CNVD-2017-29694

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2017-10-11
VLAI Severity ?
Title
LAVA Computer MFG Ether-Serial Link认证绕过漏洞
Description
Ether-Serial Link是LAVA Computer MFG公司的一款以太网串行链路设备。 LAVA Computer MFG Ether-Serial Link 6.01.00/29.03.2007及之前版本中存在认证绕过漏洞,具有相同IP地址的攻击者可利用漏洞通过访问特定的资源定位符来绕过身份验证。
Severity
Formal description

厂商尚未提供漏洞修补方案,请关注厂商主页及时更新: http://lavalink.com/

Reference
https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-17-283-01
Impacted products
Name
LAVA Computer MFG Ether-Serial Link <=6.01.00/29.03.2007
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2017-14003"
    }
  },
  "description": "Ether-Serial Link\u662fLAVA Computer MFG\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u4ee5\u592a\u7f51\u4e32\u884c\u94fe\u8def\u8bbe\u5907\u3002\r\n\r\nLAVA Computer MFG Ether-Serial Link 6.01.00/29.03.2007\u53ca\u4e4b\u524d\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u8ba4\u8bc1\u7ed5\u8fc7\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5177\u6709\u76f8\u540cIP\u5730\u5740\u7684\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\u901a\u8fc7\u8bbf\u95ee\u7279\u5b9a\u7684\u8d44\u6e90\u5b9a\u4f4d\u7b26\u6765\u7ed5\u8fc7\u8eab\u4efd\u9a8c\u8bc1\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Maxim Rupp",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u8865\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u53ca\u65f6\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttp://lavalink.com/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2017-29694",
  "openTime": "2017-10-11",
  "products": {
    "product": "LAVA Computer MFG Ether-Serial Link \u003c=6.01.00/29.03.2007"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-17-283-01",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2017-10-11",
  "title": "LAVA Computer MFG Ether-Serial Link\u8ba4\u8bc1\u7ed5\u8fc7\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…