_open+0x297/0x4d0 net/core/dev.c:1417 __dev_change_flags+0x587/0x750 net/core/dev.c:8530 dev_change_flags+0x97/0x170 net/core/dev.c:8602 devinet_ioctl+0x15a2/0x1d70 net/ipv4/devinet.c:1147 inet_ioctl+0x33f/0x380 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:979 sock_do_ioctl+0xcc/0x230 net/socket.c:1169 sock_ioctl+0x1f8/0x680 net/socket.c:1286 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
The fix is to call usbnet_write_cmd() instead of usbnet_read_cmd() and remove the USB_DIR_IN flag.(CVE-2023-52742)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/hfi1: Restore allocated resources on failed copyout
Fix a resource leak if an error occurs.(CVE-2023-52747)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker
Syzkaller reported the following issue: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c:1031:27 shift exponent 245 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
When the value of the variable "sd->params.exposure.gain" exceeds the number of bits in an integer, a shift-out-of-bounds error is reported. It is triggered because the variable "currentexp" cannot be left-shifted by more than the number of bits in an integer. In order to avoid invalid range during left-shift, the conditional expression is added.(CVE-2023-52764)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/jfs: Add check for negative db_l2nbperpage
l2nbperpage is log2(number of blks per page), and the minimum legal value should be 0, not negative.
In the case of l2nbperpage being negative, an error will occur when subsequently used as shift exponent.
Syzbot reported this bug:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:799:12 shift exponent -16777216 is negative(CVE-2023-52810)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
locking/ww_mutex/test: Fix potential workqueue corruption
In some cases running with the test-ww_mutex code, I was seeing odd behavior where sometimes it seemed flush_workqueue was returning before all the work threads were finished.
Often this would cause strange crashes as the mutexes would be freed while they were being used.
Looking at the code, there is a lifetime problem as the controlling thread that spawns the work allocates the "struct stress" structures that are passed to the workqueue threads. Then when the workqueue threads are finished, they free the stress struct that was passed to them.
Unfortunately the workqueue work_struct node is in the stress struct. Which means the work_struct is freed before the work thread returns and while flush_workqueue is waiting.
It seems like a better idea to have the controlling thread both allocate and free the stress structures, so that we can be sure we don't corrupt the workqueue by freeing the structure prematurely.
So this patch reworks the test to do so, and with this change I no longer see the early flush_workqueue returns.(CVE-2023-52836)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
llc: verify mac len before reading mac header
LLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb has an Ethernet header.
Syzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert packets without mac len and with user configurable skb->protocol (passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111
llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]
llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111
llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637
netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]
netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782
tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555
tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002
Add a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.
There are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are protected by a test skb->protocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not protect against this tun scenario.
But the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will indirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any other LLC code.
It is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but not sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume an Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3 protocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used to, on top of Token Ring.
At least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start of git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in this commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all stable kernels should receive this.(CVE-2023-52843)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: mediatek: clk-mt2701: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data
Add the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52875)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tty: n_gsm: require CAP_NET_ADMIN to attach N_GSM0710 ldisc
Any unprivileged user can attach N_GSM0710 ldisc, but it requires CAP_NET_ADMIN to create a GSM network anyway.
Require initial namespace CAP_NET_ADMIN to do that.(CVE-2023-52880)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Prevent deadlock while disabling aRFS
When disabling aRFS under the priv->state_lock, any scheduled
aRFS works are canceled using the cancel_work_sync function,
which waits for the work to end if it has already started.
However, while waiting for the work handler, the handler will
try to acquire the state_lock which is already acquired.
The worker acquires the lock to delete the rules if the state is down, which is not the worker's responsibility since disabling aRFS deletes the rules.
Add an aRFS state variable, which indicates whether the aRFS is enabled and prevent adding rules when the aRFS is disabled.
Kernel log:
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Tainted: G I
ethtool/386089 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810f21ce68 ((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0
but task is already holding lock: ffff8884a1808cc0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x80/0xc90 arfs_handle_work+0x4b/0x3b0 [mlx5_core] process_one_work+0x1dc/0x4a0 worker_thread+0x1bf/0x3c0 kthread+0xd7/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
-> #0 ((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80 lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0 __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0 arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core] ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0 ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120 genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x1a1/0x270 netlink_sendmsg+0x214/0x460 __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60 __sys_sendto+0x113/0x170 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&priv->state_lock); lock((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)); lock(&priv->state_lock); lock((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work));
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by ethtool/386089: #0: ffffffff82ea7210 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 #1: ffffffff82e94c88 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ethnl_default_set_doit+0xd3/0x240 #2: ffff8884a1808cc0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]
stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 386089 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G I 6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x144/0x160 __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80 lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 ? save_trace+0x3e/0x360 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 ? __lock_acquire+0xa78/0x2c80 ? lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core] ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0 ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120 genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0 ? ethn ---truncated---(CVE-2024-27014)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_obj_type_get()
nft_unregister_obj() can concurrent with __nft_obj_type_get(), and there is not any protection when iterate over nf_tables_objects list in __nft_obj_type_get(). Therefore, there is potential data-race of nf_tables_objects list entry.
Use list_for_each_entry_rcu() to iterate over nf_tables_objects list in __nft_obj_type_get(), and use rcu_read_lock() in the caller nft_obj_type_get() to protect the entire type query process.(CVE-2024-27019)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
phonet/pep: fix racy skb_queue_empty() use
The receive queues are protected by their respective spin-lock, not the socket lock. This could lead to skb_peek() unexpectedly returning NULL or a pointer to an already dequeued socket buffer.(CVE-2024-27402)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: fsl: qbman: Use raw spinlock for cgr_lock
smp_call_function always runs its callback in hard IRQ context, even on PREEMPT_RT, where spinlocks can sleep. So we need to use a raw spinlock for cgr_lock to ensure we aren't waiting on a sleeping task.
Although this bug has existed for a while, it was not apparent until commit ef2a8d5478b9 ("net: dpaa: Adjust queue depth on rate change") which invokes smp_call_function_single via qman_update_cgr_safe every time a link goes up or down.(CVE-2024-35819)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ubifs: Set page uptodate in the correct place
Page cache reads are lockless, so setting the freshly allocated page uptodate before we've overwritten it with the data it's supposed to have in it will allow a simultaneous reader to see old data. Move the call to SetPageUptodate into ubifs_write_end(), which is after we copied the new data into the page.(CVE-2024-35821)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: libertas: fix some memleaks in lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer()
In the for statement of lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer(), if the allocation of cmdarray[i].cmdbuf fails, both cmdarray and cmdarray[i].cmdbuf needs to be freed. Otherwise, there will be memleaks in lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer().(CVE-2024-35828)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets
We had various syzbot reports about tcp timers firing after the corresponding netns has been dismantled.
Fortunately Josef Bacik could trigger the issue more often, and could test a patch I wrote two years ago.
When TCP sockets are closed, we call inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() to 'stop' the timers.
inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() can be called from any context, including when socket lock is held. This is the reason it uses sk_stop_timer(), aka del_timer(). This means that ongoing timers might finish much later.
For user sockets, this is fine because each running timer holds a reference on the socket, and the user socket holds a reference on the netns.
For kernel sockets, we risk that the netns is freed before timer can complete, because kernel sockets do not hold reference on the netns.
This patch adds inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() function that using sk_stop_timer_sync() to make sure all timers are terminated before the kernel socket is released. Modules using kernel sockets close them in their netns exit() handler.
Also add sock_not_owned_by_me() helper to get LOCKDEP support : inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() must not be called while socket lock is held.
It is very possible we can revert in the future commit 3a58f13a881e ("net: rds: acquire refcount on TCP sockets") which attempted to solve the issue in rds only. (net/smc/af_smc.c and net/mptcp/subflow.c have similar code)
We probably can remove the check_net() tests from tcp_out_of_resources() and __tcp_close() in the future.(CVE-2024-35910)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: send: handle path ref underflow in header iterate_inode_ref()
Change BUG_ON to proper error handling if building the path buffer fails. The pointers are not printed so we don't accidentally leak kernel addresses.(CVE-2024-35935)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: check A-MSDU format more carefully
If it looks like there's another subframe in the A-MSDU but the header isn't fully there, we can end up reading data out of bounds, only to discard later. Make this a bit more careful and check if the subframe header can even be present.(CVE-2024-35937)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dyndbg: fix old BUG_ON in >control parser
Fix a BUG_ON from 2009. Even if it looks "unreachable" (I didn't really look), lets make sure by removing it, doing pr_err and return -EINVAL instead.(CVE-2024-35947)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
batman-adv: Avoid infinite loop trying to resize local TT
If the MTU of one of an attached interface becomes too small to transmit the local translation table then it must be resized to fit inside all fragments (when enabled) or a single packet.
But if the MTU becomes too low to transmit even the header + the VLAN specific part then the resizing of the local TT will never succeed. This can for example happen when the usable space is 110 bytes and 11 VLANs are on top of batman-adv. In this case, at least 116 byte would be needed. There will just be an endless spam of
batman_adv: batadv0: Forced to purge local tt entries to fit new maximum fragment MTU (110)
in the log but the function will never finish. Problem here is that the timeout will be halved all the time and will then stagnate at 0 and therefore never be able to reduce the table even more.
There are other scenarios possible with a similar result. The number of BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NOPURGE entries in the local TT can for example be too high to fit inside a packet. Such a scenario can therefore happen also with only a single VLAN + 7 non-purgable addresses - requiring at least 120 bytes.
While this should be handled proactively when:
- interface with too low MTU is added
- VLAN is added
- non-purgeable local mac is added
- MTU of an attached interface is reduced
- fragmentation setting gets disabled (which most likely requires dropping attached interfaces)
not all of these scenarios can be prevented because batman-adv is only consuming events without the the possibility to prevent these actions (non-purgable MAC address added, MTU of an attached interface is reduced). It is therefore necessary to also make sure that the code is able to handle also the situations when there were already incompatible system configuration are present.(CVE-2024-35982)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tty: n_gsm: fix possible out-of-bounds in gsm0_receive()
Assuming the following: - side A configures the n_gsm in basic option mode - side B sends the header of a basic option mode frame with data length 1 - side A switches to advanced option mode - side B sends 2 data bytes which exceeds gsm->len Reason: gsm->len is not used in advanced option mode. - side A switches to basic option mode - side B keeps sending until gsm0_receive() writes past gsm->buf Reason: Neither gsm->state nor gsm->len have been reset after reconfiguration.
Fix this by changing gsm->count to gsm->len comparison from equal to less than. Also add upper limit checks against the constant MAX_MRU in gsm0_receive() and gsm1_receive() to harden against memory corruption of gsm->len and gsm->mru.
All other checks remain as we still need to limit the data according to the user configuration and actual payload size.(CVE-2024-36016)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tipc: fix UAF in error path
Sam Page (sam4k) working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative reported a UAF in the tipc_buf_append() error path:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88804d2a7c80 by task poc/8034
CPU: 1 PID: 8034 Comm: poc Not tainted 6.8.2 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.0-debian-1.16.0-5 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack linux/lib/dump_stack.c:88 dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 linux/lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description linux/mm/kasan/report.c:377 print_report+0xc4/0x620 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0xda/0x110 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:601 kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183 skb_release_data+0x5af/0x880 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1026 skb_release_all linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1094 __kfree_skb linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1108 kfree_skb_reason+0x12d/0x210 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1144 kfree_skb linux/./include/linux/skbuff.h:1244 tipc_buf_append+0x425/0xb50 linux/net/tipc/msg.c:186 tipc_link_input+0x224/0x7c0 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1324 tipc_link_rcv+0x76e/0x2d70 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1824 tipc_rcv+0x45f/0x10f0 linux/net/tipc/node.c:2159 tipc_udp_recv+0x73b/0x8f0 linux/net/tipc/udp_media.c:390 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0xad2/0x1850 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2108 udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x131/0xb00 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2186 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x165/0x3b0 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2346 __udp4_lib_rcv+0x2594/0x3400 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2422 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x30c/0x4e0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x2e4/0x520 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308 ip_local_deliver+0x18e/0x1f0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254 dst_input linux/./include/net/dst.h:461 ip_rcv_finish linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308 ip_rcv+0x2c5/0x5d0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:569 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x199/0x1e0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5534 __netif_receive_skb+0x1f/0x1c0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5648 process_backlog+0x101/0x6b0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5976 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xba/0x550 linux/net/core/dev.c:6576 napi_poll linux/net/core/dev.c:6645 net_rx_action+0x95a/0xe90 linux/net/core/dev.c:6781 __do_softirq+0x21f/0x8e7 linux/kernel/softirq.c:553 do_softirq linux/kernel/softirq.c:454 do_softirq+0xb2/0xf0 linux/kernel/softirq.c:441 </IRQ> <TASK> __local_bh_enable_ip+0x100/0x120 linux/kernel/softirq.c:381 local_bh_enable linux/./include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 rcu_read_unlock_bh linux/./include/linux/rcupdate.h:851 __dev_queue_xmit+0x871/0x3ee0 linux/net/core/dev.c:4378 dev_queue_xmit linux/./include/linux/netdevice.h:3169 neigh_hh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:526 neigh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:540 ip_finish_output2+0x169f/0x2550 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235 __ip_finish_output linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:313 __ip_finish_output+0x49e/0x950 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:295 ip_finish_output+0x31/0x310 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:323 NF_HOOK_COND linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:303 ip_output+0x13b/0x2a0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433 dst_output linux/./include/net/dst.h:451 ip_local_out linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 ip_send_skb+0x3e5/0x560 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1492 udp_send_skb+0x73f/0x1530 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:963 udp_sendmsg+0x1a36/0x2b40 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:1250 inet_sendmsg+0x105/0x140 linux/net/ipv4/af_inet.c:850 sock_sendmsg_nosec linux/net/socket.c:730 __sock_sendmsg linux/net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x42c/0x4e0 linux/net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2203 __se_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2199 __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 linux/net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_x64 linux/arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 do_syscall_ ---truncated---(CVE-2024-36886)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: prevent NULL dereference in ip6_output()
According to syzbot, there is a chance that ip6_dst_idev() returns NULL in ip6_output(). Most places in IPv6 stack deal with a NULL idev just fine, but not here.
syzbot reported:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000bc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000005e0-0x00000000000005e7] CPU: 0 PID: 9775 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00157-g6a30653b604a #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:ip6_output+0x231/0x3f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:237 Code: 3c 1e 00 49 89 df 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 19 58 db f7 48 8b 44 24 20 49 89 45 00 49 89 c5 48 8d 9d e0 05 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 38 84 c0 4c 8b 74 24 28 0f 85 61 01 00 00 8b 1b 31 ff RSP: 0018:ffffc9000927f0d8 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 00000000000000bc RBX: 00000000000005e0 RCX: 0000000000040000 RDX: ffffc900131f9000 RSI: 0000000000004f47 RDI: 0000000000004f48 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff8a1f0b9a R09: 1ffffffff1f51fad R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f51fae R12: ffff8880293ec8c0 R13: ffff88805d7fc000 R14: 1ffff1100527d91a R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 00007f135c6856c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020000080 CR3: 0000000064096000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ip6_xmit+0xefe/0x17f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:358 sctp_v6_xmit+0x9f2/0x13f0 net/sctp/ipv6.c:248 sctp_packet_transmit+0x26ad/0x2ca0 net/sctp/output.c:653 sctp_packet_singleton+0x22c/0x320 net/sctp/outqueue.c:783 sctp_outq_flush_ctrl net/sctp/outqueue.c:914 [inline] sctp_outq_flush+0x6d5/0x3e20 net/sctp/outqueue.c:1212 sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1198 [inline] sctp_do_sm+0x59cc/0x60c0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1169 sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE+0x95/0xc0 net/sctp/primitive.c:73 __sctp_connect+0x9cd/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1234 sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline] sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834 __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline] __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36901)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets
TCP_SYN_RECV state is really special, it is only used by cross-syn connections, mostly used by fuzzers.
In the following crash [1], syzbot managed to trigger a divide by zero in tcp_rcv_space_adjust()
A socket makes the following state transitions, without ever calling tcp_init_transfer(), meaning tcp_init_buffer_space() is also not called.
TCP_CLOSE
connect() TCP_SYN_SENT TCP_SYN_RECV shutdown() -> tcp_shutdown(sk, SEND_SHUTDOWN) TCP_FIN_WAIT1
To fix this issue, change tcp_shutdown() to not perform a TCP_SYN_RECV -> TCP_FIN_WAIT1 transition, which makes no sense anyway.
When tcp_rcv_state_process() later changes socket state from TCP_SYN_RECV to TCP_ESTABLISH, then look at sk->sk_shutdown to finally enter TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state, and send a FIN packet from a sane socket state.
This means tcp_send_fin() can now be called from BH context, and must use GFP_ATOMIC allocations.
[1] divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 5084 Comm: syz-executor358 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-syzkaller-00022-g98369dccd2f8 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:tcp_rcv_space_adjust+0x2df/0x890 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:767 Code: e3 04 4c 01 eb 48 8b 44 24 38 0f b6 04 10 84 c0 49 89 d5 0f 85 a5 03 00 00 41 8b 8e c8 09 00 00 89 e8 29 c8 48 0f af c3 31 d2 <48> f7 f1 48 8d 1c 43 49 8d 96 76 08 00 00 48 89 d0 48 c1 e8 03 48 RSP: 0018:ffffc900031ef3f0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0c677a10441f8f42 RBX: 000000004fb95e7e RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000027d4b11f R08: ffffffff89e535a4 R09: 1ffffffff25e6ab7 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffffff8135e920 R12: ffff88802a9f8d30 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff88802a9f8d00 R15: 1ffff1100553f2da FS: 00005555775c0380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f1155bf2304 CR3: 000000002b9f2000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_recvmsg_locked+0x106d/0x25a0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2513 tcp_recvmsg+0x25d/0x920 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2578 inet6_recvmsg+0x16a/0x730 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:680 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x109/0x280 net/socket.c:1068 _sysrecvmsg+0x1db/0x470 net/socket.c:2803 _sys_recvmsg net/socket.c:2845 [inline] do_recvmmsg+0x474/0xae0 net/socket.c:2939 __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline] __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline] __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline] __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x199/0x250 net/socket.c:3034 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7faeb6363db9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 c1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffcc1997168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000012b RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007faeb6363db9 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000bc0 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000001c R10: 0000000000000122 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001(CVE-2024-36905)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: bnx2fc: Remove spin_lock_bh while releasing resources after upload
The session resources are used by FW and driver when session is offloaded, once session is uploaded these resources are not used. The lock is not required as these fields won't be used any longer. The offload and upload calls are sequential, hence lock is not required.
This will suppress following BUG_ON():
[ 449.843143] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 449.848302] kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:2727! [ 449.853072] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [ 449.858712] CPU: 5 PID: 1996 Comm: kworker/u24:2 Not tainted 5.14.0-118.el9.x86_64 #1 Rebooting. [ 449.867454] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/0WCJNT, BIOS 2.3.4 11/08/2016 [ 449.876966] Workqueue: fc_rport_eq fc_rport_work [libfc] [ 449.882910] RIP: 0010:vunmap+0x2e/0x30 [ 449.887098] Code: 00 65 8b 05 14 a2 f0 4a a9 00 ff ff 00 75 1b 55 48 89 fd e8 34 36 79 00 48 85 ed 74 0b 48 89 ef 31 f6 5d e9 14 fc ff ff 5d c3 <0f> 0b 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 57 41 56 49 89 ce 41 55 49 89 fd 41 54 41 [ 449.908054] RSP: 0018:ffffb83d878b3d68 EFLAGS: 00010206 [ 449.913887] RAX: 0000000080000201 RBX: ffff8f4355133550 RCX: 000000000d400005 [ 449.921843] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: ffffb83da53f5000 [ 449.929808] RBP: ffff8f4ac6675800 R08: ffffb83d878b3d30 R09: 00000000000efbdf [ 449.937774] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffff8f434573e000 R12: 0000000000001000 [ 449.945736] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffffb83da53f5000 R15: ffff8f43d4ea3ae0 [ 449.953701] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f529fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 449.962732] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 449.969138] CR2: 00007f8cf993e150 CR3: 0000000efbe10003 CR4: 00000000003706e0 [ 449.977102] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 449.985065] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 449.993028] Call Trace: [ 449.995756] __iommu_dma_free+0x96/0x100 [ 450.000139] bnx2fc_free_session_resc+0x67/0x240 [bnx2fc] [ 450.006171] bnx2fc_upload_session+0xce/0x100 [bnx2fc] [ 450.011910] bnx2fc_rport_event_handler+0x9f/0x240 [bnx2fc] [ 450.018136] fc_rport_work+0x103/0x5b0 [libfc] [ 450.023103] process_one_work+0x1e8/0x3c0 [ 450.027581] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 450.031669] ? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370 [ 450.036143] kthread+0x149/0x170 [ 450.039744] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [ 450.044411] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 450.048404] Modules linked in: vfat msdos fat xfs nfs_layout_nfsv41_files rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver dm_service_time qedf qed crc8 bnx2fc libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp dcdbas rapl intel_cstate intel_uncore mei_me pcspkr mei ipmi_ssif lpc_ich ipmi_si fuse zram ext4 mbcache jbd2 loop nfsv3 nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache netfs irdma ice sd_mod t10_pi sg ib_uverbs ib_core 8021q garp mrp stp llc mgag200 i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi fb_sys_fops cec crct10dif_pclmul ahci crc32_pclmul bnx2x drm ghash_clmulni_intel libahci rfkill i40e libata megaraid_sas mdio wmi sunrpc lrw dm_crypt dm_round_robin dm_multipath dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_zero dm_mod linear raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_intel raid1 raid0 iscsi_ibft squashfs be2iscsi bnx2i cnic uio cxgb4i cxgb4 tls [ 450.048497] libcxgbi libcxgb qla4xxx iscsi_boot_sysfs iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi edd ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler [ 450.159753] ---[ end trace 712de2c57c64abc8 ]---(CVE-2024-36919)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bna: ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated
Currently, we allocate a nbytes-sized kernel buffer and copy nbytes from userspace to that buffer. Later, we use sscanf on this buffer but we don't ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to OOB read when using sscanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-36934)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Move NPIV's transport unregistration to after resource clean up
There are cases after NPIV deletion where the fabric switch still believes the NPIV is logged into the fabric. This occurs when a vport is unregistered before the Remove All DA_ID CT and LOGO ELS are sent to the fabric.
Currently fc_remove_host(), which calls dev_loss_tmo for all D_IDs including the fabric D_ID, removes the last ndlp reference and frees the ndlp rport object. This sometimes causes the race condition where the final DA_ID and LOGO are skipped from being sent to the fabric switch.
Fix by moving the fc_remove_host() and scsi_remove_host() calls after DA_ID and LOGO are sent.(CVE-2024-36952)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/vmwgfx: Fix invalid reads in fence signaled events
Correctly set the length of the drm_event to the size of the structure that's actually used.
