CVE-2026-79918 (GCVE-0-2026-79918)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-21 20:47 – Updated: 2026-09-21 20:47
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
MaxKB: Sandbox escape via unhooked fexecve
Summary
MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Prior to version 2.10.6-lts, the ToolExecutor LD_PRELOAD sandbox hooks execve, execvpe, and execveat to prevent subprocess creation but does not hook fexecve. An authenticated attacker able to execute tool code can call fexecve to start a process outside the sandbox's intended subprocess policy. This issue is fixed in version 2.10.6-lts.
Severity
6.3 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-693 - Protection Mechanism Failure
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/1Panel-dev/MaxKB/security/advi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/1Panel-dev/MaxKB/commit/6fa794… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/1Panel-dev/MaxKB/releases/tag/… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Panel-dev | MaxKB |
Affected:
< 2.10.6-lts
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "MaxKB",
"vendor": "1Panel-dev",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.10.6-lts"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Prior to version 2.10.6-lts, the ToolExecutor LD_PRELOAD sandbox hooks execve, execvpe, and execveat to prevent subprocess creation but does not hook fexecve. An authenticated attacker able to execute tool code can call fexecve to start a process outside the sandbox\u0027s intended subprocess policy. This issue is fixed in version 2.10.6-lts."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-693",
"description": "CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T20:47:13.575Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/MaxKB/security/advisories/GHSA-9mh9-v949-fwqh",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/MaxKB/security/advisories/GHSA-9mh9-v949-fwqh"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/MaxKB/commit/6fa7947a85030b87977c4026f33af11ca10dd1e6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/MaxKB/commit/6fa7947a85030b87977c4026f33af11ca10dd1e6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/MaxKB/releases/tag/v2.10.6-lts",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/MaxKB/releases/tag/v2.10.6-lts"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-9mh9-v949-fwqh",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "MaxKB: Sandbox escape via unhooked fexecve"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-79918",
"datePublished": "2026-09-21T20:47:13.575Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-25T14:59:32.746Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T20:47:13.575Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "MaxKB",
"vendor": "1Panel-dev",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.10.6-lts"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Prior to version 2.10.6-lts, the ToolExecutor LD_PRELOAD sandbox hooks execve, execvpe, and execveat to prevent subprocess creation but does not hook fexecve. An authenticated attacker able to execute tool code can call fexecve to start a process outside the sandbox\u0027s intended subprocess policy. This issue is fixed in version 2.10.6-lts."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-79918",
"lastModified": "2026-09-21T21:17:12.900",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.4,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-09-21T21:17:12.777",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/MaxKB/commit/6fa7947a85030b87977c4026f33af11ca10dd1e6"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/MaxKB/releases/tag/v2.10.6-lts"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/MaxKB/security/advisories/GHSA-9mh9-v949-fwqh"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-693"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…