GHSA-V422-HMWV-36X6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-20 23:23 – Updated: 2026-07-20 23:23
VLAI
Summary
body-parser vulnerable to denial of service when invalid limit value silently disables size enforcement
Details

Impact

When body-parser is configured with an invalid limit option value, such as an unparseable string or NaN, bytes.parse() returns null and the request body size check is silently skipped. Applications that rely on limit as their primary safeguard against oversized request bodies will accept arbitrarily large payloads, leading to excessive memory and CPU usage and denial of service.

This issue affects applications that pass a programmatically computed or user-configurable value to the limit option without validating it first.

Patches

This issue is fixed in body-parser@2.3.0 and body-parser@1.20.6 via #698. After the fix, invalid limit values throw a clear error at parser construction time instead of silently disabling enforcement. null and undefined continue to fall back to the default limit (100kb).

Workarounds

Validate limit before passing it to body-parser. For example, parse the value with bytes.parse() at startup and reject any configuration where it returns null or a non-finite number.

References

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "body-parser"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.20.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "body-parser"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.3.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-12590"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-770"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-20T23:23:26Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-09T11:16:24Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nWhen body-parser is configured with an invalid `limit` option value, such as an unparseable string or `NaN`, `bytes.parse()` returns `null` and the request body size check is silently skipped. Applications that rely on `limit` as their primary safeguard against oversized request bodies will accept arbitrarily large payloads, leading to excessive memory and CPU usage and denial of service.\n\nThis issue affects applications that pass a programmatically computed or user-configurable value to the `limit` option without validating it first.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis issue is fixed in [body-parser@2.3.0](https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/releases/tag/v2.3.0) and [body-parser@1.20.6](https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/releases/tag/v1.20.6) via [#698](https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/pull/698). After the fix, invalid `limit` values throw a clear error at parser construction time instead of silently disabling enforcement. `null` and `undefined` continue to fall back to the default limit (`100kb`).\n\n### Workarounds\n\nValidate `limit` before passing it to body-parser. For example, parse the value with [`bytes.parse()`](https://github.com/visionmedia/bytes.js) at startup and reject any configuration where it returns `null` or a non-finite number.\n\n### References\n\n- [#698](https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/pull/698): fix PR\n- [bytes.js](https://github.com/visionmedia/bytes.js): limit parser",
  "id": "GHSA-v422-hmwv-36x6",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T23:23:26Z",
  "published": "2026-07-20T23:23:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/security/advisories/GHSA-v422-hmwv-36x6"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12590"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/pull/698"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/pull/741"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/commit/2322e111cc321413ec2b7b76d01be533d3de9d7d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/commit/3492672eee593d5c158f239b6e9115498a5dbeac"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/releases/tag/1.20.6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/releases/tag/v2.3.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "body-parser vulnerable to denial of service when invalid limit value silently disables size enforcement"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…