CERTA-2011-AVI-520

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Deux vulnérabilités dans CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution permettent l'exécution de code arbitraire à distance.

Description

Deux vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution. Un attaquant peut, sans authentification préalable, provoquer l'exécution de code arbitraire à distance en envoyant une série de paquets au serveur en écoute sur le port 9002/tcp.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
N/A N/A CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution version 3.2 si le composant Device Fault Management (DFM) est installé ;
N/A N/A CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution version 4.0.
N/A N/A CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution version 3.1 si le composant Device Fault Management (DFM) est installé ;
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution version 3.2 si le composant Device Fault Management (DFM) est install\u00e9 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution version 4.0.",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution version 3.1 si le composant Device Fault Management (DFM) est install\u00e9 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nDeux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans CiscoWorks LAN Management\nSolution. Un attaquant peut, sans authentification pr\u00e9alable, provoquer\nl\u0027ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance en envoyant une s\u00e9rie de\npaquets au serveur en \u00e9coute sur le port 9002/tcp.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-2738",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-2738"
    }
  ],
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 cisco-sa-20110914-lms du 14 septembre    2011 :",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20110914-lms.shtml"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2011-AVI-520",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2011-09-15T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Deux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eCiscoWorks LAN Management\nSolution\u003c/span\u003e permettent l\u0027ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 cisco-sa-20110914-lms du 14 septembre 2011",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.