CVE-2026-3479 (GCVE-0-2026-3479)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-18 18:13 – Updated: 2026-04-07 22:01 Disputed
VLAI
Title
pkgutil.get_data() does not enforce documented restrictions
Summary
DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model. pkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.
Severity
0 (None)
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-22 - Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Assigner
PSF
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Python Software Foundation CPython Affected: 0 , < 3.13.13 (python)
Affected: 3.14.0 , < 3.14.4 (python)
Affected: 3.15.0a1 , < 3.15.0a8 (python)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-3479",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-03-18T18:50:20.603616Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-22",
                "description": "CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-03-18T18:50:41.609Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "pkgutil"
          ],
          "product": "CPython",
          "vendor": "Python Software Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "3.13.13",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "python"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.14.4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.14.0",
              "versionType": "python"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.15.0a8",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.15.0a1",
              "versionType": "python"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eDISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003epkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.\n\npkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "PHYSICAL",
            "baseScore": 0,
            "baseSeverity": "NONE",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T22:01:35.724Z",
        "orgId": "28c92f92-d60d-412d-b760-e73465c3df22",
        "shortName": "PSF"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/146122"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/WYLLVQOOCKGK73JM7Z7ZSNOJC4N7BAWY/"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "issue-tracking"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/146121"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/bcdf231946b1da8bdfbab4c05539bb0cc964a1c7"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5af6ce3e7b643a30a02d22245c1e3f4a8bc0a1fe"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/cf59bf76470f3d75ad47d80ffb8ce76b64b5e943"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d786d59a8f7196bb630100a869f28ad13436b59c"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "tags": [
        "disputed"
      ],
      "title": "pkgutil.get_data() does not enforce documented restrictions",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.6.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "28c92f92-d60d-412d-b760-e73465c3df22",
    "assignerShortName": "PSF",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-3479",
    "datePublished": "2026-03-18T18:13:42.288Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-03-03T14:18:35.394Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T22:01:35.724Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-3479",
      "date": "2026-06-05",
      "epss": "0.00016",
      "percentile": "0.03793"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-3479\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cna@python.org\",\"published\":\"2026-03-18T19:16:06.810\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-07T18:16:46.740\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[{\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cna@python.org\",\"tags\":[\"disputed\"]}],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.\\n\\npkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"pkgutil.get_data() no valid\u00f3 el argumento de recurso como se document\u00f3, permitiendo recorridos de ruta.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"cna@python.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":0.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"NONE\",\"attackVector\":\"PHYSICAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-22\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5af6ce3e7b643a30a02d22245c1e3f4a8bc0a1fe\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/bcdf231946b1da8bdfbab4c05539bb0cc964a1c7\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/cf59bf76470f3d75ad47d80ffb8ce76b64b5e943\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d786d59a8f7196bb630100a869f28ad13436b59c\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/146121\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/146122\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/WYLLVQOOCKGK73JM7Z7ZSNOJC4N7BAWY/\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-3479\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-03-18T18:50:20.603616Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-22\", \"description\": \"CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-03-18T18:49:24.573Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"tags\": [\"disputed\"], \"title\": \"pkgutil.get_data() does not enforce documented restrictions\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 0, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"PHYSICAL\", \"baseSeverity\": \"NONE\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"exploitMaturity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Python Software Foundation\", \"modules\": [\"pkgutil\"], \"product\": \"CPython\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.13.13\", \"versionType\": \"python\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.14.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.14.4\", \"versionType\": \"python\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.15.0a1\", \"lessThan\": \"3.15.0a8\", \"versionType\": \"python\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/146122\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/WYLLVQOOCKGK73JM7Z7ZSNOJC4N7BAWY/\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/146121\", \"tags\": [\"issue-tracking\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/bcdf231946b1da8bdfbab4c05539bb0cc964a1c7\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5af6ce3e7b643a30a02d22245c1e3f4a8bc0a1fe\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/cf59bf76470f3d75ad47d80ffb8ce76b64b5e943\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d786d59a8f7196bb630100a869f28ad13436b59c\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.6.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.\\n\\npkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eDISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003epkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"28c92f92-d60d-412d-b760-e73465c3df22\", \"shortName\": \"PSF\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-07T22:01:35.724Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-3479\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-07T22:01:35.724Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-03-03T14:18:35.394Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"28c92f92-d60d-412d-b760-e73465c3df22\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-03-18T18:13:42.288Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"PSF\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.