GHSA-XMV7-R254-6Q78

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-08 23:02 – Updated: 2026-06-12 19:29
VLAI
Summary
Netty: DNS Cache Poisoning due to Predictable PRNG and Default Static Source Port
Details

Summary

Netty's DNS resolver uses a predictable PRNG for generating DNS transaction IDs and defaults to a static UDP source port. This combination reduces the entropy of DNS queries, enabling DNS Cache Poisoning (Kaminsky attack).

Details

Two factors contribute to this vulnerability in io.netty.resolver.dns: - Predictable Query IDs: DnsQueryIdSpace manages 16-bit transaction IDs in buckets of 16,384 IDs. It initializes only the first bucket. When an ID is returned, it is pushed back into the bucket at a random index generated by java.util.concurrent.ThreadLocalRandom:

Random random = ThreadLocalRandom.current();
int insertionPosition = random.nextInt(count + 1);

Because ThreadLocalRandom is a predictable LCG and the resolver operates within a single bucket, the sequence of IDs is predictable once the PRNG state is mathematically recovered.

  • Default Static Source Port: DnsNameResolverBuilder defaults to a channelStrategy of ChannelPerResolver. This binds the DatagramChannel once, resulting in a static source port for all subsequent queries.

Combined, a static source port and predictable transaction IDs reduces the entropy required to secure DNS resolution against spoofing.

Impact

DNS Cache Poisoning. Downstream applications using the default Netty DNS resolver may connect to malicious IPs, leading to traffic interception or MitM attacks.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.2.14.Final"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.netty:netty-resolver-dns"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.2.0.Final"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.2.15.Final"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.1.134.Final"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.netty:netty-resolver-dns"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.1.135.Final"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-45673"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-330",
      "CWE-340"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-08T23:02:05Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-12T15:16:27Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nNetty\u0027s DNS resolver uses a predictable PRNG for generating DNS transaction IDs and defaults to a static UDP source port. This combination reduces the entropy of DNS queries, enabling DNS Cache Poisoning (Kaminsky attack).\n\n### Details\nTwo factors contribute to this vulnerability in io.netty.resolver.dns:\n- Predictable Query IDs: `DnsQueryIdSpace` manages 16-bit transaction IDs in buckets of 16,384 IDs. It initializes only the first bucket. When an ID is returned, it is pushed back into the bucket at a random index generated by java.util.concurrent.ThreadLocalRandom:\n\n```java\nRandom random = ThreadLocalRandom.current();\nint insertionPosition = random.nextInt(count + 1);\n```\n\nBecause ThreadLocalRandom is a predictable LCG and the resolver operates within a single bucket, the sequence of IDs is predictable once the PRNG state is mathematically recovered.\n\n- Default Static Source Port: `DnsNameResolverBuilder` defaults to a `channelStrategy` of `ChannelPerResolver`. This binds the DatagramChannel once, resulting in a static source port for all subsequent queries.\n\nCombined, a static source port and predictable transaction IDs reduces the entropy required to secure DNS resolution against spoofing.\n\n### Impact\nDNS Cache Poisoning. Downstream applications using the default Netty DNS resolver may connect to malicious IPs, leading to traffic interception or MitM attacks.",
  "id": "GHSA-xmv7-r254-6q78",
  "modified": "2026-06-12T19:29:30Z",
  "published": "2026-06-08T23:02:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-xmv7-r254-6q78"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45673"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.135.Final"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Final"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Netty: DNS Cache Poisoning due to Predictable PRNG and Default Static Source Port"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.