CVE-2026-42772 (GCVE-0-2026-42772)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-29 15:32 – Updated: 2026-09-30 20:11
VLAI
Title
Potential CPU DoS via O(n^2) Fragment Reassembly in QUIC
Summary
Issue summary: The QUIC stream reassembly algorithm performance deteriorates progressively as packets are arriving out of order. The worst case has a quadratic complexity proportional to the number of stream frames kept in the buffer for the received stream data. Impact summary: A remote QUIC peer that completes the handshake can create a connection-scoped CPU pressure and potentially a Denial of Service using compliant STREAM frames inside the advertised receive window, with low attacker bandwidth. CWE: CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity Description: OpenSSL manages received QUIC stream fragments using a doubly-linked list. While it optimizes for append operations (at the end of the list), it falls back to a head-to-tail linear search for any fragment that does not immediately follow the current `tail`. By manipulating the sequence of offsets, an attacker can force the server to perform O(n^2) operations, consuming excessive CPU time for the QUIC process. FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-30 19:35 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-407 - Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity
Assigner
openssl CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard B 78/100 over 48 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
OpenSSL OpenSSL Affected: 4.0.0 , < 4.0.3 (semver)
Affected: 3.6.0 , < 3.6.5 (semver)
Affected: 3.5.0 , < 3.5.9 (semver)
Affected: 3.4.0 , < 3.4.8 (semver)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-09-29 14:21
Credits
Saku0512 Opal Wright (Trail of Bits) Alexandr Nedvedicky
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
              "baseScore": 5.3,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "NONE",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-42772",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-30T19:35:54.157005Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-30T20:11:09.295Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "OpenSSL",
          "vendor": "OpenSSL",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "4.0.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "4.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.6.5",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.6.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.5.9",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.5.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.4.8",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.4.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Saku0512"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Opal Wright (Trail of Bits)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Alexandr Nedvedicky"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-09-29T14:21:57.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Issue summary: The QUIC stream reassembly algorithm performance deteriorates\u003cbr\u003eprogressively as packets are arriving out of order. The worst case has\u003cbr\u003ea quadratic complexity proportional to the number of stream frames kept in\u003cbr\u003ethe buffer for the received stream data.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A remote QUIC peer that completes the handshake can create\u003cbr\u003ea connection-scoped CPU pressure and potentially a Denial of Service using\u003cbr\u003ecompliant STREAM frames inside the advertised receive window, with low\u003cbr\u003eattacker bandwidth.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eCWE: CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDescription: OpenSSL manages received QUIC stream fragments using a\u003cbr\u003edoubly-linked list. While it optimizes for append operations (at the end of\u003cbr\u003ethe list), it falls back to a head-to-tail linear search for any fragment\u003cbr\u003ethat does not immediately follow the current `tail`.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eBy manipulating the sequence of offsets, an attacker can force the server\u003cbr\u003eto perform O(n^2) operations, consuming excessive CPU time for the\u003cbr\u003eQUIC process.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFIPS impact: no\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of\u003cbr\u003ethe OpenSSL FIPS module boundary."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Issue summary: The QUIC stream reassembly algorithm performance deteriorates\nprogressively as packets are arriving out of order. The worst case has\na quadratic complexity proportional to the number of stream frames kept in\nthe buffer for the received stream data.\n\nImpact summary: A remote QUIC peer that completes the handshake can create\na connection-scoped CPU pressure and potentially a Denial of Service using\ncompliant STREAM frames inside the advertised receive window, with low\nattacker bandwidth.\n\nCWE: CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity\n\nDescription: OpenSSL manages received QUIC stream fragments using a\ndoubly-linked list. While it optimizes for append operations (at the end of\nthe list), it falls back to a head-to-tail linear search for any fragment\nthat does not immediately follow the current `tail`.\n\nBy manipulating the sequence of offsets, an attacker can force the server\nto perform O(n^2) operations, consuming excessive CPU time for the\nQUIC process.\n\nFIPS impact: no\nThe FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of\nthe OpenSSL FIPS module boundary."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "format": "other",
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "text": "Low"
            },
            "type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-407",
              "description": "CWE-407 Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-29T15:32:14.009Z",
        "orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
        "shortName": "openssl"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt"
        },
        {
          "name": "4.0.3 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f42ae513bbda513b3c121d54834040ee4a0eae1a"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.6.5 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/32d0ed8afe1b8c3e7ece725b44663da3d7087a09"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.5.9 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ca8402e273af4de5b3f04fa61a0f0c02ce3ae20e"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.4.8 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/eb2becc0a4baea7f3050a247834d0e5c2ebe1773"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Potential CPU DoS via O(n^2) Fragment Reassembly in QUIC",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
    "assignerShortName": "openssl",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-42772",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-29T15:32:14.009Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-04-29T09:22:27.969Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-30T20:11:09.295Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-42772",
      "date": "2026-11-13",
      "epss": "0.00497",
      "percentile": "0.43194"
    },
    "microsoft_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2026-10-16T01:47:40.000Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-42772",