The length of the drm_event was set to the parent structure instead of to the drm_vmw_event_fence which is supposed to be read. drm_read uses the length parameter to copy the event to the user space thus resuling in oob reads.(CVE-2024-36960)
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nPCI: aardvark: Fix kernel panic during PIO transfer\r\n\r\nTrying to start a new PIO transfer by writing value 0 in PIO_START register\nwhen previous transfer has not yet completed (which is indicated by value 1\nin PIO_START) causes an External Abort on CPU, which results in kernel\npanic:\r\n\r\n SError Interrupt on CPU0, code 0xbf000002 -- SError\n Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt\r\n\r\nTo prevent kernel panic, it is required to reject a new PIO transfer when\nprevious one has not finished yet.\r\n\r\nIf previous PIO transfer is not finished yet, the kernel may issue a new\nPIO request only if the previous PIO transfer timed out.\r\n\r\nIn the past the root cause of this issue was incorrectly identified (as it\noften happens during link retraining or after link down event) and special\nhack was implemented in Trusted Firmware to catch all SError events in EL3,\nto ignore errors with code 0xbf000002 and not forwarding any other errors\nto kernel and instead throw panic from EL3 Trusted Firmware handler.\r\n\r\nLinks to discussion and patches about this issue:\nhttps://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/commit/?id=3c7dcdac5c50\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20190316161243.29517-1-repk@triplefau.lt/\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/971be151d24312cc533989a64bd454b4@www.loen.fr/\nhttps://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/1541\r\n\r\nBut the real cause was the fact that during link retraining or after link\ndown event the PIO transfer may take longer time, up to the 1.44s until it\ntimes out. This increased probability that a new PIO transfer would be\nissued by kernel while previous one has not finished yet.\r\n\r\nAfter applying this change into the kernel, it is possible to revert the\nmentioned TF-A hack and SError events do not have to be caught in TF-A EL3.(CVE-2021-47229)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nphy: phy-mtk-tphy: Fix some resource leaks in mtk_phy_init()\r\n\r\nUse clk_disable_unprepare() in the error path of mtk_phy_init() to fix\nsome resource leaks.(CVE-2021-47234)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: rds: fix memory leak in rds_recvmsg\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported memory leak in rds. The problem\nwas in unputted refcount in case of error.\r\n\r\nint rds_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,\n\t\tint msg_flags)\n{\n...\r\n\r\n\tif (!rds_next_incoming(rs, \u0026amp;inc)) {\n\t\t...\n\t}\r\n\r\nAfter this \u0026quot;if\u0026quot; inc refcount incremented and\r\n\r\n\tif (rds_cmsg_recv(inc, msg, rs)) {\n\t\tret = -EFAULT;\n\t\tgoto out;\n\t}\n...\nout:\n\treturn ret;\n}\r\n\r\nin case of rds_cmsg_recv() fail the refcount won\u0026apos;t be\ndecremented. And it\u0026apos;s easy to see from ftrace log, that\nrds_inc_addref() don\u0026apos;t have rds_inc_put() pair in\nrds_recvmsg() after rds_cmsg_recv()\r\n\r\n 1) | rds_recvmsg() {\n 1) 3.721 us | rds_inc_addref();\n 1) 3.853 us | rds_message_inc_copy_to_user();\n 1) + 10.395 us | rds_cmsg_recv();\n 1) + 34.260 us | }(CVE-2021-47249)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ieee802154: fix null deref in parse dev addr\r\n\r\nFix a logic error that could result in a null deref if the user sets\nthe mode incorrectly for the given addr type.(CVE-2021-47257)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: fix various gadget panics on 10gbps cabling\r\n\r\nusb_assign_descriptors() is called with 5 parameters,\nthe last 4 of which are the usb_descriptor_header for:\n full-speed (USB1.1 - 12Mbps [including USB1.0 low-speed @ 1.5Mbps),\n high-speed (USB2.0 - 480Mbps),\n super-speed (USB3.0 - 5Gbps),\n super-speed-plus (USB3.1 - 10Gbps).\r\n\r\nThe differences between full/high/super-speed descriptors are usually\nsubstantial (due to changes in the maximum usb block size from 64 to 512\nto 1024 bytes and other differences in the specs), while the difference\nbetween 5 and 10Gbps descriptors may be as little as nothing\n(in many cases the same tuning is simply good enough).\r\n\r\nHowever if a gadget driver calls usb_assign_descriptors() with\na NULL descriptor for super-speed-plus and is then used on a max 10gbps\nconfiguration, the kernel will crash with a null pointer dereference,\nwhen a 10gbps capable device port + cable + host port combination shows up.\n(This wouldn\u0026apos;t happen if the gadget max-speed was set to 5gbps, but\nit of course defaults to the maximum, and there\u0026apos;s no real reason to\nartificially limit it)\r\n\r\nThe fix is to simply use the 5gbps descriptor as the 10gbps descriptor,\nif a 10gbps descriptor wasn\u0026apos;t provided.\r\n\r\nObviously this won\u0026apos;t fix the problem if the 5gbps descriptor is also\nNULL, but such cases can\u0026apos;t be so trivially solved (and any such gadgets\nare unlikely to be used with USB3 ports any way).(CVE-2021-47267)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: seq: Fix race of snd_seq_timer_open()\r\n\r\nThe timer instance per queue is exclusive, and snd_seq_timer_open()\nshould have managed the concurrent accesses. It looks as if it\u0026apos;s\nchecking the already existing timer instance at the beginning, but\nit\u0026apos;s not right, because there is no protection, hence any later\nconcurrent call of snd_seq_timer_open() may override the timer\ninstance easily. This may result in UAF, as the leftover timer\ninstance can keep running while the queue itself gets closed, as\nspotted by syzkaller recently.\r\n\r\nFor avoiding the race, add a proper check at the assignment of\ntmr-\u0026gt;timeri again, and return -EBUSY if it\u0026apos;s been already registered.(CVE-2021-47281)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nigb: Fix use-after-free error during reset\r\n\r\nCleans the next descriptor to watch (next_to_watch) when cleaning the\nTX ring.\r\n\r\nFailure to do so can cause invalid memory accesses. If igb_poll() runs\nwhile the controller is reset this can lead to the driver try to free\na skb that was already freed.\r\n\r\n(The crash is harder to reproduce with the igb driver, but the same\npotential problem exists as the code is identical to igc)(CVE-2021-47301)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ti: fix UAF in tlan_remove_one\r\n\r\npriv is netdev private data and it cannot be\nused after free_netdev() call. Using priv after free_netdev()\ncan cause UAF bug. Fix it by moving free_netdev() at the end of the\nfunction.(CVE-2021-47310)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwatchdog: Fix possible use-after-free by calling del_timer_sync()\r\n\r\nThis driver\u0026apos;s remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function\ndoes not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the\ntimer handler may still be running after the driver\u0026apos;s remove function\nhas finished, which would result in a use-after-free.\r\n\r\nFix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler\nhas finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47321)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmisc/libmasm/module: Fix two use after free in ibmasm_init_one\r\n\r\nIn ibmasm_init_one, it calls ibmasm_init_remote_input_dev().\nInside ibmasm_init_remote_input_dev, mouse_dev and keybd_dev are\nallocated by input_allocate_device(), and assigned to\nsp-\u0026gt;remote.mouse_dev and sp-\u0026gt;remote.keybd_dev respectively.\r\n\r\nIn the err_free_devices error branch of ibmasm_init_one,\nmouse_dev and keybd_dev are freed by input_free_device(), and return\nerror. Then the execution runs into error_send_message error branch\nof ibmasm_init_one, where ibmasm_free_remote_input_dev(sp) is called\nto unregister the freed sp-\u0026gt;remote.mouse_dev and sp-\u0026gt;remote.keybd_dev.\r\n\r\nMy patch add a \u0026quot;error_init_remote\u0026quot; label to handle the error of\nibmasm_init_remote_input_dev(), to avoid the uaf bugs.(CVE-2021-47334)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: zr364xx: fix memory leak in zr364xx_start_readpipe\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported memory leak in zr364xx driver.\nThe problem was in non-freed urb in case of\nusb_submit_urb() fail.\r\n\r\nbacktrace:\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff82baedf6\u0026gt;] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:561 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff82baedf6\u0026gt;] usb_alloc_urb+0x66/0xe0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:74\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff82f7cce8\u0026gt;] zr364xx_start_readpipe+0x78/0x130 drivers/media/usb/zr364xx/zr364xx.c:1022\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff84251dfc\u0026gt;] zr364xx_board_init drivers/media/usb/zr364xx/zr364xx.c:1383 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff84251dfc\u0026gt;] zr364xx_probe+0x6a3/0x851 drivers/media/usb/zr364xx/zr364xx.c:1516\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff82bb6507\u0026gt;] usb_probe_interface+0x177/0x370 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:396\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff826018a9\u0026gt;] really_probe+0x159/0x500 drivers/base/dd.c:576(CVE-2021-47344)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/sched: Avoid data corruptions\r\n\r\nWait for all dependencies of a job to complete before\nkilling it to avoid data corruptions.(CVE-2021-47354)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: macb: fix use after free on rmmod\r\n\r\nplat_dev-\u0026gt;dev-\u0026gt;platform_data is released by platform_device_unregister(),\nuse of pclk and hclk is a use-after-free. Since device unregister won\u0026apos;t\nneed a clk device we adjust the function call sequence to fix this issue.\r\n\r\n[ 31.261225] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in macb_remove+0x77/0xc6 [macb_pci]\n[ 31.275563] Freed by task 306:\n[ 30.276782] platform_device_release+0x25/0x80(CVE-2021-47372)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni2c: acpi: fix resource leak in reconfiguration device addition\r\n\r\nacpi_i2c_find_adapter_by_handle() calls bus_find_device() which takes a\nreference on the adapter which is never released which will result in a\nreference count leak and render the adapter unremovable. Make sure to\nput the adapter after creating the client in the same manner that we do\nfor OF.\r\n\r\n[wsa: fixed title](CVE-2021-47425)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: encx24j600: check error in devm_regmap_init_encx24j600\r\n\r\ndevm_regmap_init may return error which caused by like out of memory,\nthis will results in null pointer dereference later when reading\nor writing register:\r\n\r\ngeneral protection fault in encx24j600_spi_probe\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000090-0x0000000000000097]\nCPU: 0 PID: 286 Comm: spi-encx24j600- Not tainted 5.15.0-rc2-00142-g9978db750e31-dirty #11 9c53a778c1306b1b02359f3c2bbedc0222cba652\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:regcache_cache_bypass drivers/base/regmap/regcache.c:540\nCode: 54 41 89 f4 55 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 e8 26 94 a8 fe 48 8d bb a0 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 \u0026lt;80\u0026gt; 3c 02 00 0f 85 4a 03 00 00 4c 8d ab b0 00 00 00 48 8b ab a0 00\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900010476b8 EFLAGS: 00010207\nRAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: fffffffffffffff4 RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000012 RSI: ffff888002de0000 RDI: 0000000000000094\nRBP: ffff888013c9a000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff3f9cc6a\nR10: ffffc900010476e8 R11: fffffbfff3f9cc69 R12: 0000000000000001\nR13: 000000000000000a R14: ffff888013c9af54 R15: ffff888013c9ad08\nFS: 00007ffa984ab580(0000) GS:ffff88801fe00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 000055a6384136c8 CR3: 000000003bbe6003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n encx24j600_spi_probe drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/encx24j600.c:459\n spi_probe drivers/spi/spi.c:397\n really_probe drivers/base/dd.c:517\n __driver_probe_device drivers/base/dd.c:751\n driver_probe_device drivers/base/dd.c:782\n __device_attach_driver drivers/base/dd.c:899\n bus_for_each_drv drivers/base/bus.c:427\n __device_attach drivers/base/dd.c:971\n bus_probe_device drivers/base/bus.c:487\n device_add drivers/base/core.c:3364\n __spi_add_device drivers/spi/spi.c:599\n spi_add_device drivers/spi/spi.c:641\n spi_new_device drivers/spi/spi.c:717\n new_device_store+0x18c/0x1f1 [spi_stub 4e02719357f1ff33f5a43d00630982840568e85e]\n dev_attr_store drivers/base/core.c:2074\n sysfs_kf_write fs/sysfs/file.c:139\n kernfs_fop_write_iter fs/kernfs/file.c:300\n new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:508 (discriminator 4)\n vfs_write fs/read_write.c:594\n ksys_write fs/read_write.c:648\n do_syscall_64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:113\r\n\r\nAdd error check in devm_regmap_init_encx24j600 to avoid this situation.(CVE-2021-47440)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncan: peak_pci: peak_pci_remove(): fix UAF\r\n\r\nWhen remove the module peek_pci, referencing \u0026apos;chan\u0026apos; again after\nreleasing \u0026apos;dev\u0026apos; will cause UAF.\r\n\r\nFix this by releasing \u0026apos;dev\u0026apos; later.\r\n\r\nThe following log reveals it:\r\n\r\n[ 35.961814 ] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci]\n[ 35.963414 ] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888136998ee8 by task modprobe/5537\n[ 35.965513 ] Call Trace:\n[ 35.965718 ] dump_stack_lvl+0xa8/0xd1\n[ 35.966028 ] print_address_description+0x87/0x3b0\n[ 35.966420 ] kasan_report+0x172/0x1c0\n[ 35.966725 ] ? peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci]\n[ 35.967137 ] ? trace_irq_enable_rcuidle+0x10/0x170\n[ 35.967529 ] ? peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci]\n[ 35.967945 ] __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20\n[ 35.968346 ] peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci]\n[ 35.968752 ] pci_device_remove+0xa9/0x250(CVE-2021-47456)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nisdn: mISDN: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context\r\n\r\nThe driver can call card-\u0026gt;isac.release() function from an atomic\ncontext.\r\n\r\nFix this by calling this function after releasing the lock.\r\n\r\nThe following log reveals it:\r\n\r\n[ 44.168226 ] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:3018\n[ 44.168941 ] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 5475, name: modprobe\n[ 44.169574 ] INFO: lockdep is turned off.\n[ 44.169899 ] irq event stamp: 0\n[ 44.170160 ] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [\u0026lt;0000000000000000\u0026gt;] 0x0\n[ 44.170627 ] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [\u0026lt;ffffffff814209ed\u0026gt;] copy_process+0x132d/0x3e00\n[ 44.171240 ] softirqs last enabled at (0): [\u0026lt;ffffffff81420a1a\u0026gt;] copy_process+0x135a/0x3e00\n[ 44.171852 ] softirqs last disabled at (0): [\u0026lt;0000000000000000\u0026gt;] 0x0\n[ 44.172318 ] Preemption disabled at:\n[ 44.172320 ] [\u0026lt;ffffffffa009b0a9\u0026gt;] nj_release+0x69/0x500 [netjet]\n[ 44.174441 ] Call Trace:\n[ 44.174630 ] dump_stack_lvl+0xa8/0xd1\n[ 44.174912 ] dump_stack+0x15/0x17\n[ 44.175166 ] ___might_sleep+0x3a2/0x510\n[ 44.175459 ] ? nj_release+0x69/0x500 [netjet]\n[ 44.175791 ] __might_sleep+0x82/0xe0\n[ 44.176063 ] ? start_flush_work+0x20/0x7b0\n[ 44.176375 ] start_flush_work+0x33/0x7b0\n[ 44.176672 ] ? trace_irq_enable_rcuidle+0x85/0x170\n[ 44.177034 ] ? kasan_quarantine_put+0xaa/0x1f0\n[ 44.177372 ] ? kasan_quarantine_put+0xaa/0x1f0\n[ 44.177711 ] __flush_work+0x11a/0x1a0\n[ 44.177991 ] ? flush_work+0x20/0x20\n[ 44.178257 ] ? lock_release+0x13c/0x8f0\n[ 44.178550 ] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20\n[ 44.178872 ] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x148/0x360\n[ 44.179187 ] ? read_lock_is_recursive+0x20/0x20\n[ 44.179530 ] ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20\n[ 44.179846 ] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x55/0x900\n[ 44.180168 ] ? ____kasan_slab_free+0x116/0x140\n[ 44.180505 ] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x60\n[ 44.180878 ] ? skb_queue_purge+0x1a3/0x1c0\n[ 44.181189 ] ? kfree+0x13e/0x290\n[ 44.181438 ] flush_work+0x17/0x20\n[ 44.181695 ] mISDN_freedchannel+0xe8/0x100\n[ 44.182006 ] isac_release+0x210/0x260 [mISDNipac]\n[ 44.182366 ] nj_release+0xf6/0x500 [netjet]\n[ 44.182685 ] nj_remove+0x48/0x70 [netjet]\n[ 44.182989 ] pci_device_remove+0xa9/0x250(CVE-2021-47468)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncomedi: vmk80xx: fix bulk-buffer overflow\r\n\r\nThe driver is using endpoint-sized buffers but must not assume that the\ntx and rx buffers are of equal size or a malicious device could overflow\nthe slab-allocated receive buffer when doing bulk transfers.(CVE-2021-47474)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: batman-adv: fix error handling\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported ODEBUG warning in batadv_nc_mesh_free(). The problem was\nin wrong error handling in batadv_mesh_init().\r\n\r\nBefore this patch batadv_mesh_init() was calling batadv_mesh_free() in case\nof any batadv_*_init() calls failure. This approach may work well, when\nthere is some kind of indicator, which can tell which parts of batadv are\ninitialized; but there isn\u0026apos;t any.\r\n\r\nAll written above lead to cleaning up uninitialized fields. Even if we hide\nODEBUG warning by initializing bat_priv-\u0026gt;nc.work, syzbot was able to hit\nGPF in batadv_nc_purge_paths(), because hash pointer in still NULL. [1]\r\n\r\nTo fix these bugs we can unwind batadv_*_init() calls one by one.\nIt is good approach for 2 reasons: 1) It fixes bugs on error handling\npath 2) It improves the performance, since we won\u0026apos;t call unneeded\nbatadv_*_free() functions.\r\n\r\nSo, this patch makes all batadv_*_init() clean up all allocated memory\nbefore returning with an error to no call correspoing batadv_*_free()\nand open-codes batadv_mesh_free() with proper order to avoid touching\nuninitialized fields.(CVE-2021-47482)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nregmap: Fix possible double-free in regcache_rbtree_exit()\r\n\r\nIn regcache_rbtree_insert_to_block(), when \u0026apos;present\u0026apos; realloc failed,\nthe \u0026apos;blk\u0026apos; which is supposed to assign to \u0026apos;rbnode-\u0026gt;block\u0026apos; will be freed,\nso \u0026apos;rbnode-\u0026gt;block\u0026apos; points a freed memory, in the error handling path of\nregcache_rbtree_init(), \u0026apos;rbnode-\u0026gt;block\u0026apos; will be freed again in\nregcache_rbtree_exit(), KASAN will report double-free as follows:\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: double-free or invalid-free in kfree+0xce/0x390\nCall Trace:\n slab_free_freelist_hook+0x10d/0x240\n kfree+0xce/0x390\n regcache_rbtree_exit+0x15d/0x1a0\n regcache_rbtree_init+0x224/0x2c0\n regcache_init+0x88d/0x1310\n __regmap_init+0x3151/0x4a80\n __devm_regmap_init+0x7d/0x100\n madera_spi_probe+0x10f/0x333 [madera_spi]\n spi_probe+0x183/0x210\n really_probe+0x285/0xc30\r\n\r\nTo fix this, moving up the assignment of rbnode-\u0026gt;block to immediately after\nthe reallocation has succeeded so that the data structure stays valid even\nif the second reallocation fails.(CVE-2021-47483)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nIB/qib: Protect from buffer overflow in struct qib_user_sdma_pkt fields\r\n\r\nOverflowing either addrlimit or bytes_togo can allow userspace to trigger\na buffer overflow of kernel memory. Check for overflows in all the places\ndoing math on user controlled buffers.(CVE-2021-47485)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/tls: Fix flipped sign in tls_err_abort() calls\r\n\r\nsk-\u0026gt;sk_err appears to expect a positive value, a convention that ktls\ndoesn\u0026apos;t always follow and that leads to memory corruption in other code.\nFor instance,\r\n\r\n [kworker]\n tls_encrypt_done(..., err=\u0026lt;negative error from crypto request\u0026gt;)\n tls_err_abort(.., err)\n sk-\u0026gt;sk_err = err;\r\n\r\n [task]\n splice_from_pipe_feed\n ...\n tls_sw_do_sendpage\n if (sk-\u0026gt;sk_err) {\n ret = -sk-\u0026gt;sk_err; // ret is positive\r\n\r\n splice_from_pipe_feed (continued)\n ret = actor(...) // ret is still positive and interpreted as bytes\n // written, resulting in underflow of buf-\u0026gt;len and\n // sd-\u0026gt;len, leading to huge buf-\u0026gt;offset and bogus\n // addresses computed in later calls to actor()\r\n\r\nFix all tls_err_abort() callers to pass a negative error code\nconsistently and centralize the error-prone sign flip there, throwing in\na warning to catch future misuse and uninlining the function so it\nreally does only warn once.(CVE-2021-47496)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: pcm: oss: Limit the period size to 16MB\r\n\r\nSet the practical limit to the period size (the fragment shift in OSS)\ninstead of a full 31bit; a too large value could lead to the exhaust\nof memory as we allocate temporary buffers of the period size, too.\r\n\r\nAs of this patch, we set to 16MB limit, which should cover all use\ncases.(CVE-2021-47509)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfp: Fix memory leak in nfp_cpp_area_cache_add()\r\n\r\nIn line 800 (#1), nfp_cpp_area_alloc() allocates and initializes a\nCPP area structure. But in line 807 (#2), when the cache is allocated\nfailed, this CPP area structure is not freed, which will result in\nmemory leak.\r\n\r\nWe can fix it by freeing the CPP area when the cache is allocated\nfailed (#2).\r\n\r\n792 int nfp_cpp_area_cache_add(struct nfp_cpp *cpp, size_t size)\n793 {\n794 \tstruct nfp_cpp_area_cache *cache;\n795 \tstruct nfp_cpp_area *area;\r\n\r\n800\tarea = nfp_cpp_area_alloc(cpp, NFP_CPP_ID(7, NFP_CPP_ACTION_RW, 0),\n801 \t\t\t\t 0, size);\n\t// #1: allocates and initializes\r\n\r\n802 \tif (!area)\n803 \t\treturn -ENOMEM;\r\n\r\n805 \tcache = kzalloc(sizeof(*cache), GFP_KERNEL);\n806 \tif (!cache)\n807 \t\treturn -ENOMEM; // #2: missing free\r\n\r\n817\treturn 0;\n818 }(CVE-2021-47516)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nstaging: rtl8192e: Fix use after free in _rtl92e_pci_disconnect()\r\n\r\nThe free_rtllib() function frees the \u0026quot;dev\u0026quot; pointer so there is use\nafter free on the next line. Re-arrange things to avoid that.(CVE-2021-47571)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: brcmstb: pm-arm: Fix refcount leak and __iomem leak bugs\r\n\r\nIn brcmstb_pm_probe(), there are two kinds of leak bugs:\r\n\r\n(1) we need to add of_node_put() when for_each__matching_node() breaks\n(2) we need to add iounmap() for each iomap in fail path(CVE-2022-48693)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmmc: mmc_spi: fix error handling in mmc_spi_probe()\r\n\r\nIf mmc_add_host() fails, it doesn\u0026apos;t need to call mmc_remove_host(),\nor it will cause null-ptr-deref, because of deleting a not added\ndevice in mmc_remove_host().\r\n\r\nTo fix this, goto label \u0026apos;fail_glue_init\u0026apos;, if mmc_add_host() fails,\nand change the label \u0026apos;fail_add_host\u0026apos; to \u0026apos;fail_gpiod_request\u0026apos;.(CVE-2023-52708)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: USB: Fix wrong-direction WARNING in plusb.c\r\n\r\nThe syzbot fuzzer detected a bug in the plusb network driver: A\nzero-length control-OUT transfer was treated as a read instead of a\nwrite. In modern kernels this error provokes a WARNING:\r\n\r\nusb 1-1: BOGUS control dir, pipe 80000280 doesn\u0026apos;t match bRequestType c0\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4645 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:411\nusb_submit_urb+0x14a7/0x1880 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:411\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 1 PID: 4645 Comm: dhcpcd Not tainted\n6.2.0-rc6-syzkaller-00050-g9f266ccaa2f5 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google\n01/12/2023\nRIP: 0010:usb_submit_urb+0x14a7/0x1880 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:411\n...\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n usb_start_wait_urb+0x101/0x4b0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:58\n usb_internal_control_msg drivers/usb/core/message.c:102 [inline]\n usb_control_msg+0x320/0x4a0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:153\n __usbnet_read_cmd+0xb9/0x390 drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:2010\n usbnet_read_cmd+0x96/0xf0 drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:2068\n pl_vendor_req drivers/net/usb/plusb.c:60 [inline]\n pl_set_QuickLink_features drivers/net/usb/plusb.c:75 [inline]\n pl_reset+0x2f/0xf0 drivers/net/usb/plusb.c:85\n usbnet_open+0xcc/0x5d0 drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:889\n __dev_open+0x297/0x4d0 net/core/dev.c:1417\n __dev_change_flags+0x587/0x750 net/core/dev.c:8530\n dev_change_flags+0x97/0x170 net/core/dev.c:8602\n devinet_ioctl+0x15a2/0x1d70 net/ipv4/devinet.c:1147\n inet_ioctl+0x33f/0x380 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:979\n sock_do_ioctl+0xcc/0x230 net/socket.c:1169\n sock_ioctl+0x1f8/0x680 net/socket.c:1286\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\r\n\r\nThe fix is to call usbnet_write_cmd() instead of usbnet_read_cmd() and\nremove the USB_DIR_IN flag.(CVE-2023-52742)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nIB/hfi1: Restore allocated resources on failed copyout\r\n\r\nFix a resource leak if an error occurs.(CVE-2023-52747)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker\r\n\r\nSyzkaller reported the following issue:\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c:1031:27\nshift exponent 245 is too large for 32-bit type \u0026apos;int\u0026apos;\r\n\r\nWhen the value of the variable \u0026quot;sd-\u0026gt;params.exposure.gain\u0026quot; exceeds the\nnumber of bits in an integer, a shift-out-of-bounds error is reported. It\nis triggered because the variable \u0026quot;currentexp\u0026quot; cannot be left-shifted by\nmore than the number of bits in an integer. In order to avoid invalid\nrange during left-shift, the conditional expression is added.(CVE-2023-52764)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/jfs: Add check for negative db_l2nbperpage\r\n\r\nl2nbperpage is log2(number of blks per page), and the minimum legal\nvalue should be 0, not negative.\r\n\r\nIn the case of l2nbperpage being negative, an error will occur\nwhen subsequently used as shift exponent.\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported this bug:\r\n\r\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:799:12\nshift exponent -16777216 is negative(CVE-2023-52810)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nlocking/ww_mutex/test: Fix potential workqueue corruption\r\n\r\nIn some cases running with the test-ww_mutex code, I was seeing\nodd behavior where sometimes it seemed flush_workqueue was\nreturning before all the work threads were finished.\r\n\r\nOften this would cause strange crashes as the mutexes would be\nfreed while they were being used.\r\n\r\nLooking at the code, there is a lifetime problem as the\ncontrolling thread that spawns the work allocates the\n\u0026quot;struct stress\u0026quot; structures that are passed to the workqueue\nthreads. Then when the workqueue threads are finished,\nthey free the stress struct that was passed to them.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately the workqueue work_struct node is in the stress\nstruct. Which means the work_struct is freed before the work\nthread returns and while flush_workqueue is waiting.\r\n\r\nIt seems like a better idea to have the controlling thread\nboth allocate and free the stress structures, so that we can\nbe sure we don\u0026apos;t corrupt the workqueue by freeing the structure\nprematurely.\r\n\r\nSo this patch reworks the test to do so, and with this change\nI no longer see the early flush_workqueue returns.(CVE-2023-52836)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nllc: verify mac len before reading mac header\r\n\r\nLLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb\nhas an Ethernet header.\r\n\r\nSyzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert\npackets without mac len and with user configurable skb-\u0026gt;protocol\n(passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).\r\n\r\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782\n tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555\n tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\r\n\r\nAdd a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.\r\n\r\nThere are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are\nprotected by a test skb-\u0026gt;protocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not\nprotect against this tun scenario.\r\n\r\nBut the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will\nindirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any\nother LLC code.\r\n\r\nIt is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but\nnot sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume\nan Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3\nprotocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used\nto, on top of Token Ring.\r\n\r\nAt least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start\nof git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in\nthis commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all\nstable kernels should receive this.(CVE-2023-52843)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: mediatek: clk-mt2701: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data\r\n\r\nAdd the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to\navoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52875)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntty: n_gsm: require CAP_NET_ADMIN to attach N_GSM0710 ldisc\r\n\r\nAny unprivileged user can attach N_GSM0710 ldisc, but it requires\nCAP_NET_ADMIN to create a GSM network anyway.\r\n\r\nRequire initial namespace CAP_NET_ADMIN to do that.(CVE-2023-52880)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Prevent deadlock while disabling aRFS\r\n\r\nWhen disabling aRFS under the `priv-\u0026gt;state_lock`, any scheduled\naRFS works are canceled using the `cancel_work_sync` function,\nwhich waits for the work to end if it has already started.\nHowever, while waiting for the work handler, the handler will\ntry to acquire the `state_lock` which is already acquired.\r\n\r\nThe worker acquires the lock to delete the rules if the state\nis down, which is not the worker\u0026apos;s responsibility since\ndisabling aRFS deletes the rules.\r\n\r\nAdd an aRFS state variable, which indicates whether the aRFS is\nenabled and prevent adding rules when the aRFS is disabled.\r\n\r\nKernel log:\r\n\r\n======================================================\nWARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Tainted: G I\n------------------------------------------------------\nethtool/386089 is trying to acquire lock:\nffff88810f21ce68 ((work_completion)(\u0026amp;rule-\u0026gt;arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\r\n\r\nbut task is already holding lock:\nffff8884a1808cc0 (\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]\r\n\r\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\r\n\r\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\r\n\r\n-\u0026gt; #1 (\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n __mutex_lock+0x80/0xc90\n arfs_handle_work+0x4b/0x3b0 [mlx5_core]\n process_one_work+0x1dc/0x4a0\n worker_thread+0x1bf/0x3c0\n kthread+0xd7/0x100\n ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\r\n\r\n-\u0026gt; #0 ((work_completion)(\u0026amp;rule-\u0026gt;arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:\n __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80\n lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0\n __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0\n __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0\n arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0\n ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240\n genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120\n genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100\n genl_rcv+0x24/0x40\n netlink_unicast+0x1a1/0x270\n netlink_sendmsg+0x214/0x460\n __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60\n __sys_sendto+0x113/0x170\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30\n do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e\r\n\r\nother info that might help us debug this:\r\n\r\n Possible unsafe locking scenario:\r\n\r\n CPU0 CPU1\n ---- ----\n lock(\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock);\n lock((work_completion)(\u0026amp;rule-\u0026gt;arfs_work));\n lock(\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock);\n lock((work_completion)(\u0026amp;rule-\u0026gt;arfs_work));\r\n\r\n *** DEADLOCK ***\r\n\r\n3 locks held by ethtool/386089:\n #0: ffffffff82ea7210 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40\n #1: ffffffff82e94c88 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ethnl_default_set_doit+0xd3/0x240\n #2: ffff8884a1808cc0 (\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]\r\n\r\nstack backtrace:\nCPU: 15 PID: 386089 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G I 6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xa0\n check_noncircular+0x144/0x160\n __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80\n lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0\n ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\n ? save_trace+0x3e/0x360\n ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\n __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0\n ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\n ? __lock_acquire+0xa78/0x2c80\n ? lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0\n ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70\n __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0\n ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70\n arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0\n ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240\n genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120\n genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0\n ? ethn\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-27014)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_obj_type_get()\r\n\r\nnft_unregister_obj() can concurrent with __nft_obj_type_get(),\nand there is not any protection when iterate over nf_tables_objects\nlist in __nft_obj_type_get(). Therefore, there is potential data-race\nof nf_tables_objects list entry.\r\n\r\nUse list_for_each_entry_rcu() to iterate over nf_tables_objects\nlist in __nft_obj_type_get(), and use rcu_read_lock() in the caller\nnft_obj_type_get() to protect the entire type query process.(CVE-2024-27019)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nphonet/pep: fix racy skb_queue_empty() use\r\n\r\nThe receive queues are protected by their respective spin-lock, not\nthe socket lock. This could lead to skb_peek() unexpectedly\nreturning NULL or a pointer to an already dequeued socket buffer.(CVE-2024-27402)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: fsl: qbman: Use raw spinlock for cgr_lock\r\n\r\nsmp_call_function always runs its callback in hard IRQ context, even on\nPREEMPT_RT, where spinlocks can sleep. So we need to use a raw spinlock\nfor cgr_lock to ensure we aren\u0026apos;t waiting on a sleeping task.\r\n\r\nAlthough this bug has existed for a while, it was not apparent until\ncommit ef2a8d5478b9 (\u0026quot;net: dpaa: Adjust queue depth on rate change\u0026quot;)\nwhich invokes smp_call_function_single via qman_update_cgr_safe every\ntime a link goes up or down.(CVE-2024-35819)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nubifs: Set page uptodate in the correct place\r\n\r\nPage cache reads are lockless, so setting the freshly allocated page\nuptodate before we\u0026apos;ve overwritten it with the data it\u0026apos;s supposed to have\nin it will allow a simultaneous reader to see old data. Move the call\nto SetPageUptodate into ubifs_write_end(), which is after we copied the\nnew data into the page.(CVE-2024-35821)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: libertas: fix some memleaks in lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer()\r\n\r\nIn the for statement of lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer(), if the allocation of\ncmdarray[i].cmdbuf fails, both cmdarray and cmdarray[i].cmdbuf needs to\nbe freed. Otherwise, there will be memleaks in lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer().(CVE-2024-35828)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets\r\n\r\nWe had various syzbot reports about tcp timers firing after\nthe corresponding netns has been dismantled.\r\n\r\nFortunately Josef Bacik could trigger the issue more often,\nand could test a patch I wrote two years ago.\r\n\r\nWhen TCP sockets are closed, we call inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers()\nto \u0026apos;stop\u0026apos; the timers.\r\n\r\ninet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() can be called from any context,\nincluding when socket lock is held.\nThis is the reason it uses sk_stop_timer(), aka del_timer().\nThis means that ongoing timers might finish much later.\r\n\r\nFor user sockets, this is fine because each running timer\nholds a reference on the socket, and the user socket holds\na reference on the netns.\r\n\r\nFor kernel sockets, we risk that the netns is freed before\ntimer can complete, because kernel sockets do not hold\nreference on the netns.\r\n\r\nThis patch adds inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() function\nthat using sk_stop_timer_sync() to make sure all timers\nare terminated before the kernel socket is released.\nModules using kernel sockets close them in their netns exit()\nhandler.\r\n\r\nAlso add sock_not_owned_by_me() helper to get LOCKDEP\nsupport : inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() must not be called\nwhile socket lock is held.\r\n\r\nIt is very possible we can revert in the future commit\n3a58f13a881e (\u0026quot;net: rds: acquire refcount on TCP sockets\u0026quot;)\nwhich attempted to solve the issue in rds only.\n(net/smc/af_smc.c and net/mptcp/subflow.c have similar code)\r\n\r\nWe probably can remove the check_net() tests from\ntcp_out_of_resources() and __tcp_close() in the future.(CVE-2024-35910)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: send: handle path ref underflow in header iterate_inode_ref()\r\n\r\nChange BUG_ON to proper error handling if building the path buffer\nfails. The pointers are not printed so we don\u0026apos;t accidentally leak kernel\naddresses.(CVE-2024-35935)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: cfg80211: check A-MSDU format more carefully\r\n\r\nIf it looks like there\u0026apos;s another subframe in the A-MSDU\nbut the header isn\u0026apos;t fully there, we can end up reading\ndata out of bounds, only to discard later. Make this a\nbit more careful and check if the subframe header can\neven be present.