GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

JVNDB-2016-000096

Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2016-06-07 07:26 - Updated:2017-02-20 06:42
Severity
Summary
Apache Struts 1 vulnerability that allows unintended remote operations against components on memory
Details
The Apache Sturts 1 ActionForm contains a vulnerability which allows unintended remote operations against components on server memory, such as Servlets and ClassLoader, when the following 2 conditions are met: Condition 1: When the following ActionForm (including its subclasses) are in the session scope, and multiple threads that process the same session can access the same ActionForm instance * ActionForm (not including claesses that implement DynaBean interface, such as DynaActionForm and its subclasses) * ValidatingActionForm * ValidatorForm * ValidatorActionForm Condition 2: Can process multi-part requests (This condition applies whether or not the web application uses multi-part forms)
Impacted products
Show details on JVN DB website

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2016/JVNDB-2016-000096.html",
  "dc:date": "2017-02-20T15:42+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2016-06-07T16:26+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2017-02-20T15:42+09:00",
  "description": "The Apache Sturts 1 ActionForm contains a vulnerability which allows unintended remote operations against components on server memory, such as Servlets and ClassLoader, when the following 2 conditions are met:\r\n\r\nCondition 1:\r\nWhen the following ActionForm (including its subclasses) are in the session scope, and multiple threads that process the same session can access the same ActionForm instance\r\n* ActionForm (not including claesses that implement DynaBean interface, such as DynaActionForm and its subclasses)\r\n* ValidatingActionForm\r\n* ValidatorForm\r\n* ValidatorActionForm\r\n\r\nCondition 2:\r\nCan process multi-part requests\r\n(This condition applies whether or not the web application uses multi-part forms)",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2016/JVNDB-2016-000096.html",
  "sec:cpe": {
    "#text": "cpe:/a:apache:struts",
    "@product": "Apache Struts",
    "@vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
    "@version": "2.2"
  },
  "sec:cvss": [
    {
      "@score": "6.8",
      "@severity": "Medium",
      "@type": "Base",
      "@vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
      "@version": "2.0"
    },
    {
      "@score": "8.1",
      "@severity": "High",
      "@type": "Base",
      "@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "@version": "3.0"
    }
  ],
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2016-000096",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN03188560/index.html",
      "@id": "JVN#03188560",
      "@source": "JVN"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU91417143/",
      "@id": "JVNVU#91417143",
      "@source": "JVN"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1181",
      "@id": "CVE-2016-1181",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2016-1181",
      "@id": "CVE-2016-1181",
      "@source": "NVD"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://github.com/kawasima/struts1-forever/commit/eda3a79907ed8fcb0387a0496d0cb14332f250e8",
      "@id": "Fixed CVE-2016-1181 and CVE-2016-1182 ",
      "@source": "Related document"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
      "@id": "CWE-Other",
      "@title": "No Mapping(CWE-Other)"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Apache Struts 1 vulnerability that allows unintended remote operations against components on memory"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…