CNVD-2016-05064

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-07-21
VLAI
Title
Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime HTML注入漏洞
Description
Pivotal Cloud Foundry是美国Pivotal Software公司的一套开源的平台即服务(PaaS)云计算平台,它提供容器调度、持续交付和自动化服务部署等功能。Elastic Runtime是Pivotal Cloud Foundry的一个运行环境。 Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.6.32之前的1.6.x 版本和1.7.8之前的1.7.x版本中存在HTML注入漏洞。攻击者可利用该漏洞在受影响站点上下文中执行任意脚本代码,窃取基于cookie的身份认证。
Severity
中
Patch Name
Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime HTML注入漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
Pivotal Cloud Foundry是美国Pivotal Software公司的一套开源的平台即服务(PaaS)云计算平台,它提供容器调度、持续交付和自动化服务部署等功能。Elastic Runtime是Pivotal Cloud Foundry的一个运行环境。 Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.6.32之前的1.6.x 版本和1.7.8之前的1.7.x版本中存在HTML注入漏洞。攻击者可利用该漏洞在受影响站点上下文中执行任意脚本代码,窃取基于cookie的身份认证。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

用户可参考如下厂商提供的安全补丁以修复该漏洞: http://pivotal.io/security/cve-2016-0926

Reference
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91677
Impacted products
Name
['Pivotal Software Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.6.*,<1.6.32', 'Pivotal Software Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.7.*,<1.7.8']
Show details on source website

{
  "bids": {
    "bid": {
      "bidNumber": "91677"
    }
  },
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2016-0926"
    }
  },
  "description": "Pivotal Cloud Foundry\u662f\u7f8e\u56fdPivotal Software\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u5e73\u53f0\u5373\u670d\u52a1\uff08PaaS\uff09\u4e91\u8ba1\u7b97\u5e73\u53f0\uff0c\u5b83\u63d0\u4f9b\u5bb9\u5668\u8c03\u5ea6\u3001\u6301\u7eed\u4ea4\u4ed8\u548c\u81ea\u52a8\u5316\u670d\u52a1\u90e8\u7f72\u7b49\u529f\u80fd\u3002Elastic Runtime\u662fPivotal Cloud Foundry\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u8fd0\u884c\u73af\u5883\u3002\r\n\r\nPivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.6.32\u4e4b\u524d\u76841.6.x \u7248\u672c\u548c1.7.8\u4e4b\u524d\u76841.7.x\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728HTML\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u5728\u53d7\u5f71\u54cd\u7ad9\u70b9\u4e0a\u4e0b\u6587\u4e2d\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u811a\u672c\u4ee3\u7801\uff0c\u7a83\u53d6\u57fa\u4e8ecookie\u7684\u8eab\u4efd\u8ba4\u8bc1\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Joe Blac and Dor Tumarkin, Cisco Security consultants.",
  "formalWay": "\u7528\u6237\u53ef\u53c2\u8003\u5982\u4e0b\u5382\u5546\u63d0\u4f9b\u7684\u5b89\u5168\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff1a\r\nhttp://pivotal.io/security/cve-2016-0926",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-05064",
  "openTime": "2016-07-21",
  "patchDescription": "Pivotal Cloud Foundry\u662f\u7f8e\u56fdPivotal Software\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u5e73\u53f0\u5373\u670d\u52a1\uff08PaaS\uff09\u4e91\u8ba1\u7b97\u5e73\u53f0\uff0c\u5b83\u63d0\u4f9b\u5bb9\u5668\u8c03\u5ea6\u3001\u6301\u7eed\u4ea4\u4ed8\u548c\u81ea\u52a8\u5316\u670d\u52a1\u90e8\u7f72\u7b49\u529f\u80fd\u3002Elastic Runtime\u662fPivotal Cloud Foundry\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u8fd0\u884c\u73af\u5883\u3002\r\n\r\nPivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.6.32\u4e4b\u524d\u76841.6.x \u7248\u672c\u548c1.7.8\u4e4b\u524d\u76841.7.x\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728HTML\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u5728\u53d7\u5f71\u54cd\u7ad9\u70b9\u4e0a\u4e0b\u6587\u4e2d\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u811a\u672c\u4ee3\u7801\uff0c\u7a83\u53d6\u57fa\u4e8ecookie\u7684\u8eab\u4efd\u8ba4\u8bc1\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime HTML\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "Pivotal Software Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.6.*\uff0c\u003c1.6.32",
      "Pivotal Software Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.7.*\uff0c\u003c1.7.8"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91677",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2016-07-17",
  "title": "Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime HTML\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.