(CVE-2024-35937)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndyndbg: fix old BUG_ON in \u0026gt;control parser\r\n\r\nFix a BUG_ON from 2009. Even if it looks \u0026quot;unreachable\u0026quot; (I didn\u0026apos;t\nreally look), lets make sure by removing it, doing pr_err and return\n-EINVAL instead.(CVE-2024-35947)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbatman-adv: Avoid infinite loop trying to resize local TT\r\n\r\nIf the MTU of one of an attached interface becomes too small to transmit\nthe local translation table then it must be resized to fit inside all\nfragments (when enabled) or a single packet.\r\n\r\nBut if the MTU becomes too low to transmit even the header + the VLAN\nspecific part then the resizing of the local TT will never succeed. This\ncan for example happen when the usable space is 110 bytes and 11 VLANs are\non top of batman-adv. In this case, at least 116 byte would be needed.\nThere will just be an endless spam of\r\n\r\n batman_adv: batadv0: Forced to purge local tt entries to fit new maximum fragment MTU (110)\r\n\r\nin the log but the function will never finish. Problem here is that the\ntimeout will be halved all the time and will then stagnate at 0 and\ntherefore never be able to reduce the table even more.\r\n\r\nThere are other scenarios possible with a similar result. The number of\nBATADV_TT_CLIENT_NOPURGE entries in the local TT can for example be too\nhigh to fit inside a packet. Such a scenario can therefore happen also with\nonly a single VLAN + 7 non-purgable addresses - requiring at least 120\nbytes.\r\n\r\nWhile this should be handled proactively when:\r\n\r\n* interface with too low MTU is added\n* VLAN is added\n* non-purgeable local mac is added\n* MTU of an attached interface is reduced\n* fragmentation setting gets disabled (which most likely requires dropping\n attached interfaces)\r\n\r\nnot all of these scenarios can be prevented because batman-adv is only\nconsuming events without the the possibility to prevent these actions\n(non-purgable MAC address added, MTU of an attached interface is reduced).\nIt is therefore necessary to also make sure that the code is able to handle\nalso the situations when there were already incompatible system\nconfiguration are present.(CVE-2024-35982)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntty: n_gsm: fix possible out-of-bounds in gsm0_receive()\r\n\r\nAssuming the following:\n- side A configures the n_gsm in basic option mode\n- side B sends the header of a basic option mode frame with data length 1\n- side A switches to advanced option mode\n- side B sends 2 data bytes which exceeds gsm-\u0026gt;len\n Reason: gsm-\u0026gt;len is not used in advanced option mode.\n- side A switches to basic option mode\n- side B keeps sending until gsm0_receive() writes past gsm-\u0026gt;buf\n Reason: Neither gsm-\u0026gt;state nor gsm-\u0026gt;len have been reset after\n reconfiguration.\r\n\r\nFix this by changing gsm-\u0026gt;count to gsm-\u0026gt;len comparison from equal to less\nthan. Also add upper limit checks against the constant MAX_MRU in\ngsm0_receive() and gsm1_receive() to harden against memory corruption of\ngsm-\u0026gt;len and gsm-\u0026gt;mru.\r\n\r\nAll other checks remain as we still need to limit the data according to the\nuser configuration and actual payload size.(CVE-2024-36016)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntipc: fix UAF in error path\r\n\r\nSam Page (sam4k) working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative reported\na UAF in the tipc_buf_append() error path:\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0\nlinux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff88804d2a7c80 by task poc/8034\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 8034 Comm: poc Not tainted 6.8.2 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS\n1.16.0-debian-1.16.0-5 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack linux/lib/dump_stack.c:88\n dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 linux/lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description linux/mm/kasan/report.c:377\n print_report+0xc4/0x620 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0xda/0x110 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:601\n kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183\n skb_release_data+0x5af/0x880 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1026\n skb_release_all linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1094\n __kfree_skb linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1108\n kfree_skb_reason+0x12d/0x210 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1144\n kfree_skb linux/./include/linux/skbuff.h:1244\n tipc_buf_append+0x425/0xb50 linux/net/tipc/msg.c:186\n tipc_link_input+0x224/0x7c0 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1324\n tipc_link_rcv+0x76e/0x2d70 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1824\n tipc_rcv+0x45f/0x10f0 linux/net/tipc/node.c:2159\n tipc_udp_recv+0x73b/0x8f0 linux/net/tipc/udp_media.c:390\n udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0xad2/0x1850 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2108\n udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x131/0xb00 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2186\n udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x165/0x3b0 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2346\n __udp4_lib_rcv+0x2594/0x3400 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2422\n ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x30c/0x4e0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205\n ip_local_deliver_finish+0x2e4/0x520 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308\n ip_local_deliver+0x18e/0x1f0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254\n dst_input linux/./include/net/dst.h:461\n ip_rcv_finish linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308\n ip_rcv+0x2c5/0x5d0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:569\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x199/0x1e0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5534\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1f/0x1c0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5648\n process_backlog+0x101/0x6b0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5976\n __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xba/0x550 linux/net/core/dev.c:6576\n napi_poll linux/net/core/dev.c:6645\n net_rx_action+0x95a/0xe90 linux/net/core/dev.c:6781\n __do_softirq+0x21f/0x8e7 linux/kernel/softirq.c:553\n do_softirq linux/kernel/softirq.c:454\n do_softirq+0xb2/0xf0 linux/kernel/softirq.c:441\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __local_bh_enable_ip+0x100/0x120 linux/kernel/softirq.c:381\n local_bh_enable linux/./include/linux/bottom_half.h:33\n rcu_read_unlock_bh linux/./include/linux/rcupdate.h:851\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x871/0x3ee0 linux/net/core/dev.c:4378\n dev_queue_xmit linux/./include/linux/netdevice.h:3169\n neigh_hh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:526\n neigh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:540\n ip_finish_output2+0x169f/0x2550 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235\n __ip_finish_output linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:313\n __ip_finish_output+0x49e/0x950 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:295\n ip_finish_output+0x31/0x310 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:323\n NF_HOOK_COND linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:303\n ip_output+0x13b/0x2a0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433\n dst_output linux/./include/net/dst.h:451\n ip_local_out linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129\n ip_send_skb+0x3e5/0x560 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1492\n udp_send_skb+0x73f/0x1530 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:963\n udp_sendmsg+0x1a36/0x2b40 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:1250\n inet_sendmsg+0x105/0x140 linux/net/ipv4/af_inet.c:850\n sock_sendmsg_nosec linux/net/socket.c:730\n __sock_sendmsg linux/net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x42c/0x4e0 linux/net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2203\n __se_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2199\n __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 linux/net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_x64 linux/arch/x86/entry/common.c:52\n do_syscall_\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-36886)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: prevent NULL dereference in ip6_output()\r\n\r\nAccording to syzbot, there is a chance that ip6_dst_idev()\nreturns NULL in ip6_output(). Most places in IPv6 stack\ndeal with a NULL idev just fine, but not here.\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported:\r\n\r\ngeneral protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000bc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000005e0-0x00000000000005e7]\nCPU: 0 PID: 9775 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00157-g6a30653b604a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\n RIP: 0010:ip6_output+0x231/0x3f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:237\nCode: 3c 1e 00 49 89 df 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 19 58 db f7 48 8b 44 24 20 49 89 45 00 49 89 c5 48 8d 9d e0 05 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 \u0026lt;42\u0026gt; 0f b6 04 38 84 c0 4c 8b 74 24 28 0f 85 61 01 00 00 8b 1b 31 ff\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000927f0d8 EFLAGS: 00010202\nRAX: 00000000000000bc RBX: 00000000000005e0 RCX: 0000000000040000\nRDX: ffffc900131f9000 RSI: 0000000000004f47 RDI: 0000000000004f48\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff8a1f0b9a R09: 1ffffffff1f51fad\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f51fae R12: ffff8880293ec8c0\nR13: ffff88805d7fc000 R14: 1ffff1100527d91a R15: dffffc0000000000\nFS: 00007f135c6856c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000000020000080 CR3: 0000000064096000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline]\n ip6_xmit+0xefe/0x17f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:358\n sctp_v6_xmit+0x9f2/0x13f0 net/sctp/ipv6.c:248\n sctp_packet_transmit+0x26ad/0x2ca0 net/sctp/output.c:653\n sctp_packet_singleton+0x22c/0x320 net/sctp/outqueue.c:783\n sctp_outq_flush_ctrl net/sctp/outqueue.c:914 [inline]\n sctp_outq_flush+0x6d5/0x3e20 net/sctp/outqueue.c:1212\n sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1198 [inline]\n sctp_do_sm+0x59cc/0x60c0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1169\n sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE+0x95/0xc0 net/sctp/primitive.c:73\n __sctp_connect+0x9cd/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1234\n sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline]\n sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834\n __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline]\n __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065\n __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline]\n __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline]\n __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36901)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets\r\n\r\nTCP_SYN_RECV state is really special, it is only used by\ncross-syn connections, mostly used by fuzzers.\r\n\r\nIn the following crash [1], syzbot managed to trigger a divide\nby zero in tcp_rcv_space_adjust()\r\n\r\nA socket makes the following state transitions,\nwithout ever calling tcp_init_transfer(),\nmeaning tcp_init_buffer_space() is also not called.\r\n\r\n TCP_CLOSE\nconnect()\n TCP_SYN_SENT\n TCP_SYN_RECV\nshutdown() -\u0026gt; tcp_shutdown(sk, SEND_SHUTDOWN)\n TCP_FIN_WAIT1\r\n\r\nTo fix this issue, change tcp_shutdown() to not\nperform a TCP_SYN_RECV -\u0026gt; TCP_FIN_WAIT1 transition,\nwhich makes no sense anyway.\r\n\r\nWhen tcp_rcv_state_process() later changes socket state\nfrom TCP_SYN_RECV to TCP_ESTABLISH, then look at\nsk-\u0026gt;sk_shutdown to finally enter TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state,\nand send a FIN packet from a sane socket state.\r\n\r\nThis means tcp_send_fin() can now be called from BH\ncontext, and must use GFP_ATOMIC allocations.\r\n\r\n[1]\ndivide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI\nCPU: 1 PID: 5084 Comm: syz-executor358 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-syzkaller-00022-g98369dccd2f8 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\n RIP: 0010:tcp_rcv_space_adjust+0x2df/0x890 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:767\nCode: e3 04 4c 01 eb 48 8b 44 24 38 0f b6 04 10 84 c0 49 89 d5 0f 85 a5 03 00 00 41 8b 8e c8 09 00 00 89 e8 29 c8 48 0f af c3 31 d2 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; f7 f1 48 8d 1c 43 49 8d 96 76 08 00 00 48 89 d0 48 c1 e8 03 48\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900031ef3f0 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0c677a10441f8f42 RBX: 000000004fb95e7e RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\nRBP: 0000000027d4b11f R08: ffffffff89e535a4 R09: 1ffffffff25e6ab7\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffffff8135e920 R12: ffff88802a9f8d30\nR13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff88802a9f8d00 R15: 1ffff1100553f2da\nFS: 00005555775c0380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f1155bf2304 CR3: 000000002b9f2000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n tcp_recvmsg_locked+0x106d/0x25a0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2513\n tcp_recvmsg+0x25d/0x920 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2578\n inet6_recvmsg+0x16a/0x730 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:680\n sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline]\n sock_recvmsg+0x109/0x280 net/socket.c:1068\n ____sys_recvmsg+0x1db/0x470 net/socket.c:2803\n ___sys_recvmsg net/socket.c:2845 [inline]\n do_recvmmsg+0x474/0xae0 net/socket.c:2939\n __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline]\n __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline]\n __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline]\n __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x199/0x250 net/socket.c:3034\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7faeb6363db9\nCode: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 c1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007ffcc1997168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000012b\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007faeb6363db9\nRDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000bc0 RDI: 0000000000000005\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000001c\nR10: 0000000000000122 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001(CVE-2024-36905)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: bnx2fc: Remove spin_lock_bh while releasing resources after upload\r\n\r\nThe session resources are used by FW and driver when session is offloaded,\nonce session is uploaded these resources are not used. The lock is not\nrequired as these fields won\u0026apos;t be used any longer. The offload and upload\ncalls are sequential, hence lock is not required.\r\n\r\nThis will suppress following BUG_ON():\r\n\r\n[ 449.843143] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 449.848302] kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:2727!\n[ 449.853072] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\n[ 449.858712] CPU: 5 PID: 1996 Comm: kworker/u24:2 Not tainted 5.14.0-118.el9.x86_64 #1\nRebooting.\n[ 449.867454] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/0WCJNT, BIOS 2.3.4 11/08/2016\n[ 449.876966] Workqueue: fc_rport_eq fc_rport_work [libfc]\n[ 449.882910] RIP: 0010:vunmap+0x2e/0x30\n[ 449.887098] Code: 00 65 8b 05 14 a2 f0 4a a9 00 ff ff 00 75 1b 55 48 89 fd e8 34 36 79 00 48 85 ed 74 0b 48 89 ef 31 f6 5d e9 14 fc ff ff 5d c3 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 57 41 56 49 89 ce 41 55 49 89 fd 41 54 41\n[ 449.908054] RSP: 0018:ffffb83d878b3d68 EFLAGS: 00010206\n[ 449.913887] RAX: 0000000080000201 RBX: ffff8f4355133550 RCX: 000000000d400005\n[ 449.921843] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: ffffb83da53f5000\n[ 449.929808] RBP: ffff8f4ac6675800 R08: ffffb83d878b3d30 R09: 00000000000efbdf\n[ 449.937774] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffff8f434573e000 R12: 0000000000001000\n[ 449.945736] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffffb83da53f5000 R15: ffff8f43d4ea3ae0\n[ 449.953701] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f529fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 449.962732] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 449.969138] CR2: 00007f8cf993e150 CR3: 0000000efbe10003 CR4: 00000000003706e0\n[ 449.977102] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n[ 449.985065] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n[ 449.993028] Call Trace:\n[ 449.995756] __iommu_dma_free+0x96/0x100\n[ 450.000139] bnx2fc_free_session_resc+0x67/0x240 [bnx2fc]\n[ 450.006171] bnx2fc_upload_session+0xce/0x100 [bnx2fc]\n[ 450.011910] bnx2fc_rport_event_handler+0x9f/0x240 [bnx2fc]\n[ 450.018136] fc_rport_work+0x103/0x5b0 [libfc]\n[ 450.023103] process_one_work+0x1e8/0x3c0\n[ 450.027581] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0\n[ 450.031669] ? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370\n[ 450.036143] kthread+0x149/0x170\n[ 450.039744] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40\n[ 450.044411] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n[ 450.048404] Modules linked in: vfat msdos fat xfs nfs_layout_nfsv41_files rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver dm_service_time qedf qed crc8 bnx2fc libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp dcdbas rapl intel_cstate intel_uncore mei_me pcspkr mei ipmi_ssif lpc_ich ipmi_si fuse zram ext4 mbcache jbd2 loop nfsv3 nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache netfs irdma ice sd_mod t10_pi sg ib_uverbs ib_core 8021q garp mrp stp llc mgag200 i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi fb_sys_fops cec crct10dif_pclmul ahci crc32_pclmul bnx2x drm ghash_clmulni_intel libahci rfkill i40e libata megaraid_sas mdio wmi sunrpc lrw dm_crypt dm_round_robin dm_multipath dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_zero dm_mod linear raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_intel raid1 raid0 iscsi_ibft squashfs be2iscsi bnx2i cnic uio cxgb4i cxgb4 tls\n[ 450.048497] libcxgbi libcxgb qla4xxx iscsi_boot_sysfs iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi edd ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler\n[ 450.159753] ---[ end trace 712de2c57c64abc8 ]---(CVE-2024-36919)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbna: ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated\r\n\r\nCurrently, we allocate a nbytes-sized kernel buffer and copy nbytes from\nuserspace to that buffer. Later, we use sscanf on this buffer but we don\u0026apos;t\nensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to\nOOB read when using sscanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul\ninstead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-36934)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: lpfc: Move NPIV\u0026apos;s transport unregistration to after resource clean up\r\n\r\nThere are cases after NPIV deletion where the fabric switch still believes\nthe NPIV is logged into the fabric. This occurs when a vport is\nunregistered before the Remove All DA_ID CT and LOGO ELS are sent to the\nfabric.\r\n\r\nCurrently fc_remove_host(), which calls dev_loss_tmo for all D_IDs including\nthe fabric D_ID, removes the last ndlp reference and frees the ndlp rport\nobject. This sometimes causes the race condition where the final DA_ID and\nLOGO are skipped from being sent to the fabric switch.\r\n\r\nFix by moving the fc_remove_host() and scsi_remove_host() calls after DA_ID\nand LOGO are sent.(CVE-2024-36952)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/vmwgfx: Fix invalid reads in fence signaled events\r\n\r\nCorrectly set the length of the drm_event to the size of the structure\nthat\u0026apos;s actually used.\r\n\r\nThe length of the drm_event was set to the parent structure instead of\nto the drm_vmw_event_fence which is supposed to be read. drm_read\nuses the length parameter to copy the event to the user space thus\nresuling in oob reads.(CVE-2024-36960)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1736",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:12Z",
"published": "2024-06-21T11:07:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1736"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47229"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47234"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47249"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47257"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47267"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47281"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47301"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47310"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47321"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47334"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47344"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47354"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47372"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47425"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47440"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47456"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47474"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47482"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47483"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47485"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47496"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47509"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47571"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48693"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52708"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52742"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52747"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27402"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35828"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35910"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36886"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36905"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36934"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36960"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47229",
"CVE-2021-47234",
"CVE-2021-47249",
"CVE-2021-47257",
"CVE-2021-47267",
"CVE-2021-47281",
"CVE-2021-47301",
"CVE-2021-47310",
"CVE-2021-47321",
"CVE-2021-47334",
"CVE-2021-47344",
"CVE-2021-47354",
"CVE-2021-47372",
"CVE-2021-47425",
"CVE-2021-47440",
"CVE-2021-47456",
"CVE-2021-47468",
"CVE-2021-47474",
"CVE-2021-47482",
"CVE-2021-47483",
"CVE-2021-47485",
"CVE-2021-47496",
"CVE-2021-47509",
"CVE-2021-47516",
"CVE-2021-47571",
"CVE-2022-48693",
"CVE-2023-52708",
"CVE-2023-52742",
"CVE-2023-52747",
"CVE-2023-52764",
"CVE-2023-52810",
"CVE-2023-52836",
"CVE-2023-52843",
"CVE-2023-52875",
"CVE-2023-52880",
"CVE-2024-27014",
"CVE-2024-27019",
"CVE-2024-27402",
"CVE-2024-35819",
"CVE-2024-35821",
"CVE-2024-35828",
"CVE-2024-35910",
"CVE-2024-35935",
"CVE-2024-35937",
"CVE-2024-35947",
"CVE-2024-35982",
"CVE-2024-36016",
"CVE-2024-36886",
"CVE-2024-36901",
"CVE-2024-36905",
"CVE-2024-36919",
"CVE-2024-36934",
"CVE-2024-36952",
"CVE-2024-36960"
]
}
OESA-2024-2255 (CVE-2022-48893)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-10-18 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/i915/gt: Cleanup partial engine discovery failures
If we abort driver initialisation in the middle of gt/engine discovery, some engines will be fully setup and some not. Those incompletely setup engines only have 'engine->release == NULL' and so will leak any of the common objects allocated.
v2: - Drop the destroy_pinned_context() helper for now. It's not really worth it with just a single callsite at the moment. (Janusz)(CVE-2022-48893)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to avoid dirent corruption
As Al reported in link[1]:
f2fs_rename() ... if (old_dir != new_dir && !whiteout) f2fs_set_link(old_inode, old_dir_entry, old_dir_page, new_dir); else f2fs_put_page(old_dir_page, 0);
You want correct inumber in the ".." link. And cross-directory rename does move the source to new parent, even if you'd been asked to leave a whiteout in the old place.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231017055040.GN800259@ZenIV/
With below testcase, it may cause dirent corruption, due to it missed to call f2fs_set_link() to update ".." link to new directory. - mkdir -p dir/foo - renameat2 -w dir/foo bar
[ASSERT] (__chk_dots_dentries:1421) --> Bad inode number[0x4] for '..', parent parent ino is [0x3] [FSCK] other corrupted bugs Fail
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
efivarfs: force RO when remounting if SetVariable is not supported
If SetVariable at runtime is not supported by the firmware we never assign a callback for that function. At the same time mount the efivarfs as RO so no one can call that. However, we never check the permission flags when someone remounts the filesystem as RW. As a result this leads to a crash looking like this:
$ mount -o remount,rw /sys/firmware/efi/efivars $ efi-updatevar -f PK.auth PK
[ 303.279166] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 [ 303.280482] Mem abort info: [ 303.280854] ESR = 0x0000000086000004 [ 303.281338] EC = 0x21: IABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 303.282016] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 303.282414] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 303.282821] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 303.283771] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000004258c000 [ 303.284913] [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 303.286076] Internal error: Oops: 0000000086000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 303.286936] Modules linked in: qrtr tpm_tis tpm_tis_core crct10dif_ce arm_smccc_trng rng_core drm fuse ip_tables x_tables ipv6 [ 303.288586] CPU: 1 PID: 755 Comm: efi-updatevar Not tainted 6.3.0-rc1-00108-gc7d0c4695c68 #1 [ 303.289748] Hardware name: Unknown Unknown Product/Unknown Product, BIOS 2023.04-00627-g88336918701d 04/01/2023 [ 303.291150] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 303.292123] pc : 0x0 [ 303.292443] lr : efivar_set_variable_locked+0x74/0xec [ 303.293156] sp : ffff800008673c10 [ 303.293619] x29: ffff800008673c10 x28: ffff0000037e8000 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 303.294592] x26: 0000000000000800 x25: ffff000002467400 x24: 0000000000000027 [ 303.295572] x23: ffffd49ea9832000 x22: ffff0000020c9800 x21: ffff000002467000 [ 303.296566] x20: 0000000000000001 x19: 00000000000007fc x18: 0000000000000000 [ 303.297531] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000aaaac807ab54 [ 303.298495] x14: ed37489f673633c0 x13: 71c45c606de13f80 x12: 47464259e219acf4 [ 303.299453] x11: ffff000002af7b01 x10: 0000000000000003 x9 : 0000000000000002 [ 303.300431] x8 : 0000000000000010 x7 : ffffd49ea8973230 x6 : 0000000000a85201 [ 303.301412] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff0000020c9800 x3 : 00000000000007fc [ 303.302370] x2 : 0000000000000027 x1 : ffff000002467400 x0 : ffff000002467000 [ 303.303341] Call trace: [ 303.303679] 0x0 [ 303.303938] efivar_entry_set_get_size+0x98/0x16c [ 303.304585] efivarfs_file_write+0xd0/0x1a4 [ 303.305148] vfs_write+0xc4/0x2e4 [ 303.305601] ksys_write+0x70/0x104 [ 303.306073] __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28 [ 303.306622] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114 [ 303.307156] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x44/0xec [ 303.307803] do_el0_svc+0x38/0x98 [ 303.308268] el0_svc+0x2c/0x84 [ 303.308702] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf4/0x120 [ 303.309293] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 [ 303.309794] Code: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? (????????) [ 303.310612] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Fix this by adding a .reconfigure() function to the fs operations which we can use to check the requested flags and deny anything that's not RO if the firmware doesn't implement SetVariable at runtime.(CVE-2023-52463)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/srso: Add SRSO mitigation for Hygon processors
Add mitigation for the speculative return stack overflow vulnerability which exists on Hygon processors too.(CVE-2023-52482)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: scomp - fix req->dst buffer overflow
The req->dst buffer size should be checked before copying from the scomp_scratch->dst to avoid req->dst buffer overflow problem.(CVE-2023-52612)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
llc: verify mac len before reading mac header
LLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb has an Ethernet header.
Syzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert packets without mac len and with user configurable skb->protocol (passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111
llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]
llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111
llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637
netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]
netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782
tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555
tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002
Add a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.
There are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are protected by a test skb->protocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not protect against this tun scenario.
But the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will indirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any other LLC code.
It is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but not sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume an Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3 protocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used to, on top of Token Ring.
At least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start of git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in this commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all stable kernels should receive this.(CVE-2023-52843)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hv_netvsc: Register VF in netvsc_probe if NET_DEVICE_REGISTER missed
If hv_netvsc driver is unloaded and reloaded, the NET_DEVICE_REGISTER handler cannot perform VF register successfully as the register call is received before netvsc_probe is finished. This is because we register register_netdevice_notifier() very early( even before vmbus_driver_register()). To fix this, we try to register each such matching VF( if it is visible as a netdevice) at the end of netvsc_probe.(CVE-2024-26820)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: honor table dormant flag from netdev release event path
Check for table dormant flag otherwise netdev release event path tries to unregister an already unregistered hook.
[524854.857999] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [524854.858010] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3386599 at net/netfilter/core.c:501 __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260 [...] [524854.858848] CPU: 0 PID: 3386599 Comm: kworker/u32:2 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3+ #365 [524854.858869] Workqueue: netns cleanup_net [524854.858886] RIP: 0010:__nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260 [524854.858903] Code: 24 e8 aa 73 83 ff 48 63 43 1c 83 f8 01 0f 85 3d ff ff ff e8 98 d1 f0 ff 48 8b 3c 24 e8 8f 73 83 ff 48 63 43 1c e9 26 ff ff ff <0f> 0b 48 83 c4 18 48 c7 c7 00 68 e9 82 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 [524854.858914] RSP: 0018:ffff8881e36d79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [524854.858926] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881339ae790 RCX: ffffffff81ba524a [524854.858936] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff8881c8a16438 [524854.858945] RBP: ffff8881c8a16438 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed103c6daf34 [524854.858954] R10: ffff8881e36d79a7 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000005 [524854.858962] R13: ffff8881c8a16000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8881351b5a00 [524854.858971] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [524854.858982] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [524854.858991] CR2: 00007fc9be0f16f4 CR3: 00000001437cc004 CR4: 00000000001706f0 [524854.859000] Call Trace: [524854.859006] <TASK> [524854.859013] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0 [524854.859027] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260 [524854.859044] ? report_bug+0x1b1/0x1e0 [524854.859060] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 [524854.859071] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x40 [524854.859083] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [524854.859100] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x6a/0x260 [524854.859116] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260 [524854.859135] nf_tables_netdev_event+0x337/0x390 [nf_tables] [524854.859304] ? __pfx_nf_tables_netdev_event+0x10/0x10 [nf_tables] [524854.859461] ? packet_notifier+0xb3/0x360 [524854.859476] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x11/0x40 [524854.859489] ? dcbnl_netdevice_event+0x35/0x140 [524854.859507] ? __pfx_nf_tables_netdev_event+0x10/0x10 [nf_tables] [524854.859661] notifier_call_chain+0x7d/0x140 [524854.859677] unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x5e1/0xae0(CVE-2024-36005)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super()
In the following concurrency we will access the uninitialized rs->lock:
ext4_fill_super ext4_register_sysfs // sysfs registered msg_ratelimit_interval_ms // Other processes modify rs->interval to // non-zero via msg_ratelimit_interval_ms ext4_orphan_cleanup ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, "Errors on filesystem, " __ext4_msg ratelimit(&(EXT4SB(sb)->s_msg_ratelimit_state) if (!rs->interval) // do nothing if interval is 0 return 1; raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags) raw_spin_trylock(lock) _raw_spin_trylock raw_spin_trylock spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, RET_IP) lock_acquire __lock_acquire register_lock_class assign_lock_key dump_stack(); ratelimit_state_init(&sbi->s_msg_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10); raw_spin_lock_init(&rs->lock); // init rs->lock here
and get the following dump_stack:
========================================================= INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 12 PID: 753 Comm: mount Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc6-next-20231222 #504 [...] Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x170 dump_stack+0x18/0x30 register_lock_class+0x740/0x7c0 __lock_acquire+0x69/0x13a0 lock_acquire+0x120/0x450 _raw_spin_trylock+0x98/0xd0 ratelimit+0xf6/0x220 _ext4_msg+0x7f/0x160 [ext4] ext4_orphan_cleanup+0x665/0x740 [ext4] ext4_fill_super+0x21ea/0x2b10 [ext4] ext4_fill_super+0x14d/0x360 [ext4] [...] =========================================================
Normally interval is 0 until s_msg_ratelimit_state is initialized, so ___ratelimit() does nothing. But registering sysfs precedes initializing rs->lock, so it is possible to change rs->interval to a non-zero value via the msg_ratelimit_interval_ms interface of sysfs while rs->lock is uninitialized, and then a call to ext4_msg triggers the problem by accessing an uninitialized rs->lock. Therefore register sysfs after all initializations are complete to avoid such problems.(CVE-2024-40998)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Take return from set_memory_rox() into account with bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro()
set_memory_rox() can fail, leaving memory unprotected.
Check return and bail out when bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro() returns an error.(CVE-2024-42067)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: nexthop: Initialize all fields in dumped nexthops
struct nexthop_grp contains two reserved fields that are not initialized by nla_put_nh_group(), and carry garbage. This can be observed e.g. with strace (edited for clarity):
# ip nexthop add id 1 dev lo
# ip nexthop add id 101 group 1
# strace -e recvmsg ip nexthop get id 101
...
recvmsg(... [{nla_len=12, nla_type=NHA_GROUP},
[{id=1, weight=0, resvd1=0x69, resvd2=0x67}]] ...) = 52
The fields are reserved and therefore not currently used. But as they are, they leak kernel memory, and the fact they are not just zero complicates repurposing of the fields for new ends. Initialize the full structure.(CVE-2024-42283)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Handle runtime power management correctly
The power domain is automatically activated from clk_prepare(). However, on certain platforms like i.MX8QM and i.MX8QXP, the power-on handling invokes sleeping functions, which triggers the 'scheduling while atomic' bug in the context switch path during device probing:
BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u13:1/48/0x00000002 Call trace: __schedule_bug+0x54/0x6c __schedule+0x7f0/0xa94 schedule+0x5c/0xc4 schedule_preempt_disabled+0x24/0x40 __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x2c0/0x540 __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x14/0x20 mutex_lock+0x48/0x54 clk_prepare_lock+0x44/0xa0 clk_prepare+0x20/0x44 imx_irqsteer_resume+0x28/0xe0 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x44 __genpd_runtime_resume+0x30/0x80 genpd_runtime_resume+0xc8/0x2c0 __rpm_callback+0x48/0x1d8 rpm_callback+0x6c/0x78 rpm_resume+0x490/0x6b4 __pm_runtime_resume+0x50/0x94 irq_chip_pm_get+0x2c/0xa0 __irq_do_set_handler+0x178/0x24c irq_set_chained_handler_and_data+0x60/0xa4 mxc_gpio_probe+0x160/0x4b0
Cure this by implementing the irq_bus_lock/sync_unlock() interrupt chip callbacks and handle power management in them as they are invoked from non-atomic context.
tglx: Rewrote change log, added Fixes tag
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
udf: Avoid using corrupted block bitmap buffer
When the filesystem block bitmap is corrupted, we detect the corruption while loading the bitmap and fail the allocation with error. However the next allocation from the same bitmap will notice the bitmap buffer is already loaded and tries to allocate from the bitmap with mixed results (depending on the exact nature of the bitmap corruption). Fix the problem by using BH_verified bit to indicate whether the bitmap is valid or not.(CVE-2024-42306)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/gma500: fix null pointer dereference in psb_intel_lvds_get_modes
In psb_intel_lvds_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-42309)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: venus: fix use after free in vdec_close
There appears to be a possible use after free with vdec_close(). The firmware will add buffer release work to the work queue through HFI callbacks as a normal part of decoding. Randomly closing the decoder device from userspace during normal decoding can incur a read after free for inst.
