CVE-2025-34095 (GCVE-0-2025-34095)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-10 19:14 – Updated: 2025-07-11 13:21
VLAI?
Summary
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6, specifically within the tutorial interface provided by the examples/save.lsp endpoint. An unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted PUT request containing arbitrary Lua os.execute() code, which is then persisted on disk and triggered via a subsequent GET request to examples/manage.lsp. This allows remote command execution on the underlying operating system, impacting both Windows and Unix-based deployments.
Severity ?
9.3 (Critical)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CWE
  • CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Real Time Logic Mako Server Affected: 2.5 , ≤ 2.6 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
John Page (hyp3rlinx) of Beyond Security SecuriTeam Secure Disclosure
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-34095",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-07-11T13:21:00.970515Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-07-11T13:21:05.453Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "examples/save.lsp",
            "examples/manage.lsp",
            "HTTP body content passed to save.lsp (with ex=2.1 GET parameter)"
          ],
          "product": "Mako Server",
          "vendor": "Real Time Logic",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.5",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "John Page (hyp3rlinx) of Beyond Security SecuriTeam Secure Disclosure"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eAn OS command injection vulnerability exists in Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6, specifically within the tutorial interface provided by the \u003ccode\u003eexamples/save.lsp\u003c/code\u003e endpoint. An unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted PUT request containing arbitrary Lua \u003ccode\u003eos.execute()\u003c/code\u003e code, which is then persisted on disk and triggered via a subsequent GET request to \u003ccode\u003eexamples/manage.lsp\u003c/code\u003e. This allows remote command execution on the underlying operating system, impacting both Windows and Unix-based deployments.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "An OS command injection vulnerability exists in Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6, specifically within the tutorial interface provided by the examples/save.lsp endpoint. An unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted PUT request containing arbitrary Lua os.execute() code, which is then persisted on disk and triggered via a subsequent GET request to examples/manage.lsp. This allows remote command execution on the underlying operating system, impacting both Windows and Unix-based deployments."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-88",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-137",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-137 Parameter Injection"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 9.3,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-78",
              "description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-07-10T19:14:30.933Z",
        "orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
        "shortName": "VulnCheck"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "exploit"
          ],
          "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/master/modules/exploits/multi/http/makoserver_cmd_exec.rb"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "exploit"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43132"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://vulncheck/advisories/mako-server-rce"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Mako Server v2.5 and v2.6 OS Command Injection via examples/save.lsp",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
    "assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-34095",
    "datePublished": "2025-07-10T19:14:30.933Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-04-15T19:15:22.552Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-07-11T13:21:05.453Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-34095\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\",\"published\":\"2025-07-10T20:15:24.953\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-07-15T13:14:49.980\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"An OS command injection vulnerability exists in Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6, specifically within the tutorial interface provided by the examples/save.lsp endpoint. An unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted PUT request containing arbitrary Lua os.execute() code, which is then persisted on disk and triggered via a subsequent GET request to examples/manage.lsp. This allows remote command execution on the underlying operating system, impacting both Windows and Unix-based deployments.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Existe una vulnerabilidad de inyecci\u00f3n de comandos del sistema operativo en las versiones 2.5 y 2.6 de Mako Server, espec\u00edficamente en la interfaz del tutorial proporcionada por el endpoint examples/save.lsp. Un atacante no autenticado puede enviar una solicitud PUT manipulada que contenga c\u00f3digo Lua os.execute() arbitrario, que posteriormente se almacena en el disco y se activa mediante una solicitud GET posterior a examples/manage.lsp. Esto permite la ejecuci\u00f3n remota de comandos en el sistema operativo subyacente, lo que afecta tanto a las implementaciones basadas en Windows como en Unix.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":9.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-78\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/master/modules/exploits/multi/http/makoserver_cmd_exec.rb\",\"source\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://vulncheck/advisories/mako-server-rce\",\"source\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43132\",\"source\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-34095\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-07-11T13:21:00.970515Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-10T20:27:23.428Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Mako Server v2.5 and v2.6 OS Command Injection via examples/save.lsp\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"John Page (hyp3rlinx) of Beyond Security SecuriTeam Secure Disclosure\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-88\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection\"}]}, {\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-137\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-137 Parameter Injection\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 9.3, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Real Time Logic\", \"modules\": [\"examples/save.lsp\", \"examples/manage.lsp\", \"HTTP body content passed to save.lsp (with ex=2.1 GET parameter)\"], \"product\": \"Mako Server\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"2.5\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"2.6\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/master/modules/exploits/multi/http/makoserver_cmd_exec.rb\", \"tags\": [\"exploit\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43132\", \"tags\": [\"exploit\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://vulncheck/advisories/mako-server-rce\", \"tags\": [\"third-party-advisory\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"An OS command injection vulnerability exists in Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6, specifically within the tutorial interface provided by the examples/save.lsp endpoint. An unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted PUT request containing arbitrary Lua os.execute() code, which is then persisted on disk and triggered via a subsequent GET request to examples/manage.lsp. This allows remote command execution on the underlying operating system, impacting both Windows and Unix-based deployments.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eAn OS command injection vulnerability exists in Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6, specifically within the tutorial interface provided by the \u003ccode\u003eexamples/save.lsp\u003c/code\u003e endpoint. An unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted PUT request containing arbitrary Lua \u003ccode\u003eos.execute()\u003c/code\u003e code, which is then persisted on disk and triggered via a subsequent GET request to \u003ccode\u003eexamples/manage.lsp\u003c/code\u003e. This allows remote command execution on the underlying operating system, impacting both Windows and Unix-based deployments.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-78\", \"description\": \"CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10\", \"shortName\": \"VulnCheck\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-10T19:14:30.933Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-34095\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-11T13:21:05.453Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-04-15T19:15:22.552Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-07-10T19:14:30.933Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"VulnCheck\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.