GHSA-G6WQ-QCWM-J5G2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2020-06-05 14:21 – Updated: 2023-05-16 16:17
VLAI?
Summary
Regular Expression Denial of Service in websocket-extensions (RubyGem)
Details
Impact
The ReDoS flaw allows an attacker to exhaust the server's capacity to process incoming requests by sending a WebSocket handshake request containing a header of the following form:
Sec-WebSocket-Extensions: a; b="\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c ...
That is, a header containing an unclosed string parameter value whose content is a repeating two-byte sequence of a backslash and some other character. The parser takes exponential time to reject this header as invalid, and this will block the processing of any other work on the same thread. Thus if you are running a single-threaded server, such a request can render your service completely unavailable.
Patches
Users should upgrade to version 0.1.5.
Workarounds
There are no known work-arounds other than disabling any public-facing WebSocket functionality you are operating.
References
- https://blog.jcoglan.com/2020/06/02/redos-vulnerability-in-websocket-extensions/
Severity ?
8.2 (High)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "websocket-extensions"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.1.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-7663"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-03T23:10:34Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2020-06-02T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nThe ReDoS flaw allows an attacker to exhaust the server\u0027s capacity to process incoming requests by sending a WebSocket handshake request containing a header of the following form:\n\n Sec-WebSocket-Extensions: a; b=\"\\c\\c\\c\\c\\c\\c\\c\\c\\c\\c ...\n\nThat is, a header containing an unclosed string parameter value whose content is a repeating two-byte sequence of a backslash and some other character. The parser takes exponential time to reject this header as invalid, and this will block the processing of any other work on the same thread. Thus if you are running a single-threaded server, such a request can render your service completely unavailable.\n\n### Patches\n\nUsers should upgrade to version 0.1.5.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThere are no known work-arounds other than disabling any public-facing WebSocket functionality you are operating.\n\n### References\n\n- https://blog.jcoglan.com/2020/06/02/redos-vulnerability-in-websocket-extensions/",
"id": "GHSA-g6wq-qcwm-j5g2",
"modified": "2023-05-16T16:17:54Z",
"published": "2020-06-05T14:21:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/faye/websocket-extensions-ruby/security/advisories/GHSA-g6wq-qcwm-j5g2"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-7663"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/faye/websocket-extensions-ruby/commit/aa156a439da681361ed6f53f1a8131892418838b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.jcoglan.com/2020/06/02/redos-vulnerability-in-websocket-extensions"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/faye/websocket-extensions-ruby"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/websocket-extensions/CVE-2020-7663.yml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00031.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-WEBSOCKETEXTENSIONS-570830"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4502-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Regular Expression Denial of Service in websocket-extensions (RubyGem)"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…