Fix it by cancelling the work in vdec_close.(CVE-2024-42313)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipvs: properly dereference pe in ip_vs_add_service
Use pe directly to resolve sparse warning:
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1471:27: warning: dereference of noderef expression(CVE-2024-42322)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: keystone: Fix NULL pointer dereference in case of DT error in ks_pcie_setup_rc_app_regs()
If IORESOURCE_MEM is not provided in Device Tree due to any error, resource_list_first_type() will return NULL and pci_parse_request_of_pci_ranges() will just emit a warning.
This will cause a NULL pointer dereference. Fix this bug by adding NULL return check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-43823)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
leds: trigger: Unregister sysfs attributes before calling deactivate()
Triggers which have trigger specific sysfs attributes typically store related data in trigger-data allocated by the activate() callback and freed by the deactivate() callback.
Calling device_remove_groups() after calling deactivate() leaves a window where the sysfs attributes show/store functions could be called after deactivation and then operate on the just freed trigger-data.
Move the device_remove_groups() call to before deactivate() to close this race window.
This also makes the deactivation path properly do things in reverse order of the activation path which calls the activate() callback before calling device_add_groups().(CVE-2024-43830)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf, arm64: Fix trampoline for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG
When BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG is set, the trampoline calls __bpf_tramp_enter() and __bpf_tramp_exit() functions, passing them the struct bpf_tramp_image *im pointer as an argument in R0.
The trampoline generation code uses emit_addr_mov_i64() to emit instructions for moving the bpf_tramp_image address into R0, but emit_addr_mov_i64() assumes the address to be in the vmalloc() space and uses only 48 bits. Because bpf_tramp_image is allocated using kzalloc(), its address can use more than 48-bits, in this case the trampoline will pass an invalid address to __bpf_tramp_enter/exit() causing a kernel crash.
Fix this by using emit_a64_mov_i64() in place of emit_addr_mov_i64() as it can work with addresses that are greater than 48-bits.(CVE-2024-43840)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md: fix deadlock between mddev_suspend and flush bio
Deadlock occurs when mddev is being suspended while some flush bio is in progress. It is a complex issue.
T1. the first flush is at the ending stage, it clears 'mddev->flush_bio' and tries to submit data, but is blocked because mddev is suspended by T4. T2. the second flush sets 'mddev->flush_bio', and attempts to queue md_submit_flush_data(), which is already running (T1) and won't execute again if on the same CPU as T1. T3. the third flush inc active_io and tries to flush, but is blocked because 'mddev->flush_bio' is not NULL (set by T2). T4. mddev_suspend() is called and waits for active_io dec to 0 which is inc by T3.
T1 T2 T3 T4 (flush 1) (flush 2) (third 3) (suspend) md_submit_flush_data mddev->flush_bio = NULL; . . md_flush_request . mddev->flush_bio = bio . queue submit_flushes . . . . md_handle_request . . active_io + 1 . . md_flush_request . . wait !mddev->flush_bio . . . . mddev_suspend . . wait !active_io . . . submit_flushes . queue_work md_submit_flush_data . //md_submit_flush_data is already running (T1) . md_handle_request wait resume
The root issue is non-atomic inc/dec of active_io during flush process. active_io is dec before md_submit_flush_data is queued, and inc soon after md_submit_flush_data() run. md_flush_request active_io + 1 submit_flushes active_io - 1 md_submit_flush_data md_handle_request active_io + 1 make_request active_io - 1
If active_io is dec after md_handle_request() instead of within submit_flushes(), make_request() can be called directly intead of md_handle_request() in md_submit_flush_data(), and active_io will only inc and dec once in the whole flush process. Deadlock will be fixed.
Additionally, the only difference between fixing the issue and before is that there is no return error handling of make_request(). But after previous patch cleaned md_write_start(), make_requst() only return error in raid5_make_request() by dm-raid, see commit 41425f96d7aa ("dm-raid456, md/raid456: fix a deadlock for dm-raid456 while io concurrent with reshape)". Since dm always splits data and flush operation into two separate io, io size of flush submitted by dm always is 0, make_request() will not be called in md_submit_flush_data(). To prevent future modifications from introducing issues, add WARN_ON to ensure make_request() no error is returned in this context.(CVE-2024-43855)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup under heavy CEQE load
CEQEs are handled in interrupt handler currently. This may cause the CPU core staying in interrupt context too long and lead to soft lockup under heavy load.
Handle CEQEs in BH workqueue and set an upper limit for the number of CEQE handled by a single call of work handler.(CVE-2024-43872)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
memcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr
Commit 73f576c04b94 ("mm: memcontrol: fix cgroup creation failure after many small jobs") decoupled the memcg IDs from the CSS ID space to fix the cgroup creation failures. It introduced IDR to maintain the memcg ID space. The IDR depends on external synchronization mechanisms for modifications. For the mem_cgroup_idr, the idr_alloc() and idr_replace() happen within css callback and thus are protected through cgroup_mutex from concurrent modifications. However idr_remove() for mem_cgroup_idr was not protected against concurrency and can be run concurrently for different memcgs when they hit their refcnt to zero. Fix that.
We have been seeing list_lru based kernel crashes at a low frequency in our fleet for a long time. These crashes were in different part of list_lru code including list_lru_add(), list_lru_del() and reparenting code. Upon further inspection, it looked like for a given object (dentry and inode), the super_block's list_lru didn't have list_lru_one for the memcg of that object. The initial suspicions were either the object is not allocated through kmem_cache_alloc_lru() or somehow memcg_list_lru_alloc() failed to allocate list_lru_one() for a memcg but returned success. No evidence were found for these cases.
Looking more deeply, we started seeing situations where valid memcg's id is not present in mem_cgroup_idr and in some cases multiple valid memcgs have same id and mem_cgroup_idr is pointing to one of them. So, the most reasonable explanation is that these situations can happen due to race between multiple idr_remove() calls or race between idr_alloc()/idr_replace() and idr_remove(). These races are causing multiple memcgs to acquire the same ID and then offlining of one of them would cleanup list_lrus on the system for all of them. Later access from other memcgs to the list_lru cause crashes due to missing list_lru_one.(CVE-2024-43892)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: core: check uartclk for zero to avoid divide by zero
Calling ioctl TIOCSSERIAL with an invalid baud_base can result in uartclk being zero, which will result in a divide by zero error in uart_get_divisor(). The check for uartclk being zero in uart_set_info() needs to be done before other settings are made as subsequent calls to ioctl TIOCSSERIAL for the same port would be impacted if the uartclk check was done where uartclk gets set.
Oops: divide error: 0000 PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI RIP: 0010:uart_get_divisor (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:580) Call Trace: <TASK> serial8250_get_divisor (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2576 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2589) serial8250_do_set_termios (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:502 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2741) serial8250_set_termios (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2862) uart_change_line_settings (./include/linux/spinlock.h:376 ./include/linux/serial_core.h:608 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:222) uart_port_startup (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:342) uart_startup (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:368) uart_set_info (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:1034) uart_set_info_user (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:1059) tty_set_serial (drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2637) tty_ioctl (drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2647 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2791) __x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:52 fs/ioctl.c:907 fs/ioctl.c:893 fs/ioctl.c:893) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 (discriminator 1)) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
Rule: add(CVE-2024-43893)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fou: remove warn in gue_gro_receive on unsupported protocol
Drop the WARN_ON_ONCE inn gue_gro_receive if the encapsulated type is not known or does not have a GRO handler.
Such a packet is easily constructed. Syzbot generates them and sets off this warning.
Remove the warning as it is expected and not actionable.
The warning was previously reduced from WARN_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE in commit 270136613bf7 ("fou: Do WARN_ON_ONCE in gue_gro_receive for bad proto callbacks").(CVE-2024-44940)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: line6: Fix racy access to midibuf
There can be concurrent accesses to line6 midibuf from both the URB completion callback and the rawmidi API access. This could be a cause of KMSAN warning triggered by syzkaller below (so put as reported-by here).
This patch protects the midibuf call of the former code path with a spinlock for avoiding the possible races.(CVE-2024-44954)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
atm: idt77252: prevent use after free in dequeue_rx()
We can't dereference "skb" after calling vcc->push() because the skb is released.(CVE-2024-44998)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xhci: Fix Panther point NULL pointer deref at full-speed re-enumeration
re-enumerating full-speed devices after a failed address device command can trigger a NULL pointer dereference.
Full-speed devices may need to reconfigure the endpoint 0 Max Packet Size value during enumeration. Usb core calls usb_ep0_reinit() in this case, which ends up calling xhci_configure_endpoint().
On Panther point xHC the xhci_configure_endpoint() function will additionally check and reserve bandwidth in software. Other hosts do this in hardware
If xHC address device command fails then a new xhci_virt_device structure is allocated as part of re-enabling the slot, but the bandwidth table pointers are not set up properly here. This triggers the NULL pointer dereference the next time usb_ep0_reinit() is called and xhci_configure_endpoint() tries to check and reserve bandwidth
[46710.713538] usb 3-1: new full-speed USB device number 5 using xhci_hcd [46710.713699] usb 3-1: Device not responding to setup address. [46710.917684] usb 3-1: Device not responding to setup address. [46711.125536] usb 3-1: device not accepting address 5, error -71 [46711.125594] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 [46711.125600] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [46711.125603] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [46711.125606] PGD 0 P4D 0 [46711.125610] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [46711.125615] CPU: 1 PID: 25760 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 6.10.3_2 #1 [46711.125620] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. [46711.125623] Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event [usbcore] [46711.125668] RIP: 0010:xhci_reserve_bandwidth (drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
Fix this by making sure bandwidth table pointers are set up correctly after a failed address device command, and additionally by avoiding checking for bandwidth in cases like this where no actual endpoints are added or removed, i.e. only context for default control endpoint 0 is evaluated.(CVE-2024-45006)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/dasd: fix error recovery leading to data corruption on ESE devices
Extent Space Efficient (ESE) or thin provisioned volumes need to be formatted on demand during usual IO processing.
The dasd_ese_needs_format function checks for error codes that signal the non existence of a proper track format.
The check for incorrect length is to imprecise since other error cases leading to transport of insufficient data also have this flag set. This might lead to data corruption in certain error cases for example during a storage server warmstart.
Fix by removing the check for incorrect length and replacing by explicitly checking for invalid track format in transport mode.
Also remove the check for file protected since this is not a valid ESE handling case.(CVE-2024-45026)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfc: pn533: Add poll mod list filling check
In case of im_protocols value is 1 and tm_protocols value is 0 this combination successfully passes the check 'if (!im_protocols && !tm_protocols)' in the nfc_start_poll(). But then after pn533_poll_create_mod_list() call in pn533_start_poll() poll mod list will remain empty and dev->poll_mod_count will remain 0 which lead to division by zero.
Normally no im protocol has value 1 in the mask, so this combination is not expected by driver. But these protocol values actually come from userspace via Netlink interface (NFC_CMD_START_POLL operation). So a broken or malicious program may pass a message containing a "bad" combination of protocol parameter values so that dev->poll_mod_count is not incremented inside pn533_poll_create_mod_list(), thus leading to division by zero. Call trace looks like: nfc_genl_start_poll() nfc_start_poll() ->start_poll() pn533_start_poll()
Add poll mod list filling check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-46676)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: typec: ucsi: Fix null pointer dereference in trace
ucsi_register_altmode checks IS_ERR for the alt pointer and treats NULL as valid. When CONFIG_TYPEC_DP_ALTMODE is not enabled, ucsi_register_displayport returns NULL which causes a NULL pointer dereference in trace. Rather than return NULL, call typec_port_register_altmode to register DisplayPort alternate mode as a non-controllable mode when CONFIG_TYPEC_DP_ALTMODE is not enabled.(CVE-2024-46719)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Remove tst_run from lwt_seg6local_prog_ops.
The syzbot reported that the lwt_seg6 related BPF ops can be invoked via bpf_test_run() without without entering input_action_end_bpf() first.
Martin KaFai Lau said that self test for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL probably didn't work since it was introduced in commit 04d4b274e2a ("ipv6: sr: Add seg6local action End.BPF"). The reason is that the per-CPU variable seg6_bpf_srh_states::srh is never assigned in the self test case but each BPF function expects it.
Remove test_run for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL.(CVE-2024-46754)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ice: Add netif_device_attach/detach into PF reset flow
Ethtool callbacks can be executed while reset is in progress and try to access deleted resources, e.g. getting coalesce settings can result in a NULL pointer dereference seen below.
Reproduction steps: Once the driver is fully initialized, trigger reset: # echo 1 > /sys/class/net/<interface>/device/reset when reset is in progress try to get coalesce settings using ethtool: # ethtool -c <interface>
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 11 PID: 19713 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G S 6.10.0-rc7+ #7 RIP: 0010:ice_get_q_coalesce+0x2e/0xa0 [ice] RSP: 0018:ffffbab1e9bcf6a8 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 000000000000000c RBX: ffff94512305b028 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff9451c3f2e588 RDI: ffff9451c3f2e588 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff9451c3f2e580 R11: 000000000000001f R12: ffff945121fa9000 R13: ffffbab1e9bcf760 R14: 0000000000000013 R15: ffffffff9e65dd40 FS: 00007faee5fbe740(0000) GS:ffff94546fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000000106c2e005 CR4: 00000000001706f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ice_get_coalesce+0x17/0x30 [ice] coalesce_prepare_data+0x61/0x80 ethnl_default_doit+0xde/0x340 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xf2/0x150 genl_rcv_msg+0x1b3/0x2c0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x5b/0x110 genl_rcv+0x28/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x19c/0x290 netlink_sendmsg+0x222/0x490 __sys_sendto+0x1df/0x1f0 __x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x82/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7faee60d8e27
Calling netif_device_detach() before reset makes the net core not call the driver when ethtool command is issued, the attempt to execute an ethtool command during reset will result in the following message:
netlink error: No such device
instead of NULL pointer dereference. Once reset is done and ice_rebuild() is executing, the netif_device_attach() is called to allow for ethtool operations to occur again in a safe manner.(CVE-2024-46770)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: unset the binding mark of a reused connection
Steve French reported null pointer dereference error from sha256 lib. cifs.ko can send session setup requests on reused connection. If reused connection is used for binding session, conn->binding can still remain true and generate_preauth_hash() will not set sess->Preauth_HashValue and it will be NULL. It is used as a material to create an encryption key in ksmbd_gen_smb311_encryptionkey. ->Preauth_HashValue cause null pointer dereference error from crypto_shash_update().
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 8 PID: 429254 Comm: kworker/8:39 Hardware name: LENOVO 20MAS08500/20MAS08500, BIOS N2CET69W (1.52 ) Workqueue: ksmbd-io handle_ksmbd_work [ksmbd] RIP: 0010:lib_sha256_base_do_update.isra.0+0x11e/0x1d0 [sha256_ssse3] <TASK> ? show_regs+0x6d/0x80 ? __die+0x24/0x80 ? page_fault_oops+0x99/0x1b0 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2ee/0x6b0 ? exc_page_fault+0x83/0x1b0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30 ? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3] ? lib_sha256_base_do_update.isra.0+0x11e/0x1d0 [sha256_ssse3] ? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3] ? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3] _sha256_update+0x77/0xa0 [sha256_ssse3] sha256_avx2_update+0x15/0x30 [sha256_ssse3] crypto_shash_update+0x1e/0x40 hmac_update+0x12/0x20 crypto_shash_update+0x1e/0x40 generate_key+0x234/0x380 [ksmbd] generate_smb3encryptionkey+0x40/0x1c0 [ksmbd] ksmbd_gen_smb311_encryptionkey+0x72/0xa0 [ksmbd] ntlm_authenticate.isra.0+0x423/0x5d0 [ksmbd] smb2_sess_setup+0x952/0xaa0 [ksmbd] __process_request+0xa3/0x1d0 [ksmbd] __handle_ksmbd_work+0x1c4/0x2f0 [ksmbd] handle_ksmbd_work+0x2d/0xa0 [ksmbd] process_one_work+0x16c/0x350 worker_thread+0x306/0x440 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xef/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK>(CVE-2024-46795)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: the warning dereferencing obj for nbio_v7_4
if ras_manager obj null, don't print NBIO err data(CVE-2024-46819)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ELF: fix kernel.randomize_va_space double read
ELF loader uses "randomize_va_space" twice. It is sysctl and can change at any moment, so 2 loads could see 2 different values in theory with unpredictable consequences.
Issue exactly one load for consistent value across one exec.(CVE-2024-46826)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched: sch_cake: fix bulk flow accounting logic for host fairness
In sch_cake, we keep track of the count of active bulk flows per host, when running in dst/src host fairness mode, which is used as the round-robin weight when iterating through flows. The count of active bulk flows is updated whenever a flow changes state.
This has a peculiar interaction with the hash collision handling: when a hash collision occurs (after the set-associative hashing), the state of the hash bucket is simply updated to match the new packet that collided, and if host fairness is enabled, that also means assigning new per-host state to the flow. For this reason, the bulk flow counters of the host(s) assigned to the flow are decremented, before new state is assigned (and the counters, which may not belong to the same host anymore, are incremented again).
Back when this code was introduced, the host fairness mode was always enabled, so the decrement was unconditional. When the configuration flags were introduced the increment was made conditional, but the decrement was not. Which of course can lead to a spurious decrement (and associated wrap-around to U16_MAX).
AFAICT, when host fairness is disabled, the decrement and wrap-around happens as soon as a hash collision occurs (which is not that common in itself, due to the set-associative hashing). However, in most cases this is harmless, as the value is only used when host fairness mode is enabled. So in order to trigger an array overflow, sch_cake has to first be configured with host fairness disabled, and while running in this mode, a hash collision has to occur to cause the overflow. Then, the qdisc has to be reconfigured to enable host fairness, which leads to the array out-of-bounds because the wrapped-around value is retained and used as an array index. It seems that syzbot managed to trigger this, which is quite impressive in its own right.
This patch fixes the issue by introducing the same conditional check on decrement as is used on increment.
The original bug predates the upstreaming of cake, but the commit listed in the Fixes tag touched that code, meaning that this patch won't apply before that.(CVE-2024-46828)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete
In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren't holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient incorrect answer. In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could happen if we have extent tree corruption. Change that to return -EUCLEAN. In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly, however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code. Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert that to proper error handling. Also adjust the error message so we can actually do something with the information.(CVE-2024-46840)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf/x86/intel: Limit the period on Haswell
Running the ltp test cve-2015-3290 concurrently reports the following warnings.
perfevents: irq loop stuck! WARNING: CPU: 31 PID: 32438 at arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:3174 intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x285/0x370 Call Trace: <NMI> ? __warn+0xa4/0x220 ? intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x285/0x370 ? __report_bug+0x123/0x130 ? intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x285/0x370 ? __report_bug+0x123/0x130 ? intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x285/0x370 ? report_bug+0x3e/0xa0 ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x50 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? irq_work_claim+0x1e/0x40 ? intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x285/0x370 perf_event_nmi_handler+0x3d/0x60 nmi_handle+0x104/0x330
Thanks to Thomas Gleixner's analysis, the issue is caused by the low initial period (1) of the frequency estimation algorithm, which triggers the defects of the HW, specifically erratum HSW11 and HSW143. (For the details, please refer https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87plq9l5d2.ffs@tglx/)
The HSW11 requires a period larger than 100 for the INST_RETIRED.ALL event, but the initial period in the freq mode is 1. The erratum is the same as the BDM11, which has been supported in the kernel. A minimum period of 128 is enforced as well on HSW.
HSW143 is regarding that the fixed counter 1 may overcount 32 with the Hyper-Threading is enabled. However, based on the test, the hardware has more issues than it tells. Besides the fixed counter 1, the message 'interrupt took too long' can be observed on any counter which was armed with a period < 32 and two events expired in the same NMI. A minimum period of 32 is enforced for the rest of the events. The recommended workaround code of the HSW143 is not implemented. Because it only addresses the issue for the fixed counter. It brings extra overhead through extra MSR writing. No related overcounting issue has been reported so far.(CVE-2024-46848)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: dpaa: Pad packets to ETH_ZLEN
When sending packets under 60 bytes, up to three bytes of the buffer following the data may be leaked. Avoid this by extending all packets to ETH_ZLEN, ensuring nothing is leaked in the padding. This bug can be reproduced by running
$ ping -s 11 destination(CVE-2024-46854)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nft_socket: fix sk refcount leaks
We must put 'sk' reference before returning.(CVE-2024-46855)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: pm: Fix uaf in __timer_delete_sync
There are two paths to access mptcp_pm_del_add_timer, result in a race condition:
CPU1 CPU2
==== ====
net_rx_action
napi_poll netlink_sendmsg
__napi_poll netlink_unicast
process_backlog netlink_unicast_kernel
__netif_receive_skb genl_rcv
__netif_receive_skb_one_core netlink_rcv_skb
NF_HOOK genl_rcv_msg
ip_local_deliver_finish genl_family_rcv_msg
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu genl_family_rcv_msg_doit
tcp_v4_rcv mptcp_pm_nl_flush_addrs_doit
tcp_v4_do_rcv mptcp_nl_remove_addrs_list
tcp_rcv_established mptcp_pm_remove_addrs_and_subflows
tcp_data_queue remove_anno_list_by_saddr
mptcp_incoming_options mptcp_pm_del_add_timer
mptcp_pm_del_add_timer kfree(entry)
In remove_anno_list_by_saddr(running on CPU2), after leaving the critical zone protected by "pm.lock", the entry will be released, which leads to the occurrence of uaf in the mptcp_pm_del_add_timer(running on CPU1).
Keeping a reference to add_timer inside the lock, and calling sk_stop_timer_sync() with this reference, instead of "entry->add_timer".
Move list_del(&entry->list) to mptcp_pm_del_add_timer and inside the pm lock, do not directly access any members of the entry outside the pm lock, which can avoid similar "entry->x" uaf.(CVE-2024-46858)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: stm32/cryp - call finalize with bh disabled
The finalize operation in interrupt mode produce a produces a spinlock recursion warning. The reason is the fact that BH must be disabled during this process.(CVE-2024-47658)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
spi: hisi-kunpeng: Add verification for the max_frequency provided by the firmware
If the value of max_speed_hz is 0, it may cause a division by zero error in hisi_calc_effective_speed(). The value of max_speed_hz is provided by firmware. Firmware is generally considered as a trusted domain. However, as division by zero errors can cause system failure, for defense measure, the value of max_speed is validated here. So 0 is regarded as invalid and an error code is returned.(CVE-2024-47664)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: add bounds checking to ocfs2_xattr_find_entry()
Add a paranoia check to make sure it doesn't stray beyond valid memory region containing ocfs2 xattr entries when scanning for a match. It will prevent out-of-bound access in case of crafted images.(CVE-2024-47670)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: usbtmc: prevent kernel-usb-infoleak
The syzbot reported a kernel-usb-infoleak in usbtmc_write, we need to clear the structure before filling fields.(CVE-2024-47671)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: don't wait for tx queues if firmware is dead
There is a WARNING in iwl_trans_wait_tx_queues_empty() (that was recently converted from just a message), that can be hit if we wait for TX queues to become empty after firmware died. Clearly, we can't expect anything from the firmware after it's declared dead.
Don't call iwl_trans_wait_tx_queues_empty() in this case. While it could be a good idea to stop the flow earlier, the flush functions do some maintenance work that is not related to the firmware, so keep that part of the code running even when the firmware is not running.
