CVE-2026-82270 (GCVE-0-2026-82270)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-28 16:18 – Updated: 2026-08-28 16:18
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Portkey AI Gateway Server-Side Request Forgery via /v1/proxy/*
Summary
Portkey AI Gateway through 1.15.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /v1/proxy/* route that lacks requestValidator middleware. Attackers can set the x-portkey-custom-host header to internal addresses and forward requests with Authorization headers to reach internal services and exfiltrate provider API keys.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Portkey-AI/gateway/issues/1718 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/Portkey-AI/gateway | product |
| https://github.com/Portkey-AI/gateway/blob/669825… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/portkey-ai-g… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portkey-AI | gateway |
Affected:
1.14.0 , ≤ 1.15.2
(semver)
|
guessed |
Date Public
2026-07-03 00:00
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "@portkey-ai/gateway",
"product": "gateway",
"vendor": "Portkey-AI",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.15.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.14.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "George Chen"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-07-03T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Portkey AI Gateway through 1.15.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /v1/proxy/* route that lacks requestValidator middleware. Attackers can set the x-portkey-custom-host header to internal addresses and forward requests with Authorization headers to reach internal services and exfiltrate provider API keys."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-28T16:18:53.484Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #1718",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Portkey-AI/gateway/issues/1718"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Portkey-AI/gateway"
},
{
"name": "Vulnerable code: index.ts",
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Portkey-AI/gateway/blob/669825cbe89ee51569918b8f78a9db486fd69dd4/src/index.ts"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Portkey AI Gateway Server-Side Request Forgery via /v1/proxy/*",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/portkey-ai-gateway-server-side-request-forgery-via-v1-proxy"
}
],
"title": "Portkey AI Gateway Server-Side Request Forgery via /v1/proxy/*",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82270",
"datePublished": "2026-08-28T16:18:53.484Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-28T11:12:38.463Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-28T16:18:53.484Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-82270",
"date": "2026-08-29",
"epss": "0.00277",
"percentile": "0.1968"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-82270\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\",\"published\":\"2026-08-28T20:20:17.797\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-08-28T20:20:17.797\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Portkey AI Gateway through 1.15.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /v1/proxy/* route that lacks requestValidator middleware. Attackers can set the x-portkey-custom-host header to internal addresses and forward requests with Authorization headers to reach internal services and exfiltrate provider API keys.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Portkey-AI\",\"product\":\"gateway\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"packageName\":\"@portkey-ai/gateway\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"1.14.0\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"1.15.2\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":8.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-918\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/Portkey-AI/gateway\",\"source\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/Portkey-AI/gateway/blob/669825cbe89ee51569918b8f78a9db486fd69dd4/src/index.ts\",\"source\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/Portkey-AI/gateway/issues/1718\",\"source\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/portkey-ai-gateway-server-side-request-forgery-via-v1-proxy\",\"source\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…