CVE-2025-12952 (GCVE-0-2025-12952)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-10 07:11 – Updated: 2025-12-10 15:05
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Privilege Escalation in Dialogflow CX via Webhook Admin Role
Summary
A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Google Cloud's Dialogflow CX.
Dialogflow agent developers with Webhook editor permission are able to configure Webhooks using Dialogflow service agent access token authentication.
This allows the attacker to escalate their privileges from agent-level to project-level, granting them unauthorized access to manage resources in services associated with the project, leading to unexpected costs and resource depletion for the producer project.
A fix was applied on the server side to protect from this vulnerability in February 2025. No customer action is required.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-12-10 15:05 UTC
CWE
- CWE-269 - Improper Privilege Management
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Cloud | Dialogflow CX |
Affected:
0 , < 2025-02
(date)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-12952",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-10T15:05:20.215653Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-10T15:05:59.003Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Dialogflow CX",
"vendor": "Google Cloud",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2025-02",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "date"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "asterfiester"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eA privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Google Cloud\u0027s Dialogflow CX.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003eDialogflow agent developers with Webhook editor permission are able to configure Webhooks using Dialogflow service agent access token authentication. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eThis allows the attacker to escalate their privileges from agent-level to project-level, granting them unauthorized access to manage resources in services associated with the project, leading to\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp;unexpected costs and resource depletion for the producer project.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003eA fix was applied\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003eon the server side\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003eto protect from this vulnerability in February 2025. No\u0026nbsp;customer action is required.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Google Cloud\u0027s Dialogflow CX.\n\nDialogflow agent developers with Webhook editor permission are able to configure Webhooks using Dialogflow service agent access token authentication. \nThis allows the attacker to escalate their privileges from agent-level to project-level, granting them unauthorized access to manage resources in services associated with the project, leading to\u00a0unexpected costs and resource depletion for the producer project.\n\nA fix was applied\u00a0on the server side\u00a0to protect from this vulnerability in February 2025. No\u00a0customer action is required."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-233",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-233 Privilege Escalation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "CLEAR",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Clear",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-269",
"description": "CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-10T07:11:31.026Z",
"orgId": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"shortName": "GoogleCloud"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://docs.cloud.google.com/dialogflow/docs/release-notes#June_12_2025"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Privilege Escalation in Dialogflow CX via Webhook Admin Role",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"assignerShortName": "GoogleCloud",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-12952",
"datePublished": "2025-12-10T07:11:31.026Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-10T13:42:45.771Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-10T15:05:59.003Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-12952",
"date": "2026-11-13",
"epss": "0.00308",
"percentile": "0.23992"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Dialogflow CX",
"vendor": "Google Cloud",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2025-02",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "date"
}
]
}
],
"source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Google Cloud\u0027s Dialogflow CX.\n\nDialogflow agent developers with Webhook editor permission are able to configure Webhooks using Dialogflow service agent access token authentication. \nThis allows the attacker to escalate their privileges from agent-level to project-level, granting them unauthorized access to manage resources in services associated with the project, leading to\u00a0unexpected costs and resource depletion for the producer project.\n\nA fix was applied\u00a0on the server side\u00a0to protect from this vulnerability in February 2025. No\u00a0customer action is required."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Una vulnerabilidad de escalada de privilegios existe en Dialogflow CX de Google Cloud.\n\nLos desarrolladores de agentes de Dialogflow con permiso de editor de Webhook pueden configurar Webhooks utilizando la autenticaci\u00f3n de token de acceso del agente de servicio de Dialogflow. Esto permite al atacante escalar sus privilegios de nivel de agente a nivel de proyecto, otorg\u00e1ndoles acceso no autorizado para gestionar recursos en servicios asociados con el proyecto, lo que lleva a costos inesperados y agotamiento de recursos para el proyecto productor.\n\nSe aplic\u00f3 una soluci\u00f3n en el lado del servidor para proteger de esta vulnerabilidad en febrero de 2025. No se requiere ninguna acci\u00f3n por parte del cliente."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-12952",
"lastModified": "2026-10-14T21:10:00.183",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "CLEAR",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Clear",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-12952",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-10T15:05:20.215653Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-12-10T08:16:02.637",
"references": [
{
"source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"url": "https://docs.cloud.google.com/dialogflow/docs/release-notes#June_12_2025"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-269"
}
],
"source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-12-11T08:02:04+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-12952",
"id": "CVE-2025-12952",
"initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Privilege Escalation in Dialogflow CX via Webhook Admin Role",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-12952.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-12952",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-10T15:05:20.215653Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-10T15:05:49.031Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Dialogflow CX",
"vendor": "Google Cloud",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2025-02",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "date"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "asterfiester"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eA privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Google Cloud\u0027s Dialogflow CX.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003eDialogflow agent developers with Webhook editor permission are able to configure Webhooks using Dialogflow service agent access token authentication. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eThis allows the attacker to escalate their privileges from agent-level to project-level, granting them unauthorized access to manage resources in services associated with the project, leading to\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp;unexpected costs and resource depletion for the producer project.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003eA fix was applied\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003eon the server side\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003eto protect from this vulnerability in February 2025. No\u0026nbsp;customer action is required.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Google Cloud\u0027s Dialogflow CX.\n\nDialogflow agent developers with Webhook editor permission are able to configure Webhooks using Dialogflow service agent access token authentication. \nThis allows the attacker to escalate their privileges from agent-level to project-level, granting them unauthorized access to manage resources in services associated with the project, leading to\u00a0unexpected costs and resource depletion for the producer project.\n\nA fix was applied\u00a0on the server side\u00a0to protect from this vulnerability in February 2025. No\u00a0customer action is required."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-233",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-233 Privilege Escalation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "CLEAR",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Clear",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-269",
"description": "CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-10T07:11:31.026Z",
"orgId": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"shortName": "GoogleCloud"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://docs.cloud.google.com/dialogflow/docs/release-notes#June_12_2025"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Privilege Escalation in Dialogflow CX via Webhook Admin Role",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"assignerShortName": "GoogleCloud",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-12952",
"datePublished": "2025-12-10T07:11:31.026Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-10T13:42:45.771Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-10T15:05:59.003Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.