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-232.0.0.134.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/i915/gt: Cleanup partial engine discovery failures\r\n\r\nIf we abort driver initialisation in the middle of gt/engine discovery,\nsome engines will be fully setup and some not. Those incompletely setup\nengines only have \u0026apos;engine-\u0026gt;release == NULL\u0026apos; and so will leak any of the\ncommon objects allocated.\r\n\r\nv2:\n - Drop the destroy_pinned_context() helper for now. It\u0026apos;s not really\n worth it with just a single callsite at the moment. (Janusz)(CVE-2022-48893)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: fix to avoid dirent corruption\r\n\r\nAs Al reported in link[1]:\r\n\r\nf2fs_rename()\n...\n\tif (old_dir != new_dir \u0026amp;\u0026amp; !whiteout)\n\t\tf2fs_set_link(old_inode, old_dir_entry,\n\t\t\t\t\told_dir_page, new_dir);\n\telse\n\t\tf2fs_put_page(old_dir_page, 0);\r\n\r\nYou want correct inumber in the \u0026quot;..\u0026quot; link. And cross-directory\nrename does move the source to new parent, even if you\u0026apos;d been asked\nto leave a whiteout in the old place.\r\n\r\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231017055040.GN800259@ZenIV/\r\n\r\nWith below testcase, it may cause dirent corruption, due to it missed\nto call f2fs_set_link() to update \u0026quot;..\u0026quot; link to new directory.\n- mkdir -p dir/foo\n- renameat2 -w dir/foo bar\r\n\r\n[ASSERT] (__chk_dots_dentries:1421) --\u0026gt; Bad inode number[0x4] for \u0026apos;..\u0026apos;, parent parent ino is [0x3]\n[FSCK] other corrupted bugs [Fail](CVE-2023-52444)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nefivarfs: force RO when remounting if SetVariable is not supported\r\n\r\nIf SetVariable at runtime is not supported by the firmware we never assign\na callback for that function. At the same time mount the efivarfs as\nRO so no one can call that. However, we never check the permission flags\nwhen someone remounts the filesystem as RW. As a result this leads to a\ncrash looking like this:\r\n\r\n$ mount -o remount,rw /sys/firmware/efi/efivars\n$ efi-updatevar -f PK.auth PK\r\n\r\n[ 303.279166] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000\n[ 303.280482] Mem abort info:\n[ 303.280854] ESR = 0x0000000086000004\n[ 303.281338] EC = 0x21: IABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits\n[ 303.282016] SET = 0, FnV = 0\n[ 303.282414] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0\n[ 303.282821] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault\n[ 303.283771] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000004258c000\n[ 303.284913] [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000\n[ 303.286076] Internal error: Oops: 0000000086000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\n[ 303.286936] Modules linked in: qrtr tpm_tis tpm_tis_core crct10dif_ce arm_smccc_trng rng_core drm fuse ip_tables x_tables ipv6\n[ 303.288586] CPU: 1 PID: 755 Comm: efi-updatevar Not tainted 6.3.0-rc1-00108-gc7d0c4695c68 #1\n[ 303.289748] Hardware name: Unknown Unknown Product/Unknown Product, BIOS 2023.04-00627-g88336918701d 04/01/2023\n[ 303.291150] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n[ 303.292123] pc : 0x0\n[ 303.292443] lr : efivar_set_variable_locked+0x74/0xec\n[ 303.293156] sp : ffff800008673c10\n[ 303.293619] x29: ffff800008673c10 x28: ffff0000037e8000 x27: 0000000000000000\n[ 303.294592] x26: 0000000000000800 x25: ffff000002467400 x24: 0000000000000027\n[ 303.295572] x23: ffffd49ea9832000 x22: ffff0000020c9800 x21: ffff000002467000\n[ 303.296566] x20: 0000000000000001 x19: 00000000000007fc x18: 0000000000000000\n[ 303.297531] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000aaaac807ab54\n[ 303.298495] x14: ed37489f673633c0 x13: 71c45c606de13f80 x12: 47464259e219acf4\n[ 303.299453] x11: ffff000002af7b01 x10: 0000000000000003 x9 : 0000000000000002\n[ 303.300431] x8 : 0000000000000010 x7 : ffffd49ea8973230 x6 : 0000000000a85201\n[ 303.301412] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff0000020c9800 x3 : 00000000000007fc\n[ 303.302370] x2 : 0000000000000027 x1 : ffff000002467400 x0 : ffff000002467000\n[ 303.303341] Call trace:\n[ 303.303679] 0x0\n[ 303.303938] efivar_entry_set_get_size+0x98/0x16c\n[ 303.304585] efivarfs_file_write+0xd0/0x1a4\n[ 303.305148] vfs_write+0xc4/0x2e4\n[ 303.305601] ksys_write+0x70/0x104\n[ 303.306073] __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28\n[ 303.306622] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114\n[ 303.307156] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x44/0xec\n[ 303.307803] do_el0_svc+0x38/0x98\n[ 303.308268] el0_svc+0x2c/0x84\n[ 303.308702] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf4/0x120\n[ 303.309293] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194\n[ 303.309794] Code: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? (????????)\n[ 303.310612] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\r\n\r\nFix this by adding a .reconfigure() function to the fs operations which\nwe can use to check the requested flags and deny anything that\u0026apos;s not RO\nif the firmware doesn\u0026apos;t implement SetVariable at runtime.(CVE-2023-52463)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nx86/srso: Add SRSO mitigation for Hygon processors\r\n\r\nAdd mitigation for the speculative return stack overflow vulnerability\nwhich exists on Hygon processors too.(CVE-2023-52482)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: scomp - fix req-\u0026gt;dst buffer overflow\r\n\r\nThe req-\u0026gt;dst buffer size should be checked before copying from the\nscomp_scratch-\u0026gt;dst to avoid req-\u0026gt;dst buffer overflow problem.(CVE-2023-52612)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nllc: verify mac len before reading mac header\r\n\r\nLLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb\nhas an Ethernet header.\r\n\r\nSyzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert\npackets without mac len and with user configurable skb-\u0026gt;protocol\n(passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).\r\n\r\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782\n tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555\n tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\r\n\r\nAdd a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.\r\n\r\nThere are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are\nprotected by a test skb-\u0026gt;protocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not\nprotect against this tun scenario.\r\n\r\nBut the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will\nindirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any\nother LLC code.\r\n\r\nIt is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but\nnot sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume\nan Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3\nprotocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used\nto, on top of Token Ring.\r\n\r\nAt least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start\nof git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in\nthis commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all\nstable kernels should receive this.(CVE-2023-52843)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhv_netvsc: Register VF in netvsc_probe if NET_DEVICE_REGISTER missed\r\n\r\nIf hv_netvsc driver is unloaded and reloaded, the NET_DEVICE_REGISTER\nhandler cannot perform VF register successfully as the register call\nis received before netvsc_probe is finished. This is because we\nregister register_netdevice_notifier() very early( even before\nvmbus_driver_register()).\nTo fix this, we try to register each such matching VF( if it is visible\nas a netdevice) at the end of netvsc_probe.(CVE-2024-26820)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: honor table dormant flag from netdev release event path\r\n\r\nCheck for table dormant flag otherwise netdev release event path tries\nto unregister an already unregistered hook.\r\n\r\n[524854.857999] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[524854.858010] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3386599 at net/netfilter/core.c:501 __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260\n[...]\n[524854.858848] CPU: 0 PID: 3386599 Comm: kworker/u32:2 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3+ #365\n[524854.858869] Workqueue: netns cleanup_net\n[524854.858886] RIP: 0010:__nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260\n[524854.858903] Code: 24 e8 aa 73 83 ff 48 63 43 1c 83 f8 01 0f 85 3d ff ff ff e8 98 d1 f0 ff 48 8b 3c 24 e8 8f 73 83 ff 48 63 43 1c e9 26 ff ff ff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 48 83 c4 18 48 c7 c7 00 68 e9 82 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41\n[524854.858914] RSP: 0018:ffff8881e36d79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[524854.858926] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881339ae790 RCX: ffffffff81ba524a\n[524854.858936] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff8881c8a16438\n[524854.858945] RBP: ffff8881c8a16438 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed103c6daf34\n[524854.858954] R10: ffff8881e36d79a7 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000005\n[524854.858962] R13: ffff8881c8a16000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8881351b5a00\n[524854.858971] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[524854.858982] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[524854.858991] CR2: 00007fc9be0f16f4 CR3: 00000001437cc004 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n[524854.859000] Call Trace:\n[524854.859006] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[524854.859013] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[524854.859027] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260\n[524854.859044] ? report_bug+0x1b1/0x1e0\n[524854.859060] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70\n[524854.859071] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x40\n[524854.859083] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n[524854.859100] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x6a/0x260\n[524854.859116] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260\n[524854.859135] nf_tables_netdev_event+0x337/0x390 [nf_tables]\n[524854.859304] ? __pfx_nf_tables_netdev_event+0x10/0x10 [nf_tables]\n[524854.859461] ? packet_notifier+0xb3/0x360\n[524854.859476] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x11/0x40\n[524854.859489] ? dcbnl_netdevice_event+0x35/0x140\n[524854.859507] ? __pfx_nf_tables_netdev_event+0x10/0x10 [nf_tables]\n[524854.859661] notifier_call_chain+0x7d/0x140\n[524854.859677] unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x5e1/0xae0(CVE-2024-36005)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\next4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state-\u0026gt;lock access in __ext4_fill_super()\r\n\r\nIn the following concurrency we will access the uninitialized rs-\u0026gt;lock:\r\n\r\next4_fill_super\n ext4_register_sysfs\n // sysfs registered msg_ratelimit_interval_ms\n // Other processes modify rs-\u0026gt;interval to\n // non-zero via msg_ratelimit_interval_ms\n ext4_orphan_cleanup\n ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, \u0026quot;Errors on filesystem, \u0026quot;\n __ext4_msg\n ___ratelimit(\u0026amp;(EXT4_SB(sb)-\u0026gt;s_msg_ratelimit_state)\n if (!rs-\u0026gt;interval) // do nothing if interval is 0\n return 1;\n raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(\u0026amp;rs-\u0026gt;lock, flags)\n raw_spin_trylock(lock)\n _raw_spin_trylock\n __raw_spin_trylock\n spin_acquire(\u0026amp;lock-\u0026gt;dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_)\n lock_acquire\n __lock_acquire\n register_lock_class\n assign_lock_key\n dump_stack();\n ratelimit_state_init(\u0026amp;sbi-\u0026gt;s_msg_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10);\n raw_spin_lock_init(\u0026amp;rs-\u0026gt;lock);\n // init rs-\u0026gt;lock here\r\n\r\nand get the following dump_stack:\r\n\r\n=========================================================\nINFO: trying to register non-static key.\nThe code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe\nyou didn\u0026apos;t initialize this object before use?\nturning off the locking correctness validator.\nCPU: 12 PID: 753 Comm: mount Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc6-next-20231222 #504\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x170\n dump_stack+0x18/0x30\n register_lock_class+0x740/0x7c0\n __lock_acquire+0x69/0x13a0\n lock_acquire+0x120/0x450\n _raw_spin_trylock+0x98/0xd0\n ___ratelimit+0xf6/0x220\n __ext4_msg+0x7f/0x160 [ext4]\n ext4_orphan_cleanup+0x665/0x740 [ext4]\n __ext4_fill_super+0x21ea/0x2b10 [ext4]\n ext4_fill_super+0x14d/0x360 [ext4]\n[...]\n=========================================================\r\n\r\nNormally interval is 0 until s_msg_ratelimit_state is initialized, so\n___ratelimit() does nothing. But registering sysfs precedes initializing\nrs-\u0026gt;lock, so it is possible to change rs-\u0026gt;interval to a non-zero value\nvia the msg_ratelimit_interval_ms interface of sysfs while rs-\u0026gt;lock is\nuninitialized, and then a call to ext4_msg triggers the problem by\naccessing an uninitialized rs-\u0026gt;lock. Therefore register sysfs after all\ninitializations are complete to avoid such problems.(CVE-2024-40998)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Take return from set_memory_rox() into account with bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro()\r\n\r\nset_memory_rox() can fail, leaving memory unprotected.\r\n\r\nCheck return and bail out when bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro() returns\nan error.(CVE-2024-42067)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: nexthop: Initialize all fields in dumped nexthops\r\n\r\nstruct nexthop_grp contains two reserved fields that are not initialized by\nnla_put_nh_group(), and carry garbage. This can be observed e.g. with\nstrace (edited for clarity):\r\n\r\n # ip nexthop add id 1 dev lo\n # ip nexthop add id 101 group 1\n # strace -e recvmsg ip nexthop get id 101\n ...\n recvmsg(... [{nla_len=12, nla_type=NHA_GROUP},\n [{id=1, weight=0, resvd1=0x69, resvd2=0x67}]] ...) = 52\r\n\r\nThe fields are reserved and therefore not currently used. But as they are, they\nleak kernel memory, and the fact they are not just zero complicates repurposing\nof the fields for new ends. Initialize the full structure.(CVE-2024-42283)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nirqchip/imx-irqsteer: Handle runtime power management correctly\r\n\r\nThe power domain is automatically activated from clk_prepare(). However, on\ncertain platforms like i.MX8QM and i.MX8QXP, the power-on handling invokes\nsleeping functions, which triggers the \u0026apos;scheduling while atomic\u0026apos; bug in the\ncontext switch path during device probing:\r\n\r\n BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u13:1/48/0x00000002\n Call trace:\n __schedule_bug+0x54/0x6c\n __schedule+0x7f0/0xa94\n schedule+0x5c/0xc4\n schedule_preempt_disabled+0x24/0x40\n __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x2c0/0x540\n __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x14/0x20\n mutex_lock+0x48/0x54\n clk_prepare_lock+0x44/0xa0\n clk_prepare+0x20/0x44\n imx_irqsteer_resume+0x28/0xe0\n pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x44\n __genpd_runtime_resume+0x30/0x80\n genpd_runtime_resume+0xc8/0x2c0\n __rpm_callback+0x48/0x1d8\n rpm_callback+0x6c/0x78\n rpm_resume+0x490/0x6b4\n __pm_runtime_resume+0x50/0x94\n irq_chip_pm_get+0x2c/0xa0\n __irq_do_set_handler+0x178/0x24c\n irq_set_chained_handler_and_data+0x60/0xa4\n mxc_gpio_probe+0x160/0x4b0\r\n\r\nCure this by implementing the irq_bus_lock/sync_unlock() interrupt chip\ncallbacks and handle power management in them as they are invoked from\nnon-atomic context.\r\n\r\n[ tglx: Rewrote change log, added Fixes tag ](CVE-2024-42290)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nudf: Avoid using corrupted block bitmap buffer\r\n\r\nWhen the filesystem block bitmap is corrupted, we detect the corruption\nwhile loading the bitmap and fail the allocation with error. However the\nnext allocation from the same bitmap will notice the bitmap buffer is\nalready loaded and tries to allocate from the bitmap with mixed results\n(depending on the exact nature of the bitmap corruption). Fix the\nproblem by using BH_verified bit to indicate whether the bitmap is valid\nor not.(CVE-2024-42306)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/gma500: fix null pointer dereference in psb_intel_lvds_get_modes\r\n\r\nIn psb_intel_lvds_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is\nassigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference\non failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-42309)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: venus: fix use after free in vdec_close\r\n\r\nThere appears to be a possible use after free with vdec_close().\nThe firmware will add buffer release work to the work queue through\nHFI callbacks as a normal part of decoding. Randomly closing the\ndecoder device from userspace during normal decoding can incur\na read after free for inst.\r\n\r\nFix it by cancelling the work in vdec_close.(CVE-2024-42313)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipvs: properly dereference pe in ip_vs_add_service\r\n\r\nUse pe directly to resolve sparse warning:\r\n\r\n net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1471:27: warning: dereference of noderef expression(CVE-2024-42322)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nPCI: keystone: Fix NULL pointer dereference in case of DT error in ks_pcie_setup_rc_app_regs()\r\n\r\nIf IORESOURCE_MEM is not provided in Device Tree due to\nany error, resource_list_first_type() will return NULL and\npci_parse_request_of_pci_ranges() will just emit a warning.\r\n\r\nThis will cause a NULL pointer dereference. Fix this bug by adding NULL\nreturn check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-43823)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nleds: trigger: Unregister sysfs attributes before calling deactivate()\r\n\r\nTriggers which have trigger specific sysfs attributes typically store\nrelated data in trigger-data allocated by the activate() callback and\nfreed by the deactivate() callback.\r\n\r\nCalling device_remove_groups() after calling deactivate() leaves a window\nwhere the sysfs attributes show/store functions could be called after\ndeactivation and then operate on the just freed trigger-data.\r\n\r\nMove the device_remove_groups() call to before deactivate() to close\nthis race window.\r\n\r\nThis also makes the deactivation path properly do things in reverse order\nof the activation path which calls the activate() callback before calling\ndevice_add_groups().(CVE-2024-43830)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf, arm64: Fix trampoline for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG\r\n\r\nWhen BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG is set, the trampoline calls\n__bpf_tramp_enter() and __bpf_tramp_exit() functions, passing them\nthe struct bpf_tramp_image *im pointer as an argument in R0.\r\n\r\nThe trampoline generation code uses emit_addr_mov_i64() to emit\ninstructions for moving the bpf_tramp_image address into R0, but\nemit_addr_mov_i64() assumes the address to be in the vmalloc() space\nand uses only 48 bits. Because bpf_tramp_image is allocated using\nkzalloc(), its address can use more than 48-bits, in this case the\ntrampoline will pass an invalid address to __bpf_tramp_enter/exit()\ncausing a kernel crash.\r\n\r\nFix this by using emit_a64_mov_i64() in place of emit_addr_mov_i64()\nas it can work with addresses that are greater than 48-bits.(CVE-2024-43840)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmd: fix deadlock between mddev_suspend and flush bio\r\n\r\nDeadlock occurs when mddev is being suspended while some flush bio is in\nprogress. It is a complex issue.\r\n\r\nT1. the first flush is at the ending stage, it clears \u0026apos;mddev-\u0026gt;flush_bio\u0026apos;\n and tries to submit data, but is blocked because mddev is suspended\n by T4.\nT2. the second flush sets \u0026apos;mddev-\u0026gt;flush_bio\u0026apos;, and attempts to queue\n md_submit_flush_data(), which is already running (T1) and won\u0026apos;t\n execute again if on the same CPU as T1.\nT3. the third flush inc active_io and tries to flush, but is blocked because\n \u0026apos;mddev-\u0026gt;flush_bio\u0026apos; is not NULL (set by T2).\nT4. mddev_suspend() is called and waits for active_io dec to 0 which is inc\n by T3.\r\n\r\n T1\t\tT2\t\tT3\t\tT4\n (flush 1)\t(flush 2)\t(third 3)\t(suspend)\n md_submit_flush_data\n mddev-\u0026gt;flush_bio = NULL;\n .\n .\t \tmd_flush_request\n .\t \t mddev-\u0026gt;flush_bio = bio\n .\t \t queue submit_flushes\n .\t\t .\n .\t\t .\t\tmd_handle_request\n .\t\t .\t\t active_io + 1\n .\t\t .\t\t md_flush_request\n .\t\t .\t\t wait !mddev-\u0026gt;flush_bio\n .\t\t .\n .\t\t .\t\t\t\tmddev_suspend\n .\t\t .\t\t\t\t wait !active_io\n .\t\t .\n .\t\t submit_flushes\n .\t\t queue_work md_submit_flush_data\n .\t\t //md_submit_flush_data is already running (T1)\n .\n md_handle_request\n wait resume\r\n\r\nThe root issue is non-atomic inc/dec of active_io during flush process.\nactive_io is dec before md_submit_flush_data is queued, and inc soon\nafter md_submit_flush_data() run.\n md_flush_request\n active_io + 1\n submit_flushes\n active_io - 1\n md_submit_flush_data\n md_handle_request\n active_io + 1\n make_request\n active_io - 1\r\n\r\nIf active_io is dec after md_handle_request() instead of within\nsubmit_flushes(), make_request() can be called directly intead of\nmd_handle_request() in md_submit_flush_data(), and active_io will\nonly inc and dec once in the whole flush process. Deadlock will be\nfixed.\r\n\r\nAdditionally, the only difference between fixing the issue and before is\nthat there is no return error handling of make_request(). But after\nprevious patch cleaned md_write_start(), make_requst() only return error\nin raid5_make_request() by dm-raid, see commit 41425f96d7aa (\u0026quot;dm-raid456,\nmd/raid456: fix a deadlock for dm-raid456 while io concurrent with\nreshape)\u0026quot;. Since dm always splits data and flush operation into two\nseparate io, io size of flush submitted by dm always is 0, make_request()\nwill not be called in md_submit_flush_data(). To prevent future\nmodifications from introducing issues, add WARN_ON to ensure\nmake_request() no error is returned in this context.(CVE-2024-43855)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup under heavy CEQE load\r\n\r\nCEQEs are handled in interrupt handler currently. This may cause the\nCPU core staying in interrupt context too long and lead to soft lockup\nunder heavy load.\r\n\r\nHandle CEQEs in BH workqueue and set an upper limit for the number of\nCEQE handled by a single call of work handler.(CVE-2024-43872)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmemcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr\r\n\r\nCommit 73f576c04b94 (\u0026quot;mm: memcontrol: fix cgroup creation failure after\nmany small jobs\u0026quot;) decoupled the memcg IDs from the CSS ID space to fix the\ncgroup creation failures. It introduced IDR to maintain the memcg ID\nspace. The IDR depends on external synchronization mechanisms for\nmodifications. For the mem_cgroup_idr, the idr_alloc() and idr_replace()\nhappen within css callback and thus are protected through cgroup_mutex\nfrom concurrent modifications. However idr_remove() for mem_cgroup_idr\nwas not protected against concurrency and can be run concurrently for\ndifferent memcgs when they hit their refcnt to zero. Fix that.\r\n\r\nWe have been seeing list_lru based kernel crashes at a low frequency in\nour fleet for a long time. These crashes were in different part of\nlist_lru code including list_lru_add(), list_lru_del() and reparenting\ncode. Upon further inspection, it looked like for a given object (dentry\nand inode), the super_block\u0026apos;s list_lru didn\u0026apos;t have list_lru_one for the\nmemcg of that object. The initial suspicions were either the object is\nnot allocated through kmem_cache_alloc_lru() or somehow\nmemcg_list_lru_alloc() failed to allocate list_lru_one() for a memcg but\nreturned success. No evidence were found for these cases.\r\n\r\nLooking more deeply, we started seeing situations where valid memcg\u0026apos;s id\nis not present in mem_cgroup_idr and in some cases multiple valid memcgs\nhave same id and mem_cgroup_idr is pointing to one of them. So, the most\nreasonable explanation is that these situations can happen due to race\nbetween multiple idr_remove() calls or race between\nidr_alloc()/idr_replace() and idr_remove(). These races are causing\nmultiple memcgs to acquire the same ID and then offlining of one of them\nwould cleanup list_lrus on the system for all of them. Later access from\nother memcgs to the list_lru cause crashes due to missing list_lru_one.(CVE-2024-43892)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: core: check uartclk for zero to avoid divide by zero\r\n\r\nCalling ioctl TIOCSSERIAL with an invalid baud_base can\nresult in uartclk being zero, which will result in a\ndivide by zero error in uart_get_divisor(). The check for\nuartclk being zero in uart_set_info() needs to be done\nbefore other settings are made as subsequent calls to\nioctl TIOCSSERIAL for the same port would be impacted if\nthe uartclk check was done where uartclk gets set.\r\n\r\nOops: divide error: 0000 PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nRIP: 0010:uart_get_divisor (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:580)\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\nserial8250_get_divisor (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2576\n drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2589)\nserial8250_do_set_termios (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:502\n drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2741)\nserial8250_set_termios (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2862)\nuart_change_line_settings (./include/linux/spinlock.h:376\n ./include/linux/serial_core.h:608 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:222)\nuart_port_startup (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:342)\nuart_startup (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:368)\nuart_set_info (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:1034)\nuart_set_info_user (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:1059)\ntty_set_serial (drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2637)\ntty_ioctl (drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2647 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2791)\n__x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:52 fs/ioctl.c:907\n fs/ioctl.c:893 fs/ioctl.c:893)\ndo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52\n (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 (discriminator 1))\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\r\n\r\nRule: add(CVE-2024-43893)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfou: remove warn in gue_gro_receive on unsupported protocol\r\n\r\nDrop the WARN_ON_ONCE inn gue_gro_receive if the encapsulated type is\nnot known or does not have a GRO handler.\r\n\r\nSuch a packet is easily constructed. Syzbot generates them and sets\noff this warning.\r\n\r\nRemove the warning as it is expected and not actionable.\r\n\r\nThe warning was previously reduced from WARN_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE in\ncommit 270136613bf7 (\u0026quot;fou: Do WARN_ON_ONCE in gue_gro_receive for bad\nproto callbacks\u0026quot;).(CVE-2024-44940)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: line6: Fix racy access to midibuf\r\n\r\nThere can be concurrent accesses to line6 midibuf from both the URB\ncompletion callback and the rawmidi API access. This could be a cause\nof KMSAN warning triggered by syzkaller below (so put as reported-by\nhere).\r\n\r\nThis patch protects the midibuf call of the former code path with a\nspinlock for avoiding the possible races.(CVE-2024-44954)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\natm: idt77252: prevent use after free in dequeue_rx()\r\n\r\nWe can\u0026apos;t dereference \u0026quot;skb\u0026quot; after calling vcc-\u0026gt;push() because the skb\nis released.(CVE-2024-44998)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxhci: Fix Panther point NULL pointer deref at full-speed re-enumeration\r\n\r\nre-enumerating full-speed devices after a failed address device command\ncan trigger a NULL pointer dereference.\r\n\r\nFull-speed devices may need to reconfigure the endpoint 0 Max Packet Size\nvalue during enumeration. Usb core calls usb_ep0_reinit() in this case,\nwhich ends up calling xhci_configure_endpoint().\r\n\r\nOn Panther point xHC the xhci_configure_endpoint() function will\nadditionally check and reserve bandwidth in software. Other hosts do\nthis in hardware\r\n\r\nIf xHC address device command fails then a new xhci_virt_device structure\nis allocated as part of re-enabling the slot, but the bandwidth table\npointers are not set up properly here.\nThis triggers the NULL pointer dereference the next time usb_ep0_reinit()\nis called and xhci_configure_endpoint() tries to check and reserve\nbandwidth\r\n\r\n[46710.713538] usb 3-1: new full-speed USB device number 5 using xhci_hcd\n[46710.713699] usb 3-1: Device not responding to setup address.\n[46710.917684] usb 3-1: Device not responding to setup address.\n[46711.125536] usb 3-1: device not accepting address 5, error -71\n[46711.125594] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008\n[46711.125600] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n[46711.125603] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\n[46711.125606] PGD 0 P4D 0\n[46711.125610] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\n[46711.125615] CPU: 1 PID: 25760 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 6.10.3_2 #1\n[46711.125620] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.\n[46711.125623] Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event [usbcore]\n[46711.125668] RIP: 0010:xhci_reserve_bandwidth (drivers/usb/host/xhci.c\r\n\r\nFix this by making sure bandwidth table pointers are set up correctly\nafter a failed address device command, and additionally by avoiding\nchecking for bandwidth in cases like this where no actual endpoints are\nadded or removed, i.e. only context for default control endpoint 0 is\nevaluated.(CVE-2024-45006)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/dasd: fix error recovery leading to data corruption on ESE devices\r\n\r\nExtent Space Efficient (ESE) or thin provisioned volumes need to be\nformatted on demand during usual IO processing.\r\n\r\nThe dasd_ese_needs_format function checks for error codes that signal\nthe non existence of a proper track format.\r\n\r\nThe check for incorrect length is to imprecise since other error cases\nleading to transport of insufficient data also have this flag set.\nThis might lead to data corruption in certain error cases for example\nduring a storage server warmstart.\r\n\r\nFix by removing the check for incorrect length and replacing by\nexplicitly checking for invalid track format in transport mode.\r\n\r\nAlso remove the check for file protected since this is not a valid\nESE handling case.(CVE-2024-45026)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfc: pn533: Add poll mod list filling check\r\n\r\nIn case of im_protocols value is 1 and tm_protocols value is 0 this\ncombination successfully passes the check\n\u0026apos;if (!im_protocols \u0026amp;\u0026amp; !tm_protocols)\u0026apos; in the nfc_start_poll().\nBut then after pn533_poll_create_mod_list() call in pn533_start_poll()\npoll mod list will remain empty and dev-\u0026gt;poll_mod_count will remain 0\nwhich lead to division by zero.\r\n\r\nNormally no im protocol has value 1 in the mask, so this combination is\nnot expected by driver. But these protocol values actually come from\nuserspace via Netlink interface (NFC_CMD_START_POLL operation). So a\nbroken or malicious program may pass a message containing a \u0026quot;bad\u0026quot;\ncombination of protocol parameter values so that dev-\u0026gt;poll_mod_count\nis not incremented inside pn533_poll_create_mod_list(), thus leading\nto division by zero.\nCall trace looks like:\nnfc_genl_start_poll()\n nfc_start_poll()\n -\u0026gt;start_poll()\n pn533_start_poll()\r\n\r\nAdd poll mod list filling check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-46676)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: typec: ucsi: Fix null pointer dereference in trace\r\n\r\nucsi_register_altmode checks IS_ERR for the alt pointer and treats\nNULL as valid. When CONFIG_TYPEC_DP_ALTMODE is not enabled,\nucsi_register_displayport returns NULL which causes a NULL pointer\ndereference in trace. Rather than return NULL, call\ntypec_port_register_altmode to register DisplayPort alternate mode\nas a non-controllable mode when CONFIG_TYPEC_DP_ALTMODE is not enabled.(CVE-2024-46719)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Remove tst_run from lwt_seg6local_prog_ops.\r\n\r\nThe syzbot reported that the lwt_seg6 related BPF ops can be invoked\nvia bpf_test_run() without without entering input_action_end_bpf()\nfirst.\r\n\r\nMartin KaFai Lau said that self test for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL\nprobably didn\u0026apos;t work since it was introduced in commit 04d4b274e2a\n(\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: Add seg6local action End.BPF\u0026quot;). The reason is that the\nper-CPU variable seg6_bpf_srh_states::srh is never assigned in the self\ntest case but each BPF function expects it.\r\n\r\nRemove test_run for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL.(CVE-2024-46754)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nice: Add netif_device_attach/detach into PF reset flow\r\n\r\nEthtool callbacks can be executed while reset is in progress and try to\naccess deleted resources, e.g. getting coalesce settings can result in a\nNULL pointer dereference seen below.\r\n\r\nReproduction steps:\nOnce the driver is fully initialized, trigger reset:\n\t# echo 1 \u0026gt; /sys/class/net/\u0026lt;interface\u0026gt;/device/reset\nwhen reset is in progress try to get coalesce settings using ethtool:\n\t# ethtool -c \u0026lt;interface\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020\nPGD 0 P4D 0\nOops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\nCPU: 11 PID: 19713 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G S 6.10.0-rc7+ #7\nRIP: 0010:ice_get_q_coalesce+0x2e/0xa0 [ice]\nRSP: 0018:ffffbab1e9bcf6a8 EFLAGS: 00010206\nRAX: 000000000000000c RBX: ffff94512305b028 RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff9451c3f2e588 RDI: ffff9451c3f2e588\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: ffff9451c3f2e580 R11: 000000000000001f R12: ffff945121fa9000\nR13: ffffbab1e9bcf760 R14: 0000000000000013 R15: ffffffff9e65dd40\nFS: 00007faee5fbe740(0000) GS:ffff94546fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000000106c2e005 CR4: 00000000001706f0\nCall Trace:\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\nice_get_coalesce+0x17/0x30 [ice]\ncoalesce_prepare_data+0x61/0x80\nethnl_default_doit+0xde/0x340\ngenl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xf2/0x150\ngenl_rcv_msg+0x1b3/0x2c0\nnetlink_rcv_skb+0x5b/0x110\ngenl_rcv+0x28/0x40\nnetlink_unicast+0x19c/0x290\nnetlink_sendmsg+0x222/0x490\n__sys_sendto+0x1df/0x1f0\n__x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30\ndo_syscall_64+0x82/0x160\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\nRIP: 0033:0x7faee60d8e27\r\n\r\nCalling netif_device_detach() before reset makes the net core not call\nthe driver when ethtool command is issued, the attempt to execute an\nethtool command during reset will result in the following message:\r\n\r\n netlink error: No such device\r\n\r\ninstead of NULL pointer dereference. Once reset is done and\nice_rebuild() is executing, the netif_device_attach() is called to allow\nfor ethtool operations to occur again in a safe manner.