CVE-2026-78397 (GCVE-0-2026-78397)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-25 06:00 – Updated: 2026-09-25 12:40
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Link Library < 7.9.6 - Unauthenticated SSRF via Reciprocal Link Validation
Summary
The Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6 does not validate the destination of a user-supplied URL before falling back to an unprotected fetch when its safe request is rejected, allowing unauthenticated visitors to make the site issue requests to hosts on its internal network and to learn from the response whether an internal service answered.
Versions below 7.8.8 are covered by CVE-2025-68600; this entry covers 7.8.8 through 7.9.5, where that fix was incomplete. Exploitation requires the site owner to have published the Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6's public link submission form with reciprocal-link validation enabled.
Severity
4 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-25 12:37 UTC
CWE
- CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/7842ef44-582c-40… | exploitvdb-entrytechnical-description |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Link Library |
Affected:
7.8.8 , < 7.9.6
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-78397",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-25T12:37:14.730842Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T12:40:02.745Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Link Library",
"vendor": "Unknown",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.9.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.8.8",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Charles Vosburgh"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "WPScan"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6 does not validate the destination of a user-supplied URL before falling back to an unprotected fetch when its safe request is rejected, allowing unauthenticated visitors to make the site issue requests to hosts on its internal network and to learn from the response whether an internal service answered.\n\nVersions below 7.8.8 are covered by CVE-2025-68600; this entry covers 7.8.8 through 7.9.5, where that fix was incomplete. Exploitation requires the site owner to have published the Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6\u0027s public link submission form with reciprocal-link validation enabled."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T06:00:19.841Z",
"orgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
"shortName": "WPScan"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/7842ef44-582c-40a8-8f3c-cf8abebaf7fb/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Link Library \u003c 7.9.6 - Unauthenticated SSRF via Reciprocal Link Validation",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "WPScan CVE Generator"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
"assignerShortName": "WPScan",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-78397",
"datePublished": "2026-09-25T06:00:19.841Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-24T14:16:03.312Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T12:40:02.745Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-78397",
"date": "2026-11-12",
"epss": "0.00157",
"percentile": "0.04963"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Link Library",
"vendor": "Unknown",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.9.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.8.8",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "contact@wpscan.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6 does not validate the destination of a user-supplied URL before falling back to an unprotected fetch when its safe request is rejected, allowing unauthenticated visitors to make the site issue requests to hosts on its internal network and to learn from the response whether an internal service answered.\n\nVersions below 7.8.8 are covered by CVE-2025-68600; this entry covers 7.8.8 through 7.9.5, where that fix was incomplete. Exploitation requires the site owner to have published the Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6\u0027s public link submission form with reciprocal-link validation enabled."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-78397",
"lastModified": "2026-09-25T13:25:48.533",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.0,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-78397",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-25T12:37:14.730842Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-09-25T07:16:54.530",
"references": [
{
"source": "contact@wpscan.com",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/7842ef44-582c-40a8-8f3c-cf8abebaf7fb/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.0,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-78397",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-25T12:37:14.730842Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T12:35:48.738Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Link Library",
"vendor": "Unknown",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.9.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.8.8",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Charles Vosburgh"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "WPScan"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6 does not validate the destination of a user-supplied URL before falling back to an unprotected fetch when its safe request is rejected, allowing unauthenticated visitors to make the site issue requests to hosts on its internal network and to learn from the response whether an internal service answered.\n\nVersions below 7.8.8 are covered by CVE-2025-68600; this entry covers 7.8.8 through 7.9.5, where that fix was incomplete. Exploitation requires the site owner to have published the Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6\u0027s public link submission form with reciprocal-link validation enabled."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T06:00:19.841Z",
"orgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
"shortName": "WPScan"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/7842ef44-582c-40a8-8f3c-cf8abebaf7fb/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Link Library \u003c 7.9.6 - Unauthenticated SSRF via Reciprocal Link Validation",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "WPScan CVE Generator"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
"assignerShortName": "WPScan",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-78397",
"datePublished": "2026-09-25T06:00:19.841Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-24T14:16:03.312Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T12:40:02.745Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.