GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CERTFR-2022-AVI-424

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans F5 BIG-IP. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, un déni de service et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

  • Modules ASM, Advanced WAF et APM de BIG-IP en mode Appliance versions antérieures à 17.0.0

L'éditeur ne propose pas de correctif pour les versions 16.x, 15.x et 14.x des modules BIG-IP concernés par ces vulnérabilités. Des mesures de contournement sont listées dans l'avis éditeur (cf. section Documentation).

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003eModules ASM, Advanced WAF et APM de BIG-IP en mode Appliance versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 17.0.0\u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003cp\u003eL\u0027\u00e9diteur ne propose pas de correctif pour les versions 16.x, 15.x et 14.x des modules BIG-IP concern\u00e9s par ces vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s. Des mesures de contournement sont list\u00e9es dans l\u0027avis \u00e9diteur (cf. section Documentation).\u003c/p\u003e ",
  "content": "## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2021-23337",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23337"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2020-28500",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28500"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2016-7103",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-7103"
    }
  ],
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTFR-2022-AVI-424",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "Version initiale",
      "revision_date": "2022-05-09T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Injection de code indirecte \u00e0 distance (XSS)"
    },
    {
      "description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
    },
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
    },
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
    },
    {
      "description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans F5 BIG-IP.\nCertaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une\nex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, un d\u00e9ni de service et une atteinte \u00e0\nl\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.\n",
  "title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans F5 BIG-IP",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 F5 K12492858 du 06 mai 2022",
      "url": "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K12492858"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.


Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.