(CVE-2024-46770)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nksmbd: unset the binding mark of a reused connection\r\n\r\nSteve French reported null pointer dereference error from sha256 lib.\ncifs.ko can send session setup requests on reused connection.\nIf reused connection is used for binding session, conn-\u0026gt;binding can\nstill remain true and generate_preauth_hash() will not set\nsess-\u0026gt;Preauth_HashValue and it will be NULL.\nIt is used as a material to create an encryption key in\nksmbd_gen_smb311_encryptionkey. -\u0026gt;Preauth_HashValue cause null pointer\ndereference error from crypto_shash_update().\r\n\r\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000\n#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\nPGD 0 P4D 0\nOops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\nCPU: 8 PID: 429254 Comm: kworker/8:39\nHardware name: LENOVO 20MAS08500/20MAS08500, BIOS N2CET69W (1.52 )\nWorkqueue: ksmbd-io handle_ksmbd_work [ksmbd]\nRIP: 0010:lib_sha256_base_do_update.isra.0+0x11e/0x1d0 [sha256_ssse3]\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n? show_regs+0x6d/0x80\n? __die+0x24/0x80\n? page_fault_oops+0x99/0x1b0\n? do_user_addr_fault+0x2ee/0x6b0\n? exc_page_fault+0x83/0x1b0\n? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30\n? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3]\n? lib_sha256_base_do_update.isra.0+0x11e/0x1d0 [sha256_ssse3]\n? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3]\n? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3]\n_sha256_update+0x77/0xa0 [sha256_ssse3]\nsha256_avx2_update+0x15/0x30 [sha256_ssse3]\ncrypto_shash_update+0x1e/0x40\nhmac_update+0x12/0x20\ncrypto_shash_update+0x1e/0x40\ngenerate_key+0x234/0x380 [ksmbd]\ngenerate_smb3encryptionkey+0x40/0x1c0 [ksmbd]\nksmbd_gen_smb311_encryptionkey+0x72/0xa0 [ksmbd]\nntlm_authenticate.isra.0+0x423/0x5d0 [ksmbd]\nsmb2_sess_setup+0x952/0xaa0 [ksmbd]\n__process_request+0xa3/0x1d0 [ksmbd]\n__handle_ksmbd_work+0x1c4/0x2f0 [ksmbd]\nhandle_ksmbd_work+0x2d/0xa0 [ksmbd]\nprocess_one_work+0x16c/0x350\nworker_thread+0x306/0x440\n? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10\nkthread+0xef/0x120\n? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\nret_from_fork+0x44/0x70\n? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\nret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30\n\u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-46795)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: the warning dereferencing obj for nbio_v7_4\r\n\r\nif ras_manager obj null, don\u0026apos;t print NBIO err data(CVE-2024-46819)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nELF: fix kernel.randomize_va_space double read\r\n\r\nELF loader uses \u0026quot;randomize_va_space\u0026quot; twice. It is sysctl and can change\nat any moment, so 2 loads could see 2 different values in theory with\nunpredictable consequences.\r\n\r\nIssue exactly one load for consistent value across one exec.(CVE-2024-46826)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsched: sch_cake: fix bulk flow accounting logic for host fairness\r\n\r\nIn sch_cake, we keep track of the count of active bulk flows per host,\nwhen running in dst/src host fairness mode, which is used as the\nround-robin weight when iterating through flows. The count of active\nbulk flows is updated whenever a flow changes state.\r\n\r\nThis has a peculiar interaction with the hash collision handling: when a\nhash collision occurs (after the set-associative hashing), the state of\nthe hash bucket is simply updated to match the new packet that collided,\nand if host fairness is enabled, that also means assigning new per-host\nstate to the flow. For this reason, the bulk flow counters of the\nhost(s) assigned to the flow are decremented, before new state is\nassigned (and the counters, which may not belong to the same host\nanymore, are incremented again).\r\n\r\nBack when this code was introduced, the host fairness mode was always\nenabled, so the decrement was unconditional. When the configuration\nflags were introduced the *increment* was made conditional, but\nthe *decrement* was not. Which of course can lead to a spurious\ndecrement (and associated wrap-around to U16_MAX).\r\n\r\nAFAICT, when host fairness is disabled, the decrement and wrap-around\nhappens as soon as a hash collision occurs (which is not that common in\nitself, due to the set-associative hashing). However, in most cases this\nis harmless, as the value is only used when host fairness mode is\nenabled. So in order to trigger an array overflow, sch_cake has to first\nbe configured with host fairness disabled, and while running in this\nmode, a hash collision has to occur to cause the overflow. Then, the\nqdisc has to be reconfigured to enable host fairness, which leads to the\narray out-of-bounds because the wrapped-around value is retained and\nused as an array index. It seems that syzbot managed to trigger this,\nwhich is quite impressive in its own right.\r\n\r\nThis patch fixes the issue by introducing the same conditional check on\ndecrement as is used on increment.\r\n\r\nThe original bug predates the upstreaming of cake, but the commit listed\nin the Fixes tag touched that code, meaning that this patch won\u0026apos;t apply\nbefore that.(CVE-2024-46828)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete\r\n\r\nIn reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren\u0026apos;t\nholding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient\nincorrect answer. In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which\ncould happen if we have extent tree corruption. Change that to return\n-EUCLEAN. In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly,\nhowever we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code.\nFinally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert\nthat to proper error handling. Also adjust the error message so we can\nactually do something with the information.(CVE-2024-46840)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nperf/x86/intel: Limit the period on Haswell\r\n\r\nRunning the ltp test cve-2015-3290 concurrently reports the following\nwarnings.\r\n\r\nperfevents: irq loop stuck!\n WARNING: CPU: 31 PID: 32438 at arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:3174\n intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x285/0x370\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;NMI\u0026gt;\n ? __warn+0xa4/0x220\n ? intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x285/0x370\n ? __report_bug+0x123/0x130\n ? intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x285/0x370\n ? __report_bug+0x123/0x130\n ? intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x285/0x370\n ? report_bug+0x3e/0xa0\n ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x50\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n ? irq_work_claim+0x1e/0x40\n ? intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x285/0x370\n perf_event_nmi_handler+0x3d/0x60\n nmi_handle+0x104/0x330\r\n\r\nThanks to Thomas Gleixner\u0026apos;s analysis, the issue is caused by the low\ninitial period (1) of the frequency estimation algorithm, which triggers\nthe defects of the HW, specifically erratum HSW11 and HSW143. (For the\ndetails, please refer https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87plq9l5d2.ffs@tglx/)\r\n\r\nThe HSW11 requires a period larger than 100 for the INST_RETIRED.ALL\nevent, but the initial period in the freq mode is 1. The erratum is the\nsame as the BDM11, which has been supported in the kernel. A minimum\nperiod of 128 is enforced as well on HSW.\r\n\r\nHSW143 is regarding that the fixed counter 1 may overcount 32 with the\nHyper-Threading is enabled. However, based on the test, the hardware\nhas more issues than it tells. Besides the fixed counter 1, the message\n\u0026apos;interrupt took too long\u0026apos; can be observed on any counter which was armed\nwith a period \u0026lt; 32 and two events expired in the same NMI. A minimum\nperiod of 32 is enforced for the rest of the events.\nThe recommended workaround code of the HSW143 is not implemented.\nBecause it only addresses the issue for the fixed counter. It brings\nextra overhead through extra MSR writing. No related overcounting issue\nhas been reported so far.(CVE-2024-46848)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: dpaa: Pad packets to ETH_ZLEN\r\n\r\nWhen sending packets under 60 bytes, up to three bytes of the buffer\nfollowing the data may be leaked. Avoid this by extending all packets to\nETH_ZLEN, ensuring nothing is leaked in the padding. This bug can be\nreproduced by running\r\n\r\n\t$ ping -s 11 destination(CVE-2024-46854)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nft_socket: fix sk refcount leaks\r\n\r\nWe must put \u0026apos;sk\u0026apos; reference before returning.(CVE-2024-46855)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmptcp: pm: Fix uaf in __timer_delete_sync\r\n\r\nThere are two paths to access mptcp_pm_del_add_timer, result in a race\ncondition:\r\n\r\n CPU1\t\t\t\tCPU2\n ==== ====\n net_rx_action\n napi_poll netlink_sendmsg\n __napi_poll netlink_unicast\n process_backlog netlink_unicast_kernel\n __netif_receive_skb genl_rcv\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core netlink_rcv_skb\n NF_HOOK genl_rcv_msg\n ip_local_deliver_finish genl_family_rcv_msg\n ip_protocol_deliver_rcu genl_family_rcv_msg_doit\n tcp_v4_rcv mptcp_pm_nl_flush_addrs_doit\n tcp_v4_do_rcv mptcp_nl_remove_addrs_list\n tcp_rcv_established mptcp_pm_remove_addrs_and_subflows\n tcp_data_queue remove_anno_list_by_saddr\n mptcp_incoming_options mptcp_pm_del_add_timer\n mptcp_pm_del_add_timer kfree(entry)\r\n\r\nIn remove_anno_list_by_saddr(running on CPU2), after leaving the critical\nzone protected by \u0026quot;pm.lock\u0026quot;, the entry will be released, which leads to the\noccurrence of uaf in the mptcp_pm_del_add_timer(running on CPU1).\r\n\r\nKeeping a reference to add_timer inside the lock, and calling\nsk_stop_timer_sync() with this reference, instead of \u0026quot;entry-\u0026gt;add_timer\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nMove list_del(\u0026amp;entry-\u0026gt;list) to mptcp_pm_del_add_timer and inside the pm lock,\ndo not directly access any members of the entry outside the pm lock, which\ncan avoid similar \u0026quot;entry-\u0026gt;x\u0026quot; uaf.(CVE-2024-46858)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: stm32/cryp - call finalize with bh disabled\r\n\r\nThe finalize operation in interrupt mode produce a produces a spinlock\nrecursion warning. The reason is the fact that BH must be disabled\nduring this process.(CVE-2024-47658)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nspi: hisi-kunpeng: Add verification for the max_frequency provided by the firmware\r\n\r\nIf the value of max_speed_hz is 0, it may cause a division by zero\nerror in hisi_calc_effective_speed().\nThe value of max_speed_hz is provided by firmware.\nFirmware is generally considered as a trusted domain. However, as\ndivision by zero errors can cause system failure, for defense measure,\nthe value of max_speed is validated here. So 0 is regarded as invalid\nand an error code is returned.(CVE-2024-47664)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocfs2: add bounds checking to ocfs2_xattr_find_entry()\r\n\r\nAdd a paranoia check to make sure it doesn\u0026apos;t stray beyond valid memory\nregion containing ocfs2 xattr entries when scanning for a match. It will\nprevent out-of-bound access in case of crafted images.(CVE-2024-47670)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nUSB: usbtmc: prevent kernel-usb-infoleak\r\n\r\nThe syzbot reported a kernel-usb-infoleak in usbtmc_write,\nwe need to clear the structure before filling fields.(CVE-2024-47671)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: iwlwifi: mvm: don\u0026apos;t wait for tx queues if firmware is dead\r\n\r\nThere is a WARNING in iwl_trans_wait_tx_queues_empty() (that was\nrecently converted from just a message), that can be hit if we\nwait for TX queues to become empty after firmware died. Clearly,\nwe can\u0026apos;t expect anything from the firmware after it\u0026apos;s declared dead.\r\n\r\nDon\u0026apos;t call iwl_trans_wait_tx_queues_empty() in this case. While it could\nbe a good idea to stop the flow earlier, the flush functions do some\nmaintenance work that is not related to the firmware, so keep that part\nof the code running even when the firmware is not running.\r\n\r\n[edit commit message](CVE-2024-47672)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2255",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:43Z",
"published": "2024-10-18T11:07:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2255"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48893"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52444"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52463"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52482"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52612"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26820"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42067"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42283"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42290"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42306"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42309"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42313"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42322"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43823"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43830"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43840"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43855"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43872"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43892"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44940"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44954"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44998"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45006"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45026"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46676"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46719"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46754"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46770"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46795"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46819"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46826"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46828"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46840"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46848"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46854"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46855"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46858"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47658"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47664"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47670"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47671"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47672"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2022-48893",
"CVE-2023-52444",
"CVE-2023-52463",
"CVE-2023-52482",
"CVE-2023-52612",
"CVE-2023-52843",
"CVE-2024-26820",
"CVE-2024-36005",
"CVE-2024-40998",
"CVE-2024-42067",
"CVE-2024-42283",
"CVE-2024-42290",
"CVE-2024-42306",
"CVE-2024-42309",
"CVE-2024-42313",
"CVE-2024-42322",
"CVE-2024-43823",
"CVE-2024-43830",
"CVE-2024-43840",
"CVE-2024-43855",
"CVE-2024-43872",
"CVE-2024-43892",
"CVE-2024-43893",
"CVE-2024-44940",
"CVE-2024-44954",
"CVE-2024-44998",
"CVE-2024-45006",
"CVE-2024-45026",
"CVE-2024-46676",
"CVE-2024-46719",
"CVE-2024-46754",
"CVE-2024-46770",
"CVE-2024-46795",
"CVE-2024-46819",
"CVE-2024-46826",
"CVE-2024-46828",
"CVE-2024-46840",
"CVE-2024-46848",
"CVE-2024-46854",
"CVE-2024-46855",
"CVE-2024-46858",
"CVE-2024-47658",
"CVE-2024-47664",
"CVE-2024-47670",
"CVE-2024-47671",
"CVE-2024-47672"
]
}
OESA-2024-2491 (CVE-2022-48969)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-11-29 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xen-netfront: Fix NULL sring after live migration A NAPI is setup for each network sring to poll data to kernel The sring with source host is destroyed before live migration and new sring with target host is setup after live migration. The NAPI for the old sring is not deleted until setup new sring with target host after migration. With busy_poll/busy_read enabled, the NAPI can be polled before got deleted when resume VM. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 IP: xennet_poll+0xae/0xd20 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI Call Trace: finish_task_switch+0x71/0x230 timerqueue_del+0x1d/0x40 hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0xb5/0x110 xennet_alloc_rx_buffers+0x2a0/0x2a0 napi_busy_loop+0xdb/0x270 sock_poll+0x87/0x90 do_sys_poll+0x26f/0x580 tracing_map_insert+0x1d4/0x2f0 event_hist_trigger+0x14a/0x260 finish_task_switch+0x71/0x230 __schedule+0x256/0x890 recalc_sigpending+0x1b/0x50 xen_sched_clock+0x15/0x20 __rb_reserve_next+0x12d/0x140 ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x123/0x3d0 event_triggers_call+0x87/0xb0 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x1c4/0x210 xen_clocksource_get_cycles+0x15/0x20 ktime_get_ts64+0x51/0xf0 SyS_ppoll+0x160/0x1a0 SyS_ppoll+0x160/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x73/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x41/0xa6 ... RIP: xennet_poll+0xae/0xd20 RSP: ffffb4f041933900 CR2: 0000000000000008 ---[ end trace f8601785b354351c ]--- xen frontend should remove the NAPIs for the old srings before live migration as the bond srings are destroyed There is a tiny window between the srings are set to NULL and the NAPIs are disabled, It is safe as the NAPI threads are still frozen at that time(CVE-2022-48969)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bonding: stop the device in bond_setup_by_slave()
Commit 9eed321cde22 ("net: lapbether: only support ethernet devices") has been able to keep syzbot away from net/lapb, until today.
In the following splat [1], the issue is that a lapbether device has been created on a bonding device without members. Then adding a non ARPHRD_ETHER member forced the bonding master to change its type.
The fix is to make sure we call dev_close() in bond_setup_by_slave() so that the potential linked lapbether devices (or any other devices having assumptions on the physical device) are removed.
A similar bug has been addressed in commit 40baec225765 ("bonding: fix panic on non-ARPHRD_ETHER enslave failure")
[1] skbuff: skb_under_panic: text:ffff800089508810 len:44 put:40 head:ffff0000c78e7c00 data:ffff0000c78e7bea tail:0x16 end:0x140 dev:bond0 kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:192 ! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 6007 Comm: syz-executor383 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-syzkaller-gbf6547d8715b #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/04/2023 pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : skb_panic net/core/skbuff.c:188 [inline] pc : skb_under_panic+0x13c/0x140 net/core/skbuff.c:202 lr : skb_panic net/core/skbuff.c:188 [inline] lr : skb_under_panic+0x13c/0x140 net/core/skbuff.c:202 sp : ffff800096a06aa0 x29: ffff800096a06ab0 x28: ffff800096a06ba0 x27: dfff800000000000 x26: ffff0000ce9b9b50 x25: 0000000000000016 x24: ffff0000c78e7bea x23: ffff0000c78e7c00 x22: 000000000000002c x21: 0000000000000140 x20: 0000000000000028 x19: ffff800089508810 x18: ffff800096a06100 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff80008a629a3c x15: 0000000000000001 x14: 1fffe00036837a32 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 0000000000000201 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : cb50b496c519aa00 x8 : cb50b496c519aa00 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : ffff800096a063b8 x4 : ffff80008e280f80 x3 : ffff8000805ad11c x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : 0000000100000201 x0 : 0000000000000086 Call trace: skb_panic net/core/skbuff.c:188 [inline] skb_under_panic+0x13c/0x140 net/core/skbuff.c:202 skb_push+0xf0/0x108 net/core/skbuff.c:2446 ip6gre_header+0xbc/0x738 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:1384 dev_hard_header include/linux/netdevice.h:3136 [inline] lapbeth_data_transmit+0x1c4/0x298 drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c:257 lapb_data_transmit+0x8c/0xb0 net/lapb/lapb_iface.c:447 lapb_transmit_buffer+0x178/0x204 net/lapb/lapb_out.c:149 lapb_send_control+0x220/0x320 net/lapb/lapb_subr.c:251 __lapb_disconnect_request+0x9c/0x17c net/lapb/lapb_iface.c:326 lapb_device_event+0x288/0x4e0 net/lapb/lapb_iface.c:492 notifier_call_chain+0x1a4/0x510 kernel/notifier.c:93 raw_notifier_call_chain+0x3c/0x50 kernel/notifier.c:461 call_netdevice_notifiers_info net/core/dev.c:1970 [inline] call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2008 [inline] call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2022 [inline] __dev_close_many+0x1b8/0x3c4 net/core/dev.c:1508 dev_close_many+0x1e0/0x470 net/core/dev.c:1559 dev_close+0x174/0x250 net/core/dev.c:1585 lapbeth_device_event+0x2e4/0x958 drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c:466 notifier_call_chain+0x1a4/0x510 kernel/notifier.c:93 raw_notifier_call_chain+0x3c/0x50 kernel/notifier.c:461 call_netdevice_notifiers_info net/core/dev.c:1970 [inline] call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2008 [inline] call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2022 [inline] __dev_close_many+0x1b8/0x3c4 net/core/dev.c:1508 dev_close_many+0x1e0/0x470 net/core/dev.c:1559 dev_close+0x174/0x250 net/core/dev.c:1585 bond_enslave+0x2298/0x30cc drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:2332 bond_do_ioctl+0x268/0xc64 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:4539 dev_ifsioc+0x754/0x9ac dev_ioctl+0x4d8/0xd34 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:786 sock_do_ioctl+0x1d4/0x2d0 net/socket.c:1217 sock_ioctl+0x4e8/0x834 net/socket.c:1322 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_ ---truncated---(CVE-2023-52784)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
llc: verify mac len before reading mac header
LLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb has an Ethernet header.
Syzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert packets without mac len and with user configurable skb->protocol (passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111
llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]
llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111
llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637
netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]
netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782
tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555
tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002
Add a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.
There are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are protected by a test skb->protocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not protect against this tun scenario.
But the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will indirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any other LLC code.
It is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but not sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume an Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3 protocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used to, on top of Token Ring.
At least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start of git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in this commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all stable kernels should receive this.(CVE-2023-52843)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
SUNRPC: Fix UAF in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready()
After the listener svc_sock is freed, and before invoking svc_tcp_accept() for the established child sock, there is a window that the newsock retaining a freed listener svc_sock in sk_user_data which cloning from parent. In the race window, if data is received on the newsock, we will observe use-after-free report in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready().
Reproduce by two tasks:
- while :; do rpc.nfsd 0 ; rpc.nfsd; done
- while :; do echo "" | ncat -4 127.0.0.1 2049 ; done
KASAN report:
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready+0x1cf/0x1f0 [sunrpc] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888139d96228 by task nc/102553 CPU: 7 PID: 102553 Comm: nc Not tainted 6.3.0+ #18 Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 11/12/2020 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x50 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x27/0x310 print_report+0x3e/0x70 kasan_report+0xae/0xe0 svc_tcp_listen_data_ready+0x1cf/0x1f0 [sunrpc] tcp_data_queue+0x9f4/0x20e0 tcp_rcv_established+0x666/0x1f60 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x51c/0x850 tcp_v4_rcv+0x23fc/0x2e80 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x62/0x300 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x267/0x350 ip_local_deliver+0x18b/0x2d0 ip_rcv+0x2fb/0x370 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x166/0x1b0 process_backlog+0x24c/0x5e0 __napi_poll+0xa2/0x500 net_rx_action+0x854/0xc90 __do_softirq+0x1bb/0x5de do_softirq+0xcb/0x100 </IRQ> <TASK> ... </TASK>
Allocated by task 102371: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x7b/0x90 svc_setup_socket+0x52/0x4f0 [sunrpc] svc_addsock+0x20d/0x400 [sunrpc] __write_ports_addfd+0x209/0x390 [nfsd] write_ports+0x239/0x2c0 [nfsd] nfsctl_transaction_write+0xac/0x110 [nfsd] vfs_write+0x1c3/0xae0 ksys_write+0xed/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
Freed by task 102551: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x50 __kasan_slab_free+0x106/0x190 __kmem_cache_free+0x133/0x270 svc_xprt_free+0x1e2/0x350 [sunrpc] svc_xprt_destroy_all+0x25a/0x440 [sunrpc] nfsd_put+0x125/0x240 [nfsd] nfsd_svc+0x2cb/0x3c0 [nfsd] write_threads+0x1ac/0x2a0 [nfsd] nfsctl_transaction_write+0xac/0x110 [nfsd] vfs_write+0x1c3/0xae0 ksys_write+0xed/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
Fix the UAF by simply doing nothing in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready() if state != TCP_LISTEN, that will avoid dereferencing svsk for all child socket.(CVE-2023-52885)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf/aux: Fix AUX buffer serialization
Ole reported that event->mmap_mutex is strictly insufficient to serialize the AUX buffer, add a per RB mutex to fully serialize it.
Note that in the lock order comment the perf_event::mmap_mutex order was already wrong, that is, it nesting under mmap_lock is not new with this patch.(CVE-2024-46713)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/hns: Fix spin_unlock_irqrestore() called with IRQs enabled Fix missuse of spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq() when spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_lock_irqrestore() was hold. This was discovered through the lock debugging, and the corresponding log is as follows: raw_local_irq_restore() called with IRQs enabled WARNING: CPU: 96 PID: 2074 at kernel/locking/irqflag-debug.c:10 warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x30/0x40 ... Call trace: warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x30/0x40 _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x84/0xc8 add_qp_to_list+0x11c/0x148 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_create_qp_common.constprop.0+0x240/0x780 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_create_qp+0x98/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2] create_qp+0x138/0x258 ib_create_qp_kernel+0x50/0xe8 create_mad_qp+0xa8/0x128 ib_mad_port_open+0x218/0x448 ib_mad_init_device+0x70/0x1f8 add_client_context+0xfc/0x220 enable_device_and_get+0xd0/0x140 ib_register_device.part.0+0xf4/0x1c8 ib_register_device+0x34/0x50 hns_roce_register_device+0x174/0x3d0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_init+0xfc/0x2c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] __hns_roce_hw_v2_init_instance+0x7c/0x1d0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_hw_v2_init_instance+0x9c/0x180 hns_roce_hw_v2
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: call the security_mmap_file() LSM hook in remap_file_pages() The remap_file_pages syscall handler calls do_mmap() directly, which doesn't contain the LSM security check. And if the process has called personality(READ_IMPLIES_EXEC) before and remap_file_pages() is called for RW pages, this will actually result in remapping the pages to RWX, bypassing a W^X policy enforced by SELinux. So we should check prot by security_mmap_file LSM hook in the remap_file_pages syscall handler before do_mmap() is called. Otherwise, it potentially permits an attacker to bypass a W^X policy enforced by SELinux. The bypass is similar to CVE-2016-10044, which bypass the same thing via AIO and can be found in [1]. The PoC: $ cat > test.c int main(void) { size_t pagesz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE); int mfd = syscall(SYS_memfd_create, "test", 0); const char *buf = mmap(NULL, 4 * pagesz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, mfd, 0); unsigned int old = syscall(SYS_personality, 0xffffffff); syscall(SYS_personality, READ_IMPLIES_EXEC | old); syscall(SYS_remap_file_pages, buf, pagesz, 0, 2, 0); syscall(SYS_personality, old); // show the RWX page exists even if W^X policy is enforced int fd = open("/proc/self/maps", O_RDONLY); unsigned char buf2[1024]; while (1) { int ret = read(fd, buf2, 1024); if (ret <= 0) break; write(1, buf2, ret); } close(fd); } $ gcc test.c -o test $ ./test | grep rwx 7f1836c34000-7f1836c35000 rwxs 00002000 00:01 2050 /memfd:test (deleted) PM: subject line tweaks
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: seeq: Fix use after free vulnerability in ether3 Driver Due to Race Condition In the ether3_probe function, a timer is initialized with a callback function ether3_ledoff, bound to &prev(dev)->timer. Once the timer is started, there is a risk of a race condition if the module or device is removed, triggering the ether3_remove function to perform cleanup. The sequence of operations that may lead to a UAF bug is as follows: CPU0 CPU1 | ether3_ledoff ether3_remove | free_netdev(dev); | put_devic | kfree(dev); | | ether3_outw(priv(dev)->regs.config2 |= CFG2_CTRLO, REG_CONFIG2); | // use dev Fix it by ensuring that the timer is canceled before proceeding with the cleanup in ether3_remove.(CVE-2024-47747)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/cxgb4: Added NULL check for lookup_atid The lookup_atid() function can return NULL if the ATID is invalid or does not exist in the identifier table, which could lead to dereferencing a null pointer without a check in the act_establish() and act_open_rpl() functions. Add a NULL check to prevent null pointer dereferencing. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-47749)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Initialize denominators' default to 1 [WHAT & HOW] Variables used as denominators and maybe not assigned to other values, should not be 0. Change their default to 1 so they are never 0. This fixes 10 DIVIDE_BY_ZERO issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-49899)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: avoid NULL pointer dereference iwl_mvm_tx_skb_sta() and iwl_mvm_tx_mpdu() verify that the mvmvsta pointer is not NULL. It retrieves this pointer using iwl_mvm_sta_from_mac80211, which is dereferencing the ieee80211_sta pointer. If sta is NULL, iwl_mvm_sta_from_mac80211 will dereference a NULL pointer. Fix this by checking the sta pointer before retrieving the mvmsta from it. If sta is not NULL, then mvmsta isn't either.(CVE-2024-49929)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: prevent nf_skb_duplicated corruption syzbot found that nf_dup_ipv4() or nf_dup_ipv6() could write per-cpu variable nf_skb_duplicated in an unsafe way [1]. Disabling preemption as hinted by the splat is not enough, we have to disable soft interrupts as well. [1] BUG: using __this_cpu_write() in preemptible [00000000] code: syz.4.282/6316 caller is nf_dup_ipv4+0x651/0x8f0 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_dup_ipv4.c:87 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6316 Comm: syz.4.282 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7-syzkaller-00104-g7052622fccb1 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 check_preemption_disabled+0x10e/0x120 lib/smp_processor_id.c:49 nf_dup_ipv4+0x651/0x8f0 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_dup_ipv4.c:87 nft_dup_ipv4_eval+0x1db/0x300 net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_dup_ipv4.c:30 expr_call_ops_eval net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:240 [inline] nft_do_chain+0x4ad/0x1da0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:288 nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x202/0x320 net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c:23 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook+0x2c4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:269 NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:302 [inline] ip_output+0x185/0x230 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433 ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline] ip_send_skb+0x74/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1495 udp_send_skb+0xacf/0x1650 net/ipv4/udp.c:981 udp_sendmsg+0x1c21/0x2a60 net/ipv4/udp.c:1269 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745 _syssendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597 _sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline] __sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f4ce4f7def9 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f4ce5d4a038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4ce5135f80 RCX: 00007f4ce4f7def9 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020005d40 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 00007f4ce4ff0b76 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f4ce5135f80 R15: 00007ffd4cbc6d68 </TASK>(CVE-2024-49952)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: xtables: avoid NFPROTO_UNSPEC where needed syzbot managed to call xt_cluster match via ebtables: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11 at net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c:72 xt_cluster_mt+0x196/0x780 [..] ebt_do_table+0x174b/0x2a40 Module registers to NFPROTO_UNSPEC, but it assumes ipv4/ipv6 packet processing. As this is only useful to restrict locally terminating TCP/UDP traffic, register this for ipv4 and ipv6 family only. Pablo points out that this is a general issue, direct users of the set/getsockopt interface can call into targets/matches that were only intended for use with ip(6)tables. Check all UNSPEC matches and targets for similar issues: - matches and targets are fine except if they assume skb_network_header() is valid -- this is only true when called from inet layer: ip(6) stack pulls the ip/ipv6 header into linear data area. - targets that return XT_CONTINUE or other xtables verdicts must be restricted too, they are incompatbile with the ebtables traverser, e.g. EBT_CONTINUE is a completely different value than XT_CONTINUE. Most matches/targets are changed to register for NFPROTO_IPV4/IPV6, as they are provided for use by ip(6)tables. The MARK target is also used by arptables, so register for NFPROTO_ARP too. While at it, bail out if connbytes fails to enable the corresponding conntrack family. This change passes the selftests in iptables.git.