CVE-2026-75595 (GCVE-0-2026-75595)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-19 21:00 – Updated: 2026-08-19 21:00
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Netty: SNI Routing Bypass via Fragmented TLS ClientHello Causing Fallback to Default SslContext
Summary
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to 4.1.137.Fina and 4.2.17.Final, io.netty.handler.ssl.SslClientHelloHandler#decode checks the wrong offset before reading the four-byte TLS handshake header, so a ClientHello whose handshake header spans records can cause an IndexOutOfBoundsException and invoke select(ctx, null). This selects the default SslContext instead of the SNI-specific context. In deployments where per-SNI clientAuth=REQUIRE is the sole mutual TLS gate, the default SslContext uses clientAuth=NONE or clientAuth=OPTIONAL, and no application-layer certificate verification exists, an unauthenticated remote attacker can bypass the protected route's mutual TLS requirement. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.137.Final and 4.2.17.Final.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-754 - Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
Assigner
References
7 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisorie… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/17213 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/17217 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/1b5abc6443b… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/9e051923910… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "netty",
"vendor": "netty",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.1.137.Final"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.2.0.Final, \u003c 4.2.17.Final"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to 4.1.137.Fina and 4.2.17.Final, io.netty.handler.ssl.SslClientHelloHandler#decode checks the wrong offset before reading the four-byte TLS handshake header, so a ClientHello whose handshake header spans records can cause an IndexOutOfBoundsException and invoke select(ctx, null). This selects the default SslContext instead of the SNI-specific context. In deployments where per-SNI clientAuth=REQUIRE is the sole mutual TLS gate, the default SslContext uses clientAuth=NONE or clientAuth=OPTIONAL, and no application-layer certificate verification exists, an unauthenticated remote attacker can bypass the protected route\u0027s mutual TLS requirement. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.137.Final and 4.2.17.Final."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-754",
"description": "CWE-754: Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-19T21:00:27.627Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-c4c3-7fpv-j4q5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-c4c3-7fpv-j4q5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/17213",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/17213"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/17217",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/17217"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/1b5abc6443b63726c72cdd285af2feb7ddbb8ff7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/1b5abc6443b63726c72cdd285af2feb7ddbb8ff7"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/9e0519239108a69b7e9bbc5e9182ee139a0d7961",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/9e0519239108a69b7e9bbc5e9182ee139a0d7961"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.137.Final",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.137.Final"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.17.Final",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.17.Final"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-c4c3-7fpv-j4q5",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Netty: SNI Routing Bypass via Fragmented TLS ClientHello Causing Fallback to Default SslContext"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-75595",
"datePublished": "2026-08-19T21:00:27.627Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-17T23:49:03.449Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-19T21:00:27.627Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-75595",
"date": "2026-08-20",
"epss": "0.00317",
"percentile": "0.2465"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-75595\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-08-19T21:17:37.563\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-08-19T21:17:37.563\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to 4.1.137.Fina and 4.2.17.Final, io.netty.handler.ssl.SslClientHelloHandler#decode checks the wrong offset before reading the four-byte TLS handshake header, so a ClientHello whose handshake header spans records can cause an IndexOutOfBoundsException and invoke select(ctx, null). This selects the default SslContext instead of the SNI-specific context. In deployments where per-SNI clientAuth=REQUIRE is the sole mutual TLS gate, the default SslContext uses clientAuth=NONE or clientAuth=OPTIONAL, and no application-layer certificate verification exists, an unauthenticated remote attacker can bypass the protected route\u0027s mutual TLS requirement. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.137.Final and 4.2.17.Final.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"netty\",\"product\":\"netty\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 4.1.137.Final\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"\u003e= 4.2.0.Final, \u003c 4.2.17.Final\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":9.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-754\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/1b5abc6443b63726c72cdd285af2feb7ddbb8ff7\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/9e0519239108a69b7e9bbc5e9182ee139a0d7961\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/17213\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/17217\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.137.Final\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.17.Final\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-c4c3-7fpv-j4q5\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…