Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2026-03-14 08:42
Modified
2026-03-14 09:10
Summary
tarfile: Skip DIRTYPE normalization during GNU LONGNAME/LONGLINK handling
Details
The "tarfile" module would still apply normalization of AREGTYPE (\x00) blocks to DIRTYPE, even while processing a multi-block member such as GNUTYPE_LONGNAME or GNUTYPE_LONGLINK. This could result in a crafted tar archive being misinterpreted by the tarfile module compared to other implementations.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Bitnami",
"name": "libpython",
"purl": "pkg:bitnami/libpython"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.15.0"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-13462"
],
"database_specific": {
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:python:python:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"severity": "Low"
},
"details": "The \"tarfile\" module would still apply normalization of AREGTYPE (\\x00) blocks to DIRTYPE, even while processing a multi-block member such as GNUTYPE_LONGNAME or GNUTYPE_LONGLINK. This could result in a crafted tar archive being misinterpreted by the tarfile module compared to other implementations.",
"id": "BIT-libpython-2025-13462",
"modified": "2026-03-14T09:10:54.038Z",
"published": "2026-03-14T08:42:41.133Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/42d754e34c06e57ad6b8e7f92f32af679912d8ab"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/141707"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/143934"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/EOMI5I66ZMKQ2INNFT6T7IAIKUGPZYIE/"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-13462"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.6.2",
"summary": "tarfile: Skip DIRTYPE normalization during GNU LONGNAME/LONGLINK handling"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…