(CVE-2024-50038)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: br_netfilter: fix panic with metadata_dst skb Fix a kernel panic in the br_netfilter module when sending untagged traffic via a VxLAN device. This happens during the check for fragmentation in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit. It is dependent on: 1) the br_netfilter module being loaded; 2) net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables set to 1; 3) a bridge with a VxLAN (single-vxlan-device) netdevice as a bridge port; 4) untagged frames with size higher than the VxLAN MTU forwarded/flooded When forwarding the untagged packet to the VxLAN bridge port, before the netfilter hooks are called, br_handle_egress_vlan_tunnel is called and changes the skb_dst to the tunnel dst. The tunnel_dst is a metadata type of dst, i.e., skb_valid_dst(skb) is false, and metadata->dst.dev is NULL. Then in the br_netfilter hooks, in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit, there's a check for frames that needs to be fragmented: frames with higher MTU than the VxLAN device end up calling br_nf_ip_fragment, which in turns call ip_skb_dst_mtu. The ip_dst_mtu tries to use the skb_dst(skb) as if it was a valid dst with valid dst->dev, thus the crash. This case was never supported in the first place, so drop the packet instead. PING 10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2) from 0.0.0.0 h1-eth0: 2000(2028) bytes of data. [ 176.291791] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000110 [ 176.292101] Mem abort info: [ 176.292184] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 [ 176.292322] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 176.292530] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 176.292709] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 176.292862] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 176.293013] Data abort info: [ 176.293104] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 176.293488] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 176.293787] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 176.293995] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000043ef5000 [ 176.294166] [0000000000000110] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 176.294827] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 176.295252] Modules linked in: vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel veth br_netfilter bridge stp llc ipv6 crct10dif_ce [ 176.295923] CPU: 0 PID: 188 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3-g5b3fbd61b9d1 #2 [ 176.296314] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 176.296535] pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 176.296808] pc : br_nf_dev_queue_xmit+0x390/0x4ec [br_netfilter] [ 176.297382] lr : br_nf_dev_queue_xmit+0x2ac/0x4ec [br_netfilter] [ 176.297636] sp : ffff800080003630 [ 176.297743] x29: ffff800080003630 x28: 0000000000000008 x27: ffff6828c49ad9f8 [ 176.298093] x26: ffff6828c49ad000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 00000000000003e8 [ 176.298430] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffff6828c4960b40 x21: ffff6828c3b16d28 [ 176.298652] x20: ffff6828c3167048 x19: ffff6828c3b16d00 x18: 0000000000000014 [ 176.298926] x17: ffffb0476322f000 x16: ffffb7e164023730 x15: 0000000095744632 [ 176.299296] x14: ffff6828c3f1c880 x13: 0000000000000002 x12: ffffb7e137926a70 [ 176.299574] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff6828c3f1c898 x9 : 0000000000000000 [ 176.300049] x8 : ffff6828c49bf070 x7 : 0008460f18d5f20e x6 : f20e0100bebafeca [ 176.300302] x5 : ffff6828c7f918fe x4 : ffff6828c49bf070 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 176.300586] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff6828c3c7ad00 x0 : ffff6828c7f918f0 [ 176.300889] Call trace: [ 176.301123] br_nf_dev_queue_xmit+0x390/0x4ec [br_netfilter] [ 176.301411] br_nf_post_routing+0x2a8/0x3e4 [br_netfilter] [ 176.301703] nf_hook_slow+0x48/0x124 [ 176.302060] br_forward_finish+0xc8/0xe8 [bridge] [ 176.302371] br_nf_hook_thresh+0x124/0x134 [br_netfilter] [ 176.302605] br_nf_forward_finish+0x118/0x22c [br_netfilter] [ 176.302824] br_nf_forward_ip.part.0+0x264/0x290 [br_netfilter] [ 176.303136] br_nf_forward+0x2b8/0x4e0 [br_netfilter] [ 176.303359] nf_hook_slow+0x48/0x124 [ 176.303 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-50045)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/rtrs-srv: Avoid null pointer deref during path establishment For RTRS path establishment, RTRS client initiates and completes con_num of connections. After establishing all its connections, the information is exchanged between the client and server through the info_req message. During this exchange, it is essential that all connections have been established, and the state of the RTRS srv path is CONNECTED. So add these sanity checks, to make sure we detect and abort process in error scenarios to avoid null pointer deref.(CVE-2024-50062)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tty: n_gsm: Fix use-after-free in gsm_cleanup_mux BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in gsm_cleanup_mux+0x77b/0x7b0 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3160 [n_gsm] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88815fe99c00 by task poc/3379 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 3379 Comm: poc Not tainted 6.11.0+ #56 Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 11/12/2020 Call Trace: <TASK> gsm_cleanup_mux+0x77b/0x7b0 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3160 [n_gsm] __pfx_gsm_cleanup_mux+0x10/0x10 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3124 [n_gsm] __pfx_sched_clock_cpu+0x10/0x10 kernel/sched/clock.c:389 update_load_avg+0x1c1/0x27b0 kernel/sched/fair.c:4500 __pfx_min_vruntime_cb_rotate+0x10/0x10 kernel/sched/fair.c:846 __rb_insert_augmented+0x492/0xbf0 lib/rbtree.c:161 gsmld_ioctl+0x395/0x1450 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3408 [n_gsm] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x92/0xf0 arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:107 __pfx_gsmld_ioctl+0x10/0x10 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3822 [n_gsm] ktime_get+0x5e/0x140 kernel/time/timekeeping.c:195 ldsem_down_read+0x94/0x4e0 arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:79 __pfx_ldsem_down_read+0x10/0x10 drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c:338 __pfx_do_vfs_ioctl+0x10/0x10 fs/ioctl.c:805 tty_ioctl+0x643/0x1100 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2818 Allocated by task 65: gsm_data_alloc.constprop.0+0x27/0x190 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:926 [n_gsm] gsm_send+0x2c/0x580 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:819 [n_gsm] gsm1_receive+0x547/0xad0 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3038 [n_gsm] gsmld_receive_buf+0x176/0x280 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3609 [n_gsm] tty_ldisc_receive_buf+0x101/0x1e0 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:391 tty_port_default_receive_buf+0x61/0xa0 drivers/tty/tty_port.c:39 flush_to_ldisc+0x1b0/0x750 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:445 process_scheduled_works+0x2b0/0x10d0 kernel/workqueue.c:3229 worker_thread+0x3dc/0x950 kernel/workqueue.c:3391 kthread+0x2a3/0x370 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:257 Freed by task 3367: kfree+0x126/0x420 mm/slub.c:4580 gsm_cleanup_mux+0x36c/0x7b0 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3160 [n_gsm] gsmld_ioctl+0x395/0x1450 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3408 [n_gsm] tty_ioctl+0x643/0x1100 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2818 [Analysis] gsm_msg on the tx_ctrl_list or tx_data_list of gsm_mux can be freed by multi threads through ioctl,which leads to the occurrence of uaf. Protect it by gsm tx lock.(CVE-2024-50073)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: unicode: Don't special case ignorable code points We don't need to handle them separately. Instead, just let them decompose/casefold to themselves.(CVE-2024-50089)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: udf: fix uninit-value use in udf_get_fileshortad Check for overflow when computing alen in udf_current_aext to mitigate later uninit-value use in udf_get_fileshortad KMSAN bug[1]. After applying the patch reproducer did not trigger any issue[2]. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8901c4560b7ab5c2f9df [2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10242227980000(CVE-2024-50143)
(CVE-2024-50151)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: remove the incorrect Fw reference check when dirtying pages When doing the direct-io reads it will also try to mark pages dirty, but for the read path it won't hold the Fw caps and there is case will it get the Fw reference.(CVE-2024-50179)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fbdev: sisfb: Fix strbuf array overflow The values of the variables xres and yres are placed in strbuf. These variables are obtained from strbuf1. The strbuf1 array contains digit characters and a space if the array contains non-digit characters. Then, when executing sprintf(strbuf, "%ux%ux8", xres, yres); more than 16 bytes will be written to strbuf. It is suggested to increase the size of the strbuf array to 24. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-50180)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: irqchip/gic-v4: Don't allow a VMOVP on a dying VPE Kunkun Jiang reported that there is a small window of opportunity for userspace to force a change of affinity for a VPE while the VPE has already been unmapped, but the corresponding doorbell interrupt still visible in /proc/irq/. Plug the race by checking the value of vmapp_count, which tracks whether the VPE is mapped ot not, and returning an error in this case. This involves making vmapp_count common to both GICv4.1 and its v4.0 ancestor.(CVE-2024-50192)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: propagate directory read errors from nilfs_find_entry() Syzbot reported that a task hang occurs in vcs_open() during a fuzzing test for nilfs2. The root cause of this problem is that in nilfs_find_entry(), which searches for directory entries, ignores errors when loading a directory page/folio via nilfs_get_folio() fails. If the filesystem images is corrupted, and the i_size of the directory inode is large, and the directory page/folio is successfully read but fails the sanity check, for example when it is zero-filled, nilfs_check_folio() may continue to spit out error messages in bursts. Fix this issue by propagating the error to the callers when loading a page/folio fails in nilfs_find_entry(). The current interface of nilfs_find_entry() and its callers is outdated and cannot propagate error codes such as -EIO and -ENOMEM returned via nilfs_find_entry(), so fix it together.(CVE-2024-50202)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: firewire-lib: Avoid division by zero in apply_constraint_to_size() The step variable is initialized to zero. It is changed in the loop, but if it's not changed it will remain zero. Add a variable check before the division. The observed behavior was introduced by commit 826b5de90c0b ("ALSA: firewire-lib: fix insufficient PCM rule for period/buffer size"), and it is difficult to show that any of the interval parameters will satisfy the snd_interval_test() condition with data from the amdtp_rate_table[] table. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-50205)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: fix potential deadlock with newly created symlinks Syzbot reported that page_symlink(), called by nilfs_symlink(), triggers memory reclamation involving the filesystem layer, which can result in circular lock dependencies among the reader/writer semaphore nilfs->ns_segctor_sem, s_writers percpu_rwsem (intwrite) and the fs_reclaim pseudo lock. This is because after commit 21fc61c73c39 ("don't put symlink bodies in pagecache into highmem"), the gfp flags of the page cache for symbolic links are overwritten to GFP_KERNEL via inode_nohighmem(). This is not a problem for symlinks read from the backing device, because the __GFP_FS flag is dropped after inode_nohighmem() is called. However, when a new symlink is created with nilfs_symlink(), the gfp flags remain overwritten to GFP_KERNEL. Then, memory allocation called from page_symlink() etc. triggers memory reclamation including the FS layer, which may call nilfs_evict_inode() or nilfs_dirty_inode(). And these can cause a deadlock if they are called while nilfs->ns_segctor_sem is held: Fix this issue by dropping the __GFP_FS flag from the page cache GFP flags of newly created symlinks in the same way that nilfs_new_inode() and __nilfs_read_inode() do, as a workaround until we adopt nofs allocation scope consistently or improve the locking constraints.(CVE-2024-50229)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: fix kernel bug due to missing clearing of checked flag Syzbot reported that in directory operations after nilfs2 detects filesystem corruption and degrades to read-only, __block_write_begin_int(), which is called to prepare block writes, may fail the BUG_ON check for accesses exceeding the folio/page size, triggering a kernel bug. This was found to be because the "checked" flag of a page/folio was not cleared when it was discarded by nilfs2's own routine, which causes the sanity check of directory entries to be skipped when the directory page/folio is reloaded. So, fix that. This was necessary when the use of nilfs2's own page discard routine was applied to more than just metadata files.(CVE-2024-50230)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSD: Initialize struct nfsd4_copy earlier Ensure the refcount and async_copies fields are initialized early. cleanup_async_copy() will reference these fields if an error occurs in nfsd4_copy(). If they are not correctly initialized, at the very least, a refcount underflow occurs.(CVE-2024-50241)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/ntfs3: Additional check in ni_clear() Checking of NTFS_FLAGS_LOG_REPLAYING added to prevent access to uninitialized bitmap during replay process.(CVE-2024-50244)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntfs3: Add bounds checking to mi_enum_attr() Added bounds checking to make sure that every attr don't stray beyond valid memory region.(CVE-2024-50248)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key() trie_get_next_key() allocates a node stack with size trie->max_prefixlen, while it writes (trie->max_prefixlen + 1) nodes to the stack when it has full paths from the root to leaves. For example, consider a trie with max_prefixlen is 8, and the nodes with key 0x00/0, 0x00/1, 0x00/2, ... 0x00/8 inserted. Subsequent calls to trie_get_next_key with _key with .prefixlen = 8 make 9 nodes be written on the node stack with size 8.(CVE-2024-50262)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: remove entry once instead of null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove() Syzkaller is able to provoke null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove(): [ 57.319872] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_remove:2028 ERROR: status = -12 [ 57.320420] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate:1999 ERROR: Partial truncate while removing xattr overlay.upper. Leaking 1 clusters and removing the entry [ 57.321727] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000004 [...] [ 57.325727] RIP: 0010:ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0 [...] [ 57.331328] Call Trace: [ 57.331477] <TASK> [...] [ 57.333511] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x3e5/0x740 [ 57.333778] ? exc_page_fault+0x70/0x170 [ 57.334016] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x2b/0x30 [ 57.334263] ? __pfx_ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x10/0x10 [ 57.334596] ? ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0 [ 57.334913] ocfs2_xa_remove_entry+0x23/0xc0 [ 57.335164] ocfs2_xa_set+0x704/0xcf0 [ 57.335381] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x40 [ 57.335620] ? ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock+0x16/0x20 [ 57.335915] ? trace_preempt_on+0x1e/0x70 [ 57.336153] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500 [ 57.336410] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80 [ 57.336656] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x20/0x40 [ 57.336906] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500 [ 57.337162] ocfs2_xattr_block_set+0xa6/0x1e0 [ 57.337424] __ocfs2_xattr_set_handle+0x1fd/0x5d0 [ 57.337706] ? ocfs2_start_trans+0x13d/0x290 [ 57.337971] ocfs2_xattr_set+0xb13/0xfb0 [ 57.338207] ? dput+0x46/0x1c0 [ 57.338393] ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30 [ 57.338665] ? ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30 [ 57.338948] __vfs_removexattr+0x92/0xc0 [ 57.339182] __vfs_removexattr_locked+0xd5/0x190 [ 57.339456] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80 [ 57.339705] vfs_removexattr+0x5f/0x100 [...] Reproducer uses faultinject facility to fail ocfs2_xa_remove() -> ocfs2_xa_value_truncate() with -ENOMEM. In this case the comment mentions that we can return 0 if ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate() is going to wipe the entry anyway. But the following 'rc' check is wrong and execution flow do 'ocfs2_xa_remove_entry(loc);' twice: * 1st: in ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate(); * 2nd: returning back to ocfs2_xa_remove() instead of going to 'out'. Fix this by skipping the 2nd removal of the same entry and making syzkaller repro happy.(CVE-2024-50265)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: musb: sunxi: Fix accessing an released usb phy Commit 6ed05c68cbca ("usb: musb: sunxi: Explicitly release USB PHY on exit") will cause that usb phy @glue->xceiv is accessed after released. 1) register platform driver @sunxi_musb_driver // get the usb phy @glue->xceiv sunxi_musb_probe() -> devm_usb_get_phy(). 2) register and unregister platform driver @musb_driver musb_probe() -> sunxi_musb_init() use the phy here //the phy is released here musb_remove() -> sunxi_musb_exit() -> devm_usb_put_phy() 3) register @musb_driver again musb_probe() -> sunxi_musb_init() use the phy here but the phy has been released at 2). ... Fixed by reverting the commit, namely, removing devm_usb_put_phy() from sunxi_musb_exit().(CVE-2024-50269)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: reinitialize delayed ref list after deleting it from the list At insert_delayed_ref() if we need to update the action of an existing ref to BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF, we delete the ref from its ref head's ref_add_list using list_del(), which leaves the ref's add_list member not reinitialized, as list_del() sets the next and prev members of the list to LIST_POISON1 and LIST_POISON2, respectively. If later we end up calling drop_delayed_ref() against the ref, which can happen during merging or when destroying delayed refs due to a transaction abort, we can trigger a crash since at drop_delayed_ref() we call list_empty() against the ref's add_list, which returns false since the list was not reinitialized after the list_del() and as a consequence we call list_del() again at drop_delayed_ref(). This results in an invalid list access since the next and prev members are set to poison pointers, resulting in a splat if CONFIG_LIST_HARDENED and CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST are set or invalid poison pointer dereferences otherwise. So fix this by deleting from the list with list_del_init() instead.(CVE-2024-50273)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: av7110: fix a spectre vulnerability As warned by smatch: drivers/staging/media/av7110/av7110_ca.c:270 dvb_ca_ioctl() warn: potential spectre issue 'av7110->ci_slot' [w] (local cap) There is a spectre-related vulnerability at the code. Fix it.(CVE-2024-50289)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/rw: fix missing NOWAIT check for O_DIRECT start write When io_uring starts a write, it'll call kiocb_start_write() to bump the super block rwsem, preventing any freezes from happening while that write is in-flight. The freeze side will grab that rwsem for writing, excluding any new writers from happening and waiting for existing writes to finish. But io_uring unconditionally uses kiocb_start_write(), which will block if someone is currently attempting to freeze the mount point. This causes a deadlock where freeze is waiting for previous writes to complete, but the previous writes cannot complete, as the task that is supposed to complete them is blocked waiting on starting a new write. This results in the following stuck trace showing that dependency with the write blocked starting a new write: task:fio state:D stack:0 pid:886 tgid:886 ppid:876 Call trace: __switch_to+0x1d8/0x348 __schedule+0x8e8/0x2248 schedule+0x110/0x3f0 percpu_rwsem_wait+0x1e8/0x3f8 __percpu_down_read+0xe8/0x500 io_write+0xbb8/0xff8 io_issue_sqe+0x10c/0x1020 io_submit_sqes+0x614/0x2110 __arm64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x524/0x1038 invoke_syscall+0x74/0x268 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x238 do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60 el0_svc+0x44/0xb0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x128 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170 INFO: task fsfreeze:7364 blocked for more than 15 seconds. Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-00063-g76aaf945701c #7963 with the attempting freezer stuck trying to grab the rwsem: task:fsfreeze state:D stack:0 pid:7364 tgid:7364 ppid:995 Call trace: __switch_to+0x1d8/0x348 __schedule+0x8e8/0x2248 schedule+0x110/0x3f0 percpu_down_write+0x2b0/0x680 freeze_super+0x248/0x8a8 do_vfs_ioctl+0x149c/0x1b18 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x1a0 invoke_syscall+0x74/0x268 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x238 do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60 el0_svc+0x44/0xb0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x128 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170 Fix this by having the io_uring side honor IOCB_NOWAIT, and only attempt a blocking grab of the super block rwsem if it isn't set. For normal issue where IOCB_NOWAIT would always be set, this returns -EAGAIN which will have io_uring core issue a blocking attempt of the write. That will in turn also get completions run, ensuring forward progress. Since freezing requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the first place, this isn't something that can be triggered by a regular user.(CVE-2024-53052)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: s5p-jpeg: prevent buffer overflows The current logic allows word to be less than 2. If this happens, there will be buffer overflows, as reported by smatch. Add extra checks to prevent it. While here, remove an unused word = 0 assignment.(CVE-2024-53061)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfs: Fix KMSAN warning in decode_getfattr_attrs() Fix the following KMSAN warning: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 7651 Comm: cp Tainted: G B Tainted: [B]=BAD_PAGE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) ===================================================== ===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in decode_getfattr_attrs+0x2d6d/0x2f90 decode_getfattr_attrs+0x2d6d/0x2f90 decode_getfattr_generic+0x806/0xb00 nfs4_xdr_dec_getattr+0x1de/0x240 rpcauth_unwrap_resp_decode+0xab/0x100 rpcauth_unwrap_resp+0x95/0xc0 call_decode+0x4ff/0xb50 __rpc_execute+0x57b/0x19d0 rpc_execute+0x368/0x5e0 rpc_run_task+0xcfe/0xee0 nfs4_proc_getattr+0x5b5/0x990 __nfs_revalidate_inode+0x477/0xd00 nfs_access_get_cached+0x1021/0x1cc0 nfs_do_access+0x9f/0xae0 nfs_permission+0x1e4/0x8c0 inode_permission+0x356/0x6c0 link_path_walk+0x958/0x1330 path_lookupat+0xce/0x6b0 filename_lookup+0x23e/0x770 vfs_statx+0xe7/0x970 vfs_fstatat+0x1f2/0x2c0 __se_sys_newfstatat+0x67/0x880 __x64_sys_newfstatat+0xbd/0x120 x64_sys_call+0x1826/0x3cf0 do_syscall_64+0xd0/0x1b0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f The KMSAN warning is triggered in decode_getfattr_attrs(), when calling decode_attr_mdsthreshold(). It appears that fattr->mdsthreshold is not initialized. Fix the issue by initializing fattr->mdsthreshold to NULL in nfs_fattr_init().(CVE-2024-53066)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-136.103.0.184.oe2203sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xen-netfront: Fix NULL sring after live migration A NAPI is setup for each network sring to poll data to kernel The sring with source host is destroyed before live migration and new sring with target host is setup after live migration. The NAPI for the old sring is not deleted until setup new sring with target host after migration. With busy_poll/busy_read enabled, the NAPI can be polled before got deleted when resume VM. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 IP: xennet_poll+0xae/0xd20 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI Call Trace: finish_task_switch+0x71/0x230 timerqueue_del+0x1d/0x40 hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0xb5/0x110 xennet_alloc_rx_buffers+0x2a0/0x2a0 napi_busy_loop+0xdb/0x270 sock_poll+0x87/0x90 do_sys_poll+0x26f/0x580 tracing_map_insert+0x1d4/0x2f0 event_hist_trigger+0x14a/0x260 finish_task_switch+0x71/0x230 __schedule+0x256/0x890 recalc_sigpending+0x1b/0x50 xen_sched_clock+0x15/0x20 __rb_reserve_next+0x12d/0x140 ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x123/0x3d0 event_triggers_call+0x87/0xb0 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x1c4/0x210 xen_clocksource_get_cycles+0x15/0x20 ktime_get_ts64+0x51/0xf0 SyS_ppoll+0x160/0x1a0 SyS_ppoll+0x160/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x73/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x41/0xa6 ... RIP: xennet_poll+0xae/0xd20 RSP: ffffb4f041933900 CR2: 0000000000000008 ---[ end trace f8601785b354351c ]--- xen frontend should remove the NAPIs for the old srings before live migration as the bond srings are destroyed There is a tiny window between the srings are set to NULL and the NAPIs are disabled, It is safe as the NAPI threads are still frozen at that time(CVE-2022-48969)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbonding: stop the device in bond_setup_by_slave()\r\n\r\nCommit 9eed321cde22 (\u0026quot;net: lapbether: only support ethernet devices\u0026quot;)\nhas been able to keep syzbot away from net/lapb, until today.\r\n\r\nIn the following splat [1], the issue is that a lapbether device has\nbeen created on a bonding device without members. Then adding a non\nARPHRD_ETHER member forced the bonding master to change its type.\r\n\r\nThe fix is to make sure we call dev_close() in bond_setup_by_slave()\nso that the potential linked lapbether devices (or any other devices\nhaving assumptions on the physical device) are removed.\r\n\r\nA similar bug has been addressed in commit 40baec225765\n(\u0026quot;bonding: fix panic on non-ARPHRD_ETHER enslave failure\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\n[1]\nskbuff: skb_under_panic: text:ffff800089508810 len:44 put:40 head:ffff0000c78e7c00 data:ffff0000c78e7bea tail:0x16 end:0x140 dev:bond0\nkernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:192 !\nInternal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 PID: 6007 Comm: syz-executor383 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-syzkaller-gbf6547d8715b #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/04/2023\npstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\npc : skb_panic net/core/skbuff.c:188 [inline]\npc : skb_under_panic+0x13c/0x140 net/core/skbuff.c:202\nlr : skb_panic net/core/skbuff.c:188 [inline]\nlr : skb_under_panic+0x13c/0x140 net/core/skbuff.c:202\nsp : ffff800096a06aa0\nx29: ffff800096a06ab0 x28: ffff800096a06ba0 x27: dfff800000000000\nx26: ffff0000ce9b9b50 x25: 0000000000000016 x24: ffff0000c78e7bea\nx23: ffff0000c78e7c00 x22: 000000000000002c x21: 0000000000000140\nx20: 0000000000000028 x19: ffff800089508810 x18: ffff800096a06100\nx17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff80008a629a3c x15: 0000000000000001\nx14: 1fffe00036837a32 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000\nx11: 0000000000000201 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : cb50b496c519aa00\nx8 : cb50b496c519aa00 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000001\nx5 : ffff800096a063b8 x4 : ffff80008e280f80 x3 : ffff8000805ad11c\nx2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : 0000000100000201 x0 : 0000000000000086\nCall trace:\nskb_panic net/core/skbuff.c:188 [inline]\nskb_under_panic+0x13c/0x140 net/core/skbuff.c:202\nskb_push+0xf0/0x108 net/core/skbuff.c:2446\nip6gre_header+0xbc/0x738 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:1384\ndev_hard_header include/linux/netdevice.h:3136 [inline]\nlapbeth_data_transmit+0x1c4/0x298 drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c:257\nlapb_data_transmit+0x8c/0xb0 net/lapb/lapb_iface.c:447\nlapb_transmit_buffer+0x178/0x204 net/lapb/lapb_out.c:149\nlapb_send_control+0x220/0x320 net/lapb/lapb_subr.c:251\n__lapb_disconnect_request+0x9c/0x17c net/lapb/lapb_iface.c:326\nlapb_device_event+0x288/0x4e0 net/lapb/lapb_iface.c:492\nnotifier_call_chain+0x1a4/0x510 kernel/notifier.c:93\nraw_notifier_call_chain+0x3c/0x50 kernel/notifier.c:461\ncall_netdevice_notifiers_info net/core/dev.c:1970 [inline]\ncall_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2008 [inline]\ncall_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2022 [inline]\n__dev_close_many+0x1b8/0x3c4 net/core/dev.c:1508\ndev_close_many+0x1e0/0x470 net/core/dev.c:1559\ndev_close+0x174/0x250 net/core/dev.c:1585\nlapbeth_device_event+0x2e4/0x958 drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c:466\nnotifier_call_chain+0x1a4/0x510 kernel/notifier.c:93\nraw_notifier_call_chain+0x3c/0x50 kernel/notifier.c:461\ncall_netdevice_notifiers_info net/core/dev.c:1970 [inline]\ncall_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2008 [inline]\ncall_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2022 [inline]\n__dev_close_many+0x1b8/0x3c4 net/core/dev.c:1508\ndev_close_many+0x1e0/0x470 net/core/dev.c:1559\ndev_close+0x174/0x250 net/core/dev.c:1585\nbond_enslave+0x2298/0x30cc drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:2332\nbond_do_ioctl+0x268/0xc64 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:4539\ndev_ifsioc+0x754/0x9ac\ndev_ioctl+0x4d8/0xd34 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:786\nsock_do_ioctl+0x1d4/0x2d0 net/socket.c:1217\nsock_ioctl+0x4e8/0x834 net/socket.c:1322\nvfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n__do_\n---truncated---(CVE-2023-52784)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nllc: verify mac len before reading mac header\r\n\r\nLLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb\nhas an Ethernet header.\r\n\r\nSyzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert\npackets without mac len and with user configurable skb-\u0026gt;protocol\n(passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).\r\n\r\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782\n tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555\n tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\r\n\r\nAdd a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.\r\n\r\nThere are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are\nprotected by a test skb-\u0026gt;protocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not\nprotect against this tun scenario.\r\n\r\nBut the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will\nindirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any\nother LLC code.\r\n\r\nIt is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but\nnot sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume\nan Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3\nprotocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used\nto, on top of Token Ring.\r\n\r\nAt least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start\nof git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in\nthis commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all\nstable kernels should receive this.(CVE-2023-52843)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nSUNRPC: Fix UAF in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready()\r\n\r\nAfter the listener svc_sock is freed, and before invoking svc_tcp_accept()\nfor the established child sock, there is a window that the newsock\nretaining a freed listener svc_sock in sk_user_data which cloning from\nparent. In the race window, if data is received on the newsock, we will\nobserve use-after-free report in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready().\r\n\r\nReproduce by two tasks:\r\n\r\n1. while :; do rpc.nfsd 0 ; rpc.nfsd; done\n2. while :; do echo \u0026quot;\u0026quot; | ncat -4 127.0.0.1 2049 ; done\r\n\r\nKASAN report:\r\n\r\n ==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready+0x1cf/0x1f0 [sunrpc]\n Read of size 8 at addr ffff888139d96228 by task nc/102553\n CPU: 7 PID: 102553 Comm: nc Not tainted 6.3.0+ #18\n Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 11/12/2020\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x50\n print_address_description.constprop.0+0x27/0x310\n print_report+0x3e/0x70\n kasan_report+0xae/0xe0\n svc_tcp_listen_data_ready+0x1cf/0x1f0 [sunrpc]\n tcp_data_queue+0x9f4/0x20e0\n tcp_rcv_established+0x666/0x1f60\n tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x51c/0x850\n tcp_v4_rcv+0x23fc/0x2e80\n ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x62/0x300\n ip_local_deliver_finish+0x267/0x350\n ip_local_deliver+0x18b/0x2d0\n ip_rcv+0x2fb/0x370\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x166/0x1b0\n process_backlog+0x24c/0x5e0\n __napi_poll+0xa2/0x500\n net_rx_action+0x854/0xc90\n __do_softirq+0x1bb/0x5de\n do_softirq+0xcb/0x100\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ...\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\n Allocated by task 102371:\n kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40\n kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30\n __kasan_kmalloc+0x7b/0x90\n svc_setup_socket+0x52/0x4f0 [sunrpc]\n svc_addsock+0x20d/0x400 [sunrpc]\n __write_ports_addfd+0x209/0x390 [nfsd]\n write_ports+0x239/0x2c0 [nfsd]\n nfsctl_transaction_write+0xac/0x110 [nfsd]\n vfs_write+0x1c3/0xae0\n ksys_write+0xed/0x1c0\n do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc\r\n\r\n Freed by task 102551:\n kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40\n kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30\n kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x50\n __kasan_slab_free+0x106/0x190\n __kmem_cache_free+0x133/0x270\n svc_xprt_free+0x1e2/0x350 [sunrpc]\n svc_xprt_destroy_all+0x25a/0x440 [sunrpc]\n nfsd_put+0x125/0x240 [nfsd]\n nfsd_svc+0x2cb/0x3c0 [nfsd]\n write_threads+0x1ac/0x2a0 [nfsd]\n nfsctl_transaction_write+0xac/0x110 [nfsd]\n vfs_write+0x1c3/0xae0\n ksys_write+0xed/0x1c0\n do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc\r\n\r\nFix the UAF by simply doing nothing in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready()\nif state != TCP_LISTEN, that will avoid dereferencing svsk for all\nchild socket.(CVE-2023-52885)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nperf/aux: Fix AUX buffer serialization\r\n\r\nOle reported that event-\u0026gt;mmap_mutex is strictly insufficient to\nserialize the AUX buffer, add a per RB mutex to fully serialize it.\r\n\r\nNote that in the lock order comment the perf_event::mmap_mutex order\nwas already wrong, that is, it nesting under mmap_lock is not new with\nthis patch.