      "id": "msrc_CVE-2026-42772",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-10-03T01:22:17.000Z",
      "product_status:fixed": "1",
      "product_status:known_affected": "1",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "5",
      "source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "Potential CPU DoS via O(n^2) Fragment Reassembly in QUIC",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2026/msrc_cve-2026-42772.json",
      "version": "4"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
                "product": "OpenSSL",
                "vendor": "OpenSSL",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "lessThan": "4.0.3",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "4.0.0",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  },
                  {
                    "lessThan": "3.6.5",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "3.6.0",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  },
                  {
                    "lessThan": "3.5.9",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "3.5.0",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  },
                  {
                    "lessThan": "3.4.8",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "3.4.0",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
          }
        ],
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "707E1EC7-0538-4F9F-96CB-C89FECC1F3ED",
                    "versionEndExcluding": "3.4.8",
                    "versionStartIncluding": "3.4.0",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "B822E02B-8728-4C34-98BC-52D0A0A735B3",
                    "versionEndExcluding": "3.5.9",
                    "versionStartIncluding": "3.5.0",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "96C892B6-618B-4CB9-85B6-76C641D17532",
                    "versionEndExcluding": "3.6.5",
                    "versionStartIncluding": "3.6.0",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "BC4A99CC-483D-4C81-A95F-6AEB2BF1B500",
                    "versionEndExcluding": "4.0.3",
                    "versionStartIncluding": "4.0.0",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Issue summary: The QUIC stream reassembly algorithm performance deteriorates\nprogressively as packets are arriving out of order. The worst case has\na quadratic complexity proportional to the number of stream frames kept in\nthe buffer for the received stream data.\n\nImpact summary: A remote QUIC peer that completes the handshake can create\na connection-scoped CPU pressure and potentially a Denial of Service using\ncompliant STREAM frames inside the advertised receive window, with low\nattacker bandwidth.\n\nCWE: CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity\n\nDescription: OpenSSL manages received QUIC stream fragments using a\ndoubly-linked list. While it optimizes for append operations (at the end of\nthe list), it falls back to a head-to-tail linear search for any fragment\nthat does not immediately follow the current `tail`.\n\nBy manipulating the sequence of offsets, an attacker can force the server\nto perform O(n^2) operations, consuming excessive CPU time for the\nQUIC process.\n\nFIPS impact: no\nThe FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of\nthe OpenSSL FIPS module boundary."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-42772",
        "lastModified": "2026-10-08T01:18:57.547",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
                "baseScore": 5.3,
                "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
                "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "integrityImpact": "NONE",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
              "impactScore": 1.4,
              "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ],
          "ssvcV203": [
            {
              "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "ssvcData": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-42772",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "technicalImpact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-30T19:35:54.157005Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              }
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2026-09-29T16:17:07.640",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
            "tags": [
              "Patch"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/32d0ed8afe1b8c3e7ece725b44663da3d7087a09"
          },
          {
            "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
            "tags": [
              "Patch"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ca8402e273af4de5b3f04fa61a0f0c02ce3ae20e"
          },
          {
            "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
            "tags": [
              "Patch"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/eb2becc0a4baea7f3050a247834d0e5c2ebe1773"
          },
          {
            "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
            "tags": [
              "Patch"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f42ae513bbda513b3c121d54834040ee4a0eae1a"
          },
          {
            "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
            "tags": [
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
        "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-407"
              }
            ],
            "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-11-12T03:04:01+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-42772",
      "id": "CVE-2026-42772",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-09-29T15:32:14.009000+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "112",
      "product_status:known_affected": "19",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "68",
      "product_status:under_investigation": "17",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "openssl: openssl: Denial of Service via inefficient QUIC stream reassembly",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-42772.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-11-05T17:42:32Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-42772",
      "id": "CVE-2026-42772",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-11-05T17:42:32Z",
      "product_status:known_affected": "75",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "553",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2026-42772",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/2026/cve-2026-42772.json",
      "version": "2"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "adp": [
          {
            "metrics": [
              {
                "cvssV3_1": {
                  "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                  "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                  "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
                  "baseScore": 5.3,
                  "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
                  "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                  "integrityImpact": "NONE",
                  "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                  "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                  "userInteraction": "NONE",
                  "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
                  "version": "3.1"
                }
              },
              {
                "other": {
                  "content": {
