GHSA-84J7-475P-HP8V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2020-02-28 16:53 – Updated: 2023-05-16 16:16
VLAI?
Summary
HTTP Response Splitting in Puma
Details
In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.2 and 3.12.3, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in a response header, an attacker can use newline characters (i.e. CR, LF or/r, /n) to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting.
While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS).
This is related to CVE-2019-16254, which fixed this vulnerability for the WEBrick Ruby web server.
This has been fixed in versions 4.3.2 and 3.12.3 by checking all headers for line endings and rejecting headers with those characters.
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c 3.12.3"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "puma"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.12.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c 4.3.2"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "puma"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.3.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-5247"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-113"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-02-28T16:50:49Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2020-02-28T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.2 and 3.12.3, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in a response header, an attacker can use newline characters (i.e. `CR`, `LF` or`/r`, `/n`) to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting.\n\nWhile not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS).\n\nThis is related to CVE-2019-16254, which fixed this vulnerability for the WEBrick Ruby web server.\n\nThis has been fixed in versions 4.3.2 and 3.12.3 by checking all headers for line endings and rejecting headers with those characters. ",
"id": "GHSA-84j7-475p-hp8v",
"modified": "2023-05-16T16:16:12Z",
"published": "2020-02-28T16:53:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-84j7-475p-hp8v"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-5247"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/puma/puma/commit/c36491756f68a9d6a8b3a49e7e5eb07fe6f1332f"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/puma/puma"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/puma/CVE-2020-5247.yml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00034.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BMJ3CGZ3DLBJ5WUUKMI5ZFXFJQMXJZIK"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DIHVO3CQMU7BZC7FCTSRJ33YDNS3GFPK"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NJ3LL5F5QADB6LM46GXZETREAKZMQNRD"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/HTTP_Response_Splitting"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2019/10/01/http-response-splitting-in-webrick-cve-2019-16254"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "HTTP Response Splitting in Puma"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…