CERTA-2012-AVI-150

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Plusieurs vulnérabilités dans des produits Cisco permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance.

Description

Plusieurs modules dans les produits Cisco ASA et ASASM contiennent des vulnérabilités :

  • le moteur d'inspection du trafic UDP ;
  • le moteur de recherche d'attaques (Threat Detection), non activé par défaut ;
  • le client Syslog ;
  • le gestionnaire du protocole PIM (voir l'avis CERTA-2012-AVI-149).

Ces vulnérabilités permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Cisco N/A Cisco Catalyst 6500 ASA Services Module.
Cisco N/A Cisco 5500 Adaptative Security Appliance (ASA) ;
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Cisco Catalyst 6500 ASA Services Module.",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Cisco 5500 Adaptative Security Appliance (ASA) ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nPlusieurs modules dans les produits Cisco ASA et ASASM contiennent des\nvuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s\u00a0:\n\n-   le moteur d\u0027inspection du trafic UDP\u00a0;\n-   le moteur de recherche d\u0027attaques (Threat Detection), non activ\u00e9 par\n    d\u00e9faut\u00a0;\n-   le client Syslog\u00a0;\n-   le gestionnaire du protocole PIM (voir l\u0027avis CERTA-2012-AVI-149).\n\nCes vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de\nservice \u00e0 distance.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-0356",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-0356"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-0355",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-0355"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-0354",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-0354"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-0353",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-0353"
    }
  ],
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Document du CERTA CERTA-2012-AVI-149 du 16 mars 2012 :",
      "url": "http://www.certa.ssi.gouv.fr/site/CERTA-2012-AVI-149/index.html"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2012-AVI-150",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2012-03-16T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans des produits Cisco permettent \u00e0 un\nattaquant de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Cisco 6500 et 5500",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco 20120314-asa du 14 mars 2012",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20120314-asa"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.