CVE-2025-36754 (GCVE-0-2025-36754)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-13 08:16 – Updated: 2025-12-13 08:16
VLAI?
Summary
The authentication mechanism on web interface is not properly implemented. It is possible to bypass authentication checks by crafting a post request with new settings since there is no session token or authentication in place. This would allow an attacker for instance to point the device to an arbitrary address for domain name resolution to e.g. facililitate a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack.
CWE
  • CWE-290 - Authentication Bypass by Spoofing
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Growatt ShineLan-X Affected: 3.6.0.0 , ≤ 3.6.0.2 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
Hamid Rahmouni Victor Pasman
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "ShineLan-X",
          "vendor": "Growatt",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "3.6.0.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.6.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Hamid Rahmouni"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "analyst",
          "value": "Victor Pasman"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "The authentication mechanism on web interface is not properly implemented. It is\u00a0possible to bypass authentication checks by crafting a post request with new settings\u00a0since there is no session token or authentication in place. This would allow an\u00a0attacker for instance to point the device to an arbitrary address for domain name resolution to e.g. facililitate a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack."
            }
          ],
          "value": "The authentication mechanism on web interface is not properly implemented. It is\u00a0possible to bypass authentication checks by crafting a post request with new settings\u00a0since there is no session token or authentication in place. This would allow an\u00a0attacker for instance to point the device to an arbitrary address for domain name resolution to e.g. facililitate a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-233",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-233 Privilege Escalation"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "baseScore": 9.3,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-290",
              "description": "CWE-290 Authentication Bypass by Spoofing",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-12-13T08:16:24.266Z",
        "orgId": "b87402ff-ae37-4194-9dae-31abdbd6f217",
        "shortName": "DIVD"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://csirt.divd.nl/CVE-2025-36754/"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Authentication bypass on web interface",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "b87402ff-ae37-4194-9dae-31abdbd6f217",
    "assignerShortName": "DIVD",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-36754",
    "datePublished": "2025-12-13T08:16:24.266Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-04-15T21:54:36.815Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-12-13T08:16:24.266Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-36754\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"csirt@divd.nl\",\"published\":\"2025-12-13T16:16:54.570\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-12-13T16:16:54.570\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The authentication mechanism on web interface is not properly implemented. It is\u00a0possible to bypass authentication checks by crafting a post request with new settings\u00a0since there is no session token or authentication in place. This would allow an\u00a0attacker for instance to point the device to an arbitrary address for domain name resolution to e.g. facililitate a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"csirt@divd.nl\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":9.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"csirt@divd.nl\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-290\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://csirt.divd.nl/CVE-2025-36754/\",\"source\":\"csirt@divd.nl\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…