CVE-2026-44909 (GCVE-0-2026-44909)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-23 16:27 – Updated: 2026-07-23 19:07
VLAI
Summary
Proxygen lacked a generalized slow-consumer detection mechanism in its core HTTP session layer. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit HTTP/2 flow-control by setting SETTINGS_INITIAL_WINDOW_SIZE to 0 or withholding WINDOW_UPDATE frames, causing the server to buffer complete response bodies in memory indefinitely for stalled streams. By opening many simultaneous streams requesting large resources while preventing the server from transmitting responses, an attacker could induce unbounded memory growth leading to service degradation, resource exhaustion, or denial of service. Versions v2017.01.16.00 through v2026.07.20.00 are affected.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-23 19:07 UTC
CWE
Assigner
Meta CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard D 47/100 over 10 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
Facebook proxygen Affected: v2017.01.16.00 , < v2026.07.20.00 (semver)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-44909",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-23T19:07:17.371673Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T19:07:28.874Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "proxygen",
          "vendor": "Facebook",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "v2026.07.20.00",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "v2017.01.16.00",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "dateAssigned": "2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Proxygen lacked a generalized slow-consumer detection mechanism in its core HTTP session layer. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit HTTP/2 flow-control by setting SETTINGS_INITIAL_WINDOW_SIZE to 0 or withholding WINDOW_UPDATE frames, causing the server to buffer complete response bodies in memory indefinitely for stalled streams. By opening many simultaneous streams requesting large resources while preventing the server from transmitting responses, an attacker could induce unbounded memory growth leading to service degradation, resource exhaustion, or denial of service. Versions v2017.01.16.00 through v2026.07.20.00 are affected."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-770",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T16:27:01.658Z",
        "orgId": "4fc57720-52fe-4431-a0fb-3d2c8747b827",
        "shortName": "Meta"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/facebook/proxygen/commit/f28742f21f7022c261b7620d4e6b20d82b6cff72"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "4fc57720-52fe-4431-a0fb-3d2c8747b827",
    "assignerShortName": "Meta",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-44909",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-23T16:27:01.658Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-08T02:33:35.450Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T19:07:28.874Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-44909",
      "date": "2026-11-01",
      "epss": "0.00573",
      "percentile": "0.47366"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
                "product": "proxygen",
                "vendor": "Facebook",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "lessThan": "v2026.07.20.00",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "v2017.01.16.00",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "cve-assign@fb.com"
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Proxygen lacked a generalized slow-consumer detection mechanism in its core HTTP session layer. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit HTTP/2 flow-control by setting SETTINGS_INITIAL_WINDOW_SIZE to 0 or withholding WINDOW_UPDATE frames, causing the server to buffer complete response bodies in memory indefinitely for stalled streams. By opening many simultaneous streams requesting large resources while preventing the server from transmitting responses, an attacker could induce unbounded memory growth leading to service degradation, resource exhaustion, or denial of service. Versions v2017.01.16.00 through v2026.07.20.00 are affected."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "Proxygen carec\u00eda de un mecanismo generalizado de detecci\u00f3n de consumidores lentos en su capa de sesi\u00f3n HTTP central. Un atacante remoto no autenticado podr\u00eda explotar el control de flujo de HTTP/2 al establecer SETTINGS_INITIAL_WINDOW_SIZE en 0 o retener los frames WINDOW_UPDATE, lo que provocar\u00eda que el servidor almacenara en b\u00fafer cuerpos de respuesta completos en memoria indefinidamente para streams estancados. Al abrir muchos streams simult\u00e1neos solicitando recursos grandes mientras se impide que el servidor transmita respuestas, un atacante podr\u00eda inducir un crecimiento ilimitado de la memoria, lo que llevar\u00eda a la degradaci\u00f3n del servicio, el agotamiento de recursos o la denegaci\u00f3n de servicio. Las versiones v2017.01.16.00 hasta la v2026.07.20.00 est\u00e1n afectadas."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-44909",
        "lastModified": "2026-10-24T13:10:00.147",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 7.5,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "integrityImpact": "NONE",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
              "impactScore": 3.6,
              "source": "cve-assign@fb.com",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ],
          "ssvcV203": [
            {
              "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "ssvcData": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-44909",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "technicalImpact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-23T19:07:17.371673Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              }
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2026-07-23T17:16:28.170",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "cve-assign@fb.com",
            "url": "https://github.com/facebook/proxygen/commit/f28742f21f7022c261b7620d4e6b20d82b6cff72"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "cve-assign@fb.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Deferred"
      }
    },
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2026-07-30T07:52:36+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-44909",
      "id": "CVE-2026-44909",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-07-23T16:27:01.658000+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "proxygen: Proxygen: Denial of Service via HTTP/2 flow-control manipulation",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-44909.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "adp": [
          {
            "metrics": [
              {
                "other": {
                  "content": {
                    "id": "CVE-2026-44909",
                    "options": [
                      {
                        "Exploitation": "none"
                      },
                      {
                        "Automatable": "yes"
                      },
                      {
                        "Technical Impact": "partial"
                      }
                    ],
                    "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                    "timestamp": "2026-07-23T19:07:17.371673Z",
                    "version": "2.0.3"
                  },
                  "type": "ssvc"
                }
              }
            ],
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T19:07:24.780Z",
              "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
            },
            "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
          }
        ],
        "cna": {
          "affected": [
            {
              "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
              "product": "proxygen",
              "vendor": "Facebook",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "lessThan": "v2026.07.20.00",
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "v2017.01.16.00",
                  "versionType": "semver"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "dateAssigned": "2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Proxygen lacked a generalized slow-consumer detection mechanism in its core HTTP session layer. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit HTTP/2 flow-control by setting SETTINGS_INITIAL_WINDOW_SIZE to 0 or withholding WINDOW_UPDATE frames, causing the server to buffer complete response bodies in memory indefinitely for stalled streams. By opening many simultaneous streams requesting large resources while preventing the server from transmitting responses, an attacker could induce unbounded memory growth leading to service degradation, resource exhaustion, or denial of service. Versions v2017.01.16.00 through v2026.07.20.00 are affected."
            }
          ],
          "metrics": [
            {
              "cvssV3_1": {
                "baseScore": 7.5,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "format": "CVSS",
              "scenarios": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "GENERAL"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "problemTypes": [
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "description": "CWE-770",
                  "lang": "en"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T16:27:01.658Z",
            "orgId": "4fc57720-52fe-4431-a0fb-3d2c8747b827",
            "shortName": "Meta"
          },
          "references": [
            {
              "tags": [
                "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/facebook/proxygen/commit/f28742f21f7022c261b7620d4e6b20d82b6cff72"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "4fc57720-52fe-4431-a0fb-3d2c8747b827",
        "assignerShortName": "Meta",
        "cveId": "CVE-2026-44909",
        "datePublished": "2026-07-23T16:27:01.658Z",
        "dateReserved": "2026-05-08T02:33:35.450Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T19:07:28.874Z",
        "state": "PUBLISHED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.