                    "id": "CVE-2026-42772",
                    "options": [
                      {
                        "Exploitation": "none"
                      },
                      {
                        "Automatable": "yes"
                      },
                      {
                        "Technical Impact": "partial"
                      }
                    ],
                    "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                    "timestamp": "2026-09-30T19:35:54.157005Z",
                    "version": "2.0.3"
                  },
                  "type": "ssvc"
                }
              }
            ],
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2026-09-30T19:35:50.299Z",
              "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
            },
            "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
          }
        ],
        "cna": {
          "affected": [
            {
              "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
              "product": "OpenSSL",
              "vendor": "OpenSSL",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "lessThan": "4.0.3",
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "4.0.0",
                  "versionType": "semver"
                },
                {
                  "lessThan": "3.6.5",
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "3.6.0",
                  "versionType": "semver"
                },
                {
                  "lessThan": "3.5.9",
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "3.5.0",
                  "versionType": "semver"
                },
                {
                  "lessThan": "3.4.8",
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "3.4.0",
                  "versionType": "semver"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "credits": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "reporter",
              "value": "Saku0512"
            },
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "reporter",
              "value": "Opal Wright (Trail of Bits)"
            },
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "remediation developer",
              "value": "Alexandr Nedvedicky"
            }
          ],
          "datePublic": "2026-09-29T14:21:57.000Z",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "supportingMedia": [
                {
                  "base64": false,
                  "type": "text/html",
                  "value": "Issue summary: The QUIC stream reassembly algorithm performance deteriorates\u003cbr\u003eprogressively as packets are arriving out of order. The worst case has\u003cbr\u003ea quadratic complexity proportional to the number of stream frames kept in\u003cbr\u003ethe buffer for the received stream data.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A remote QUIC peer that completes the handshake can create\u003cbr\u003ea connection-scoped CPU pressure and potentially a Denial of Service using\u003cbr\u003ecompliant STREAM frames inside the advertised receive window, with low\u003cbr\u003eattacker bandwidth.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eCWE: CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDescription: OpenSSL manages received QUIC stream fragments using a\u003cbr\u003edoubly-linked list. While it optimizes for append operations (at the end of\u003cbr\u003ethe list), it falls back to a head-to-tail linear search for any fragment\u003cbr\u003ethat does not immediately follow the current `tail`.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eBy manipulating the sequence of offsets, an attacker can force the server\u003cbr\u003eto perform O(n^2) operations, consuming excessive CPU time for the\u003cbr\u003eQUIC process.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFIPS impact: no\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of\u003cbr\u003ethe OpenSSL FIPS module boundary."
                }
              ],
              "value": "Issue summary: The QUIC stream reassembly algorithm performance deteriorates\nprogressively as packets are arriving out of order. The worst case has\na quadratic complexity proportional to the number of stream frames kept in\nthe buffer for the received stream data.\n\nImpact summary: A remote QUIC peer that completes the handshake can create\na connection-scoped CPU pressure and potentially a Denial of Service using\ncompliant STREAM frames inside the advertised receive window, with low\nattacker bandwidth.\n\nCWE: CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity\n\nDescription: OpenSSL manages received QUIC stream fragments using a\ndoubly-linked list. While it optimizes for append operations (at the end of\nthe list), it falls back to a head-to-tail linear search for any fragment\nthat does not immediately follow the current `tail`.\n\nBy manipulating the sequence of offsets, an attacker can force the server\nto perform O(n^2) operations, consuming excessive CPU time for the\nQUIC process.\n\nFIPS impact: no\nThe FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of\nthe OpenSSL FIPS module boundary."
            }
          ],
          "metrics": [
            {
              "format": "other",
              "other": {
                "content": {
                  "text": "Low"
                },
                "type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
              }
            }
          ],
          "problemTypes": [
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-407",
                  "description": "CWE-407 Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2026-09-29T15:32:14.009Z",
            "orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
            "shortName": "openssl"
          },
          "references": [
            {
              "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
              "tags": [
                "vendor-advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt"
            },
            {
              "name": "4.0.3 git commit",
              "tags": [
                "patch"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f42ae513bbda513b3c121d54834040ee4a0eae1a"
            },
            {
              "name": "3.6.5 git commit",
              "tags": [
                "patch"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/32d0ed8afe1b8c3e7ece725b44663da3d7087a09"
            },
            {
              "name": "3.5.9 git commit",
              "tags": [
                "patch"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ca8402e273af4de5b3f04fa61a0f0c02ce3ae20e"
            },
            {
              "name": "3.4.8 git commit",
              "tags": [
                "patch"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/eb2becc0a4baea7f3050a247834d0e5c2ebe1773"
            }
          ],
          "source": {
            "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
          },
          "title": "Potential CPU DoS via O(n^2) Fragment Reassembly in QUIC",
          "x_generator": {
            "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
          }
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
        "assignerShortName": "openssl",
        "cveId": "CVE-2026-42772",
        "datePublished": "2026-09-29T15:32:14.009Z",
        "dateReserved": "2026-04-29T09:22:27.969Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-30T20:11:09.295Z",
        "state": "PUBLISHED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.