(CVE-2024-46713)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/hns: Fix spin_unlock_irqrestore() called with IRQs enabled Fix missuse of spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq() when spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_lock_irqrestore() was hold. This was discovered through the lock debugging, and the corresponding log is as follows: raw_local_irq_restore() called with IRQs enabled WARNING: CPU: 96 PID: 2074 at kernel/locking/irqflag-debug.c:10 warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x30/0x40 ... Call trace: warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x30/0x40 _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x84/0xc8 add_qp_to_list+0x11c/0x148 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_create_qp_common.constprop.0+0x240/0x780 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_create_qp+0x98/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2] create_qp+0x138/0x258 ib_create_qp_kernel+0x50/0xe8 create_mad_qp+0xa8/0x128 ib_mad_port_open+0x218/0x448 ib_mad_init_device+0x70/0x1f8 add_client_context+0xfc/0x220 enable_device_and_get+0xd0/0x140 ib_register_device.part.0+0xf4/0x1c8 ib_register_device+0x34/0x50 hns_roce_register_device+0x174/0x3d0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_init+0xfc/0x2c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] __hns_roce_hw_v2_init_instance+0x7c/0x1d0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_hw_v2_init_instance+0x9c/0x180 [hns_roce_hw_v2](CVE-2024-47735)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: call the security_mmap_file() LSM hook in remap_file_pages() The remap_file_pages syscall handler calls do_mmap() directly, which doesn\u0026apos;t contain the LSM security check. And if the process has called personality(READ_IMPLIES_EXEC) before and remap_file_pages() is called for RW pages, this will actually result in remapping the pages to RWX, bypassing a W^X policy enforced by SELinux. So we should check prot by security_mmap_file LSM hook in the remap_file_pages syscall handler before do_mmap() is called. Otherwise, it potentially permits an attacker to bypass a W^X policy enforced by SELinux. The bypass is similar to CVE-2016-10044, which bypass the same thing via AIO and can be found in [1]. The PoC: $ cat \u0026gt; test.c int main(void) { size_t pagesz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE); int mfd = syscall(SYS_memfd_create, \u0026quot;test\u0026quot;, 0); const char *buf = mmap(NULL, 4 * pagesz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, mfd, 0); unsigned int old = syscall(SYS_personality, 0xffffffff); syscall(SYS_personality, READ_IMPLIES_EXEC | old); syscall(SYS_remap_file_pages, buf, pagesz, 0, 2, 0); syscall(SYS_personality, old); // show the RWX page exists even if W^X policy is enforced int fd = open(\u0026quot;/proc/self/maps\u0026quot;, O_RDONLY); unsigned char buf2[1024]; while (1) { int ret = read(fd, buf2, 1024); if (ret \u0026lt;= 0) break; write(1, buf2, ret); } close(fd); } $ gcc test.c -o test $ ./test | grep rwx 7f1836c34000-7f1836c35000 rwxs 00002000 00:01 2050 /memfd:test (deleted) [PM: subject line tweaks](CVE-2024-47745)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: seeq: Fix use after free vulnerability in ether3 Driver Due to Race Condition In the ether3_probe function, a timer is initialized with a callback function ether3_ledoff, bound to \u0026amp;prev(dev)-\u0026gt;timer. Once the timer is started, there is a risk of a race condition if the module or device is removed, triggering the ether3_remove function to perform cleanup. The sequence of operations that may lead to a UAF bug is as follows: CPU0 CPU1 | ether3_ledoff ether3_remove | free_netdev(dev); | put_devic | kfree(dev); | | ether3_outw(priv(dev)-\u0026gt;regs.config2 |= CFG2_CTRLO, REG_CONFIG2); | // use dev Fix it by ensuring that the timer is canceled before proceeding with the cleanup in ether3_remove.(CVE-2024-47747)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/cxgb4: Added NULL check for lookup_atid The lookup_atid() function can return NULL if the ATID is invalid or does not exist in the identifier table, which could lead to dereferencing a null pointer without a check in the `act_establish()` and `act_open_rpl()` functions. Add a NULL check to prevent null pointer dereferencing. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-47749)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Initialize denominators\u0026apos; default to 1 [WHAT \u0026amp; HOW] Variables used as denominators and maybe not assigned to other values, should not be 0. Change their default to 1 so they are never 0. This fixes 10 DIVIDE_BY_ZERO issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-49899)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: avoid NULL pointer dereference iwl_mvm_tx_skb_sta() and iwl_mvm_tx_mpdu() verify that the mvmvsta pointer is not NULL. It retrieves this pointer using iwl_mvm_sta_from_mac80211, which is dereferencing the ieee80211_sta pointer. If sta is NULL, iwl_mvm_sta_from_mac80211 will dereference a NULL pointer. Fix this by checking the sta pointer before retrieving the mvmsta from it. If sta is not NULL, then mvmsta isn\u0026apos;t either.(CVE-2024-49929)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: prevent nf_skb_duplicated corruption syzbot found that nf_dup_ipv4() or nf_dup_ipv6() could write per-cpu variable nf_skb_duplicated in an unsafe way [1]. Disabling preemption as hinted by the splat is not enough, we have to disable soft interrupts as well. [1] BUG: using __this_cpu_write() in preemptible [00000000] code: syz.4.282/6316 caller is nf_dup_ipv4+0x651/0x8f0 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_dup_ipv4.c:87 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6316 Comm: syz.4.282 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7-syzkaller-00104-g7052622fccb1 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 check_preemption_disabled+0x10e/0x120 lib/smp_processor_id.c:49 nf_dup_ipv4+0x651/0x8f0 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_dup_ipv4.c:87 nft_dup_ipv4_eval+0x1db/0x300 net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_dup_ipv4.c:30 expr_call_ops_eval net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:240 [inline] nft_do_chain+0x4ad/0x1da0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:288 nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x202/0x320 net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c:23 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook+0x2c4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:269 NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:302 [inline] ip_output+0x185/0x230 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433 ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline] ip_send_skb+0x74/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1495 udp_send_skb+0xacf/0x1650 net/ipv4/udp.c:981 udp_sendmsg+0x1c21/0x2a60 net/ipv4/udp.c:1269 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745 ____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597 ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline] __sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f4ce4f7def9 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f4ce5d4a038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4ce5135f80 RCX: 00007f4ce4f7def9 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020005d40 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 00007f4ce4ff0b76 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f4ce5135f80 R15: 00007ffd4cbc6d68 \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-49952)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: xtables: avoid NFPROTO_UNSPEC where needed syzbot managed to call xt_cluster match via ebtables: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11 at net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c:72 xt_cluster_mt+0x196/0x780 [..] ebt_do_table+0x174b/0x2a40 Module registers to NFPROTO_UNSPEC, but it assumes ipv4/ipv6 packet processing. As this is only useful to restrict locally terminating TCP/UDP traffic, register this for ipv4 and ipv6 family only. Pablo points out that this is a general issue, direct users of the set/getsockopt interface can call into targets/matches that were only intended for use with ip(6)tables. Check all UNSPEC matches and targets for similar issues: - matches and targets are fine except if they assume skb_network_header() is valid -- this is only true when called from inet layer: ip(6) stack pulls the ip/ipv6 header into linear data area. - targets that return XT_CONTINUE or other xtables verdicts must be restricted too, they are incompatbile with the ebtables traverser, e.g. EBT_CONTINUE is a completely different value than XT_CONTINUE. Most matches/targets are changed to register for NFPROTO_IPV4/IPV6, as they are provided for use by ip(6)tables. The MARK target is also used by arptables, so register for NFPROTO_ARP too. While at it, bail out if connbytes fails to enable the corresponding conntrack family. This change passes the selftests in iptables.git.(CVE-2024-50038)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: br_netfilter: fix panic with metadata_dst skb Fix a kernel panic in the br_netfilter module when sending untagged traffic via a VxLAN device. This happens during the check for fragmentation in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit. It is dependent on: 1) the br_netfilter module being loaded; 2) net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables set to 1; 3) a bridge with a VxLAN (single-vxlan-device) netdevice as a bridge port; 4) untagged frames with size higher than the VxLAN MTU forwarded/flooded When forwarding the untagged packet to the VxLAN bridge port, before the netfilter hooks are called, br_handle_egress_vlan_tunnel is called and changes the skb_dst to the tunnel dst. The tunnel_dst is a metadata type of dst, i.e., skb_valid_dst(skb) is false, and metadata-\u0026gt;dst.dev is NULL. Then in the br_netfilter hooks, in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit, there\u0026apos;s a check for frames that needs to be fragmented: frames with higher MTU than the VxLAN device end up calling br_nf_ip_fragment, which in turns call ip_skb_dst_mtu. The ip_dst_mtu tries to use the skb_dst(skb) as if it was a valid dst with valid dst-\u0026gt;dev, thus the crash. This case was never supported in the first place, so drop the packet instead. PING 10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2) from 0.0.0.0 h1-eth0: 2000(2028) bytes of data. [ 176.291791] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000110 [ 176.292101] Mem abort info: [ 176.292184] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 [ 176.292322] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 176.292530] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 176.292709] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 176.292862] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 176.293013] Data abort info: [ 176.293104] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 176.293488] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 176.293787] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 176.293995] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000043ef5000 [ 176.294166] [0000000000000110] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 176.294827] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 176.295252] Modules linked in: vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel veth br_netfilter bridge stp llc ipv6 crct10dif_ce [ 176.295923] CPU: 0 PID: 188 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3-g5b3fbd61b9d1 #2 [ 176.296314] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 176.296535] pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 176.296808] pc : br_nf_dev_queue_xmit+0x390/0x4ec [br_netfilter] [ 176.297382] lr : br_nf_dev_queue_xmit+0x2ac/0x4ec [br_netfilter] [ 176.297636] sp : ffff800080003630 [ 176.297743] x29: ffff800080003630 x28: 0000000000000008 x27: ffff6828c49ad9f8 [ 176.298093] x26: ffff6828c49ad000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 00000000000003e8 [ 176.298430] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffff6828c4960b40 x21: ffff6828c3b16d28 [ 176.298652] x20: ffff6828c3167048 x19: ffff6828c3b16d00 x18: 0000000000000014 [ 176.298926] x17: ffffb0476322f000 x16: ffffb7e164023730 x15: 0000000095744632 [ 176.299296] x14: ffff6828c3f1c880 x13: 0000000000000002 x12: ffffb7e137926a70 [ 176.299574] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff6828c3f1c898 x9 : 0000000000000000 [ 176.300049] x8 : ffff6828c49bf070 x7 : 0008460f18d5f20e x6 : f20e0100bebafeca [ 176.300302] x5 : ffff6828c7f918fe x4 : ffff6828c49bf070 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 176.300586] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff6828c3c7ad00 x0 : ffff6828c7f918f0 [ 176.300889] Call trace: [ 176.301123] br_nf_dev_queue_xmit+0x390/0x4ec [br_netfilter] [ 176.301411] br_nf_post_routing+0x2a8/0x3e4 [br_netfilter] [ 176.301703] nf_hook_slow+0x48/0x124 [ 176.302060] br_forward_finish+0xc8/0xe8 [bridge] [ 176.302371] br_nf_hook_thresh+0x124/0x134 [br_netfilter] [ 176.302605] br_nf_forward_finish+0x118/0x22c [br_netfilter] [ 176.302824] br_nf_forward_ip.part.0+0x264/0x290 [br_netfilter] [ 176.303136] br_nf_forward+0x2b8/0x4e0 [br_netfilter] [ 176.303359] nf_hook_slow+0x48/0x124 [ 176.303 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-50045)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/rtrs-srv: Avoid null pointer deref during path establishment For RTRS path establishment, RTRS client initiates and completes con_num of connections. After establishing all its connections, the information is exchanged between the client and server through the info_req message. During this exchange, it is essential that all connections have been established, and the state of the RTRS srv path is CONNECTED. So add these sanity checks, to make sure we detect and abort process in error scenarios to avoid null pointer deref.(CVE-2024-50062)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tty: n_gsm: Fix use-after-free in gsm_cleanup_mux BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in gsm_cleanup_mux+0x77b/0x7b0 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3160 [n_gsm] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88815fe99c00 by task poc/3379 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 3379 Comm: poc Not tainted 6.11.0+ #56 Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 11/12/2020 Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; gsm_cleanup_mux+0x77b/0x7b0 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3160 [n_gsm] __pfx_gsm_cleanup_mux+0x10/0x10 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3124 [n_gsm] __pfx_sched_clock_cpu+0x10/0x10 kernel/sched/clock.c:389 update_load_avg+0x1c1/0x27b0 kernel/sched/fair.c:4500 __pfx_min_vruntime_cb_rotate+0x10/0x10 kernel/sched/fair.c:846 __rb_insert_augmented+0x492/0xbf0 lib/rbtree.c:161 gsmld_ioctl+0x395/0x1450 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3408 [n_gsm] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x92/0xf0 arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:107 __pfx_gsmld_ioctl+0x10/0x10 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3822 [n_gsm] ktime_get+0x5e/0x140 kernel/time/timekeeping.c:195 ldsem_down_read+0x94/0x4e0 arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:79 __pfx_ldsem_down_read+0x10/0x10 drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c:338 __pfx_do_vfs_ioctl+0x10/0x10 fs/ioctl.c:805 tty_ioctl+0x643/0x1100 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2818 Allocated by task 65: gsm_data_alloc.constprop.0+0x27/0x190 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:926 [n_gsm] gsm_send+0x2c/0x580 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:819 [n_gsm] gsm1_receive+0x547/0xad0 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3038 [n_gsm] gsmld_receive_buf+0x176/0x280 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3609 [n_gsm] tty_ldisc_receive_buf+0x101/0x1e0 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:391 tty_port_default_receive_buf+0x61/0xa0 drivers/tty/tty_port.c:39 flush_to_ldisc+0x1b0/0x750 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:445 process_scheduled_works+0x2b0/0x10d0 kernel/workqueue.c:3229 worker_thread+0x3dc/0x950 kernel/workqueue.c:3391 kthread+0x2a3/0x370 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:257 Freed by task 3367: kfree+0x126/0x420 mm/slub.c:4580 gsm_cleanup_mux+0x36c/0x7b0 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3160 [n_gsm] gsmld_ioctl+0x395/0x1450 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3408 [n_gsm] tty_ioctl+0x643/0x1100 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2818 [Analysis] gsm_msg on the tx_ctrl_list or tx_data_list of gsm_mux can be freed by multi threads through ioctl,which leads to the occurrence of uaf. Protect it by gsm tx lock.(CVE-2024-50073)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: unicode: Don\u0026apos;t special case ignorable code points We don\u0026apos;t need to handle them separately. Instead, just let them decompose/casefold to themselves.(CVE-2024-50089)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: udf: fix uninit-value use in udf_get_fileshortad Check for overflow when computing alen in udf_current_aext to mitigate later uninit-value use in udf_get_fileshortad KMSAN bug[1]. After applying the patch reproducer did not trigger any issue[2]. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8901c4560b7ab5c2f9df [2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10242227980000(CVE-2024-50143)\r\n\r\n(CVE-2024-50151)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: remove the incorrect Fw reference check when dirtying pages When doing the direct-io reads it will also try to mark pages dirty, but for the read path it won\u0026apos;t hold the Fw caps and there is case will it get the Fw reference.(CVE-2024-50179)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fbdev: sisfb: Fix strbuf array overflow The values of the variables xres and yres are placed in strbuf. These variables are obtained from strbuf1. The strbuf1 array contains digit characters and a space if the array contains non-digit characters. Then, when executing sprintf(strbuf, \u0026quot;%ux%ux8\u0026quot;, xres, yres); more than 16 bytes will be written to strbuf. It is suggested to increase the size of the strbuf array to 24. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-50180)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: irqchip/gic-v4: Don\u0026apos;t allow a VMOVP on a dying VPE Kunkun Jiang reported that there is a small window of opportunity for userspace to force a change of affinity for a VPE while the VPE has already been unmapped, but the corresponding doorbell interrupt still visible in /proc/irq/. Plug the race by checking the value of vmapp_count, which tracks whether the VPE is mapped ot not, and returning an error in this case. This involves making vmapp_count common to both GICv4.1 and its v4.0 ancestor.(CVE-2024-50192)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: propagate directory read errors from nilfs_find_entry() Syzbot reported that a task hang occurs in vcs_open() during a fuzzing test for nilfs2. The root cause of this problem is that in nilfs_find_entry(), which searches for directory entries, ignores errors when loading a directory page/folio via nilfs_get_folio() fails. If the filesystem images is corrupted, and the i_size of the directory inode is large, and the directory page/folio is successfully read but fails the sanity check, for example when it is zero-filled, nilfs_check_folio() may continue to spit out error messages in bursts. Fix this issue by propagating the error to the callers when loading a page/folio fails in nilfs_find_entry(). The current interface of nilfs_find_entry() and its callers is outdated and cannot propagate error codes such as -EIO and -ENOMEM returned via nilfs_find_entry(), so fix it together.(CVE-2024-50202)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: firewire-lib: Avoid division by zero in apply_constraint_to_size() The step variable is initialized to zero. It is changed in the loop, but if it\u0026apos;s not changed it will remain zero. Add a variable check before the division. The observed behavior was introduced by commit 826b5de90c0b (\u0026quot;ALSA: firewire-lib: fix insufficient PCM rule for period/buffer size\u0026quot;), and it is difficult to show that any of the interval parameters will satisfy the snd_interval_test() condition with data from the amdtp_rate_table[] table. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-50205)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: fix potential deadlock with newly created symlinks Syzbot reported that page_symlink(), called by nilfs_symlink(), triggers memory reclamation involving the filesystem layer, which can result in circular lock dependencies among the reader/writer semaphore nilfs-\u0026gt;ns_segctor_sem, s_writers percpu_rwsem (intwrite) and the fs_reclaim pseudo lock. This is because after commit 21fc61c73c39 (\u0026quot;don\u0026apos;t put symlink bodies in pagecache into highmem\u0026quot;), the gfp flags of the page cache for symbolic links are overwritten to GFP_KERNEL via inode_nohighmem(). This is not a problem for symlinks read from the backing device, because the __GFP_FS flag is dropped after inode_nohighmem() is called. However, when a new symlink is created with nilfs_symlink(), the gfp flags remain overwritten to GFP_KERNEL. Then, memory allocation called from page_symlink() etc. triggers memory reclamation including the FS layer, which may call nilfs_evict_inode() or nilfs_dirty_inode(). And these can cause a deadlock if they are called while nilfs-\u0026gt;ns_segctor_sem is held: Fix this issue by dropping the __GFP_FS flag from the page cache GFP flags of newly created symlinks in the same way that nilfs_new_inode() and __nilfs_read_inode() do, as a workaround until we adopt nofs allocation scope consistently or improve the locking constraints.(CVE-2024-50229)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: fix kernel bug due to missing clearing of checked flag Syzbot reported that in directory operations after nilfs2 detects filesystem corruption and degrades to read-only, __block_write_begin_int(), which is called to prepare block writes, may fail the BUG_ON check for accesses exceeding the folio/page size, triggering a kernel bug. This was found to be because the \u0026quot;checked\u0026quot; flag of a page/folio was not cleared when it was discarded by nilfs2\u0026apos;s own routine, which causes the sanity check of directory entries to be skipped when the directory page/folio is reloaded. So, fix that. This was necessary when the use of nilfs2\u0026apos;s own page discard routine was applied to more than just metadata files.(CVE-2024-50230)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSD: Initialize struct nfsd4_copy earlier Ensure the refcount and async_copies fields are initialized early. cleanup_async_copy() will reference these fields if an error occurs in nfsd4_copy(). If they are not correctly initialized, at the very least, a refcount underflow occurs.(CVE-2024-50241)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/ntfs3: Additional check in ni_clear() Checking of NTFS_FLAGS_LOG_REPLAYING added to prevent access to uninitialized bitmap during replay process.(CVE-2024-50244)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntfs3: Add bounds checking to mi_enum_attr() Added bounds checking to make sure that every attr don\u0026apos;t stray beyond valid memory region.(CVE-2024-50248)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key() trie_get_next_key() allocates a node stack with size trie-\u0026gt;max_prefixlen, while it writes (trie-\u0026gt;max_prefixlen + 1) nodes to the stack when it has full paths from the root to leaves. For example, consider a trie with max_prefixlen is 8, and the nodes with key 0x00/0, 0x00/1, 0x00/2, ... 0x00/8 inserted. Subsequent calls to trie_get_next_key with _key with .prefixlen = 8 make 9 nodes be written on the node stack with size 8.(CVE-2024-50262)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: remove entry once instead of null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove() Syzkaller is able to provoke null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove(): [ 57.319872] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_remove:2028 ERROR: status = -12 [ 57.320420] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate:1999 ERROR: Partial truncate while removing xattr overlay.upper. Leaking 1 clusters and removing the entry [ 57.321727] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000004 [...] [ 57.325727] RIP: 0010:ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0 [...] [ 57.331328] Call Trace: [ 57.331477] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; [...] [ 57.333511] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x3e5/0x740 [ 57.333778] ? exc_page_fault+0x70/0x170 [ 57.334016] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x2b/0x30 [ 57.334263] ? __pfx_ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x10/0x10 [ 57.334596] ? ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0 [ 57.334913] ocfs2_xa_remove_entry+0x23/0xc0 [ 57.335164] ocfs2_xa_set+0x704/0xcf0 [ 57.335381] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x40 [ 57.335620] ? ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock+0x16/0x20 [ 57.335915] ? trace_preempt_on+0x1e/0x70 [ 57.336153] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500 [ 57.336410] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80 [ 57.336656] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x20/0x40 [ 57.336906] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500 [ 57.337162] ocfs2_xattr_block_set+0xa6/0x1e0 [ 57.337424] __ocfs2_xattr_set_handle+0x1fd/0x5d0 [ 57.337706] ? ocfs2_start_trans+0x13d/0x290 [ 57.337971] ocfs2_xattr_set+0xb13/0xfb0 [ 57.338207] ? dput+0x46/0x1c0 [ 57.338393] ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30 [ 57.338665] ? ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30 [ 57.338948] __vfs_removexattr+0x92/0xc0 [ 57.339182] __vfs_removexattr_locked+0xd5/0x190 [ 57.339456] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80 [ 57.339705] vfs_removexattr+0x5f/0x100 [...] Reproducer uses faultinject facility to fail ocfs2_xa_remove() -\u0026gt; ocfs2_xa_value_truncate() with -ENOMEM. In this case the comment mentions that we can return 0 if ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate() is going to wipe the entry anyway. But the following \u0026apos;rc\u0026apos; check is wrong and execution flow do \u0026apos;ocfs2_xa_remove_entry(loc);\u0026apos; twice: * 1st: in ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate(); * 2nd: returning back to ocfs2_xa_remove() instead of going to \u0026apos;out\u0026apos;. Fix this by skipping the 2nd removal of the same entry and making syzkaller repro happy.(CVE-2024-50265)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: musb: sunxi: Fix accessing an released usb phy Commit 6ed05c68cbca (\u0026quot;usb: musb: sunxi: Explicitly release USB PHY on exit\u0026quot;) will cause that usb phy @glue-\u0026gt;xceiv is accessed after released. 1) register platform driver @sunxi_musb_driver // get the usb phy @glue-\u0026gt;xceiv sunxi_musb_probe() -\u0026gt; devm_usb_get_phy(). 2) register and unregister platform driver @musb_driver musb_probe() -\u0026gt; sunxi_musb_init() use the phy here //the phy is released here musb_remove() -\u0026gt; sunxi_musb_exit() -\u0026gt; devm_usb_put_phy() 3) register @musb_driver again musb_probe() -\u0026gt; sunxi_musb_init() use the phy here but the phy has been released at 2). ... Fixed by reverting the commit, namely, removing devm_usb_put_phy() from sunxi_musb_exit().(CVE-2024-50269)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: reinitialize delayed ref list after deleting it from the list At insert_delayed_ref() if we need to update the action of an existing ref to BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF, we delete the ref from its ref head\u0026apos;s ref_add_list using list_del(), which leaves the ref\u0026apos;s add_list member not reinitialized, as list_del() sets the next and prev members of the list to LIST_POISON1 and LIST_POISON2, respectively. If later we end up calling drop_delayed_ref() against the ref, which can happen during merging or when destroying delayed refs due to a transaction abort, we can trigger a crash since at drop_delayed_ref() we call list_empty() against the ref\u0026apos;s add_list, which returns false since the list was not reinitialized after the list_del() and as a consequence we call list_del() again at drop_delayed_ref(). This results in an invalid list access since the next and prev members are set to poison pointers, resulting in a splat if CONFIG_LIST_HARDENED and CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST are set or invalid poison pointer dereferences otherwise. So fix this by deleting from the list with list_del_init() instead.(CVE-2024-50273)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: av7110: fix a spectre vulnerability As warned by smatch: drivers/staging/media/av7110/av7110_ca.c:270 dvb_ca_ioctl() warn: potential spectre issue \u0026apos;av7110-\u0026gt;ci_slot\u0026apos; [w] (local cap) There is a spectre-related vulnerability at the code. Fix it.(CVE-2024-50289)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/rw: fix missing NOWAIT check for O_DIRECT start write When io_uring starts a write, it\u0026apos;ll call kiocb_start_write() to bump the super block rwsem, preventing any freezes from happening while that write is in-flight. The freeze side will grab that rwsem for writing, excluding any new writers from happening and waiting for existing writes to finish. But io_uring unconditionally uses kiocb_start_write(), which will block if someone is currently attempting to freeze the mount point. This causes a deadlock where freeze is waiting for previous writes to complete, but the previous writes cannot complete, as the task that is supposed to complete them is blocked waiting on starting a new write. This results in the following stuck trace showing that dependency with the write blocked starting a new write: task:fio state:D stack:0 pid:886 tgid:886 ppid:876 Call trace: __switch_to+0x1d8/0x348 __schedule+0x8e8/0x2248 schedule+0x110/0x3f0 percpu_rwsem_wait+0x1e8/0x3f8 __percpu_down_read+0xe8/0x500 io_write+0xbb8/0xff8 io_issue_sqe+0x10c/0x1020 io_submit_sqes+0x614/0x2110 __arm64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x524/0x1038 invoke_syscall+0x74/0x268 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x238 do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60 el0_svc+0x44/0xb0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x128 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170 INFO: task fsfreeze:7364 blocked for more than 15 seconds. Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-00063-g76aaf945701c #7963 with the attempting freezer stuck trying to grab the rwsem: task:fsfreeze state:D stack:0 pid:7364 tgid:7364 ppid:995 Call trace: __switch_to+0x1d8/0x348 __schedule+0x8e8/0x2248 schedule+0x110/0x3f0 percpu_down_write+0x2b0/0x680 freeze_super+0x248/0x8a8 do_vfs_ioctl+0x149c/0x1b18 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x1a0 invoke_syscall+0x74/0x268 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x238 do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60 el0_svc+0x44/0xb0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x128 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170 Fix this by having the io_uring side honor IOCB_NOWAIT, and only attempt a blocking grab of the super block rwsem if it isn\u0026apos;t set. For normal issue where IOCB_NOWAIT would always be set, this returns -EAGAIN which will have io_uring core issue a blocking attempt of the write. That will in turn also get completions run, ensuring forward progress. Since freezing requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the first place, this isn\u0026apos;t something that can be triggered by a regular user.(CVE-2024-53052)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: s5p-jpeg: prevent buffer overflows The current logic allows word to be less than 2. If this happens, there will be buffer overflows, as reported by smatch. Add extra checks to prevent it. While here, remove an unused word = 0 assignment.(CVE-2024-53061)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfs: Fix KMSAN warning in decode_getfattr_attrs() Fix the following KMSAN warning: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 7651 Comm: cp Tainted: G B Tainted: [B]=BAD_PAGE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) ===================================================== ===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in decode_getfattr_attrs+0x2d6d/0x2f90 decode_getfattr_attrs+0x2d6d/0x2f90 decode_getfattr_generic+0x806/0xb00 nfs4_xdr_dec_getattr+0x1de/0x240 rpcauth_unwrap_resp_decode+0xab/0x100 rpcauth_unwrap_resp+0x95/0xc0 call_decode+0x4ff/0xb50 __rpc_execute+0x57b/0x19d0 rpc_execute+0x368/0x5e0 rpc_run_task+0xcfe/0xee0 nfs4_proc_getattr+0x5b5/0x990 __nfs_revalidate_inode+0x477/0xd00 nfs_access_get_cached+0x1021/0x1cc0 nfs_do_access+0x9f/0xae0 nfs_permission+0x1e4/0x8c0 inode_permission+0x356/0x6c0 link_path_walk+0x958/0x1330 path_lookupat+0xce/0x6b0 filename_lookup+0x23e/0x770 vfs_statx+0xe7/0x970 vfs_fstatat+0x1f2/0x2c0 __se_sys_newfstatat+0x67/0x880 __x64_sys_newfstatat+0xbd/0x120 x64_sys_call+0x1826/0x3cf0 do_syscall_64+0xd0/0x1b0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f The KMSAN warning is triggered in decode_getfattr_attrs(), when calling decode_attr_mdsthreshold(). It appears that fattr-\u0026gt;mdsthreshold is not initialized. Fix the issue by initializing fattr-\u0026gt;mdsthreshold to NULL in nfs_fattr_init().(CVE-2024-53066)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2491",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:58Z",
"published": "2024-11-29T11:07:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2491"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48969"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52885"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46713"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47735"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47745"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47747"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47749"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49899"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49929"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50038"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50045"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50062"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50073"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50089"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50143"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50151"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50179"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50180"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50192"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50205"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50229"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50230"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50241"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50244"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50248"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50265"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50269"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50273"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50289"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53052"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53061"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53066"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2022-48969",
"CVE-2023-52784",
"CVE-2023-52843",
"CVE-2023-52885",
"CVE-2024-46713",
"CVE-2024-47735",
"CVE-2024-47745",
"CVE-2024-47747",
"CVE-2024-47749",
"CVE-2024-49899",
"CVE-2024-49929",
"CVE-2024-49952",
"CVE-2024-50038",
"CVE-2024-50045",
"CVE-2024-50062",
"CVE-2024-50073",
"CVE-2024-50089",
"CVE-2024-50143",
"CVE-2024-50151",
"CVE-2024-50179",
"CVE-2024-50180",
"CVE-2024-50192",
"CVE-2024-50202",
"CVE-2024-50205",
"CVE-2024-50229",
"CVE-2024-50230",
"CVE-2024-50241",
"CVE-2024-50244",
"CVE-2024-50248",
"CVE-2024-50262",
"CVE-2024-50265",
"CVE-2024-50269",
"CVE-2024-50273",
"CVE-2024-50289",
"CVE-2024-53052",
"CVE-2024-53061",
"CVE-2024-53066"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.